Politics › Re: Court Asked To Sack Adeleke As Senator, Order Salary Refund by engineerboat(m): 9:03am On Apr 27, 2019 |
Gforce2019: Lawyer in the house, can this be the judgement...
What I'm seeing here is letter from the plaintiffs to summon .. . I may be wrong.
Pls barrister help. This is called jankara APC goose chase. The same bwari judgement had been appealed already. APC yet to file their response to the Appeal. Yet the same APC went back to the same high court to file another summon. Yeye dey smell. APC tueeeeeeeeee Shameful set of individuals |
Politics › Re: Court Asked To Sack Adeleke As Senator, Order Salary Refund by engineerboat(m): 7:23am On Apr 27, 2019 |
BuhariAdvocate: But why media not carry this news since April 2nd.well that's great news. They should also send him to jail that would serve warning to other people try to forge certificate. Which news That the bwari judgement had been appealed |
Politics › Re: Court Asked To Sack Adeleke As Senator, Order Salary Refund by engineerboat(m): 7:22am On Apr 27, 2019 |
Goose chase again
A judgement in appeal court for appeal
APC and bwari high court make una continue una foolish journey |
Politics › Re: "Atiku's Server" Shows Buhari Garnered Over 1.5 Million Votes In South East by engineerboat(m): 12:59pm On Apr 26, 2019 |
ChristianNorth: I am not here to trade insults, challenging the legality of the use of card readers is challenging the validity of the election itself.
Show me where the Electoral Act specifically condemned electronic transmission. None. Our law is silent on that, so INEC can claim they issued that guideline pursuant to their powers to do that.
Why didn't the NASS act to change sequence of the election successful?
It is prejudice to the power of INEC to issue guidelines. Use of card readers is a valid INEC guideline and since this guideline wasn't challenged before the election, there is no ground to challenge it again after the election.
INEC guidelines are purely pre-election matter. Zombie before election: NASS cannot dictate to INEC the guidelines to use. They can n use anything they like. Leave the. Alone. Zombie after election: INEC guidelines must not contradict of constitution Shameless set of individuals |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 12:22pm On Apr 26, 2019 |
garfield1: I think you are the one that needs to read it.and then send to your fellow dollar hungry wailers Since your pay master Fraudstus Otobo Mumuyamo is now the led counsel for both INEC and APC we'll be glad to have him engage us in the court next adjuned date. I rest my case for now on you. You're just a small boy |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 12:20pm On Apr 26, 2019 |
garfield1: I think you are the one that needs to read it.and then send to your fellow dollar hungry wailers For the last time. You're just a small boy, Your noise master Fraudstus Otobo Mumuyamo can only rant on Twitter but will ever remain behind in the Court room like a woman who's husband had just married 2nd wife |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 12:18pm On Apr 26, 2019 |
garfield1: Atiku has failed. Zombie usual trait. Result to abuse. I'm not worried about your case. Toju iwa omode yi, n ba ho lo ri yen |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 12:13pm On Apr 26, 2019 |
NgeneUkwenu: Lol! The court is not a father Christmas, they can't give you what you didn't plead for.
Why am I even wasting my time with an unlearned fellow? I am now fully convinced that you have not read Atiku petition. No wonder you're making unfounded claims here GOH |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 12:12pm On Apr 26, 2019 |
garfield1: You are at the losing end as usual. Go back and read Atiku Petition and stop fooling yourself. Aren't surprise why your master are hiding the real ingredient of the petition form you all. You all need to cover your eyes in shame |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 12:11pm On Apr 26, 2019 |
garfield1: Nobody is accusing inec of over voting.if card reader records are brought out,it will indict atiku more because actual votes will be lower Go back and read Atiku petition and stop displaying incoherent comment here |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 12:10pm On Apr 26, 2019 |
ChristianNorth: Stay away from my mentions, you argue incoherently.
