bayooooooo: [size=18pt]Nasir el-Rufai’s Book as Intellectual Fraud?[/size]

Since el-Rufai takes pleasure in reporting what ordinarily should be private conversations, let me also take the liberty to report that he admitted to me on April 28, 2013 that what he wrote about me were the “impressions” he was given. That for me summed it up. My advice el-Rufai, is that you don’t collect some hair dressing salon gossip, hearsay, ‘impressions’, and wild imaginations – all intentionally designed to damage others, and bind them into a book without crosschecking the facts. That is intellectual fraud!

http://www.thisdaylive.com/articles/nasir-el-rufai-s-book-as-intellectual-fraud-/146818/

ayenny02:
You said what I qouted was out of context, why not use ur own point to buttress my proof.
So u went to bible school for good solid 18yrs and u don't see all what I proof for u abi?. If u don't see it, I will proof another one for u maybe ur eyes will open, I don't know maybe u people don't read ur book constantly. HERE BELOW ARE MY PROOF TO CALL UR BIBLE UNHOLY:

1.If you can twist what I posted here on Nairaland, it shows how deeply rooted you are in falsehood. I went to SUNDAY SCHOOL not bible school....the spirit of lies dwells inside of you.
2.Is the holiness of the Bible your next question for our bible study class? if it is, I will be ready to teach you.

ARE U SURE THAT THE BIBLE IS HOLY (YES or NO) Beyond the extent of the holiness of the quaran. A reason you and religious fanatic has declared a fatwa on the man who wrote the satanic verses. The fact that we will not go violent to fight for a GOD who can fight for Himself shows the sanctity of our belief in him. But your Allah and his holy book requires you to fight for him.

3. That said, you have quoted two accounts of the same story from the Old testament of the Bible that differs in respect to figures. Accepted there are errors of reconciliation which is due largely to the persecution faced by those translating the Bible in those times.

4. And what has that disparity gotten to do with the Holiness of the Bible? God spoke to men like you claim he spoke to your prophet mohammed and he wrote whatever he heard. Everyman is subject to his own interpretation.

5. I have told you and will keep telling you to put your "intelligence" to better use by solving economic and social problems affecting your muslim brothers in the north of nigeria.

6. Your understanding can never be deeper than your interpretation. since you have chosen to interpret the Bible from a bias perspective, you will only see errors in it.

7. If the quaran is half as holy as the Bible, the boko haram sect will not be killing people like they are doing.

ayenny02: The christian will quote Mark 16:19 as a proof that jesus was raised up to heaven and sat on d right hand of God.

Mark 16:9-20 has bn expunged in many bibles. MARK 16 RELEGATED http://niv.scripturetext.com/mark/16.htm.

Where did you get that from? It is people who bare false witnesses that says their witnesses are in heaven. Argue your points based on available facts and stop using words like "something was removed" "the arabic cant be interpreted"...etc. in a court of law, that will not be admissible evidence...


And in Mathew
Matthew 9:13
13 But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.

Also in matt again
Matthew 12:7
7 But if ye had known what this meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless.


These are scriptures that negates the hypocrisy of the religious bigots of the days of Jesus. The same phenomenon which is common practise today both in the Islamic and Christian faith. People who offer animal sacrifices and got to mecca yet can arrange the death of innocent souls in the name of sacrifice to allah...christians who will pay tithes, do night vigils yet divert funds meant for national development and infrastructure. It does not refer to the ultimate sacrifice of the Messiah. I dont know what you and some people read from holy books.....outside of moral living, human development, love for one's neighbor and fellow humans, the rest is fanaticm

IT WAS PAUL WHO TAUGHT THE RESURRECTION
Very laughable......Acts of the apostles was not written by Paul. The Resurrection was the main theme of the gospel of the disciples after the baptism of the Holy Ghost in Acts chapter 2. Paul was not even near it. You are so full of error cause that is only what you wish to see.

ayenny02: The christian will quote Mark 16:19 as a proof that jesus was raised up to heaven and sat on d right hand of God.

Mark 16:9-20 has bn expunged in many bibles. MARK 16 RELEGATED http://niv.scripturetext.com/mark/16.htm.


Christian believes in d cruxification necessary for their redemption of sin and consequently have to aaccept ths accursedness of jesus, too. This Christianity belief opposes d bibles teaching in Hosea
Hosea 6:6

6 For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings.

ayenny02: The christian will quote Mark 16:19 as a proof that jesus was raised up to heaven and sat on d right hand of God.

Mark 16:9-20 has bn expunged in many bibles. MARK 16 RELEGATED http://niv.scripturetext.com/mark/16.htm.


Christian believes in d cruxification necessary for their redemption of sin and consequently have to aaccept ths accursedness of jesus, too. This Christianity belief opposes d bibles teaching in Hosea
Hosea 6:6

6 For I desired mercy, and not sacrifice; and the knowledge of God more than burnt offerings.

And in Mathew
Matthew 9:13
13 But go ye and learn what that meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice: for I am not come to call the righteous, but sinners to repentance.

Also in matt again
Matthew 12:7
7 But if ye had known what this meaneth, I will have mercy, and not sacrifice, ye would not have condemned the guiltless.


IT WAS PAUL WHO TAUGHT THE RESURRECTION

Acts 17:18
18 Then certain philosophers of the Epicureans, and of the Stoicks, encountered him. And some said, What will this babbler say? other some, He seemeth to be a setter forth of strange gods: because he preached unto them Jesus, and the resurrection.

PAUL WHO NEVER SAW JESUS also admitted that resurrectn was his Gospel. 2 Timothy 2:8

8 Remember that Jesus Christ of the seed of David was raised from the dead according to my gospel:

So christianity is not a teaching of jesus but of paul.

If you still believe that jesus is divine becos he was raised up to heaven, Why don't yuo accept other prophet as divine. Who was also raised;



2 Kings 2:11-12
11 And it came to pass, as they still went on, and talked, that, behold, there appeared a chariot of fire, and horses of fire, and parted them both asunder; and Elijah went up by a whirlwind into heaven.

12 And Elisha saw it, and he cried, My father, my father, the chariot of Israel, and the horsemen thereof. And he saw him no more: and he took hold of his own clothes, and rent them in two pieces.

Also see; Genesis 5:24
24 And Enoch walked with God: and he was not; for God took him.

And see Hebrews 11:5
5 By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death; and was not found, because God had translated him: for before his translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God.

ayenny02:
So jesus no be God again? Are u accepted that u bible is not Holy too?

the_ripper3: Boko Haram dey monitor this thread o. Christians beware.