₦airaland Forum

badinfluence:
Really, you don't know that a schemer is opportunistic?

An opportunist waits for luck to come his way before doing anything a schemer creates his own luck enough said

badinfluence:
It's not too risky to kill villains aunty, after all ultron was killed off, zod was killed.. so I don't know who told you it is risky to kill villains.

Zod is going to be reanimated in superman vs batman, as for ultron did you see him die? Does anything stop him from re-appearing in other movies?e.g: dead shot returning in green arrow even though he was shot in the eye That's my point they are very careful with killing off characters in comic book movies

badinfluence:
You think comic fan boys have no say in a movie adapted from comics, why do you think some of these movies are rebooted with different screenwriters and directors. As a director you can't ignore these back stories entirely and come up with crap.

What are you talking about? Who said anything about fanboys and back stories?

badinfluence:
Captain stacy is the father to gwen stacy in the amazing spiderman movies, and quicksilver's death was not as significant as stacy's death. When you kill off an insignificant character it doesn't affect squat in the movie

You didn't answer my question how is quicksilver death not as significant as captain stacy's death?

badinfluence:
.
Moreover you know a version of quicksilver was shown in days of future past ba.

So?

badinfluence:
Xmen 3 saw the death of cyclops, jean grey. These are pioneers in the xmen. Granted they came back, but after how many movies.

You think xmen last stand. Was just a random movie? Didn't you notice how the follow up movies still stringed plots together and prepared the grounds for days of future past we saw how wolverine found the xmen then we saw how how he followed up from xmen last stand and connected to days of future past and of course you know about xmen first class? They all didn't just tie up nice by coincidence they planned it all

badinfluence:
Days of future past atleast had a dark undertone, and the sentinels were well depicted. The stone in loki's scepter is the mind stone, why would he begin trying to convince you when he can easily sway you with the mind stone.

Because loki is not as cunning and scheming as you say case closed

badinfluence:
If you had a gun and bullets, would you start throwing the bullets at your target when there's a gun?.. if thor could use anyone as you claimed why did he chose loki.

Like I said loki was "needed" by thor because marvel said so or what special skill did thor need loki for that the other soldiers thor was overseeing in the beginning of thor 2 could not help him with?

badinfluence:
And ultimately the end of thor 2 was a win win for loki.He had nothing to lose but gained

And it all depended on luck just imagine if malaki never attacked asgard or kill the queen of asgard was loki going to escape and become king?

badinfluence:
Quick question, are thor and avengers the only movies you've seen loki? It's clear avengers 2 was the first time you heard of ultron. In this case you're just an average film watcher, since you have no clue on their back stories. Captain America: civil war is in process and some people know some essentials that movie should have.

Well then if ultron's depiction in the movie was a shame while loki's depiction was so cool then why are you having such a hard time proving it? I believe I'm even making it easy for you,focus on the movies like I'm doing and stop making excuses

badinfluence:
I never said ultron is sucks as a villain, I'm saying ultron's depiction in the movie sucked seriously. So, loki throwing tony off wasn't an attempt to kill him ba,

But did tony die? Please answer that question you can't kill someone by attempting to kill him you know

badinfluence:
at least loki attempted not ultron who decided to pick on the world.

Lol did you just say loki tried or are you trying to imply that loki was only concerned with conquering newyork's business district? Ultron practically destroyed sokovia what did loki and his borrowed chitauris do?

badinfluence:
Ultron's inability to eliminate jarvis cost him ultimately. I'm sure you also think the amazing spiderman 2 was great....

Ok you hate spiderman 2 I have heard but answer this question was jarvis ultron's target? I remember tony stark saying to bruce banner " that is why ultron destroyed jarvis" please if jarvis was ultrons concern he would have worked on it

badinfluence:
He had the upper hand in that situation. Did he escape? Yes. Was there any casualty? Yes. Did the avengers handle that situation? No.

Lol so because loki escaped that means he had the upper hand lokis objective wasn't to cause casualties it was to destroy the avengers and the hellicarrier but non of that happened so I'll say the avengers handled the situation pretty well

badinfluence:
Coulson's death was even more significant than that of quicksilver.

