₦airaland Forum

f4frances:
That things are hard in the country is pretty obvious.

What remains unanswered is whether things are hard now than at anytime in the country's history. Do you think so? Mr Omor thinks so - that things are harder than ever. Giving his reason in this hilarious video, he says that, these days the hardship has gotten to dreamland, such that people no longer see free food to eat even in their dreams.

Watch full video here:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9y7DQ35CE4

I can't stop watching this...
really true and funny

At the moment, things are so hard in the country. Not only do many people not find food to eat; people no longer see free food to eat even in dreams...

watch this Mr Omor epic and hilarious summary of the current hardship in the country


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9y7DQ35CE4

Don't forget to like the video, Subscribe, and share

Is the Presidency okay This OP is still amazed at the presidency.

Nothing the Presidency does amazes me anymore after i watched this video...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpCHeoAtAo4

It answers all the questions.

Mr Omor Comedy is a must-watch

Humorous, Lessons-filled, insightful...

For example: want to know why the country is in shambles, watch IQ Levels


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpCHeoAtAo4

internationalman:
To return this book to the library he borrowed it from

it seems he is still in chapter 2; and the book has like 22 chapters

Lordave:
My advice to buhari is for him not to slow down in showing the true colors and intentions of the fulani and hausa parasites in Nigeria. We can"t afford to repeat this mistake again by thinking anything good could ever come out from his people again, not even when one has contested for the presidency 9 times and shading alligator tears.

I mean for a combined 40 years or more under fulani and hausa democratic and autocratic military leadership yet Nigeria with all her resources is still competing as the poverty capital of the world. buhari is certainly Nigeria's last president from the hausa and fulani group. They have nothing to offer towards Nigeria progress, all what they are after is the money they can loot and enjoy in with their 4 wives in an event of disintegration.

you are funny

[img]https://imgur.com/a/ecKwnTf[/img]

[img]https://imgur.com/vAMQslU[/img]

testing
[img]file:///C:/Users/USER%20PC/Desktop/trend.JPG[/img]

In our Nigeria of today, this Mr Omor comedy video is timeless...

Must watch for all Nigerian youths


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxvWa4IJ0Hk

Everyday, people wonder why the country is failing, and why those tasked with steering it are failing miserably.

Mr Omor explains it all.

Watch this Mr Omor comedy video for his hilarious take.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpCHeoAtAo4

Biafranboys:
Of course the fear of buhari is real and this is why everyone is silent even the news people are silent

The fear of Buhari is VERY real....

In the video, even the famed adviser, was advice-less when it came to advicing Bubu


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peLMJqDic2E

I'm not surprised by all the misses of Bubu

You now why? Watch this insightful video...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpCHeoAtAo4

All of you u expecting something good from the re-energized president, keep expecting....

To get answers to any question about Buhari, watch this video


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpCHeoAtAo4

Don't forget to subscribe, drop your comments for us, like the video, and share.

With everything happening in the country, do you have something to say to Mr President?

Make sure you watch this before you do


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=peLMJqDic2E

Somehow this post on "birthday celebration" veered into a discussion of Michael the archangel.

The JWs in the house think they have given strong biblical proofs to support their claim that michael the archangel is jesus.

Well, what does the atheist me know about such discussions.
I can only say that JWs have given michael the archangel different identities since they started.

Number 1
first they said michael the archangel was definitely not jesus, but simply an angel who even worshiped jesus.
This they stated in their journal, Zion's Watch Tower 1879 Nov p.4.
Of course, they quoted scripture to support this claim, including Heb 1:6 which says in part "Let all the angels of God worship him". In their arguments they said, all the angels that were commanded to worship jesus included the archangel, so the archangel cannot be jesus.

