₦airaland Forum

seunoni34:
Is there any programmer who can write Java with no knowledge of OOP? Are you serious? Or you just want to sound big or what? Infact tell us What language can you write and what exactly do you need a software developer for ? I suppose you know it's not only Java you can use to write mobile applications.

What do you know about SOLID principles. I am notlooking down or trying to feel big just saying what my company is looking for.

joey150:
really?? Chelsea the biggest club in london You better go back to history as you claim and verify your claim.. Champions league dosent make you king.. And we are talking locally here. Leave ucl out of it.

Oh so you talking about history now when talking about the biggest club in london or can you compare the number of trophies arsenal won with d ones chelsea won in d last ten years.

It is not just champions league that makes us king we av more league titles and local trophies than you can dream of and with a smart coach like klopp we are on the way up while with wenger you guys are nothing more than a good investment

joey150:
so champions league is the only thing mediocre liverpool would achieve? Living on history.. I get am before no be property.

Everything you have today is history tomorrow. You have had over 25 years to equal our historical records, yet you have not. You are not eventhe biggest clubin london not to talk of england.

10 years

joey150:
its so painful to be an arsenal fan.. Even lowly rated liverpool would drag the bragging rights with you.

Lowly rated Liverpool, who rates them arsenal fans lol. Win the champions league and maybe we could sit and talk like mates.

joey150:
18 times?? Am talking about since it was rebranded and called the epl. Not since the 80's . you have the greater shame..0/23.

And your champions league success is 0/150 bro, i av not won the league in 23 years but even within that time you couldnt equal my record. Remember you av not won d league in 11 years. You are getting dere one day, but while you at it try and win the champions league dont let man city win it before you again or even leichester.

Champions of Europe, Champions of Europe
You would never sing that song

joey150:
we are talking local now... When its time for europe I'll pitch my tent in another team.

To me sef...arsenal are not even in the champions league. But try and win epl please.. See Leicester na.. Ahh nawa oh.

We av won it 18 times try and win it 18 times and we can sit down on the same table and discuss but for now look for your mates. I wonder where arsenal fans would bury their faces in when Leicestar or Totteham wins the league.

This is trully front page material but as usual since there is no cleavage pic of one of the yeyebrities it wont make front page

Any software developer who is proficient in Object Oriented Programming (OOP) and in using programming languages such as Java for developing mobile applications should send his cv to jimi.adegbulugbe@viratecglobal.com.ng

Evathyst:
Just two pages for a whole derby game, yet these Liverpool fans here are having an er*ction.


It seems failure has been encoded in some people's DNA. O mase o!

We dont like crowd. We are a VIP club

joey150:
e pain am oh..sadly my dear ARSENAL is turning to this.

I rebuke you oh wenger..lord never make me accept and be happy with mediocrity...


Amen...

We mightnot have won the league since 93 but has your team ever won the champions league?

There is a song i sing for arsenal haters like you

Champions of Europe, Champions of Europe
You will never sing that song.

Loverpool for life YNWA

Lol

MadCow1:
Nobody said that, but typical Idiot like you who cant read and reason properly would interpret it like that.


You sound so stupid right now I am amazed you can know how to use the internet.

Madcow1 I didnt insult you, please dont insult me. I understand that you are one of the nairaland children so please dont quote me, I dont sell bobo.

cloudgoddess:
The world is extremely complex and to think that such a complex creation was done by luck and without an external force is follishness of the highest order.
How are natural laws of physics & chemistry "luck"? Surely in the relatively short time humans have been doing science, we've seen that things like the formation of planets and other celestial bodies, the growth of planets and animals, and the molding of mountains and earth, all follow rather predictably from natural laws. We don't know everything, of course, but we know enough to conclude that virtually all of what we see around us happens naturally - NOT with magic. No one ever waves a wand and creates a tree, or prays to someone's stomach and POOF a baby. It would not be surprising, then, if the "original cause", the beginning of the universe, or whatever one would like to call it, was also of natural causes. Perhaps natural causes we do not yet fully understand, but natural causes nontheless.

This is really funny, the bible clearly says that God is not a magician, now let me give you an example, I am a computer scientist, if i should create an A.I. and give the program ability to learn and improve itself without my aid does that mean the machine created itself?

Look at an ant, they are very tiny, yet they know that they are supposed to store food during dry season and build a house to prevent rain from destroying them likewise every single animal has inbuilt survival tactics. There is no way these things could just come to be without an intelligent being behind it, people would love to believe there is no God as it gives you the freedom you desire to do as you wish but it is foolishness.

Science is the greatest proof that there is God, everyday we discover amazing things about this planet and yet you claim that it was created without an intelligent being. Have you ever seen a painting without a painter.