Yes except that coulson didn't die but quicksilver actually died for real and please who is coulson compared to quick silver?

badinfluence:
Avengers 2 felt like a suckier version of part one. Again, the scepter is Loki's scepter. Hawkeye had detailed info on shield, and you think having someone like that doesn't count.

Ehen that's more like it so now you can see hawkeye did more than shoot arrows?

badinfluence:
Everyone under loki's hypnosis played a part in getting him what he wanted, isn't that manipulation? Manipulation isn't it mostly done by schemers?

Lol so if no one was there to "manipulate" or if the "manipulated" had no ideas on how to help loki what would loki have done look for more people to "manipulate"?

badinfluence:
Having an inside man doesn't make you less, one of the greatest strength is the ability to use pawns. Ultron couldn't even successfully use two silly teenagers.

ultron had the sceptre but did he use it on everyone he saw? Did he use it to build his army did he use it to "manipulate" the twins? The only time he used it was on that doctor and that was to make sure she didn't sabotage anything, a base loki failed to cover

badinfluence:
The ode even removed the stone from the scepter and it fell into the hands of his opponents, how smart.

If the twins didn't sabotage ultron's plan ultron would not have dropped the stone "into the hands of his opponents" so what was loki's excuse for dr selvig sabotaging the worm hole even when he was under loki's trance

Why would a grown man want to have sex with a 10 year old smh

Good move can't wait to have my own gun.

Basket mouth and his old "one pack joke" isn't he tired already

If you ask her she will say she was pushed by poverty but that's just an excuse cause poverty cannot push you into rituals only an evil mind can do that

badinfluence:
You do know that one of the infinity stones powers loki's scepter right.

What does that have to do with anything?

badinfluence:
How can you say loki relied on luck,

Because his so called scheme in thor 2 relied solely on luck

badinfluence:
he takes advantage of situations. He is a shape shifter plus he can make you see what he wants you to see. Loki always wanted to take over asgard and he used the situation in thor 2 to do that.

So now loki is now an opportunist he is no longer a schemer? Hmmm and what exactly did malaki's hench man see that made him think he was being stabbed from behind by loki?

badinfluence:
Moreover thor didn't just break him out of jail for show. He needed his help.

Yes he needed loki's help to act like he was against thor when he is indeed working with thor to deceive malaki? Like no one else in the whole kingdom can help with that please the only reason thor broke loki out of prison was because marvel said so

badinfluence:
What's this about heroes not dying. Err.. Watch this xmen franchise again please.

Oh perfect example after all the deaths at through out the franchise what did they do at the end of days of future past? Didn't they bring them all back?

badinfluence:
Quicksilver's death wasn't even as significant as captain stacy's death in spider.

Lol please can you explain this part

badinfluence:
And you can't judge based on the movies, why? Because the comics have been there years before the movies. Any director that decides to deviate from the comic stories takes a risk, a risk that didn't pay off for whedon. These stories weren't coined recently my dear, whedon gave you a popcorn flick.

Of course the movies were derived from comics but I'm judging loki and ultron based on their movies if you can't do the same then perhaps we shouldn't be having this discussion in the first place
FYI the movie is rated 7.9/10. On IMDB just few points from it's prequel so whoever criticized the movie for not following the comics belong to the minority

badinfluence:
Why do you think the movie generated criticisms despite the money it made. Now let me explain thanos' role for you. Thanos intends on having all infinity stones( so far only four or three have been shown) so he would have enough power to rule the galaxy.

Ok so loki borrowed the chitauris and the sceptre in exchange for the tesseract thank you but I already know that

badinfluence:
And you said they can't kill off loki, well this is because loki's role in this whole thing is significant.

So loki survived that fall in thor 1 and that stabbing in thor 2 because he is going to appear in avengers 3 that's my point they can't even kill villains because it's too risky for the producers

badinfluence:
You said loki cannot fight, well like I said he would rather flee to fight another day. Take scar for instance. Thor and loki are synonymous to mufasa and scar. Scar even admitted he can't fight mufasa because he knows mufasa is stronger. Loki knows he is physically no match for thor, and thor is very much aware of loki's devious

Yes his devious nature that was only implied and hardly applied the only strength loki has is talking too much

badinfluence:
nature. The best villains aren't those that solely rely on strength.E.g lex, joker, loki, doom... these guys are smart.

