₦airaland Forum

iloveyou82:
as i told you before, nothing to defend, atiku witness has already done the defence, the case has be concluded that inec did not conduct the election electronically

You keep jumping from one moniker to another.

Nobody takes you serious.

Concluded you say, yet keep opening threads about on PEPT,

Why not have you seat and watch as events unfold at the tribunals.

iloveyou82:
that is what i told tuniski and engineerboat

Keep mutiplying monikers

I dont find this funny.

How will a teacher ask his student this kind of Question in writting examination for a primary school.

The question:

Write.

FIFTY THREE DAYS NO SALARY


Surprising the date is so another case 53rd June 2019


Which state could this be Nairalanders

Ao INEC cannot bend rule in NE, NW, NC but strictly follow their guidelines in Sw, se, ss

So INEC must tell the court they allow that and they must pbe able to defend the discrepancies

rkennyking:
OK SCR is legal because its within freehand of INEC and also I think there is a legislation to it already. But this is what I see , places where INEC could use SCR but failed to use maybe cancelled and places where its not possible they have to result to incident form. I mean normally its okay to use SCR in Lagos but some places in north its not possible so are we going to disenfranchised those people ?? No but we can have plans to suite this situations which is what INEC did. Borno with lot of terrorism destruction in place can't use SCR or electronic transmission successful. This is the issue . but the problem with transmission is different because the legislation is clear on that, only manual is recognized. If we did use manual transmission successful all over the country we can't use electronic transmission successfully hence the only one we can rely on is manual still

Let me gove you a case study.

Where I voted.

The SCR could not authenticate a single voter and at the end The PO and APO waited for replacement, when its getting certain no replacement is forthcoming they said ewe should vote once we can recognize our name from the list.

To my suprise on getting to collation centre, whooas, where SCR could not authenticate voter, such unit amount to zero.

How do you see that

rkennyking:
so for as long as its not a legal thing then it can't be forced on Inec. Moreover transmission require legislation everything inec do requires. Else it will be nullified. The law of Nigeria only recognized manual transmission go and read up the constitution bro

Does the usage of SCR to authenticate voter require legislative approval

rkennyking:
the usage of SCR is with INEC prerogative so its left to them to determine. Its not legal that is what we are saying transmission too is not legal. See the whole verification done on election day can be jettisoned In court by good lawyers . all this SCR and co are all a support system and INec is very careful with them. Yes they may have transmitted election electronically but constitutionally the result can only be recognized when transmitted manually

CAN you say.

For your information, INEC cancel several polling units because card readers could not authenticate Voters, I am a witness to this.

Even while announcing result, they had to cancel where card readers could not be used.

But you will agree with me, whatever guidelines INEC laid down also have a vital effect on the outcome of the election.

You cannot agree that SCR is not legal, and at the same time the major means of authenticating voters.

rkennyking:
Smart card Readers are very different from electronic transmission. The purpose of SCR was contended in court in past election and we all see the result. Which was why incident form was introduced. You see one thing we all after recognize is that election in Nigeria is manual and anything that conflict with that is defeated. If we use any electronic advancements it should assist the manual not jettison it for now. So if manual transmission produce Buhari then E-voting can only corroborate that or it will be discarded. Its just like any new laws in Nigeria that conflicts with existing laws will be discarded for sure

So inec can cancel a polling unit because they did use SCR while they turn blind to its non usage in some area right

rkennyking:
but still the result recognized legally will always be manual. If we are going to have a E-voting system we can't go on this way. Because if manual and electronic transmission have this much discrepancies then we give excuse to fault E-voting process. Apparently they can blame discrepancies on hacking , lack of technical know how and other things

Is SCR recognized in our electoral law

rkennyking:
no you are the one missing the point . when the INEC Rac-Tech team you alleged imputed all the counted votes into the INEC SCR as alleged by you are Nigerians there ?? Any form of transmission that is not clearly recognized and agreed to by voters is nulled. I voted and I only witnessed vote counting and input of result in the result form which is used for the manual counting. Anything but that is nulled. Yes Inec might use electronic privately for any purpose known yo inec but that can't displace the authentic result from manual transmission. Vote is a manual thing in Nigeria , this is why the incidence form was introduced you can't disenfranchised a Nigerian just because of an electronic device no.

