Disloman's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Disloman's Profile › Disloman's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 (of 95 pages)
MuamarGaddaffi:Israel?Any similarities between Israel and Biafra.SMH. |
menix:Use the same google and see what's going on there.Bro!you funny oooooo.South sudan?If that's what you prayed for,I reject am for you oooo. |
IGBOPRINCE:It seems you didn't get this.Wish I could tutor you this morning.I own you one. |
menix:You mean countries that secede from parent countries?Tell us. |
mazeltov:He deserves it. |
Abbykem:Boss?I hear you.Your night? |
mazeltov:Bro!They didn't consider a lot of things before clamouring for biafra.Do they think that all those who own business shattered in Nigeria will support such move?They thought South south will joined them not knowing that they won't.South east don't have much natural resources to cater for them.Let's say they succeed,Do they think that people won't come out and fight for the post of a president?There are lot of things they need to be told.I tell some of my igbo friends some don't know what they are clamouring for.Let mi rest my case. |
Abbykem:Definitely.He gat no choice.Good morning. |
Ikengawo:Your dad is the god of them all.Oponu weyrey. |
menix:You are only mentioning Biafra.I doubt it if you know what that mean.Go and study what isbiafra and what it entails.You will be shocked.A country within a country?You guys will be landlocked.How will you survive? |
They ain't needed to be told.A year old baby knows.Their undoing is pride.We can do it alone,not knowing that no tribe can mount the president post alone.You gat to lobby. |
chukwudi44:This is what hatred and sentiment do to one's life.You can't comprehend what you just read.Na wa oooo. |
stexsy:I don't know how you just want to be known stupid.Must you be this foolish?Did you read the news at all?I wonder how your life will be. |
PiperAlpha:I doubt if the Op's lady won't curse some people here.We know that this is a public forum but we should watch the way we post comment here.God bless the union. |
Abbykem:Same here.Some people gat bad mouth.I deyf ear for the op.I pray he's strong enough to stand these comments. |
mrlaw93:Mad man.LOOL |
Fine is okay. |
Let mi look into the future.I see high number of suicide committed in certain part of this country in the next 2years.With the rate they keep wailing unreasonably. |
Xetima:You are a baboon.Next time,make sure you understand the kind you go into b4 you ran into problem.In as. Much Govt pay subsidy,you are no longer the owner of that biz.Make them try am and see. Olodo. |
This lawyer must be high on cow's urine. |
Bobbystanley:Lives were lost and all you could do is to politicise it.I pray you be the next victim. |
Can you imagine a litigant walking up to Supreme Court Justices in the middle of a trial and handing the justices a check to halt a pending case that the Appellate Court had decided should go to trial? This is exactly what the Senate President, Bukola Saraki, did to temporarily halt his case at the Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT) scheduled for a hearing on November 19th, 2015. SaharaReporters (SR) in its lead story Thursday, November 12th, 2015 stated that Justice John Fabiyi led four other Supreme Court Justices in halting the trial of Mr. Saraki pending the determination of Mr. Saraki's appeal before them. According to SR, “...Toyin Sanusi, one of his [Saraki's] aides, drove a Black Toyota Corolla car, license plate YAB 595KZ, to a meeting several times with the Supreme Court registrar at No 17 Mandela Street in Asokoro, Abuja. It was at this house that Mr. Saraki's agents reportedly met some justices.” On Friday, November 13th, SR carried a follow-up story detailing the process by which the Supreme Court deputy registrar helped cut a deal to halt Mr. Saraki's trial. “SaharaReporters learned that a Deputy Registrar of the Supreme Court, Hajio Sarki-Bello, played a key role in facilitating a decision by a panel of justices of the apex court to temporarily halt the corruption trial of Nigeria's Senate President Bukola Saraki.” SR further reports that “... Mrs. Sarki-Bello... arrange with few ethically questionable justices to quickly hear Mr. Saraki's case and grant him a temporary reprieve from the ongoing trial at Code of Conduct Tribunal (CCT). Our sources disclosed that the deputy registrar at the Supreme Court met several times with Toyin Sanusi, a