₦airaland Forum

ejimatic:
. Waec brought one which was conducted by Cambridge A level .It was said in the court that Mohammed and Mohaammodu refer to same person as long as the contents are smilar.. So the summation is. certificate was not available when filing the firm but it is available e now

ejimatic:
. Spelling is important in documents. it can make a person two

ejimatic:
. The army wrote letter of attestation on his result. WAEC tendered one from Cambridge.... It is still in order.....Affidavit was used to fill in the form.. the certificate has been produced now

ejimatic:
. It was said in the court that Mohammed and Mohaammodu refer to same person as long as the contents are smilar.. So the summation is. certificate was not available when filing the firm but it is available e now

ejimatic:
. The interpretation is. the result was not available at the time of filling his form ..Now it is available and tendered in court. ...it is still in order.

ejimatic:
. Affjdavit is a legal document that covers every situation.. It is a representation of what is true....The copy of what he presented support the breakdown in the affidavit or its content .It is still in order in law.

ejimatic:
. Go online you will see the copy if his A level cerficate presented in court....even if he went to NDA and used its certificate he qualified to contest..... Buhari academic qualification will be the first to be struck out by the tribunal

ejimatic:
. Your opinion is respected.However Buhari used affidavidavit in the first term which is binding in the law.He used same for the second term on the ground that his result is missing. During the hearing he brought a copy of his result.... it is in order in law. So Buhari satisfied the requirement to contest before and after the election.

garfield1:
Nothing is fundamentally flawed.you are just trying to twist things or rather deliberately misunderstand issues.i will engage you in this argument not to just educate you but others because while you are learning,others are reading and appreciating.when you comment,know that others are reading and learning hence the dragging and insulting comments you received.

I will use myself as an example.i am contesting for elections but i lost my originals and photocopies but i swore an affidavit attesting that to that and that i am educated up to secondary school cert level.an opponent drags me to court saying that i did not attach my certs and qualifications to the inec form cf001,therefore i dont have the nevessary certs and am not qualified.he did not plead forgery.what am i to do? how do i prove to the court that i am qualified and that indeed i was possessed the documents i claimed to get.i have to go to my former school to get an attestation from them,a picture or proof that i wrote waec there or was in class 5.some of my class mates at then were brought to testify in my favour,a broadsheet,attestation letters and transcripts from waec and neco are brought to the court.

There are three differsnt results and one has my name fully.i have proven that i wrote waec and was educated up to school cert level.if the certs were forged or any discrepancy noticed,it cannot be entertained by the as what was pleaded was non qualification and not forgery.



You do not know the word compelling,just accept it.or lets say strong.adeleke case was stronger,he almost won.he won the main election,was declared winner by the tribunal,proved clearly to the tribunal that there were errors in the result sheets,proved to the court that cancelled units were done by the rec instead of presiding officers.what has atiku successfully proven?

ejimatic:
. Affjdavit is a legal document that covers every situation.. It is a representation of what is true....The copy of what he presented support the breakdown in the affidavit or its content .It is still in order in law.

tuniski:
Buhari didn't tender any results at the filing of his form and even on commencement of trial in march but, suddenly came up with a bogus result during the pendency of trial. Such procurement of evidence is flawed in law. It is of no effect and value let alone the numerous contradictions therein.

ejimatic:
Buhari did not present three certificates bearing different names.Let leave sentiments. He is educationally qualified to contest in view of the constitutional requirement to contest as the president.....Section 140 of the constitution says ....educated to the secondary school level or it's equivalent....The result he used which was also tendered in court qualifies him to contest....

Afamed:
Hypocrite. Did Buhari tell you that he submitted his certificate with the army?

ejimatic:
Buhari did not present three certificates bearing different names.Let leave sentiments. He is educationally qualified to contest in view of the constitutional requirement to contest as the president.....Section 140 of the constitution says ....educated to the secondary school level or it's equivalent....The result he used which was also tendered in court qualifies him to contest....

Afamed:
Will you be bold enough to accept whichever way the court verdict goes in the next few days?

Afamed:
Jonathan also raised certificate before he withdrew the case at the 11th hour

Afamed:
Ignore Engineerboat. I have sampled the guy yesterday. He's not just wack but totally empty.
Just few days from now, Atiku case will be thrown out of court for lack of merit and frivolous claims. You can bookmark this thread

Afamed:
The problem with both of you. The day Atiku case is thrown out of court for lack of merit and frivolous claims. Democracy will suddenly under threat

Cajal:
..in fact his witness worked significantly against Atiku

tuniski:
I am too evolved beyond your exuberance!

tuniski:
Hey stop coaching. I am at liberty to support anyone's position at anytime. He took his time to update and those without updates are simply using foul languages as argument just so they may make comments.

In the matter at hand, the written addresses were in response to what happened at the trial with judicial references. Each party responded to one another's grounds why not folks here stick to what is now in the open but, simply insult.

Buhari is already the president and the worst that can happen to atiku/pdp has already happen any ruling that addresses the grievances of the petitioner will be massive even if buhari's victory is affirmed.

As an evolved man, I take most insulting comments to be from younger generations aka youth. Some days in the future, they will become measured in utterance rather than exuberant!

garfield1:
Mere hearsays and speculations backed with no evidencial facts.no documentary proofs that his parents are nigerians,even his two witnessed failed him.he has failed to prove that hes a nigerian by birth.

all he needed to do was to present the dates of birth of his parents,friends or peer group of his parents,witnesses that knew his parents,his uncles and aunties,his date of birth and clear evidences that jada was never in cameroun.

garfield1:
Did you teach me anything in osun? Am the teacher and will always tutor you.

If atiku presented the above,it means that he has conceded to not being a citizen by birth but now expecting the tribunal to use this outdated provision to rescue him.funny enough,it still doesnt make him a citizen by birth

Rochasstatue:
Your views are pedestrian and solely fit for comedy.
The court can't fill the blank spaces for you.
In a matter of weeks we will read the ruling of the PEPT and your dance steps will change.
None of Atiku's 63 witnesses offered a coherent unimpeachable testimony in court.
Atiku never called a single witness to attest to his citizenship and did not even mention it in their adopted closing briefs.
Every leg on which they premised their plea was shaky and decrepit.
Anyway you have a right to keep dreaming and continue this unending recourse to vigorous intellectual masturbation.
Atiku can't and won't cum!

focus7:
Op your sentimental opinion does not count, we wait for tribunal judgement.

agabusta:
You are the one that is expressing thoughts gathered from a non conscious state. Continue in your foolery, your food go soon done.

garfield1:
Mere hearsays and speculations backed with no evidencial facts.no documentary proofs that his parents are nigerians,even his two witnessed failed him.he has failed to prove that hes a nigerian by birth.

all he needed to do was to present the dates of birth of his parents,friends or peer group of his parents,witnesses that knew his parents,his uncles and aunties,his date of birth and clear evidences that jada was never in cameroun.

garfield1:
Mere hearsays and speculations backed with no evidencial facts.no documentary proofs that his parents are nigerians,even his two witnessed failed him.he has failed to prove that hes a nigerian by birth.

all he needed to do was to present the dates of birth of his parents,friends or peer group of his parents,witnesses that knew his parents,his uncles and aunties,his date of birth and clear evidences that jada was never in cameroun.