₦airaland Forum

macphilip:
Good evening our dear customers

muller101:
As long as it has to do with sex. Analysis go full nairaland. Wasted generation.

xtervaganza:
during world war 2, June 1944 the battle of Normandy.18 year olds jumped out of planes to fight war.



August 2020 27 year old man does not know what to do with a broad.


This generation is weak

lammyna:
The site should have been closed down by now. Someone needs to report this site to stop further scamming, please don't mind my grammar.

Kccheechy:
This opinion of yours is not only preposterous, it is the wackest and dumbest opinion I have heard concerning married people who cheat. It also Shows that you are just trying to justify your sleeping with another man's wife. Most times, we are the architect of our downfall. You are taking pride in sleeping with another man's wife not knowing you are creating an avalanche of problems that you may not come out from. Problems that your children will partake in if caution is not taken. If the husband of the woman you are bedding finds out and decides to punish you by killing you or rendering you useless through diabolical means now people who will see you then will start to pity you, not knowing the reason behind the fate that befell you.

etrange:
A "hoe" is supposedly someone who sleeps with different men. Kim is a married woman with a family who hasn't been accused of cheating. Kim's sex tape with someone she was dating when she was 22 got leaked and she sued the company who paid dearly for it outside court. Besides, she wasn't the only person whose sex got leaked that period but hers went viral cause she was already popular even before the tape. If your point is that anyone who has sex before marriage is a hoe, that's fine, she is one. But then, who isn't?

Ok, let's agree she was chasing clout then since it's a possibility that shouldn't be ruled out, that is not even our argument now. You posited that she made this exact post for clout and I am saying that's an assumption. I don't buy into that assumption cause there are a million things she could use to take over the social media if such was her aim. But again, I'm not ruling it off, I'm saying you shouldn't present your thoughts or assumptions like facts because you could be wrong. You'd agree with me if you aren't being sentimental.

I never for once said the error was a typo. I have always maintained it was an error (limited knowledge) and I am sure there are names you think you know how to spell but can't. Even auto correct wouldn't help you with such unpopular names that are not of English origin. Like I said, you simply made an assumption, the ideal thing was to use words like "probably", "might", etc. since you don't have any evidence. But your sentiments wouldn't let you.

etrange:
And I'm telling there's nothing that evidently shows it's clout chasing. You're only presenting your assumption as a fact and that's fallacious. And that is even a funny assumption cause deliberate wrong spellings wouldn't get Kim, one of the most famous female celebrities in the world, any more attention than her family tv series or her pictures or her brand or her husband would get her. When it comes to proper nouns like people's names, names of places, etc., wrong spelling is very common even amongst native speakers so it's not a matter of knowing that words aren't necessarily pronounced according to words.

Concluding I'm saying these cause I love Kim goes to show how hastily you make your assumptions. I've not even seen a complete episode of her family show. I'm trying to be logical with my perspectives unlike some people who are calling her a clout chaser or a "hoe" based on pure sentiments and no evidence.

etrange:
Wow! So you assume she actually went to the Netherlands to buy the horse? Do you guys in Nigeria go to Germany to buy a German shepherd? Oga, I live in North America and you can buy this horse from many breeding houses around here. The spelling she gave would have the same pronunciation as the correct word so she might have always called it correctly and just didn't know the spelling. An error is not a crime and not unusual.

"Insultive" is just an error that is very frequent. Anybody could coin anything and call it a word but regardless of how you paint it, it is still an error cause when you were making that post, I bet your intention wasn't to employ a "non standard word". You probably didn't know it wasn't an acceptable English word until I called your attention to it. And here you are justifying the usage.

etrange:
Friesland is a place but you'd have to know the horse was named based on that fact that it originated from that place to know the spelling. She might know what someone from there is called but might not be aware that's the basis for naming the horse. Even if she didn't know about the place and what people from there are called, it's still an error caused by limited knowledge and not necessarily clout chasing. Friesland is a region in the Netherlands, you can't possibly tell me you know all the regions there and what people from each are called.

_{You don't have to be defensive, "insultive" is a frequent error in countries that speak English as a second language. It is called malapropism (the use of an incorrect word in place of a word with a similar sound). No English language testing institution would accept that regardless of the region. Whether it becomes standard tomorrow or not is another thing entirely.}

etrange:
She spelt it wrong twice because it never occurred to her the spelling was wrong. It was not a mistake (accidental), it was an error (lack of knowledge). That doesn't make it deliberate. Anybody could be in that position just like you didn't know "insultive" is not a standard English word.

_{Btw, I wouldn't care if you sounded insulting, that's what NL is known for anyway.}