How man petitions did Atiku submitted? Don't mind him. He move from an incoherent comment to another one. That's one of his trait. I'm not surprised |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 12:09pm On Apr 26, 2019 |
garfield1: That is not a ground for non compliance moreover the guidelines was majorly followed.most votes not accredited were canceled affecting both candidates. Moat vote. INEC never said Most Vote. All vote not accredited by Card reader. Meaning INEC will tell the court how many voters were reader |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 12:01pm On Apr 26, 2019 |
garfield1: Inec by now would have compromised every thing or sorted out itself hence the delay.over voting can be constitutionally established if votes are more than those in the register which isn't the case. INEC had been cought red-handed no way of escape for them. |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 12:00pm On Apr 26, 2019 |
Emedu: CARD Reader is not illegal but only limited for the accreditation of voters to avoid over voting. Transmission of results by any means other than the manual method is strange to our Constitution. And INEC will show to the court the Accredited votes right from card reader. |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 11:58am On Apr 26, 2019 |
OAUTemitayo: It is better to allow Atikulooters to debate nonsense among themselves till the election petition tribunal throw the useless heap of rubbish Atiku called 'petition' into the dustbin of history. Arguing with them is just a mere academic exercise, their brain is full of mud! Zombie have nothing upstairs so they always think other people are like them. I'm sorry for your current situation Sorry ghen |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 11:55am On Apr 26, 2019 |
garfield1: Inec will still not defend it vigorously.that clause is not sufficient to be a ground for substantial non compliance.finally,even if card readers are admitted,its data will be limited to the less than 1000 units atiku pleaded Remember PDP/ATIKU had thrown the ball to INEC now, INEC is in dilemma already. They will have to bring out the report of those card readers. Remember the card readers had been calibrated for governorship election, but that not before all it's data had been harvested into their central database. Are you aware about that. Or that is also non-existent also |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 11:53am On Apr 26, 2019 |
garfield1: So its no more about server results? You're a small boy. Just watch by the sideline. The elders in this matter are talking. APC, INEC and BUHARI are been stretched and pinned to a corner without them knowing. You will not see that coming anyway because your pay master will not let you think on that |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 11:51am On Apr 26, 2019 |
Backed by Section 52 of the Electoral Act, INEC decides the guidelines to use in conducting elections and in 2019, e-collation was used and no law prohibits the use of e-collation. |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 11:49am On Apr 26, 2019 |
Section 52 of the Electoral Act says that
“voting at an election shall be in accordance with the procedure determined by the Independent National Electoral Commission.”
Even If INEC says it is using palm kernels for fingerprints. |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 11:46am On Apr 26, 2019 |
NgeneUkwenu: So INEC Chairman press releases supercede the Constitution and the electoral laws?
Daftness! Men and women are talking who is this |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 11:46am On Apr 26, 2019 |
I personally listen to the INEC chairman string clearly that only voted recognized by Card reader will be Counted as real result.
This is where INEC will also need to explain.
How where they able to ascertain the actually accredited voters by Card Reader.
Isn't it from their Card Reader Data base.
Hmmmm. |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 11:44am On Apr 26, 2019 |
The kernel of the atiku petition isn't the e-collation results, it's the number of accredited voters vis a vis the number of votes.
Inec regulation clearly states that any PU where the votes outstrip accredited voters will be voided |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 11:43am On Apr 26, 2019 |
I sincerelly appreciate how ATIKU is giving the following a run of their live.
1. INEC 2. APC 3. BUHARI
a hard but to crack from all possible front |
Politics › Re: Will Supreme Court Judgment On Wike On Card Reader Be Relevant In Atiku's Case? by engineerboat(m): 11:40am On Apr 26, 2019 |
Ratello: I need brilliant and unbiased analyses from our learned gentlemen in the house please on this. ChristianNorth, engineerboat, tuniski, wiseandtrue, etc oya come and contribute Good morning in making contribution I will quote INEC chairman statements The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has confirmed that anyone whose Permanent Voter Card (PVC) is not recognised by the Smart Card Reader will not be allowed to vote.
Professor Mahmood Yakubu, the INEC Chairman, said this on Thursday in Abuja during a press briefing on the commission’s readiness to conduct the rescheduled presidential and National Assembly elections on Saturday, February 23, 2019.
He also answered questions on the logistics preparations for the elections.
He said: "The commission has operated under the policy that no citizen can vote without the PVC issued by the commission and read by the smart card reader.
“Having announced the total number of registered voters and their distribution by age, gender and occupation, citizens deserve the right to know how many PVCs have been collected across the country.
"The last date for the collection of PVCs was Monday 11th February 2019. Out of the 84,000,484 registered voters, the total number of PVCs collected stands at 72,775,585, which represents 86.3% of the total PVCs produced. Detailed breakdown and percentages of collection on state-by-state basis have been published on our website few minutes ago."
In the 2015 elections, electoral officers had to resort to the manual process as the card readers failed to read the PVCs.
In fact, former President Goodluck Jonathan and his wife, Patience Jonathan, spent more than almost an hour at their polling station in Otuoke, Bayelsa State, as at least four card readers failed to capture. He was eventually accredited to vote manually without a card reader. |
Politics › Re: VIDEO: INEC Chairman Admits Sending Presidential Results To Central Server by engineerboat(m): 9:06pm On Apr 25, 2019 |
Pentasoft1978: Fool...so when did the INEC chairman withdraw his statement that he won't do it again Zombie is a dangerous and deadly disease |
Politics › Re: VIDEO: INEC Chairman Admits Sending Presidential Results To Central Server by engineerboat(m): 9:05pm On Apr 25, 2019 |
garfield1: I was going through the Presidential election result that was released by Atiku's legal team this evening which was said to be hacked from INEC server. My attention was first directed to Anambra state where Buhari got 333, 710 votes. How could that be possible ? Peter Obi's state ? The heart beat of Igbo land. Thesame state where Buhari got 17,926 votes in 2015 ? So what gave rise to over 1800% vote increment in 2019 ? I now took my time to do the breakdown of number of votes Buhari got from South East:
Anambra: 333,710 votes Abia: 198,391 votes Ebonyi: 291,846 votes Enugu: 267,821 votes Imo: 423,801 votes TOTAL: 1,515,569 votes.
