₦airaland Forum

BassReeves:
1. Tell me what is good in adultery, fornication and even paedophilia, and I will replicate with what is good homosexuality
2. Tell me what fruit of the Holy Spirit is in displayed in adultery, fornication and even paedophilia, and I will replicate with what fruit of the Holy Spirit is in displayed in accepted and permissible homosexuality

BassReeves:
Incest, fornication, adultery and even paedophilia has the same chance to just happen in heterosexuality, as much as in homosexuality, so why are you typing in homosexuality, as a specific of sexual immoralities and not equally type in heterosexuality too?

Adultery, fornication and even paedophilia, are forms of wickedness, evilness, treachery, disloyalty, perverse judgment etc

BassReeves:
Please simply just answer the 'What exactly is the evil in acceptable, harmless, innocent and permissible homosexuality' question and stop this insane detour away from saying what exactly is the evil in acceptable, harmless, innocent and permissible homosexuality

BassReeves:
Please simply just answer the 'What exactly is the evil in acceptable, harmless, innocent and permissible homosexuality' question and stop this insane detour away from saying what exactly is the evil in acceptable, harmless, innocent and permissible homosexuality

What is your problem? Are you a politician because I dont understand why you are trying the pivot with me and evading directly answering the 'what really is sinful in being a strictly monogamous homosexual?' question

What manner of fuckery response to the 'How does being a homosexual personally affect anyone in a wicked, harmful or evil way?' question is this?

Are you normal? Can you please stay focused on homosexuality without needing to introduce masturbation or suicide. The question asked that how does being a homosexual personally affect anyone, with emphasis stressed on, the effect in a wicked, harmful or evil way on anyone. Please bear in mind, the situation of strictly monogamous same sex attraction couple being amorous in the comfort and privacy of their home with no one seeing them

What has 'multiple partners' have anything to do, in strictly monogamous same sex attraction relationship?

What is the matter with you? You have this habit of dodging questions and people like you who do that are often just trying to hide from coming face to face with truth.

So, 'exactly what it is, specifically in homosexuality, that pains or bothers you' is 'multiple partners' right? But doing 'multiple partners' also happens in heterosexuality or bisexuality setting, so homosexuality does not have a monopoly on 'multiple partners' for you to single it out alone and pained and bothered by

You were asked a simple and direct question about 'Do you know that you will held accountable for demonising two people for life, loving each other' but as usual you parried it with some nonsensical waste of my precious time reply

BassReeves:
To start with immorality has to do with wickedness, now sexual immorality, has to do with being sexually wicked...

BeLookingIDIOT:
...Your bible was very specific on what it considers sexual immoralities like homosexuality,incest, fornication,adultery etc why didn't it include paedophilia?

fineboynl:
so what is the essence of next of kin on the document in the first place.q

iamkazeem:
WHAT THE LAW SAYS ABOUT NEXT-OF-KIN IN NIGERIA

Are you among those that think by giving a name to financial institutions (bank for example) as next-of-kin you have chosen that person to automatically inherit your wealth in the event of your demise? In other words, do you think by merely picking someone as your next-of-kin you have made that person a beneficiary to your wealth or entitlement(s) in the event of your death? Let us attempt a little legal analysis based on two factors: whether the deceased has a Will (a document written by a deceased when he was alive that prescribes how his property is to be shared when he dies) or whether he dies without a will

In law when a person dies leaving behind a will, he is said to have died testate. In such a circumstance, Issue of next-of-kin becomes useless. The reason is that the wealth of the deceased will simply be shared in line with the contents of the will.

The position is still the same even where the deceased dies without leaving a will. The position is that when a person dies without a will, the question as to who to inherit his wealth is determined by law, that is to say, customary law, or Islamic law or English Law or the Administration of Estates law (or equivalent legislation) not whom the deceased mentioned in his bank or place of work as next-of-kin.

How then do we know the law to be applied in sharing the property of the deceased? The law to be applicable in distributing the estate of the deceased shall be determined by the incidence of marriage of the deceased. If a deceased contracted a statutory marriage, succession to his wealth will be effected in accordance with either the English law or the Administration of Estates Law (or equivalent legislation), depending on the jurisdiction. See Obuzez V. Obuzez (2007) 10 NWLR (Pt. 1043) 430.

doggedfighter:
People should be free to live their lives the way that suits them with whomsoever that consents with them.

BassReeves:
1. What exactly is the evil in acceptable, harmless, innocent and permissible homosexuality

BassReeves:
2. What really is sinful in being a strictly monogamous homosexual?