former aide to Governor Ahmed Abdul Fatah of Kwara State who now works for Mr. Saraki in Abuja, to cut the deal for the embattled senator.” “Our source described Mrs. Sarki-Bello as extremely close to former Chief Justice of Nigeria, Alfa Belgore, who had been anchoring the attempts to bribe justices to halt Mr. Saraki's trial at the CCT. Our judicial sources said Mrs. Sarki-Bello, who hails from Niger State, was promoted from level 9 to level 16 between 2006 and 2007 when Mr. Belgore was the Chief Justice of Nigeria.” The Supreme Court panel that temporarily halted Mr. Saraki's case included Justices Suleiman Galadima, K.M.O. Kekere-Ekun, John Inyang Okoro, and Aminu Sanusi. It is instructive to note that Justice Fabiyi is reputed for rendering purchased verdicts in favor of powerful politicians. He was the judge who reversed PDP's Bode George case after a deal was struck. He was the same judge who declared late President Umaru Yar'Adua the winner of the presidential elections. Yar'Adua later admitted that the elections were rigged. Mr. Saraki's case is a complicated corruption stature with moving parts. With his legal options running out, Mr. Saraki widened his shopping frenzy to buy Supreme Court justices. Corruption in Nigeria's court will disgust and frighten you and propel you into a world of racketeering, greed, larceny, outrageous disdain for due process, the Rule of Law and the Nigerian Constitution. It is a bleak irony that the Supreme Court of a nation is awash in “dark money.” The coming and going of Mr. Saraki's case like Abiku has become a notorious symbol of money and power in our judicial system which gave corruption a central place. It's not always that Barbarians usually bring down advanced civilizations, even epidemics of Biblical proportions do not necessarily destroy a culture. Far more dangerous are institutionalized corruption, a lack of transparency, and creeping neglect of criminal laws. Nigeria continues to be in the cesspool of corruption because government works for only those who pay kickbacks. Only politicians who stole our money and the stinkingly rich Nigerians can expect upward mobility, clean water, adequate public safety, and reliable power. In Nigeria, tribalism and bribery determine who is hired and is fired, who gets prosecuted and convicted, who wins or loses a contract, who receives or goes without public services. Nigerian people are sick of these age-old symptoms of internal decay. The frightening thing about the Supreme Court of Nigeria, it's not that it is stacked with cheap biddable justices – buy one get four free – who are willing and ready to truncate a corruption case against the chief lawbreaker of Nigeria, but that it assumed no one would find out, or perhaps even mind. Ultimately, no nation can continue to thrive if its Supreme Court refuses to enforce the laws of the land but rather offer its justices for sale to the highest bidder. Nigerians are angry. Why are some highly placed lawbreakers like Mr. Saraki selectively exempted from following the law, but ordinary Nigerians face the wrath of the legal system? If Mr. Saraki succeeded in buying off the Supreme Court justices, it means the justices are breaking the law from inside. The case gives another clear example of how injustice and arrogant corruption are tightly woven and embedded into the fabric and body of our judicial system. An article written by the US Supreme Court Associate Justice Louis Brandeis published by Harper's Weekly in 1913 characterized the actions of justices like Fabiyi and his four colleagues as “...the wickedness of people shielding wrongdoers and passing them off (or at least allowing them to pass themselves off) as honest men.” The one question that kept coming to my mind as I continue to write and observe Mr. Saraki's case was if Mr. Saraki was a poor Nigerian would he be able to abuse the legal system for so long and get an undeserved reprieve from the law? The answer always returned to me as “No.” I'm not a lawyer. I'm a journalist. But I know the Code of Ethics in the legal profession insists that all judges who are officers of the court and arbitrators, avoid even the appearance of impropriety and must remain impartial. Mr. Saraki's case continues to dominate the headlines with appalling news stories of expanding crisis of corruption among Nigerian judges. The deepening despair of Nigerians about their own legal system is fueling frustration and criticisms