₦airaland Forum

Still been produced by Don Jazzy?

Nakele:
Majid talked about a lot of things including answering the question, who is the best “kisser” among all the actresses he has worked with, that is-who he enjoys kissing the most…

If I were Majid, I would have just said “ My Wife”, but I guess his wife isn’t that good so he wouldn’t lie on a national TV .

Keyword, WORKED WITH not slept with, he doesn't work with his wife because she's not an actress, to the best of my knowledge. . .

No sympathy for this Kelly guy, just like your yahoo boyfriends these robbers are just looking for some bread. . .maga must always pay one way or the other, shout hallelujah.

Always wondered about this site, all celeb pictures are watermarked with bella naija. . .

jennykadry:
In a show of solidarity, Tuface Idibia and Makun’s wife, Mabel, donated N100,000 to Ekehinde, who also launched her charity organisation, Give and Let Give on Sunday.

Cheap motherfu-kers. . .

Are you sure you made that? Because I've seen that somewhere before.

Candyness = Mr cork, seriously people can be pathetic.

ILLUMINATI!!

https://cdn.bellanaija.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/2Face-LIVE-Red-Carpet-Bella-Naija242-403x600.jpg

jennykadry:
I taught my daughters that when any man, be he their uncle, brother or even my friends in the industry, comes to the house, they should greet and go to their seats. If the visitor says, give me a hug, give them side hug. If he says give me a full hug, tell him mummy says that I shouldn't do that. If he says sit on my lap, say no, I want to sit on the chair. If he says come, let me buy you ice cream, tell him thank you.
I told them that if any man touches them between their chests and thighs, they should scream and run. I warned them that they should not stay there and later come and tell me story.

A little bit too much no?

Is that the picture you intend to use? if so it might help if you clean her eyes up, those spots are

Poosie baby! at the end of the day it all comes down to poosie.

Mobinga:
Maybe its not from youtube coz i did it nd nothing happens

Can you see an image? if not then it won't work. . .

I bet Missy B of Nairaland can do better than that lady. . .

Lol, yes as you can see these tutorials are freely available from the internet, for faster download you need a Rapidshare account.

davidylan:
Tacitus annals is a book my dear.

Which you got from Google no?

davidylan:
Yep it was going nowhere for a long time, sounded more like trying to teach a blooming  how to read.

Flattering ourselves again are we?   so ridiculous.

davidylan:
Enough of excusing your ignorance on the basis of  you being willing to look at a different point of view . . . you dont even have a clue what YOUR OWN point of view is. I'm willing to look at different opinions, at least i do READ up on the issues. The same cannot be said of you.

More of your silly assumptions. . .

davidylan:
Here was your direct quote - He cited Tactius and that makes the hole thing credible

And when I say read between the lines he says I'm flattering myself, when I mentioned Tactius I meant any historic figure, do you comprehend?

davidylan:
Like i said before - what would you all do without google?

I don't see you citing REAL books. . .this is really going no where, I'm done.

Mobinga:
. . My eyesight is not too good as a result of staring into the cathode-ray tube for long hours I spent while in junior sec. .

If they'd invented computers in your day, your eyesight could have been better. . .

davidylan:
Christ called the pharisees a generation of vipers so i'm not bothered by such nonsensical claims.

Besides where did these address any of the issues on the thread? I thought you wanted to verify the credibility of sources posted . . . perhaps the problem is not whether the sources are credible or not, its more whether you are even aware that they exist in the first place. Calling you folks moose brains is not an insult really, its just an indication of how little you people truly know about the real world. The sad thing is that you still insist on exposing your ignorance by posting in sections that are obviously above your IQ.

Seriously, dont consider the above an insult. Just a candid advice.

And you want me to verify your sources in 10 minutes, really the point is your sources makes sense to you as mine to me, but unlike you I am willing to look at a different point of view while you? not so much. . .

davidylan:
Seriously just stop. this is getting more silly by the minute.

1. Anyone who is doubting the credibility of Tacitus annals seriously needs help.

2. You DID NOT cite any sources. If you did pls indicate.

3. the mithraic claims you got from the internet WHICH HAVE NO SOURCES! Infact CREDIBLE historical sources debunk the claims, same with that of dionysus.

1. Where did I say I doubted Tactius directly? show me!!

2. I didn't cite any sources yet, because when I called names you were quick to shut it down without wanting to know where i got such information from. Assuming as usual.

3. CREDIBLE he says, lol. . .that just proves what I've been saying all along.

davidylan:
looks like you never bothered to read, its just easier to pass off insults.