BassReeves:
3. How does being a homosexual personally affect anyone in a wicked, harmful or evil way?

BassReeves:
4. What exactly is it, specifically in homosexuality, that pains or bothers you.

BassReeves:
5. Do you know that you will held accountable for demonising two people for life, loving each other?

Draslo:
Take a chill pill bro. What then would you say about Arabic, the Indian Vedas, or the very many weird looking texts in the whole of Asia?

Princewell2012:
Happy Sunday to you all. Let me make it brief.

In John chapter 13. from verse 4 He riseth from supper and laid aside his garments, and took a towel and girded himself. 5. After that he poured water into a basin and began to wash the disciples feet and to wipe them with the towel where with his was girded.

Let me stop here, what actually is the essence of these?

Princewell2012:
Because some today's churches are doing it very often, and my feet have also been washed several times in the church. But I believe something is missing somewhere.

To my own understanding I think Jesus was just trying to emphasize about sharing and caring with each others as a Christian, I don't believe he gave it as a practice or a commandment for us to be washing our feet physically when ever we are gathered in the church.

Am just confused, does anyone knows a better meaning For these. Even those mega churches do practice it too.
Shalom.

missionmex:
As a child of God who has money, how much is good enough for Sunday offering. I say at least 1k. What is your take?

Newsblenda:
Christian means christlike, Followers of jesus christ, as a Christian ask ur self this very important question.
Did jesus celebrate his own birthday?
Or did any of his apostle/ disciples celebrated jesus birthday after his death?

What is the origin of birthdays?
There alot of things that christian do that's unchristian....

Amujale:
That's is inconsequential jibberjabber, try again, and here kindly answer my question.

It isn't a trick question.

Amujale:
Explain how a tool that was used to physically enslave innocent people and is being used to mentally enslave innocent people is meant to be the best thing?

TheSourcerer:
Open Topic please

1. Looking at yourself in the mirror . What harsh truths do you prefer to ignore?

2. 2. If you could become immortal on the condition you would NEVER be able to die or kill yourself, would you choose immortality?

Iliyasdass:
There is this worldwide accepted rule known as the Pass by Catastrophe

It states that for all students whose grades are affected by a catastrophe are automatically awarded passing grades.

So therefore if a university burns down then all the students currently enrolled in that university graduate from the university.

Other examples of this include

If someone dies during an examination, all the students present there pass the semester.
If a student commits suicide in his/her hostel room, then his/her roommate automatically passes the semester on the grounds of a traumatic event.

https://www.quora.com/What-happens-to-students-if-the-whole-of-a-university-campus-razes-in-a-fire-down-to-ashes

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pass_by_catastrophe

LordReed:
I said you love the things your god sanctions then you said No, I love the things my god sanctions, that is a funny disjointed response.

LordReed:
I am not sure what you are objecting to. Do you like the things your god does not sanction?

You can express your reservations without being derogatory.

HellVictorinho:
Congratulations

HellVictorinho:
Is that an achievement now

LordReed:
LoL. I think you should revise your post, it seems confused.

LordReed:
I never said your like or dislike was of consequence...

HellVictorinho:
He can't reply without Bible quotes.

LordReed:
LMAO!

So very simply you do not like what your god has not sanctioned. Put in another way you would have liked it if your god had actually sanctioned it.

Now you can see your previous objection is moot.

LordReed:
No because that is a different question. Let me illustrate, your god doesn't sanction men taking concubines but your god doesn't prohibit it either so my question using this example will be, do you like the taking of concubines?

EDIT: Concubines in today's parlance is Baby Mama.

Amujale:
Stop veering off on a tangent.

Answer my question.

Amujale:
Similar to all the foreign extremist ideologically based narratives, the Christian bible is tool of conquerors, manufactured specifically for those reasons.

You haven't answered my question.

aadoiza:
Precise and brilliant.

justfriends:
If in actual truth he made them male and female, then why did Abraham, Isaac, moses and their likes married more than one wife

annyplenty:
Let us continue.

Before I continue, I will like to say or stress that the phrase 'great tribulation' are used three times in the whole of the bible; one in Mathew 24 and twice in the book of revelation. The other phrace that looks like it is 'much tribulation' which is used in the book of acts.

So it follows that the phrase 'great tribulation is a term that relates solely to the end time. And to understand it clearly, scriptures especially those about end time should be consulted.

Amujale:
Explain how a tool that was used to physically enslave innocent people and is being used to mentally enslave innocent people be the best thing.