₦airaland Forum

PastorAIO:
And where did they draw their inspiration from? The bible? NO!!!

Aristotle? YES!!! Aristotle Aristotle Aristotle all the way.

KingEbukasBlog:
The contributors in science were mostly from his religion . His religion provided the animus for most of those contributors to make their mark in science .

PastorAIO:
You want to poke holes in science but your religion cannot do for mankind what science has done for mankind in the last 500 years.

PastorAIO:
But I note that you dodged many of my salient points

I'll repeat my point in condensed form, as a question.


Why do you (and your ilk) feel the need to claim Scientific Authority?

PastorAIO:
I'm instead talking about the conflict between a body of people who follow a certain methodology called the scientific method and who present ideas to each other for scrutiny , versus another body of people who are pushing a religious agenda and have been found in a court of law to be mendacious and prone to manipulating data to serve their ends.

By calling an idea scientific they blatantly seek to give themselves the prestige that has been gained by scientists such as are members of the Royal Society, individuals like Sir Isaac Newton etc, over the course of centuries.

PastorAIO:
I asked about Science Journals. Anybody can publish something and invite his friends/peers to come and review.

For example is it a Journal referenced by the members of the Royal Society. https://royalsociety.org/

PastorAIO:
Of course 'rebuttals' can go back and forth till the day of judgment, but I think the crux of Ken Ham, or is it Dan Arel is here:



A rebuttal to end all rebuttals would be to simple provide the real scientific journal in which their discoveries were presented and the acceptance of the scientific community.

Droldnallufepoh:
Doctiralien should be very grateful to his goons cuz he's been spouting nonsense on this thread till his cohorts came and gave him a reason to ignore my posts, I'm pretty sure he's learnt a lot from this thread and would not make the idiotic claim he made on this thread, claims like

"Big bang is an explosion"

"Big Bang is an atheistic claim"

KingEbukasBlog:
Doctor Alien , this one ba ? The guy just prattles endlessly . You can NEVER have an intelligent discussion with this fellow .

benzics:
Hahaha please we are being realistic here and not unto some dumb speculations, there's no way Sean would have an electronic device that tells him all truths.. Your reply confirms the saying:

The difference between a Scientist and a creationist is that a scientist creates theories through observations to support facts, while a creationist bend facts through mental gymnastics and speculations to support theories

KingEbukasBlog:
I mean look all around us . The only people who have and are making meaningful and significant contributions to man's pursuit of knowledge and study of nature have been people who acknowledge the existence of God .

The only things these lowbrows know is to spend 24 hours every day telling us how smart they are .

benzics:
lol, come on, you can do more than that.

It's very obvious that Dean and Sean met the corpse lying there AT THE SAME TIME! And everything Sean said were just CLEARLY speculations! Damn!

benzics:

Dean and Sean were walking down a street and saw a dead man lying there, they just stood and looked at the lying corpse, then came someone who asked them "how did this man die"?..

Dean answered "I don't know, I just saw the corpse here", then Sean interrupted "no, I think I know, he was involved in a cult clash, he was open fired on and the cultists who killed him were all wearing red clothes, they drove him in their Grey SUV and dropped his body here, then they drove off"...


Now Between Sean and Dean, who is the idiot?

Droldnallufepoh:
nope, maybe I overrated your intelligence, you don't even know who a scientist is, why won't you assume big bang is an explosion?
it all seems clearer now that you're just regurgitating things you have no idea about

the theory is not atheistic, its SCIENTIFIC but since you don't know what makes one a scientist how would you know a scientific claim?

atheists have been existing before the big bang was postulated

and it was first postulated by Georges Lemaître, a Belgian physicist and ROMAN CATHOLIC PRIEST even the pope at the time wanted to make it part of church doctrine as "proof of God"

what connects Big bang and atheism

maybe Roman Catholic is an "atheistic" organisation

Droldnallufepoh:
bros, stop doing this to yourself
there's no "explosion", like I said take the time to read about science from scientists
big bang was never an atheistic claim

Droldnallufepoh:
"exploded"

Your understanding of science and evolution is so flawed, I can only assume you were home schooled. Please take the time to read about science from scientists, because the fallacious tripe you've just regurgitated here (presumably from your pastor or fellow believers) is so wrong, I'm at a loss as to where to even start but I'll try a bit for the readers

here they are again, hiding under deism as expected

spacetacular:
Whatever throttles your day sir. You keep infuriating yourself with nobody's assistance. How on earth do you think that false name calling makes you sound intelligent or gives you regard?

I have asked that you seek professional medical evaluation because you are schizophrenic.

spacetacular:
Oh I thought you were. Sorry about that.

DoctorAlien just came across to me like you are a Doctor to Aliens or from outer space yourself. Not like it's true or anything, just looked funny to me when I tried to understand why such a name.

spacetacular:
You reason well. But I have seen some grotesque reasoning abilities here and characters and would never in a million worlds give my personal valuable Information to anyone online when they are not a verified organization or a physically known friend.

Are you a doctor? Your name is funny

akintom:
*the earliest fossil, puts man's age at 200,000 years. How you can now say your imaginary Adam and Eve, lived 6000 years ago, and are the first lives (without any verifiable evidence), is not only ridiculous that you're putting this nonsense on NL, but that you're saying it with certainty.

Contending scientific facts, with biblical craps, is the deepest descent into delusion.

Ubenedictus:
ֶפֶשׁ nephesh {neh'-fesh}
Hebrew Word Study (Transliteration- Pronunciation Etymology & Grammar)

1) soul, self, life, creature, person, appetite, mind, living being, desire, emotion, passion 1a) that which breathes, the breathing substance or being, soul, the inner being of man
1b) living being
1c) living being (with life in the blood) 1d) the man himself, self, person or individual
1e) seat of the appetites
1f) seat of emotions and passions
1g) activity of mind 1g1) dubious 1h) activity of the will 1h1) dubious 1i) activity of the character
1i1) dubious
lexiconcordance.com/hebrew/5315.html

ARE YOU STILL DENYING THAT AMONG THE MEANINGS OF SOUL, IT ALSO REFERS TO THE INNER BEING IN MAN?

Ubenedictus:
AS I EARLIER SAID, the soul is a word used to mean many different thing according to it context here soul means d seat of human appetite and yes can b hungary here it means life, which can be bought...

job was talking in dat passage about his soul within him and dat soul has emotion! how do u explain that?

Ubenedictus:
Isaiah 26:9 says this: “ At night my soul longs for Thee, indeed my spirit within me seeks Thee diligently.” Zech.12:1: “Thus says the LORD, who stretches out the heavens, lays the foundation of the earth, and forms the spirit of man within him:”

Ubenedictus:
As i said earlier, d bible translate d word to mean many things, but in d case noted above job says his soul is WITHIN him and is capable of emotion. is ur soul capable of that?