From the analysis, it shows 1,515,569 easterners voted for Buhari. How could that be possible ? Same Buhari that is always vilified by the Igbos on social media. ? Same Buhari that was rejected by Ohanenze Ndigbo ? Same Buhari that has been labeled an arch-enemy of Igbos? Same Buhari that Nnamdi Kanu openly told his followers not to vote for ? Same Buhari that that experienced poor turnouts during his campaign in South East. ? Is it not surprising ?
Let's take a look at how South East voted for Buhari in 2015:
Enugu: 14,157 votes Anambra: 17,926 votes Abia: 13,394 votes Imo:133,253 votes Ebonyi: 19,518 votes TOTAL: 198,248 votes
So Buhari's popularity grew by over 1800% votes in South East within the space of 4 years!!!!
MY CONCLUSION: Atiku's server result is fake. I assume the result was prepared prior to election based on their Forecast, because no sensible person would believe that Buhari amassed over 1.5 million votes in South East. You have a problem |
Politics › Re: "Atiku's Server" Shows Buhari Garnered Over 1.5 Million Votes In South East by engineerboat(m): 8:57pm On Apr 25, 2019 |
garfield1: Where are the polling unit tabulation With the court. Go and collect it from them |
Politics › Re: "Atiku's Server" Shows Buhari Garnered Over 1.5 Million Votes In South East by engineerboat(m): 8:56pm On Apr 25, 2019 |
Tospringe: Lol... You are the one obviously having a high BP here. I have busted your ego over your fake excel sheet that has been given you joy. Shame! You will be a good sacrificial lamb for Wole Olanipekun to use. |
Politics › Re: "Atiku's Server" Shows Buhari Garnered Over 1.5 Million Votes In South East by engineerboat(m): 8:46pm On Apr 25, 2019 |
Tospringe: I'm even surprised PDP fans are already showboating on twitter as if Atiku has already won the court case. However, the hacked result is obviously fake Case already in court stop having sleepless night It will give you HBP |
Politics › Re: "Atiku's Server" Shows Buhari Garnered Over 1.5 Million Votes In South East by engineerboat(m): 8:45pm On Apr 25, 2019 |
Tospringe: I was going through the Presidential election result that was released by Atiku's legal team this evening which was said to be hacked from INEC server. My attention was first directed to Anambra state where Buhari got 333, 710 votes. How could that be possible ? Peter Obi's state ? The heart beat of Igbo land. Thesame state where Buhari got 17,926 votes in 2015 ? So what gave rise to over 1800% vote increment in 2019 ? I now took my time to do the breakdown of number of votes Buhari got from South East:
Anambra: 333,710 votes Abia: 198,391 votes Ebonyi: 291,846 votes Enugu: 267,821 votes Imo: 423,801 votes TOTAL: 1,515,569 votes.
From the analysis, it shows 1,515,569 easterners voted for Buhari. How could that be possible ? Same Buhari that is always vilified by the Igbos on social media. ? Same Buhari that was rejected by Ohanenze Ndigbo ? Same Buhari that has been labeled an arch-enemy of Igbos? Same Buhari that Nnamdi Kanu openly told his followers not to vote for ? Same Buhari that that experienced poor turnouts during his campaign in South East. ? Is it not surprising ?
Let's take a look at how South East voted for Buhari in 2015:
Enugu: 14,157 votes Anambra: 17,926 votes Abia: 13,394 votes Imo:133,253 votes Ebonyi: 19,518 votes TOTAL: 198,248 votes
So Buhari's popularity grew by over 1800% votes in South East within the space of 4 years!!!!
MY CONCLUSION: Atiku's server result is fake. I assume the result was prepared prior to election based on their Forecast, because no sensible person would believe that Buhari amassed over 1.5 million votes in South East.
Cc: OAM4J , Mynd44 Since you said it's fake. Why not volunteer yourself to Woke Olanipekun as a witness |
Politics › Re: "Atiku's Server" Shows Buhari Garnered Over 1.5 Million Votes In South East by engineerboat(m): 8:43pm On Apr 25, 2019 |
Tospringe: At all At all. INEC too is not managing the situation well. They should come out straight and tell us what's really going on. I think they also goofed by saying result wasn't transmitted to the server The best INEC do now is to save their image by telling the tribunal what happen |
Politics › Re: "Atiku's Server" Shows Buhari Garnered Over 1.5 Million Votes In South East by engineerboat(m): 8:31pm On Apr 25, 2019 |
Tospringe: You are just disgracing yourself here. The figures are the same with what you have on your spreadsheet. I also have the spreadsheet. Stop acting like a dumb fellow It's not the same stop acting zombiest |