Show me where I have insulted you? you're the one throwing insults here. . .

davidylan:
I wouldnt put anything past these moose brains.

Aha, virtues of a Christian when their religion is questioned, the insults come out.

davidylan:
As regarding the credibility of the sources, if you bothered to read any of the links i sent you would see each claim is carefully cited with original sources. Just as an example . . . Cornelius Tacitus is cited in his Annals XV, 44. I'm sure you know that's credible right?

He cited Tactius and that makes the hole thing credible, my sources also cite historical figures. . .

davidylan:
Quite silly. These happened donkey yrs AFTER the bible had already been compiled and had become common knowledge. the era of the crusades where NOT to kill enemies of the gospel (pls LEARN TO READ HISTORY PLS) but to stop the islamic advance both in Jerusalem and western Europe.

the Spanish inquistion was to force jews and muslims to convert to catholicism (by this time the bible was already set).

the reason i posted the point about the dead sea scrolls is simple (i know you're quite slow and wont get that so its alright) . . . the dead sea scrolls VALIDATE the bible, they are almost a carbon copy of the books found in the bible and a few not found in the bible. They also contain certain fragments that are not found in the bible as well. What is most incredible about this is that it completely tears the claim that the wars you post above were meant to "protect the bible" . . . that would be foolish as the dead sea scrolls themselves predate those wars!

There is no beating chest anywhere . . . i provide sources to buttress my claims, you make silly claims that dont hold water without providing any sources to back it up. If you understand science at all you shld know that citing sources is a very critical part of supporting your work.

davidylan:
allow me to digress and address this a bit more, perhaps not in sufficient detail as i would have wanted. the above claims are what you would expect a muslim to make . . . What really was the essence of this? this came up based on this point raised by dolemite - The bible stood the test of time because once it was accepted Christians killed people who didn't believe or had different views. . .

Now how were the crusades, inquisition and burning witches on stakes the reason the bible stood the test of time? Seriously? What about the numerous roman historians who predated all these events and ACCURATELY recorded many of the biblical accounts in secular documents? There are MANY GNOSTIC GOSPELS . . . yet if we were to go by dolemite's false claim the authors of these books shld be dead and their books destroyed . . . how come the crusaders ignored them and chose to go fight the muslims at the gates of Vienna (the crusades really)?

How come the authors os many of the new testament books were all martyred and YET their books survived? Was this because their disciples went around killing enemies and unbelievers? Seriously?

Are these people so unable to think they just stumble from one talking point to the other?

All I see you doing here is just running your mouth, or fingers on a keyboard in this case, where are your sources and how credible or biased are they, or did you do all these research by yourself, or perhaps god told you all these things. . .

I'm sure Brooklyn has enough hospitals, why not build the biggest state of the art hospital in NIGERIA!! This is just a waste.

davidylan:
For example . . . the book of Jude makes a quote that is found no where in the bible. The discovery of the book of enoch among the dead sea scrolls is amazing in the fact that Jude's quote is found ALMOST VERBATIM in the book of enoch! One of the books hidden by sects persecuted by the Roman destruction of Jerusalem (the essenes) . . . i doubt if they had any power to kill off unbelievers since they didnt even survive the Roman onslaught . . . but its ok to stupidly parrot what you heard from others.

MY GOD!! this guy is so damn assuming!! I was talking about the era of the crusades, the Spanish inquisition, the English burning 'witches' in the name of God! that's all fiction too right?

All I see here is you beating your chest in arrogance about your sources and to everyone else is either name dropping or doesn't have credible sources. . .well this won't go anywhere now would it?

davidylan:
1. it is not a fact that any pagan god challenges this.

2. the only thing that is fact here is that you DO NOT KNOW anything about these pagan gods, you have simply plagiarized the baseless claims of others while trying to co-opt them as your own independent thinking.

3. if the pagan claims are your reason to doubt the validity of Christ's birth then gosh . . . you must be darn ignorant.

I did say I asked questions and made decisions by myself, you're so assuming it's ridiculous and annoying! and I'm ignorant to think that the story of Jesus could have been plagiarized from stories of pagan gods before? Ok, guess you know it all.

davidylan:
then why the unnecessary name dropping? you could simply have made your point without it, if i hadnt done my homework well i'd have been sitting here thinking you knew what you were talking about. perhaps that's why clueless folks like rhino can set up threads claiming that atheists are "intelligent".

Insecure about your intelligence? now I see where all this is from. . .

davidylan:
What was wrong with the credibility? I'd like to know too. Maybe i could start questioning it as well. So far i think it has stood the test of time. 2000 yrs after we have nothing but folk tales from you all . . .