Number 2
Not long after, they swift gears, and said michael the archangel is the pope. their arguments can be found in Zion's Watch Tower 1879 December p.6

Number 3
They switched gears again not long after, and said michal was the pre-human jesus
first it was a cautious. with statements like: Can it be that he [/b]who was called Michael--Jehovah's chief-messenger--was none other than our Lord in his pre-human condition? we conclude that [b]HE must have been "chief messenger."
For their supposedly scriptural backing for this new claim, see Zion's Watch Tower 1883 June p.3

Number 4
Not long after, they did a reverse. the archangel now went back to being the pope. This is stated in their book: The Finished Mystery 1917 p.188

Number 5
Then they moved again, and said michael the archangel is the heavenly name of jesus. This new view was first taught in their journal Watchtower 1984 December 15 p.26. this view the have maintained.

So when JW fling out verses of the bible as scriptural proofs for their "michael the archangel is jesus" argument, they sincerely feel they are correct, and they wonder why other people cannot see those verses as the JWs see them.
They forget (or choose to ignore) that they also flung out bible verses as scriptural evidence when they were teaching that michael the archangel is "the pope", and "just an angel that is not jesus", etc.
Using what i call "bible gymnastics", and clever interpretations, desired explanations can be squeezed from almost any Scripture. Yes, the JW can come out tommorow saying michael the archangel is Buhari, and bible verses can be flung out as scriptural evidence.

what do i know! i am just a senseless atheist

Question: What is Easter

Me: according to what i've heard, someone/ something/ some force somewhere called god felt humans have offended him/her/it so greatly, so he gave them his son to kill so that he/ she/ it will forgive them.

An interesting story!!!

Jashub:
Who is justifying Elisha? And secondly, islam justifies itself by killing on a daily basis. And Christians and every other person out there, have a right to condemn it. Why? Because it is senseless and goes against the laws of conscience. But I know this some you cannot grasp because you have no sense of moral objectivity being an atheist.


Just because you have a bone of contention with God does make Him any less concerned of how justice should be administered.

People are quick to say atheist have no sense of moral objectivity

And i have no bone of contention with god. My bone of contention is people that do unthinkable things in the name of religion or people that explain away atrocities in the name of religion.

As you said every right thinking person should condemn anything that goes against the laws of conscience. The problem is that most person's conscience are built by religious dictates. Thus, someone can commit atrocities conscientiously and feel justified because of his/ her belief or unbelief system.

Moral objectivity is actually what i call for.
Don't justify the killing of Talle simply because u are a muslim
Don't justify the killing of those children (in that elisha story) simply because u are a christian (or it is in your christian holy book)
Don't justify the killing of anyone simply because u are an an atheist and feels u are not accountable to a sky personage

Be morally objective....

If an act causes you to flinch when done by others, don't justify a parallel act when it is done in your circle of belief/ unbelief

Jashub:
You have not answered the question : is Elisha a Christian? And you made a mistake : Elijah did not kill children ; it was Elisha. Now answer the question.

And secondly, Muslims kill people on daily basis. And they justify this with verses from their Quran. But I am yet to see a Christian justify killing from the verses of the Bible. So your bickering is illogical

Whether eli-whatever is a jew, christian, hindu, muslim, etc is not the bone of contention.

It is not deniable that christians rush to justify the eli-whatever story simply he is seen as a true prophet in their holy book. You can see that in this thread already, with some commentators saying: "it hurts to be mocked, insulted, etc" or that "u should not judge another if u are not in their shoes", etc

My initial post has this: "I understand that christians today (at least the majority) do not go about killing for their faith, but is it not hypocritical to still justify that elisha story and condemn a parallel case?"
So as you said christians may not justify killing from the verses of the Bible.
The question is whether it is not hypocritical to still justify that eli-whatever story and condemn a parallel case (as is the case of Talle)

Jashub:
How is it hypocritical? Elisha was never a christian ; he was a Jew. So how does he relate to christian murders?