of the judges. A lot has been revealed by Mr. Saraki's case that Nigeria's legal system resembles that of a banana republic. Nigeria judiciary has become a sink well of secret dealings sullied with documented corruption, fake trials, and court fraud. The Nigerian judicial corruption is a key to understanding Nigeria's whole socioeconomic and political crisis. Human Rights lawyer and activist Femi Falana does not disappoint. His thoughtful and thought-provoking article on the illegality of stay of proceedings in Saraki's case published yesterday by SR is a solid piece that illuminates the subject of the unending trial of Mr. Saraki. Citing the provisions of sections 306 and 396 of the Administration of Criminal Justice Act, 2015, Falana argues that “... the law has abolished stay of proceedings and interlocutory appeals by merging all preliminary objections with the substantive case in any criminal case instituted in a federal court in the country.” “The evolutionary intervention of the law,” continues Falana, “ was occasioned by the unending trial of politically exposed persons in corruption cases.” In a penetrating and insightful analysis citing numerous cases, Mr. Falana blames Justice Fabiyi for the stay on Mr. Saraki's case. Listen to Mr. Falana: “Therefore, any judge who orders a stay of proceedings in any criminal trial does so illegally and is liable to be sanctioned by the National Judicial Council. It is unfathomable that the Supreme Court decided to return the country to the status quo ante in rather brazen and bizarre manner.” Fabiyi's decision to stay the proceedings of Saraki's case at the CCT is inherently dangerous to the health of our democracy and for justice to thrive in a country badly riddled by corruption. In order to control things for the benefit of the rich and the powerful like Saraki, Nigerian judges act like perverts with regard to average Nigerians. They lie, rob, cheat, steal, and destroy any mere Nigerian. With the expose done so far by SR on Nigerian judges handling Saraki's case, the Nigerian judges operate like criminal gangs. They get together to decide which case to halt or dismiss outright. The Supreme Court's job is to interpret the Constitution – nothing more and nothing less. What the Supreme Court says and does has a broad effect on the values and long term direction of our society. The Supreme Court has a special power to rise above corruption, bribery, mean- spirited stereotypes. The Supreme Court should lead the way in interpreting the Constitution and upholding justice for the highly and the lowly, the prince and the pauper. But “the Emperor has no clothes!” The Supreme Court has been stripped naked by the SR investigative reports and the illegality of its ruling brilliantly exposed by Falana. The Supreme Court is boxed in. The nation is waiting and watching. Let Saraki's case begin NOW! Source:saharareporters.com/2015/11/17/saraki-shops-supreme-court-justices-justice-john-fabiyi-auction-block-buy-one-get-four |
obum88:That if you don't know something,you should go back to school and learn.Is that an insult?na wa ooooo.Hatred and sentiment are more deadly compare to HIV and ignorance. |
obum88:Where is the insult?
|
modath:Bro! 3.No free money when committee sits. 4.Any money deducted will be accounted for. |
Guseh:That boy is a goat.No wonder he is a wife beater. |
Technical knock-out to Dinosuar and Fayothug.What a shame to those who should have been a leader.TSA is here to stay.Wailing wailer!keep fighting degoatification of our yams.Ela oju kan. |
mirabel001:Cos he tells you the story you want to hear.He had given you that.Enjoy it while it lasts.Some people are jokes. |
The Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC)
has revealed that it imposed fines on all mobile
phone operators in country over the non-
compliance with its SIM deactivation directive.
The regulator said it fined Globacom N7.4 million,
Etisalat N7 million, Airtel N3.8 million and MTN N102.2
million.
The fines, imposed in August 2015, were paid by all the
telcos apart from MTN, Tony Ojobo, the NCC director of
public affairs, said in a press statement on Monday.
MTN later got a fine of N1.04tr for not deactivating 5.1
million unregistered lines.
Although the statement was silent on the fate of MTN
which has until midnight on Monday to pay its fine,
Ojobo recounted the events that led to the imposition of
heavy sanctions on the largest mobile operator in
Africa.