Why would the external force have to be an emotional Jewish God and not the infinite number of other possible external forces that could have possibly lead to the universe? How is it not a huge misstep to jump to the conclusion that the answer must be a human-like supernatural entity of middle-eastern origin who was introduced to Africans by white missionaries?

Why is 2 + 2 = 4 and not one of the infinitely numbers available, you cant argue something is a lie just because there are other options. I have discovered that the Christian God is the true God, that would be an arguement for another day but you should know that just because there are other gods does not mean there is no true God. That arguement is faulty in many ways.

Check out how complex the DNA structure is, Antony Flew a prominent atheist converted after reading about the DNA and how complex the structure is.
This is silly. Hundreds of thousands of scientists work on DNA every day and are not religious, party because they know how DNA works. It does not defy any laws of chemistry or physics. Just because it's mindblowing, complex, and difficult to understand, doesn't mean it's magic.

Do you know that it has been discoverd that you can store data that would fill like three story building using the tech we have today in just one cube of DNA?

How much research and human knowledge was used to get to the level of technology we achieved today billions and billions of hours of cummulative research and funny enough we never created a new thing just used the resources we found on this earth. why didnt these things develop themselves yet something more complex than it all created itself. Your logic is faulty

Yet you would still choose to believe a lie that all this was created by a random body.
This is creating a false dichotomy. The only two options are not either "Jewish humanoid supernatural entity called Yahweh" or "a completely random jumbling of chemicals (which btw is not even what the big bang claims, if that's what you were referring to)". There is an entire spectrum of possible answers for that question (in no particular order):
- any of the 4,000+ gods that have been created and worshipped throughout human history (including but by no means limited to yahweh)
- a different god which no human has named yet
- natural laws that have always been in existence in some form, changing gradually as eons pass (most of what we know scientifically points to this answer)
- unicorns
- goblins
- aliens

The list goes on. The amount of possible answers is vast, and the only reason you particularly accept Yahweh is because it's what you were raised to accept, or at the very least, it's one of the very few options your society has lead you to accept (Yahweh or Allah, in terms of most of Nigeria).

Do you know that the big bang theory actually agrees with the bible's claim of how the world was created.

According to big bang theory there was nothing the world was empty until out of a sudden within the twinkle of an eye, in micro seconds the world came to be everything that needed to be created was created in that one second.

The same with what the bible says in Genesis The world was empty and void, God said let there be light and there was light, that happened in a twinkle of an eye.

There are many options quite alright but no doubt the most foolish of those options is the one that says earth just came to be and was created by protons etc. the fact that there are natural laws only points more to an intelligent being, it is left for you to discover the being. Do you think natural laws just came to be and were created by the movement of protons and electrons who had a meeting place. There is no way science would be able to explain the origins of the natural laws or how they came to be which is because this things are too complex to be explained by jumping protons and electrons.

MadCow1:
The Entire Civil Service (Both federal & State) is over staffed with over 75% inefficient Buffoons because they did not get employed on merit but on 'I'ma mmadu' a.k.a Connection.


Also because subsequent Governments in their cluelessness on how to go about creating jobs ends up just employing more people into the Civil Service.

Also, Duplicity of functions and agencies.. Imagine that we have WAEC, GCE & NECO all basicaly doing the same thing. Why not scrap NECO and GCE and leave only WAEC to handle SSCE examinations.. Scrap JAMB is Post JAMB is going to be there. Why write 2 SSCE and 2 JAMBs to gain admission?

Why have Federal Road Safety and and still have Vehicle Inspection Officers.. Duplicity of a function that can be handled by the same agency.


And it continues like that through out the entire Civil Service.


That is why they would need to borrow money to pay these people for doing absolutely nothing.

Sack the whole civil service staff smh talking trash

This is so bad, i dont believe it, after allthe money they claim they are made from the TSA. Well i just pray it is a lie and that things would get better, if not hmmmm we would see aw much suffering the average nigerian can take before he figures things out.

APRIL FOOL

APRIL FOOL

.

plaetton:
If life can grow on its own , then who needs god?

Who do you think created the life and gave it the ability to grow or whats the genome created in the lab done by natural forces. The world is extremely complex and to think that such a complex creation was done by luck and without an external force is follishness of the highest order.

It took scientists a cummulative of billions of hours to create a genome and then we are to use that as an evidence that life was created by nothing and just a random movement of electrons and protons. Check out how complex the DNA structure is, Antony Flew a prominent atheist converted after reading about the DNA and how complex the structure is. We are still far from discovering the full complexity of the DNA and would probably take us anoother billions of hours of researchers time to discover it. Yet you would still choose to believe a lie that all this was created by a random body.

That is why the book of Romans says that "For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made. So they are without excuse." - Rom 1:20

ifenes:
How can one believe Jesus and not believe Mithra? Ain't both the same sun god?