Yes they are all smart except loki please take him off that list

badinfluence:
Ultron did squat in quicksilver's death ooo... watch how he died again.

Quick silver shoved hawk eye away from the bullets coming from the avengers jet, who was flying the plane and firing those bullets? ultron right? Case closed don't even go there

badinfluence:
Loki couldn't kill tony stark without the suit. Did you miss the part where tony was falling to his death but was saved by his suit. Shey he just slipped?

Rather than stabbing or bludgeoning an unarmed tony stark to death Loki first monologued then embarrassed himself when his effort to brainwash tony failed like that wasn't embarrassing enough out of desperation loki shoved tony stark out of the window did tony die? No so I don't understand what you're talking about

badinfluence:
Almighty ultron couldn't even kill jarvis, why? Because jarvis hid in the internet..

Was jarvis ultron's target? No when he needed to get jarvis out of the way he did it without even breaking a sweat

badinfluence:
When loki told his plan to black widow did she stop it then? He had the upper hand then not withstanding he was locked up in a cell meant for the hulk. The avengers for sure learnt how not to underestimate loki

Ok loki's plan was to use hulk to kill the avengers and take down the hellicarrier, did any of those happen? no despite the little time given the hulk was successfully ejected out of the hellicarrier and loki lost hawkeye so how did he have the upperhand in this situation? Hawk eyes plan would have worked perfectly if god motor mouth didn't snitch to the avengers, it even feels silly calling loki a god that's just how ridiculous he is

badinfluence:
Thanos is desperate to gather the infinity stones and not picking a bone with mankind.

You don't seem to get me yes it wasn't thanos desire to conquer earth but it was thanos through his chitauri intermediary that loaned loki the sceptre and the chitauri army suggesting loki invaded earth if he wanted to conquer it, my question is how would loki have conquered and ruled the earth it if he had no help from the chitauris?

badinfluence:
The scepter is loki's main weapon for crying out loud, why shouldn't he use his main weapon.

Ok so in other words loki's idea of cunningness is to wave his convenient magic wand around to make everyone do his bidding gee I wonder what would happen to loki if the sceptre is gone?

badinfluence:
If you don't have an idea of how scheming loki is, I suggest you see the end of thor 2. As it stands now, loki is in charge of asgard.

Oh yes his ultimate plan which relied solely on luck, luck that thor will burst him out of jail, luck that malaki's henchman will attempt to kill him, luck that thor will discard his body I didn't see any scheming from his part anyone can win with luck on their side.And it also relied on a huge plot hole how did loki even fake his death malaki's henchman really stabbed him and loki's duplication cannot hurt people

badinfluence:
The only thing important about vision is the gem on his head, which is one of the stones thanos is after. So the Avengers reliance on vision to defeat ultron makes ultron more of a joke.

Ok so if the avengers couldn't defeat ultron without vision but defeated loki without visions help doesn't that make loki a bigger joke? I remember hawkeye delivering the final blow to loki before the hulk descended on him that shows that the avengers weren't even necessary in stopping loki

badinfluence:
Don't know why you're arguing for ultron when it's clear you don't know his back story. First off, contrary to what that movie shows,he was created by ant man not tony. Secondly, ultron has once cleared the whole avengers.. but the movie ultron can't do that because he is more concerned about his punchlines. Heck, he didn't even kill or come close to killing any avenger

Why don't we just stick to the movies and not the comic book stories you picked up from the internet

badinfluence:
. Quicksilver doesn't count and moreover he died taking a bullet( which is dumb, cos he's faster than a bullet).

Stop trying to down play quick silver's death, since hollywood started converting superhero comics to movies, how many known characters have died hell sometimes they hardly even kill the villains(loki comes to mind) so killing quick silver wasn't only a break from the norm it was also a risk which is something other superhero movies should try more often

badinfluence:
And loki is not the physical type, I don't know why you're arguing that. There's a difference between being able to hold your own in a battle and being physical.