It's part of INEC internal control mechanism.

Are you saying its the counted vote that eventual gets to Abuja.

Lots of padding by crooked officials

garfield1:
Oh,so polling unit results are so important and you didnt advice atiku to use them

As usual, you come here to show your true colour.

Cancelling osun PU result is legal

While cancelling Akpabio PU result is illegal.

Keep living in your fool paradise

garfield1:
Seems your living there already.the constitution which is supreme says manual accreditation is s must boy

Go to the court and stop ranting here

plaindealer:
There's no need for INEC to break a sweat over a crumbled and DOA case based on den say den say INEC get server but no proof. Even the so called SCAM expert failed to INEC server, juts den say den say about obtained rubbish from another website.


Look here, server or no server, it is against the law to transmit election results electronically so whatever server or results atiku obtained from the Dark Web is rubbish, it's inadmissible and at the end of the day won't be admissible and eventually thrown out like bad akpu..

Is SCR in our law.

How INEC mandated all its PO AND APO where SCR is mot used, suh result stand cancelled

Mylove55:
as the op succinctly put it, inec and APC don't have anything to defend, PDP witnesses were the ones that boxed themselves into one corner.
As you can see, anybody can formulate result and to be trance to inec server without an evidence,
Anybody can also create website today and claim to be ICT expert from USA that he has trance his website to inec server.

And this was the main reason we can never transmit result or conduct election electronically.
Nigeria politicians will abuse the process

Alright tell INEC and APC not to put up any defense

tuniski:
Oh so cancelation of result is an ilegality? God punish devil the curious case of Osun. Oyetola/apc you see yourselves.

Anyway, they ain't the same thing. No election yet result were cooked up by Apkabio. SCR accreditation 19k+ yet the disgraced akpabio of the infamous warsaw came up with magical 61k+ for only himself.

He was even presenting impostor as agent. Akpabio did not only lose fairly, he is burying whatever remains of his dying political clout.

He will come to spin this i know,

He had been caught in his webcage.

Osun cacellation Legal

Akpabio cancellation (Where a ward collation officer cannot account for unit result) is illegal

Garfield1 is on somthing

garfield1:
There the same thing my friend.based on latest supreme court judgment,courts do not look at or care whether votes are legitimate,rigged,inflwted or phantom but how well election processes were followed.i know you wont read as usual but for legal righteousness,read the ruling on otti vs ikpeazu and inec 2015

Was Osun vote cancellation legal

Dahun

garfield1:
Tuniski,its still the same thing.no wonder you are silent.results were illegally canceled by returning official instead of polling officials.secondly,cancellations were done based on card readetlr reports instead of msnual register.

Three things will happen.essien udim results restored and akpabio declared winner or a rerun in essien udim or a total rerun.up apc

INEC regulation says, no voter card verification no results

Stop living in fool paradise

garfield1:
Tuniski,its still the same thing.no wonder you are silent.results were illegally canceled by returning official instead of polling officials.secondly,cancellations were done based on card readetlr reports instead of msnual register.

Three things will happen.essien udim results restored and akpabio declared winner or a rerun in essien udim or a total rerun.up apc

How is result illegally cancelled

How fo you collate ward result without polling unit result.

No where to be found

Who does that

oglalasioux:
There's a thread on front page reporting the opposite.

Dont mind them,

The moment i see the thread i know its faksehood

tuniski:
garfield1 senatordave1 abi genelpatton come and see your folly.

For where theybare still looking for another false news in supprort of akpabio

plaindealer:
Atiku and his experts, roadside SANs and witnesses closed their doomed case without producing any concrete and factual evidence about the existence of INEC server or that INEC used servers to conduct and transmit election results, but you want INEC to help you prove that INEC used servers to transmit election results?

How smart are you gan sef?

You will be a good witness for inec.


Contact them that you're a good witnesss on this case

MetaPhysical:
You should be able to answer this simple question independent of INEC appearance.