Christians have the elijah story in their holy book, and they go to great lengths to defend the killing of those children. I have seen about 5 different christian explanations to justify the killing of the children whose act of wickedness and deserving death is insulting a prophet.
Yet i see christians rushing to condemn the Bauchi youths for killing a man whose act of wickedness and deserving death is insulting a prophet.

The parallel is killing for insulting a prophet. If you can justify the first, is it not hypocritical to condemn the other

Dtruthspeaker:
You think it is for Nought that God came to the earth and we sing "He walked where I walked, He Stood where I stand" by Don Moen.

Oya Lie that little children have never abused you AND YOU DID NOT CURSE THEM? Oya Lie!

Even a single child who abused and insulted you, YOU SURELY CURSED HIM IN YOUR HEART, even if you did not voice it out!

Why did you Curse him?

Is it not because your curses have no effect generally, that is the reason why you think that Elijah is different from you

Oh, because he is a Prophet he should feel no pain? Did you not see that he tried to ignore them but the Stupid children would not let him have his Peace?

Be Reasonable please!

so he killed them!!!!!!!!!

do you know the pain in the heart of those Bauchi mob when Talle insulted their prophet?? So they killed him.


If i teach that when someone insults you, and you are very pained by it, you should kill them, what will you think of me


Will you justify my stand by: the children are unruly, i was very pained by their curses, etc??

Jashub:
That's the same thing Stalin and Mao did and they are Atheist. So why are you not condemning them?

I will not justify crime of any sort because the perpetrators express my belief or unbelief.
A crime is a crime no matter who does it.

I will not justify the crimes that Stalin or whoever commits simply because they are atheists. In fact, that is the reason for the initial question. because i see that most persons rush to condemn an act when done by another religion, but will quickly justify a parallel act when done in their religion. My question again is, is that not hypocritical?

Dtruthspeaker:
A Certain Act either has a Reasonable and Just Excuse or it does not!

And the 2 cases are different!

In the case of the murdered Muslim, he insulted their Prophet and it is for the Prophet to Act on it! Being the Direct Party Affected!

Privies and relations have limited right of action. They Have No Locus Standi!

In the case of Elijah, he was the direct recipient and in he so acted on it.

Conpare
How often is it rightful to interfere in the cause of another in comparison to when a person spits on you or defames you?

Scarcely can a person be Just -Filled when he enters into the matter concerning another full adult for he has no Right to Act!

The Law is "It is only the parties themselves to an Action who can Complain and Raise A Court on it"!

Privies and relations have limited right of action. They Have No Locus Standi!

Very correct. So killing someone who wrongs a prophet is wronged, but if the prophet kills the offender(s) himself/ herself, it is fine.
So a random prophet can kill someone tomorrow, and you won't flinch because he/ she is the direct party affected?

truespeak:
Tell me the truth, have you been Mocked, Ridiculed, Abusing, Insulted, Laughed at continuously by a group of say 3 or 4 children?

If you have, now imagine 42 of them Constantly and Wickedly Harassing and Abusing you?

Which I bet you have Never encountered, thus not having been in his place to Feel and Experience what he went through, you are not qualified to condemn him!

It is he who wears the shoes that know where it pinches!

He who has not worn the shoe cannot speak on it!

If i understand your questions, it will mean that if one is mocked, ridiculed, and laughed at, and wickedly harassed by a group of children, it is justifiable for he/she to kill them.

So all your blabbering is dancing on the thin line of advance stupidity

Really

Why am i not surprised?

This is what virtually all theists do. they dodge issues that fingers their particular religion, and insults (attack) the person critiquing.

Will you commit crime in the name of your religion?
Will you justify a crime committed in the name of your religion?
Will you condemn crime committed in the name of your religion and fail to see the parallel in your religion?

If you condemn the killing of Talle, is it not hypocritical to still go about justifying (or explaining away) the story of elisha??
That is the question that remain unaswered by you.

Jashub:
Atheism that has killed more people? Abegi, I do not have enough faith to be an Atheist.

