₦airaland Forum

Izuchukwu70:
Nigerians and their biases. Its Davido nobody will talk. Forgetting that Davidos family has been in politics for over 50 years from his grandfather who was a Senator, 2 Uncles are Governors . Whether you like it or not. His family and him have benefitted from government money 💰.

donshady:
Just bought some Pennzoil. Thanks for the update. Nawa for naira ooo

Chikebrain:
@dru23 sent you a mail. I need the mobil1

Cousin9999:
lol He didn't convince them of anything. He just parroted their delusional ramblings. A toddler could do the same. lol

Blue3k:
[b]Sir you no time to lecture me but you wrote multiple paragraphs with answering direct questions. [/b]You nairaland negroids are a weird bunch. Again your family being dependent on dollars overseas is not my life stop projecting your issues. Instead of you rambling foolishly about your past just answer direct questions regarding the subject.

Why not hire legal migrants instead of illegals. A hard work ethic is a cultural and individual trait. Why exactly should they be allowed to break immigration and employment laws? America somehow managed to have cheap eggs for decades without illegal aliens we can do it again. They used to hire temporary workers from Mexico and other country for these jobs. Ceasar Chavez advocated for these type of workers instead of "wetbacks".

Cousin9999:
He didn't convince anyone, crackers are mentally ill and freakishly insecure, and he fed that. Also, watch the movie Idiocracy.

Stilloracle:
I pray Trump kick the bucket

Blue3k:
My eggs will cost $10 dollars because farmers don't want to hire more legal migrants? They already admitted half their workforce is legal. Why exactly should they be allowed to break immigration and employment laws? America somehow managed to have cheap eggs for decades without illegal aliens we can do it again. Ask yourself what's the real reason they opting for illegal labor.

2nd why is your nation and family so dependent on handouts from people abroad. Shouldn't you be worried about fixing your nation's economy so you won't need their charity?

zinaunreal:
I think Trump is a dumb person if he gets rid of illegals with fundermental skills. China is 20 years ahead of them militarily and economically

Blue3k:
Its interesting farmers always seem to have this issue. They will either pay more, embrace tech, or hire legal workers.

1865: How can we do farm work with slave labor?
2025: How can we do farm work with exploiting illegal aliens as a permanent under class?

Flangelo12:

Trump is a fool.

Here are facts:

Fentanyl smuggling is ultimately funded by U.S. consumers who pay for illicit opioids: nearly 99 percent of whom are U.S. citizens.
In 2021, U.S. citizens were 86.3 percent of convicted fentanyl drug traffickers—ten times greater than convictions of illegal immigrants for the same offense.
Over 90 percent of fentanyl seizures occur at legal crossing points or interior vehicle checkpoints, not on illegal migration routes, so U.S. citizens (who are subject to less scrutiny) when crossing legally are the best smugglers.

ednut1:
you obviously dont know what u are talking about. I have lived with oyinbo. 3 years in uk. 4 years in Canada now. There are jobs they wouldn’t do. So rest. Which oyinbo wants to pick strawberries or avocado for 5 dols an hour 🤡

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/despite-economy-americans-dont-want-farm-work/#:~:text=In%20the%20heart%20of%20the,t%20stay%20in%20the%20fields.

Glimpsetv:
Trump will listen, I definitely trust him to do the right thing.

DiamondsAreFore:
Please educate us more. I've been thinking of importing a new alternator for my car because there are too many fakes in Nigeria. How do I initiate the process of using freight forwarders? Can it be done online?

chinnyTF95:
I am thinking of buying the 2008 Mazda Cx-7 as a first time car owner. Please what do you advise. I want to reach you on WhatsApp too. Thanks

smallsmall:
This is an abuse of the Constitution, Nigeria is a federal System.
T-Pain needs to stop this Nonsense.
Our Rogue Judges too, need to stop being a Political Tool, they are embarrassing Nigerians.
"Lawmakers who switch Party, have lost their Seats". That is Nigeria's Constitution and any Judge that tries to "bend it", is an enemy of the Nation.