Help me define the physical non-physical villain stuff to my understanding a non physical villain is a villain who sees no use for his violent skills but relies more on his intellectual skills a pure example of such would be ozymandas from the watchmen movie not loki to tell you the truth I don't even know what loki is because he is terrible at being both a physical villain and a non-physical villain fight e no sabi fight anyone can kick his ass from here to mars brain power he has none everyone can spot his "schemes" even before planning just see the avengers they all knew. About his intention to be deliberately captured and the mumu took it a step further to monologue his whole plans to black widow so really I don't know how to classify loki

badinfluence:
Thor is more of the physical one, loki would rather flee to fight another day. You asked for evidence on loki's scheming nature in thor 1 or thor 2... seriously? Did you follow the plot line? And in case you forgot loki's chaos in part 1 put the government in a spot, and they intended nuking a city just to contain it.

Ok loki's chaos that depended solely on the chitauris? How does that make loki " scheming"?
In the part one of thor loki's "brilliant" plot was foiled by odin waking up? Isn't that moronic?

badinfluence:
The comedian ultron couldn't even handle the maximoff twins.. really? You said someone sent loki for the tesseract, names please.

em thanos or where else did loki get the chitauris from?so ultron couldn't handle the maximoffs Is it as bad as loki not being able to kill tony stark I know you are goin to say loki isn't a physical villain but how hard is it to kill a tony stark that was outside his armour?
And what do you mean ultron couldn't "handle" the maximoff twins didn't we just go over how he killed quicksilver besides the twins were always eluding. Ultron besides they were barely his concern the only time the scarlett witch confronted ultron was when he was almost dead the only people who couldn't handle the twins were the avengers. I mean they couldn't apprehend the twins till they surrendered themselves

badinfluence:
And if you watch the beginning of part one, I'm sure you'd see the alliance between loki and chitauri abi whatever..

Yea the beginning of the avengers which just proves that loki was nothing more than an errand boy with an ultimatum? Yes I think I've watched it

badinfluence:
Any smart person knows when he's outnumbered, so there wasn't any way he could fight them all. How many times do I have to tell you loki isn't the physical type. And how can a "mindless" minion have ideas??.. well people didn't laugh nor cry when quicksilver died.. why? Because he was insignificant the whole movie. And as for loki wielding the sceptre, well he needed it and he got it. Let me remind you of the joker, the guy can't stand a hand to hand combat against batman, but we all know how much of a pain he is to him. And we all know that's one of the coolest villain in the comic universe. So hulk smashing loki doesn't make him any less cool.. it's the friggin hulk for heaven sake. I can't even believe you'd be impressed by that joke that is ultron. Ultron is bad ass but that movie made him look like kevin hart in an iron suit. Where the two parts are concerned loki was a better villain. Get me.. in the comics ultron is the boss but as for the movies ultron is a joke. Watch that movie again, the avengers couldn't do squat till vision was created. Wait first so you're telling me loki had no motive as a bad guy, rather he made hawkeye his minion for pleasure.. but since hawkeye wanted to be a bad guy all along, he began telling loki what to do... really

He was outnumbered or his leverage was taken away from him which one? i'm still trying to accomplish how loki was still a threat without his sceptre or minions

And are you trying to tell me that hawkeye didn't tell loki to get himself captured deliberately? Or loki sceptre-ized the battalion that attacked the hellicarrier what else are you going to change about the story? The chitauris were created by loki? Or loki was in charge of whoever sent him to earth to retrieve the tesseract hell maybe loki even created the tesseract am i right?

No one laughed when quick silver died that made it dark it's their choice to cry abt it if they like

Hulk smashing loki doesn't make him less cool? Are you serious? Didn't you cringe out of embarrassment for loki? it made him look so st*pid and what do you mean he isn't a physical villain? isn't he a soldier like thor weren't they fighting side by side in both thor 1 and 2? You said he waved. Sceptre around because he had to, did ultron need to wave a sceptre around to get his minions? If loki is as cunning as you say then he wouldn't need a sceptre to make friends


So the avengers needed vision to defeat ultron and yet you still think ultron is a joke?