The bible stood the test of time because once it was accepted Christians killed people who didn't believe or had different views. . .

davidylan:
As expected. You will simply go back and name-drop to your clueless friends and they'd go away with the false impression that you knew anything at all.

Bottomline dear - if you dont know something, dont pretend that you do. Issues like this are way over your head.

What the hell are you talking about? is this guy all right?  

davidylan:
you didnt need to mention 20 names. The very fact that you included mithra blew any credibility you might have had out of the water. It just means that like others you simply parrot claims you yourself have not studied in detail. If you dont know anything about mithra then how am i confident you have any clue as to who dionysius is?

You can give me more pagan gods of course, google is your friend.

Arrrgh, read between the lines! the point is NOT that I researched these pagan gods or not, I told you one of the reasons why I doubted was because of the credibility of Jesus's birth, the very fact that any pagan god can challenge this makes me doubt. . .and there are many out there. I don't have to research them one by one that would be useless not to mention time consuming, I've not even gone half way on that link you gave me so who knows how credible that one is?. . .

davidylan:
this is for dolemite . . . here is one out of the few threads dealing with the "mithra" issue you raised . . .

https://www.nairaland.com/nigeria/topic-343660.0.html

- First post contains a link to a comprehensive debunking of the silly mithra claims

This was way back in 2009 . . . which is why your "look it up Jack" comment had me chuckling . . . apparently some of you assume you do know anything at all.

Your claim that "even the roman catholic church acknowledges this fact" is no surprise . . . its the same claim that has been pushed (notice the thread above has deepsight making the same unfounded claim) by other atheists before you - many of you just parrot the same lines with no evidence at all.

Ok? I mentioned two names yet you choose to dwell on Mithra. . .I could give you more pagan gods that share similarities with Jesus if you want. . .

And where did I say I believed in Mithra? for someone who claims to have a phd you're pretty slow, read between the lines believer, you just make judgements from your silly assumptions- very annoying.

davidylan:
2. The portrait you are painting is one of a confused person grasping at straws to justify your unbelief.

That is your interpretation and you're entitled to it, to some the Mona Lisa is a masterpiece, to others. . . and I'm not trying to justify myself to you, I don't have to. . .

Mobinga:
Post the youtube link sharp sharp . . . . my browser doesn't play embedded vids

Just double click the space where the video should be. . .

davidylan:
what's illogical about it? I guess the opposing belief that you descended from monkeys is a much better alternative?

Actually it is, considering the fact that the very computer you're using right now was invented by someone who decided think for himself and solve his own problems instead of relying on some god in the sky to do it for him. I go with science all the way.

davidylan:
But you do exercise "faith" in your every day life dont you? "faith" that the sun wont fall out of the sky and that it will rain when it shld and that night will follow the day . . . wonder why you're hot on those ideas afterall no one knows who set those patterns in motion.

Lol where have I heard this before?(insert mish-mash of watered down explanations found on the internet here) anyway I don't exercise faith in anything, if things go bad I look for a logical explanation, I don't sit on my ass and say god made it happen. . .that's the difference between me and a believer.

davidylan:
This is the go-to argument for those grasping at straws. there are historical documents supporting his birth and plenty of the claims in the bible . . . the problem is many of you are simply not interested in researching about what you were taught. You'd be surprised how much evidence exists that corroborates the bible even down to the names of the ancient towns.

Mithra, Dionysis. . .look it up jack! even the catholic church acknowledges this fact, their explanation for it was that Satan knew of Jesus's coming. . .went back in time to counterfeit it, I'm sure god told them this.

davidylan:
that to me seals it. I was posting in the other thread how a lot of the time atheists DOUBT first then go around ferreting for excuses to justify their doubt. Most of the time there is no basis for the doubt save you simply want to throw the bible overboard.

When you ask questions you find answers which leads to more questions, hence not one thing made me doubt. . .

davidylan:
you're a lot more confused than i thot. There is no coherence to your thot pattern as regards your christian faith. Its simply a mish-mash of watered down excuses one can find anywhere on the internet.

You are just too arrogant to see the portrait I'm painting you here, so in your pride you simply say I'm confused. . .maybe I am though, I don't know who/what made the heavens and the earth, but if your explanation for this is that some god made it all then I am not impressed. . .and I can see this 'discussion' slowly turning into a trade off of insults as it mostly does when I talk with believers like you so I'm done with you. . .oh and when next you talk to god, tell I said hello.