A lot of skeptics have been trying to destroy the name of God by making you believe false information about Mitrha there is little or no similarity between Mithra and Jesus Christ and there is no way you can compare Jesus Christ with Mithra, so do not be deceived.

Jews do not worship the sun god and several times in the scriptures they were ordered not to do so. It is very easy for you to say Jesus was not real but looking at the route most of those false gods went despite the fact that they had lots of worshippers and magnificent temple to their name are nothing today. Jesus was crucified, his disciples were hunted and killed, at least that fact can't be disputed, yet he is the most important person to have ever walked the surface of the earth and the most popular ever. There have been investigations by historians and even CNN has done an investigation to see if Jesus truly existed and they came to the conclusion that He did. It is only a fool who would like to be deceived that would say Jesus never existed, people would die for what they believe to be true and not what they know to be a lie.

The parallels between mithra the sun god and Jesus Christ

Claim: Mithras was born of a virgin on December 25th, in a cave, attended by shepherds
Truth: Mithras was actually born out of solid rock, leaving a hole in the side of a mountain (presumably described as a “cave”). He was not born of a virgin (unless you consider the rock mountain to have been a virgin). His birth was celebrated on December 25th, but the first Christians knew this was not the true date of Christ’s birth anyway, and both Mithraic worshippers and the early Roman Church borrowed this celebration from earlier winter solstice celebrations. Shepherds are part of Mithraism, witnessing his birth and helping Mithras emerge from the rock, but interestingly, the shepherds exist in the birth chronology at a time when humans are not supposed to have been yet born. This, coupled with the fact the earliest version of this part of the Mithraic mythology emerges one hundred years after the appearance of the New Testament, infers it is far more likely this portion of Mithraism was borrowed from Christianity rather than the other way around.

Claim: Mithras was considered a great traveling teacher and master
Truth: There is nothing in the Mithraic tradition indicating he was a teacher of any kind, but he was could have been considered a master of sorts. This would not be unexpected of any deity, however. Most mythologies describe their gods in this way.

Claim: Mithras had 12 companions or disciples
Truth: There is no evidence for any of this in the traditions of Iran or Rome. It is possible the idea Mithras had 12 disciples is simply derived from murals in which Mithras is surrounded by twelve signs and personages of the Zodiac (two of whom are the moon and the sun). Even this imagery is post Christian, and, therefore, did not contribute to the imagery of Christianity (although it could certainly have borrowed from Christianity).

Claim: Mithras promised his followers immortality
Truth: While there is little evidence for this, it is certainly reasonable to think Mithras might have offered immortality, as this is not uncommon for any God of mythology.

Claim: Mithras performed miracles
Truth: Of course this is true, as this too was not uncommon for mythological characters.

Claim: Mithras sacrificed himself for world peace
Truth: There is little or no evidence this is true, although there is a story about Mithras slaying a threatening bull in a heroic deed. But that’s about as close as it gets.

Claim: Mithras was buried in a tomb and after three days rose again, and Mithras was celebrated each year at the time of His resurrection (later to become Easter)
Truth: There is nothing in the Mithraic tradition indicating he ever even died, let alone resurrected. Tertullian did write about Mithraic believers re-enacting resurrection scenes, but he wrote about this occurring well after New Testament times. Christianity could not, therefore, have borrowed from Mithraic traditions, but the opposite could certainly be true.

Claim: Mithras was called “the Good Shepherd”, and was identified with both the Lamb and the Lion
Truth: There is no evidence that Mithras was ever called “the Good Shepherd” or identified with a lamb, but since Mithras was a sun-god, there was an association with Leo (the House of the Sun in Babylonian astrology), so one might say he was associated with a Lion. But once again, all of this evidence is actually post New Testament; Mithraic believers may once again have borrowed this attribute from Christianity.

Dont you see that the devil is trying to decieve you by all these lies.

These stories of different gods often reflect the expectations of acient people of the God which truly came to save the earth. Most of the claims by historians are false starting with horus.
Horus was worshiped principally in two Egyptian cultural centers (Bekhdet in the north and Idfu in the south). Horus was usually represented as a falcon. He was the great sky God and the Son of Isis and Osiris.

Claim: Horus was conceived by a virgin mother named Meri, and had a stepfather named Seb (Joseph)
Truth: Horus was NOT conceived of a virgin. In fact, mural and textual evidence from Egypt indicates Isis (there is no evidence that “Meri” was ever part of her name) hovered over the erect penis (she created) of Osiris to conceive Horus. While she may have been a virgin before the conception, she utilized Osiris’ penis to conceive. She later had another son with Osiris as well. There is no evidence of three wise men as part of the Horus story at all. Seb was actually the “earth god”; He was not Horus’ earthly father. Seb is not the equivalent of Joseph and, in most cases, Seb is described as Osiris’ father.