And for christ sake the same way hawk eye attacked the chitauris at the end was the same way he attacked shield when he was loyal to loki the ideas and strategies neither belonged to his hero nor villainous side

You know what i think? You know that ultron is way better than loki but you just don't want to admit it if not give me live examples of how loki was cunning and dangerous in the avenger movie and stop going around in circles with your argument

And it was neither hawkeye nor loki's idea to attack the world with the chitauri it was the guy that sent loki for the tesseract that planned that attack. Loki has no business invading the world or why do you think thanos is growing impatient and leading an invasion himself if it's loki's objective?

badinfluence:
Err.. without hawkeye and all those, loki is still a threat to the avengers . And who turned hawkeye into a minion.. loki.. he chose to turn hawkeye to his minion because that was part of his plan. Thor attacked tony because he's thor, the same thor fought tony in the prequel. Loki is witty because that's his character.. always has been. Everyone knows loki isn't physical, but he gives the avengers a hard time. As for ultron being witty, it doesn't sit right. Imagine a superman movie with darkseid being all funny.. In the attempt to make a pop corn flick, marvel gave us a hot mess of a villain in ultron. Moreover watch thor and see the scheming nature of loki. And quicksilver's death was just an attempt to darken the movie. Moreover the character was insignificant and had to be killed off. To cap it all off, the almighty ultron was defeated by the babysitter vision.. really??

What? Loki would have still been a threat flash back after hulk slammed loki all over the room and the avengers gathered loki why didn't loki attack them or even try to run away? Because he was powerless

And without the sceptre loaned to him would loki have been able to turn hawkeye into a minion and you're not getting me yes hawkeye was a minion but every step loki took in the whole movie was hawkeye's idea despite being a mindless minion
Okay so thor just felt like attacking tony stark for no reason he wasn't provoked by tony tampering with the sceptre?
Quick silver's death came as a shock and as long as no one laughed when he died i will say they pretty much succeeded in darkening the movie
And why do you keep saying vision defeated ultron is it because he killed the last robot? You keep saying that and it doesn't make any sense

badinfluence:
I wonder how you rate villains. Your precious hawkeye was being controlled by loki. Loki is never known for brawn. He is the master of friggin mischief, he doesn't just attack. The look on the faces of the avengers when the comedian ultron showed up wasn't fear biko. Loki doesn't need to sell his bad guy image by making unnecessary kills. Loki is good at using pawns, which he did to your precious hawkeye.. don't rate villains in terms of brawn. After all batman's major nemesis is the joker and not grundy. You should follow the back stories of these characters and not judge with what you saw in avengers: age of kevin hart sorry ultron

My friend don't dance around the question

I asked what would have been of loki if not for hawk eye,the sceptre and the chitauris?
And answer these questions as well
Apart from getting himself captured deliberately please list perfect examples of which other acts of mischieve loki committed?

how does depending excessively on your henchmen make you good at using pawns?

yea hawk eye was under his spell but whose idea was it to hire the man power needed to attack the hellicarrier,establish loki's evil base,for loki to deliberately get himself captured to distract the avengers and buy some time and whose idea was it for the chitauris to attack newyork?

what was the look on the face of the avengers when ultron showed up? And why was thor so mad at tony stark when ultron left?

if loki was witty how come ultron was clownish?

when did i ever rate ultron using brawn? Didn't i specifically say that ultron was more of a schemer than a physical villain? The "unnecessary kills" and all was just me rating the villain according to how dangerous he was i hope that's a better way of rating villains?

badinfluence:
Na wa o. Hawk eye the main villain sha.. Loki was true to his character... cunning, witty, scheming. If you say he didn't give the avengers any worry.. please go re-watch the movie. He was cooler than ultron. If I never saw ultron in the comics, then I'd see him as an average villain.. nothing special about him in the movie. So you want to tell me with the chaos loki caused, people didn't die? Or you're talking about those unnecessary kills ultron had. Those were just silly attempts to to sell his bad guy image..