I hope our "Judiciary", will not truncate this our Democracy, if care is not taken, with the way they are using the Bench for all manners of malfeasance.
An Opinion.

smallsmall:
About Ukraine POSSESSING and GIVING-UP Nuclear Weapons and The ASSURANCES it was given:

1) I have read a few HERE, saying that Ukraine gave-up its Nuclear Weapon.
This statement is the usual Ignorant statements that people make, because they dont research what they are talking about and just say what they heard on MSM.
The fact here, is that[b] Ukraine NEVER HAD any Nuclear Weapon[/b], Period.
Explanation:
- For the records, USSR (as a single country, with its Capital and largest City, as Moscow), is the OWNER of all Nukes within its borders.
- Ukraine was one of the Cities of USSR, just like Moscow, which was the largest City and Capital.

- Moscow (now part of Russia), was the seat of Government of USSR and controlled access to all their Nukes. (A Nuke is not just the Missile alone, the most important things are the "Launch Codes", without which, the Nuke is just a piece of explosive, not different from any other conventional bomb.)
- Moscow OWENED all the Nukes of USSR.

- USSR has its Nukes STORED in different parts of the USSR, including in the City of Ukraine but the Cities themselves and by themselves. do not have control over the Nukes, except from the Capital and largest City, MOSCOW.

- Ukraine never OWNED, nor have CONTROL over any of the USSR Nukes STORED in its City.
They all belong to USSR and the Centre of that USSR-Government, was Moscow.

- When the USSR dissolved, the constituents Cities were seeking Independence, not all at the same time, but at different times, close to each other though.
- Ukraine broke-away and at that point, it was instructed to surrender all the Nukes stored on its territory, by Moscow (now Represented and Capital of Russia).

- Even if the Nukes were left on Ukrainian soil, Ukraine could not operate them because it does not have access to the launch codes.
Ukraine dutifully handed over the Nukes, to Russia.

- Also, the "Black Sea, Nuclear Submarine fleet" was stationed in Ukraine, under USSR.
It was also asked to hand them over to the Nation which succeeded USSR, that is Russia.

- In return, Ukraine asked for "Protection and assurances" for its security, which Russia and some other Powers promised.

I am saying all these, to let us know what transpired back then and to put an end to this false notion that Ukraine OWNED Nuclear Weapons at any point in time, in its History since 1991.

It is like saying 'River State' OWNS all the Oil Wells "of Nigeria", despite being on its Land?
That was one of the reasons Biafra (which had annexed the South-South, including Rivers, Delta, Edo and Bayelsa of today, as part of Biafra in 1968) could not be actualized, in the Civil War because there is no way Nigeria would have let-go of such "Resources", to a breakaway part of it.
There is No way Russia would have allowed Ukraine to keep those "Nukes and nuclear Submarines", and hand-over the Launch Codes to Ukraine.

Russia was the "succeeding Nation" to USSR, the owner of Moscow (its Capital) and the Nukes belongs to Moscow /Russia.
That is the way the World works.

2) Now, Let us talk about those ASSURANCES that Russia (and the US), gave Ukraine, back then in 1991:

- Those Assurances of 1991 given to Ukraine[/b, were PREMISED on [b]Ukraine not becoming a Hostile Nation to Russia.]

- Today, we know that Ukraine is not only a "Proxy and Pawn" for NATO war on Russia, it is also actively killing "Ethnic Russians" on its territory, It is burning their Churches, forbidding their language, bombing their Homes and it even made a failed attempt to occupy Russian territory of Kursk.
This means the "Condition for the Assurances" have been violated and Russia does not owe any apology, for not honoring the Assurances anymore.

smallsmall:
About Ukraine POSSESSING and GIVING-UP Nuclear Weapons and The ASSURANCES it was given:

1) I have read a few HERE, saying that Ukraine gave-up its Nuclear Weapon.
This statement is the usual Ignorant statements that people make, because they dont research what they are talking about and just say what they heard on MSM.
The fact here, is that[b] Ukraine NEVER HAD any Nuclear Weapon[/b], Period.
Explanation:
- For the records, USSR (as a single country, with its Capital and largest City, as Moscow), is the OWNER of all Nukes within its borders.
- Ukraine was one of the Cities of USSR, just like Moscow, which was the largest City and Capital.