Claim: Horus was born in a cave, his birth announced by an angel, heralded by a star and attended by shepherds.
Truth: There is no reference to a cave or manger in the Egyptian birth story of Horus. In fact, none of these details are present in the ancient Egyptian stories of Horus. Horus was born in a swamp. His birth was not heralded by an angel. There was no star.

Claim: Horus attended a special rite of passage at the age of twelve and there is no data on the child from the age of 12 to 30.
Truth: There is no continuous effort in the Horus mythology to account for all these years, so there are no real gaps in the chronology. Horus never taught in any temple at twelve (as did Jesus).

Claim: Horus was baptized in a river at the age of 30, and his baptizer was later beheaded.
Truth: Horus was never baptized. While conspiracy theorists often point to “Anup the Baptizer” (claiming he was later beheaded), there is no such person in Horus’ story.

Claim: Horus had 12 disciples.
Truth: Horus had only four disciples (called ‘Heru-Shemsu’), but at some point in his story there is reference to sixteen followers and a group of unnumbered followers who join Horus in battle (called ‘mesnui’).

Claim: Horus performed miracles, exorcized demons, raised someone from the dead, and walked on water.
Truth: Horus certainly performed miracles (he was, after all, described as a god). But there was no mention of exorcizing demons, raising people from the dead or walking on water.

Claim: Horus was called “Iusa”, the “ever-becoming son” and the “Holy Child”.
Truth: No one in Egyptian history was ever called “Iusa” (the word does not exist) nor was anyone called “Holy Child”.

Claim: Horus delivered a “Sermon on the Mount”, and his followers recounted his sayings. He was transfigured on the Mount.
Truth: Horus never delivered a “Sermon on the Mount”, nor was he transfigured.

Claim: Horus was crucified between two thieves, buried for three days in a tomb, and was resurrected.
Truth: Horus is not reported to have died at all in the vast majority of Egyptian narratives. There is also no crucifixion story. Instead, Horus is usually described as eventually merging with Re (the Sun god) after which he “dies” and is “reborn” every day as the sun rises. There is a parallel account describing Horus’ death and detailing how he was cast in pieces into the water, later fished out by a crocodile at Isis’ request.

Claim: Horus was called “Way”, “the Truth the Light”, “Messiah”, “God’s Anointed Son”, “Son of Man”, “Good Shepherd”, “Lamb of God”, “Word made flesh”, “Word of Truth”, “the KRST” or “Anointed One”.
Truth: None of these titles are in Egyptian history, but Horus is called by several names you might expect for any god in mythology: “Great God”, “Chief of the Powers”, “Master of Heaven”, and “Avenger of His Father”. Horus was not called “the Krst”. This word in Egyptian means “burial” (it wasn’t a title at all).

Claim: Horus was “the Fisher” and was associated with the Fish, Lamb and Lion.
Truth: Some of conspiracy theorists associate Horus with fish (by virtue of the fact that Horus was a fish in some portion of the ancient narrative), but there is no evidence Horus was ever called a “fisher” or was ever associated with the Lion or the Lamb.

Claim: Horus came to fulfill the Law, and was supposed to reign one thousand years.
Truth: There was no Egyptian “law” for Horus to fulfill, and there is no mention of a thousand year reign in Egyptian mythology.

K

plaetton:
Depends on your definition of life.

Life as we understand must be able to grow on his own and reproduce his kind. This stuff d biologists did is like a guy writing an helloworld program and challenging Google that he has created a program mtshew

He sacrificed his glory in heaven with the father to come and save the lost sheep which is us.

You, atheists do not want to agree to the fact that death is not the end for mankind. You may keep saying there is no proof that there is life after death, but mankind has always sensed that there is life and judgement after death according to many tradititions from vahala to Hades etc.

You can decide to be blinded by what you see now but the truth is that we are not more wiser than the people who lived generations before us.

Aw do you call a sythensized genome life, it is kind of shameful the things biologists and evolutionarists boast of these days

plaetton:
Lecturer

Chai!!

We are doomed.

So we are going to have graduates in this country who have been taught that earthquakes and malari are caused by sin ?

It's no wonder then that we depend on drugs manufactured in a Hindu nation to cure us of many common illnesses.

You don't understand what I said, I simply pointed out that because we allowed sin into the world. God's creation became corrupted, and that is the reason why we experience this things.

But not to worry we have a perfect world waiting for us when this world finishes it's course.

plaetton:
Ha ha ha.
I can't stop laughing.

All the above is perhaps true in your universe, not mine.

I hope you're not a school teacher.

I am actually a lecturer, and can you point to any of the facts I mentioned that is not true