How was loki cunning? It was hawk eye's idea that loki deliberately got himself captured, and even worse black widow tricked him into revealing his plan on the hellicarrier? how was he scheming especially when Hawk eye planned everything, the sceptre was loaned to him as well as the chitauris and how can loki be witty for throwing punchlines around when the same attempt by ultron makes him a clown? Did you see the look on the avengers face when ultron first arrived how many people had that look on their faces for loki for God sakes a german senior civilian stood up to him how does that make him scary and how does killing von stryker and quicksilver unnecessary? Be that as it may how many "unnecessary kills" did loki commit to sell himself as a bad guy?
Perhaps you should watch avengers 1 again, the invasion had not a single casualty everyone was rescued unlike the ultrons attack where we saw countless people fall to their deaths or gravely injured



Just answer this question for me what would have been of loki if he had no chitauris or hawkeye or sceptre?

Csami:
Hawkeye? You're joking right!

Loki didn't scare anyone yet he was locked up in a cage meant for hulk.
Loki didn't scare anyone yet he controlled the aliens that came through the wormhole on flying jet ski.
Loki didn't scare anyone yet he has more kills than that comedian ultron.

If loki had not mind controlled hawkeye, don't you think hawkeye will have been clueless as some of our past president if left in charge?

Yes loki controlled hawkeye but everything else hawkeye did was pure instincts, the same thing he would have done if he was working for shield
The only reason they kept loki in that holding cell was because that was the only one available on the hellicarrier, and was loki controlling the chitauris from the wormhole? I am asking cause I never saw him give orders or attack anyone he just kept flying about and what skills did loki have apart from his loaned sceptre and his mirage act?
Loki was controlled all thru the movie by the alien who sent him to retrieve the tesseract and by hawkeye no plan was actually his the mind controlled dr selvig was even able to put a fail safe in the sceptre under loki's watchful eye

badinfluence:
Loki was way cooler than ultron biko. If you are familiar with the comic and animation depiction of ultron, then you'd know the movie ultron is synonymous with kevin hart

Loki was way cooler are u for real? Did loki kill anyone? Did loki destroy an entire city? Did loki even put fear or worry into the avengers the way ultron did?
If you ask me the main villain in the first avengers was hawk eye cause he called the shots all thru he stole materials for the tesseract he suggested the diversion, he led the attack on the heLlicarrier and even recruited soldiers to join loki how does that make loki cooler?

Okay let's assume you never saw ultron in the comic books, what do you think about him

badinfluence:
Ultron was a joke as a villain in the movie. He did nothing special except running his mouth. He was a huge disappointment

A joke? Are you serious? This guy destroyed a country and killed tons of people if he is a joke then what would you call loki or malaki?

brothers:
yet he can lift the mijolnir? that iron man couldn't

He is a shape shifter and stronger than everyone else its only logical

badinfluence:
Actually it took only vision(which is lame considering vision is like the avengers babysitter) . Ultron is meant to be synonymous with doom, but the ultron in the movie was more concerned with being a comedian. Moreover he was created by ant man but that's a story for another day..

Yes vision is stronger than all the avengers but defeating the robots saving civilians and avoiding further casualty is something he couldn't have handled himself he isn't a multi-tasker. And ultron is menacing and deadly enough so far in mcu there hasn't been any better villain

brothers:
That red guy shei na robot abi na asgardian?

he is vision from the comics and he is a droid

badinfluence:
I'm not talking about how it did in the market. If you actually are consistent with the comic universe, you'd know the movie was a big disappointment. Moreover it wasn't different from what we saw in the prequel. If you are familiar with the story of ultron, you'd know his depiction in the movie was a joke.

to me he was alright though he isn't the fighting type so i didn't expect much
he was more of a schemer and you know how that ended, it took 5 super heroes to beat him

badinfluence:
age of ultron flopped

Pls what exactly is your idea of a movie flopping
It made $1.3billion it,it holds a rating of over 70% if it was a flop then i wonder what you'll call a successful movie?