- Moscow (now part of Russia), was the seat of Government of USSR and controlled access to all their Nukes. (A Nuke is not just the Missile alone, the most important things are the "Launch Codes", without which, the Nuke is just a piece of explosive, not different from any other conventional bomb.)
- Moscow OWENED all the Nukes of USSR.

- USSR has its Nukes STORED in different parts of the USSR, including in the City of Ukraine but the Cities themselves and by themselves. do not have control over the Nukes, except from the Capital and largest City, MOSCOW.

- Ukraine never OWNED, nor have CONTROL over any of the USSR Nukes STORED in its City.
They all belong to USSR and the Centre of that USSR-Government, was Moscow.

- When the USSR dissolved, the constituents Cities were seeking Independence, not all at the same time, but at different times, close to each other though.
- Ukraine broke-away and at that point, it was instructed to surrender all the Nukes stored on its territory, by Moscow (now Represented and Capital of Russia).

- Even if the Nukes were left on Ukrainian soil, Ukraine could not operate them because it does not have access to the launch codes.
Ukraine dutifully handed over the Nukes, to Russia.

- Also, the "Black Sea, Nuclear Submarine fleet" was stationed in Ukraine, under USSR.
It was also asked to hand them over to the Nation which succeeded USSR, that is Russia.

- In return, Ukraine asked for "Protection and assurances" for its security, which Russia and some other Powers promised.

I am saying all these, to let us know what transpired back then and to put an end to this false notion that Ukraine OWNED Nuclear Weapons at any point in time, in its History since 1991.

It is like saying 'River State' OWNS all the Oil Wells "of Nigeria", despite being on its Land?
That was one of the reasons Biafra (which had annexed the South-South, including Rivers, Delta, Edo and Bayelsa of today, as part of Biafra in 1968) could not be actualized, in the Civil War because there is no way Nigeria would have let-go of such "Resources", to a breakaway part of it.
There is No way Russia would have allowed Ukraine to keep those "Nukes and nuclear Submarines", and hand-over the Launch Codes to Ukraine.

Russia was the "succeeding Nation" to USSR, the owner of Moscow (its Capital) and the Nukes belongs to Moscow /Russia.
That is the way the World works.

2) Now, Let us talk about those ASSURANCES that Russia (and the US), gave Ukraine, back then in 1991:

- Those Assurances of 1991 given to Ukraine[/b, were PREMISED on [b]Ukraine not becoming a Hostile Nation to Russia.]

- Today, we know that Ukraine is not only a "Proxy and Pawn" for NATO war on Russia, it is also actively killing "Ethnic Russians" on its territory, It is burning their Churches, forbidding their language, bombing their Homes and it even made a failed attempt to occupy Russian territory of Kursk.
This means the "Condition for the Assurances" have been violated and Russia does not owe any apology, for not honoring the Assurances anymore.

smallsmall:
Aside from that, there are Three Issues here, that most people praising Ukraine now, are not aware of:

1) Ukraine has a very limited amount of these long Range Missiles (ATACMS) and they will soon run out of it.
Russia on the other hand, has a Pile of Hypersonic Missiles of various types that can reach and burn anywhere in Ukraine.

2) The "Approval" given to Ukraine by America, is a LIMITED ONE, and it is to use the ATACMS against Russia border regions ONLY and in Kursk.
Why is that?
- The Maximum Range of these Missiles, are just about 300Km, it wont even go much into Russian heartland.