I definitely did not say you should become an atheist. I only asked if it is not hypocritical to justify an act when done in the name of your religion but call it crime when done in the name of another religion.

That is:
1. do not commit crime in the name of your religion
2. do not justify crime committed in the name of your religion
3. when condemning crime committed in the name of other religion, do not hypocritically fail to see the parallel in your religion

you want content that are humorous and enlightening... check out Mr Omor youtube channel
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCqSmEgZIt0Ra9K7NF_g1vwQ


This MR Omor IQ levels video is a classic... funny but full with lessons that'll make your relationships (and other associations) a success

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpCHeoAtAo4

Don't forget to subscribe to the channel if you like the content. Who wouldn't? Also, SHARE to help grow the channel

I woke up on April 1st and heard the disturbing news of Talle Mia Ruwa, the middle-aged man who was lynched by a mob in Bauchi state for alleged blasphemy.

Because of my "religionlessness", crime (whatever crime) perpetuated in the name of religion (whatever religion) gets to me. So, I thought the Talle news disturbed me more than it did anyone else. However, on relating with some persons, I saw that they were equally disturbed.

A christian friend went on a barrage on how the Muslims are so wicked as to kill a man simply for insulting their prophet. Then i reminded him of the discussion we had some time ago when he was justifying that story of elisha in the christian holy book where the man called upon 2 bears to kill 42 children because they mocked him. At the time, he had told me of how wrong it is to insult the anointed of God, and that the children got just judgement.
As i suspected he would, my friend went into another bout of justification. "They are two different stories" he told me. "In Elisha's case, he didn't do the killing himself, the bears did" he added

My answer to him was "Talle insulted a prophet and was killed for it, just as the 42 kids in the elisha story insulted a prophet and were killed for it"
Saying "elisha did not do the killing, the bears did" is like saying "the irate Bauchi mob did not do the killing, the fire did".

Then i added "you can only be a hypocrite if you justify one and condemn the other"

I understand that christians today (at least the majority) do not go about killing for their faith, but is it not hypocritical to still justify that elisha story and condemn a parallel case?

If you are among the many christians that condemn the killing of Talle, then you also should condemn the killing of those children (in that story in your holy book). If for any reason, you find some reasonable explanations or justifications for the killing of those children; then i see no reason why you should be disturbed that many muslims will find the killing of Talle justifiable.


As for me... what do i know. I am just a senseless atheist who thinks "religion makes people do crazy things and feel okay about doing them"

People go to school hoping to to get good jobs upon graduation. But, sadly, that is not always the case. That is why there are a lot of unemployed graduates.
However, it seems that some graduates remain unemployed because they are picky, and see some jobs as beneath them.
This reminds me of a comic video titled "Gateman Job", where a man is asked whether as a graduate he will take a gateman job that pays $1million a month. His reply is epic; and it is the mindset that graduates should have when job-hunting.
See video here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxvWa4IJ0Hk

As a graduate, what should be your attitude when job-hunting. Will you reject a legit and well-paying job because you find it demeaning?

This statement by the OP is one that polarize Nigerians.

As a man, who should you go for when it is time to marry, someone educated or not?
I find a powerful answer to that in this MR Omor video titled "IQ levels"

He explains that a relationship can only work if the intelligence gap between the partners is not too much. According to the video, if the intelligence gap is much, there will be no tolerance and understanding of one another, and problems will brew. He uses a powerful case to support hos arguments.

See video here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpCHeoAtAo4

This should serve as advice for Nigerian university graduates. DO NOT allow PAPER qualification becloud you and put unnecessary pride in your head, if the office job come fine. if not try your hand and head somewhere else.

One of the best advice for Nigerian graduates. it reminds me of this Mr Omor video where he explains that he will not let his "graduate" status get into his head so as to see a particular legit and well-paying job as demeaning

See the must-watch video here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yxvWa4IJ0Hk