@mrmagoo
Seconded i loved this movie apart from the increase in action scenes
It went deeper into the story of the characters which made them more human
E.g: hawkeye's family, black widow and bruce banner,tony starks fear and mistakes etc
It was realistic enough to show that their actions had consequencies and actually caused casualties especially the hulk ironman fight in wakanda and for once not everyone loved them even though their actions were noble its synonymous to the U.S and their perception to the middle east
And don't get me started on ultron, he was a refreshing change to the MCU villain cluster he wasn't after some power source or world domination he just wanted peace and change which he resolved human extinction to be the only solution which made him more dangerous and upped the stakes in this movie, he wasn't the flashy look at me villain but more of a listen to me villain i really liked that about him marvel really tried this time, they really lived up to the hype

Are you kidding this movie was awesome

severee: Fela sef talk am say "if you suffer for world na your fault be that” observe the mentality of a Nigerian

1. When a Nigerian buys a newspaper he goes through the first few pages which cover terrorist attacks,political mayhem and poverty but when he gets to the IPOs and business ads he rips the paper up and wipe his a*ss with it

2. Nigerians use their upfront salary to buy a car ,rent an expensive flat and get married then when money finish, they go Nigerian standard of living sucks

3. When it comes to mingling in Nigeria Yorubas hate igbos ,igbos hate yorubas while Hausas hate them both then later they give the suffer head speech to succeed in Nigeria its who you know

4. Nigerians prefer to rent a house while building another house rather buying a house on mortgage while building another then they wonder why real properties belong only to rich people

5. Nigerians be like I can only take nollywood seriously when their movies start becoming more creative and competitive then half of a yellow sun and October 1st come out and then Nigerians be like mtchew I go come watch Nigerian film for cinema when alaba dey there

6. Nigerians be like Nigerians consume more than they produce Nigeria cant move forward if we import more than we produce then MINDA phones come out and d’banj brings out koko garri and Nigerians be like yeah right like I will risk MINDA phone exploding in my ear and d’banj dey sell garri when e mates dey win grammy

7. Nigerians be like security in the country is very poor what is government doing bla bla but when security announcements or programmes are on tv they be like f*ck this sh*t I’m watching a telemundo

8.Nigerians grumble about how we suck at soccer but then when NPL is on Nigerians be like mtchew EPL wannabe I don’t watch such

9. Nigerians be like I’m tired of the hardship in this country and the solution is to forge account papers and travel papers ,get out of the country then go assume a dead persons identity or contract a bride to fool authorities into granting me citizenship,after all that they begin to wonder why the nation is so corrupt

10. Nigerians be like 70% of Nigerians live in poverty and deprivation how many people can boast of eating three square meals then NGOs/charity organizations come up and Nigerians be like SCAM!

11. Nigerians complain of how dirty and disgusting Nigerian environment looks then they slam dunk a plastic bottle in the middle of the road then take a piss in a nearby gutter and sleep during sanitation days

12. World bank calls Nigerian economy the largest in Africa and Nigerians be like mtchew largest economy where the people survive on less than $5 a day bla bla then they wonder why foreigners(who took advantage of the opportunity) boss them around in their own country

Moral of the story: do your part and appreciate progress even though as you say they are mediocre, sometimes in life it’s the little things that pack the biggest punch.

Happy independence day

long post pretty meaningless though whats your point?

5minsmadness: You eat ceramic plates?

actually he is trying to say he doesn't like any of it.
I like that type of winding

@magoo mtchew! So if I seat you down and start telling you that I can fly and grow plants on my head what you are trying to say is that as long as you are entertained by my lies I am a stellar person right? If you didn't think skyfall was unrealistic why not try explaining what happened to bond in istanbul simple.

mr.magoo:
Answer to your question guess what? It is a freaking james bond movie not grey's anatomy it is what we have come to expect from james bond movies for 50 years you shd be used to it
James bond has survived a free off a plane with no parachute in moonraker
James bond has survived a 50 ft fall off a balloon in the world is not enough
James bond and survived a car crash three times in casino royale , goldfinger and licensed to kill
James bond has stayed under water with out an oxygen tank for hours in a view to a kill
James bond survived another free fall unto sharp rocks in quantum of solace
James bond has survived plane crashes in you only live twice and golden eye respectively

So if bond surviving the istanbul shooting in skyfall is actually your problem then I guess you aren't so familiar with bond movies afterall

Hehehe so you know that skyfall is unrealistic and fake so what then do you people now like about this movie

kobosmart: Oh yea and lemme add that in the istanbul shooting
-Bond was shot with a poisonous bullet in the shoulder
-Bond was shot in the stomach with a long range snipers rifle and u know how long those bullets can be
-bond fell off a speeding train head first 100 ft into a lake which from that distance rather feels like a rock rather than water
-bond then fell thru a water fall probably to sharp rocks at the bottom
- and finally bond's body sank into a lake(wonder why it was that deep in the first place)