He said: “Following the sanctions placed on MTN
Nigeria, by the Nigerian Communications Commission
(NCC), members of the public have expressed diverse
interest as to what actually transpired.
“The fine was a result of violation of Section 20(1) of the
Registration of Telephone Subscribers Regulation of
2011.
“Section 20 (1) of Registration of Telephone Subscribers
Regulations 2011 states that: “Any licensee who
activates or fails to deactivate a subscription medium in
violation of any provision of these Regulations is liable
to a penalty of N 200,000.00 for each unregistered but
activated subscription medium.”
“The fine of N1.04Trillion on MTN Nigeria by the
Nigerian Communications Commission (NCC) was done
in the interest of the public which has been at the
receiving end of security challenges.
“Consequent upon the overwhelming evidence of non-
compliance, and obvious disregard to the rule of
engagement by MTN, the NCC had no choice but to
impose the sanctions.
“MTN, in a letter of November 2, 2015 admitted the
infraction and pleaded for leniency. The Commission
has acknowledged this and is looking into their plea
without any prejudice to the fine. The fine remains but
the appeal and other engagements with MTN may affect
the payment deadline.
“The fine that was imposed on MTN was the second
within two months after the operators were given a
seven-day ultimatum to deactivate all unregistered and
improperly registered Subscriber Identification Module
(SIM) Cards. While others complied, MTN did not.
“On August 4, 2015, at a meeting of all the
representatives of the Mobile Network Operators
(MNO), with NCC, major security challenges through
preregistered, unregistered and improperly registered
SIM Cards topped the agenda after which Operators
were given the ultimatum to deactivate such within
seven days.
“On August 14, 2015, three days after the ultimatum
expired, NCC carried out a network audit, while other
Operators complied with the directive, to deactivate the
improperly registered SIM Cards, MTN showed no sign
of compliance at all.
“Please recall that four (4) Operators, MTN, Airtel,
Globacom and Etisalat, were sanctioned in August for
none compliance of the directive to deactivate the
improperly registered SIM Cards. MTN got a fine of
N102.2Million, Globacom N7.4Million, Etisalat N7Million
and Airtel N3.8Million fine. Others complied while MTN
flouted the fine.
“Based on the report of the compliance Audit Team, an
Enforcement Team which visited MTN from September 2
– 4, 2015 wherein MTN admitted that the Team
confirmed that 5.2million improperly registered SIM
Cards were still left active on their network; hence, a
contravention of the Regulations was established.
“Consistent with the Commission’s enforcement
process, MTN was by a letter dated October 5, 2015,
given notice to state why it should not be sanctioned in
line with the Regulations for failure to deactivate
improperly registered SIM Cards that were found to be
active at the time of enforcement team’s visit of
September 15, 2015.
“On October 19, 2015, the Commission received and
reviewed MTN’s response and found no convincing
evidence why it should not be sanctioned for the
established violations.
“Accordingly, by a letter dated October 20, 2015 the
Commission conveyed appropriate sanctions to MTN in
accordance with Regulations 20(1) of the Telephone
Subscribers Registration Regulation 2011, to pay the
Sum of N 200,000.00 only for each of the 5.2million
improperly registered SIM Cards.
“The statement further averred that: In order to ensure
proper identification of telephone subscribers with their
biometric data and in line with international best
practice, the Commission came up with a framework for
the registration of telephone subscribers in Nigeria.
(Nigerian Communications Commission Registration of
Telephone Subscribers Regulations 2011).
“The above Regulations were developed with the full
participation of all key industry Stakeholders including
all Mobile Network Operators (MNO) in 2011.
“The Commission on its part has a statutory
responsibility to monitor and enforce compliance to the
rules. More so, when national security is at stake.”
Source: https://www.thecable.ng/.Vkn4GWlZ4W8.twitter |
Chubhie:Okay bro.I feel you.Do have a nice day.Cheers. |
Chubhie:Hmmm.I will be waiting but stop complaining of this govt base on your comment. |
Chubhie:State your facts and let's discuss.Thanks. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 (of 95 pages)