Any document not authenticated by electoral authority is not admissible as legitimate record.

Is the record in Atiku's possession authentic?

I never went to law school but is obvious to see that that Atiku's case can be punctured using technicalities to test its validity.

Im sure the lagal counsels all know this, but they are paid in hours. Why rush to end the contract?

The case is before the Judge

Let INEC come and defend himself.

We will meet during cross-examination.

Case closed

Mylove55:
only rivers were not uploaded, so how come thief atiku got the result of 35 States and fct even as thief atiku himself admitted that card reader were not used in all polling unit.
So who gave thief atiku such fraudulent server result

Since you dont understand

There is difference between card reader failure to authenticate Your card or finger and Uploading of result after voting

MetaPhysical:

Is the result presented by Atiku authentic?

Let INEC come and explain itself,

We'll meet at Cross-examination,

We cannot help INEC build their case,

But we wull help them during their defense.

Till then, APC robots, enjoy your propaganda

tuniski:
On diligent understanding you are spot on. The apc goons have launch media propaganda as if the website was the inec server deceiving gullible fans of theirs.

The content in the website has been expertly traced to inec via an inec-ict whistle blower.

They are disappointed

INEC had been boxed to a corner

APC warriors are expecting something like

1. This is the INEC official
2. This is the server location
3. This is how we got into the server
4. This is when and when the server was this and that.

APC dondees, that is not how it happen in this case, youre disappointed.

Let INEC come and defend, then we will meet during cross-examination

Mylove55:
you are the one that lack understanding, The witness admitted that the site they are parading were not inec site, and they fraudulently created their own site on March 12 after the said election on Feb 23. And the whistle blower deceived thief atiku that their site located inec server. What a criminal minded ipob just to defraud thief atiku

The time it was created is immaterial let INEC come and explain itself

You can as well serve as INEC witness

Mylove55:
you are the one that lack understanding, The witness admitted that the site they are parading were not inec site, and they fraudulently created their own site on March 12 after the said election on Feb 23. And the whistle blower deceived thief atiku that their site located inec server. What a criminal minded ipob just to defraud thief atiku

You're the one living in full paradise on this issue.


This had shown you know next to nothing on rhis case

Mylove55:
but thief atiku fraudulent server imputed result for APC and PDP in all region, both where SCR were not used.
This is just a prove that inec never transmitted result with card reader to their server, and thief atiku were scam with those his fraudulent server result.
tuniski can also understand the truth.

Let INEC come and make their defense.


Not on nairaland

Afamed:
Whose witness provided the site above? I thought you were intelligent enough before

And the witness said this is INEC server

Olodo ni he


You lack proper and diligent understanding

rinzaugustine:
Dont mind the kids typing rubbish.The case is a simple one.Atiku said there is a server INEC said there is none.Atiku applies to inspect servers and govt organization INEC refused.Issues were joined and so based on law if issues are joined application will not be granted.Under the irrebutable presumption section of the evidence act,if you withhold or refuse to release evidence the law deems it that the evidence is not favorable to you particularly in a civil case where the court looks at preponderance of evidence.Olanipekun wanted to cross examine the server expert on information within a server that is outside his custody which he smartly declined.This is what will be covered in the final address after the defense open and close their case.Dont mind all these fake and APC sponsored journalism meant for ignorant and lazy youths and people who had never to the courtroom

What can I give you this evening..

This e-apc online robots are just not normal at all

baganas:
Inec chairman has already clarified that pilot(test)electronic collation was used in some selected states and polling units. But the results so collated is not complete as well as illegal for use as evidence in a court of law. Remember electronic transmission and collation is not approve by the existing electoral act. This is just a pilot excersise for future use

Same way as SCR was not in out electoral law.

However in some region NO SCR no vote

But in some region anything goes

MetaPhysical:
At the moment, the bottomline is the server result possessed by Atiku and which formed the material for this petition is a falsified/forged document.

If proven that Atiku presented falsified information he will be banned from ever running for elective office under the Electoral Act.

He could also be prosecuted if care is not taken....

How is it falsified.

Has INEC make their defense

Are you the tribunal judge.

Metaphysical indeed