- America has a shortage of the ATACMS Missiles.
Infact, General Loyd Austin (American equivalent of our COAS), told Zelensky last week that "The US has an obligation, first and foremost, to its Clients who have paid for these Missiles in advance and would supply them to those Client first, before considering Ukraine!".

- He also said that America cannot deplete its own stock of Missiles, just to satisfy Ukraine because that would put American Security in jeopardy.
- So, America will not supply additional ATACMS to Ukraine, Trump is taking Office soon and wont approve additional Supply, so what happens, when the few ATACMS Ukraine was given, runs out?
Meanwhile, Russia is rolling out Supersonic Missiles, at an alarming rate, not to mention its Drone production, which even EU Generals have said is "shocking".

3) Russia has been expecting that "Genocide Joe" will give this "ATACMS approval" very soon, for some time now and has moved all its Weapons Storage, Attack Planes and Helicopters, all strategic Assets..... out of the range of the ATACMS Missile, which is just about 300Km.

- Gen. Loyd Austin told Zelensky this, arguing that using ATACMS now, will not give Ukraine any "strategic advantage" in the War.
If anyone is in-doubt about this, let them provide any Video from any source, that shows the damage the Six ATACMS that Ukraine fired, damaging any Significant Russian Military Asset.

At best, Zelensky will kill a few Russians and damage a few buildings, in the border Region and maybe hold unto Kursk, the Russian border City, for a little longer, since they are being encircled already. Then he would fold.
He doesn't even have the ManPower (Soldiers) to pursue this War anymore.
His Soldiers are poorly trained Conscripts, forcefully snatched on the Streets and they are deserting or surrendering in droves.

What l am more worried about, is what the Russian Response to this attack, will be.
A lot of Ukrainians will "freeze-to-kpai" this Winter, because Russia will attack their Energy Infrastructure so badly.

greggng:
Can you listen to yourself? The last time I checked Ukraine is an independent nation ...they don't need Russia permission to join any association . Usa doesn't prevent any of her nebors from joining any association . Brazil recently joined brets ...where Russia is the leader ...nobody is forcing them not to join . If Russia is Indeed a good country why all her nebors are interested in joining nato? No democratic country will not like to join nato for there protection against undemocratic country like Russia etc

iLoveYouToo:
Not my business. Ukraine should’ve matched Russia’s energy from day 1, maybe this war would’ve ended sooner

Mikelarteta:
Russia think say na only then get Nuclear weapon? You are the oppressor here and I don’t know why some people still supporting this idiot. You are not comfortable with them joining NATO and they have agreed, still you went ahead with your oppression against them. Any little thing you go Dey threaten with Nukes as if na only you get am.

jUeLiZ:
Make Putin do him worse now....

Everytime Nuclear threat like say na only Russia get nuclear weapons.... make Putin press the button if him get mind...

twosquare:
WW111

They want to spoil the ground before Trump comes in. Unnecessary.

Sunerise:
Biden making last minute calls, never a good thing for Ukraine

timilehin007:
trump will reverse it

Toktee:
Some ediots here once said Ukraine's incursion into Russia is a suicide and that Ukraine won't last a week, how far now?
Stupid putler and members of Nigeria coward association.

ZELENSKY is a man with balls.

Zonefree:
Trump is coming to restore lasting peace.

lanrefront1:
You really have no idea what you're talking about.

If you do you wouldn't have said that Trump is responsible for the inflation.

Prices of groceries and gasoline was low during the Trump years

NewDea4:
Donald Trump is the world's best choice at the moment...he might not seem like (or even actually be) much of a choice, but he's the better and only other option to Skamala Harris

Chisilasweb:
Trump is too much. He just made history in the just concluded election
What a come back. Most people that has ever lose in the US presidential election never had the chance of re-contesting talkless of winning it.
Please give the man his flowers

femi4:
E go soon clear for una eyes after one year in office