So think well before explaining one of the world's. Greatest wonders
God bless u as u try

Well I think it was a dream, that would explain why M didn't have a swam of helicopters try to stop the assassin in turkey or why 007 woke up on some tropical resort and why he isn't really annoyed with moneypenny or M hell he even tried to sleep with moneypenny doesn't look like something I would do to someone who almost killed me

33117: Ans: Q gave bond a portable motorbike set which bond took out of his pocket and inflated it was off camera tho.

Now my question, why wasn't moneypenny able to shoot the assassin at the bridge @ point blank range did he spray on some kind of bullet repellent that kept deflecting the bullets I just don't get it

Ans: no rather the bridge was made of magnets which attracted all the bullets allowed non of them touch the assassin


Question: why the Bleep was no one interested in following silva's plot, the casino security, the disgusting lizard even the assassin at istanbul THEY ALL TRIED TO KILL BOND" didn't they know they weren't supposed to.

oga no dey office boredom wan kill me o, now time for one of my most timeless hobbies which is "INSULTING SKYFALL"(applause) now let's have a skyfall quiz we put out questions about the shameful movie and then someone answers it
Just make sure the question opens anoda angle on why the movie is so terrible.#OYA
In istanbul how come someone conveniently left a motorbike with full tank and good tires unattended so that bond could steal it?

I'm not really sure of Dr.no and goldfinger but thunderball made a billion , you remember thrunderball crappy movie almost few steps close to utter 5 year old disaster like skyfall about nuclear missiles and jet packs and a boring water fight

mr.magoo:
skyfall is a classic, it is so wierd how much hate this movie is getting so what do you now like? Is it that dreadful quantum of solace or the overhyped casino royale where the faith of the world laid in the 10:1 chance of bond getting an ace of spades flush lol

Skyfall is a wannabe classic this movie was so forced and rushed with cheap cheap gimmicks every single bond ritual didn't go un-performed they forced in big shot scenes from every successful movie you know then gave it some kind of pretentious realistic gritty feel with fine camera abeg anybody can do that jare not particularly a classic not even qualified as a good movie

Venting and time to relax by taking out my frustration on the worst bond movie ever. I am tackling number 1-daniel craig performance:
Really I don't know if to blame the script or daniel craig. But this was daniel craig's worst performance it was so inconsistent, one minute he is daniel craig then he sean connery then he realizes oops I'm supposed to be roger moore in this scene it confused everyone so much so that everyone didn't even understand his emotions in this movie
Daniel craig is daniel craig the bad asssss bond hit man with emotions, he is not a campy actor neither is he a romantic. The only funny one liner daniel craig has ever dropped that worked was when he fondly noted M as his mother figure in QOS apart from that every single one liner is just an embarrassment he was trying to be suave and elegant but that failed too cause he is kinda ugly. womanizing? oh God the man rushes thru all the sex scenes like the ladies have some kinda STD I noticed it in casino royale and QOS , so daniel craig.playing pierce brosnan pornnstarr was also a bad idea. And in this movie daniel craigs dialogue is so slow and choreographed I noticed that in the car with moneypenny. then it just went on and on. Then daniel craigs action expressions were pretty lazy here like when he was shot he didn't even nurse the pain he just kept moving like nothing happened when he was even wrestling patrice on the train daniel craig isn't even panting or acting exhausted after the rigorous chase that preceded their clash,during the evaluation scenes when bond is doing the pull ups he doesn't even look like he is straining himself no vein popping out ,wow this is quite odd considering the fact that in his previous entries daniel craig always paid attention to details like after every fight scene he is always panting, looking around the area to see if anyone saw him just commit murder and his face always looks like he needs a doctor but in skyfall bond is supposed to be the man of steele so no human element for daniel craig here. I know I shouldn't have noticed all these but I just had to I was freaking bored and had to find something to keep me glued to the screen perhaps its the director that sucks at character interpretation who knows?

.