₦airaland Forum

muhammaduyusufu:
Also Seyi law.

The OP is one of the people Seyi law was referring to.

"Because you agree with/support someone does not mean that you cannot criticise them once in a while or when they err" only applies to something that is GENERALLY GOOD. It is only an acceptable excuse for people that do or say sensible things 80% of the time.


If it is EVERY single policy since the inception of this government that has been bad, where are the good things about him that y'all campaigned with, chanted, and "promised" he was going to do?


Obviously it is senile, stupidly senile for you to be using "because I supported him doesn't mean I cannot criticise him" as a face-saving cop-out. It'll only (possibly) make sense when someone does some good and does something bad sometimes. Yes, an upright person going astray or overdoing something can be called back (to order), but ever since that thing y'all supported wrestled himself into power, he's been plunging the country from one depth to another.


Abi why were y'all making him out to be the best thing since sliced bread?

I do not have enough words to express my DISGUST for this man and others like him.


I really really detest the casual cruelty of them all coming out now and grandstanding with criticism and face-value change of ideals.


Wo, God will punish you people and all that matters to you sha. No need for long talk.

No.

PerfectStranger:
Crying like you're not the bread winner of the house. Instead of getting your shìt together. Are you not a man?

All these Genz kids jumping into marriage. Can't even cheat successfully

So being the breadwinner of a home gives a person a pass at cheating? Then a dual-income home would be a playing field for an open relationship abi?


I did not remember when this update dropped, but it's cool.

Tallesty1:
Where did she fall out from?

The sky. Literally.

phr0nesis:
This 90 minutes, no touches, I no understand o.
How can a player go through the entire 90 minutes without touching the ball?

Oh, that's what it means. 🤣🤣😂

Now I understand the joke better, and it's crazy.


What do you mean for a whole match...your leg or body did not even brush the ball??

brain54:
It's the pull of the moon's gravity...

That holds earth in place.


Without the moon earth cannot/will not exist.


Or at least not the way we know it!

So in order words small but mighty.

It's so small, yet significant to our existence.

Evolutionism:
Okay, So what took you so long to reply my mention?

I was thinking of a befitting response; but I'm glad you made the realization on your own and reworded what you wrote.


Do not make that kind of jokes/insinuations about me being a feminist again. I mean, ever.

She's pretty. 🧡💕


Women are really God's most beautiful creations fr.

Evolutionism:
Lol seems like you were banned right

No, I wasn't.

Eweduses:
Because that's how you pu*ks sideline every victory pertaining to Peter Obi, just to promote ur imb*cilic drug barron handicap from ronu brown roof enclave

See Tinupoo's latest suit, a colossal disgrace

I am hard pressed to think that you're an educated fellow, because a sensible human who has gone through the four walls of an institution and sat through its classes would realize my comment could go either way. I mean, even if one didn't understand it on a first read, logic, again, should demand a restrain, to go through it the second time to get where a post is coming from.

But no, you jumped to insulting me to the shame of the ones who wasted money in sending you to a school.


Defaced lizard.

I am surprised this topic is on NL's front-page o. Hehe.

Gerrard59:
While that is true of modern women, why are you not aiming for men at the same level as you are? Why aim for men who are higher than you are? Edunt stated here how new female grads in Big4 firms don't regard or consider their male colleagues on the same level, but target men working at oil companies and investment banks. But as they approach their early 30s, they now move towards the same male colleagues they derided and snubbed.

Hypergamy doesn't lie.

Do I still even remember the context of this convo lol?

First of all, how is hypergamy true, if at the end of the day, the same women end up moving back to the men they once rejected?

And I remember in one of my responses to you, I told you that nobody forces you into a relationship, a monogamous/equal one at that, as a man. You have all the choice of refusing to play by any dating market rule. Let me just assume you're speaking of a generic "you" and not addressing me personally. So your case with the hypergamous women is not my concern. It is your opinion, so it's anecdotal at best.

Ehen, I recall now.

Saying I shouldn't be with a richer, committed man because I am not "built" =/= I should be with a built man on my level. Okay? That's fine? I never said I do not find men I'm same with attractive. My response was only in the context of the scenario that dude raised. So whether I'm with a man who's richer or not, I expect commitment from him.

Evolutionism:
Oni yeye.

You want to join bad geng abi.

Lemme hear such thing in your mouth again

Ahh. You modified this post?

I think you did; I'm fairly certain. Because this was not what I read when I first saw the post, and wanted to respond lmao. You for leave what you originally typed na.

x

Acidosis:
Like it or not, if the MOG had let that woman go with her BSc in law talk, Paul Eneche would have been accused of planting a fake testifier and probably trending on TikTok. Nobody would have believed he had no hand in the B.Sc. in law talk.

Hmm. You have a point.


Na small thing e dey take for Internet people to start dragging and trolling and flying with their narratives. They will never bother to cross-check the origin of something anymore once it starts trending.