₦airaland Forum

MRbrownJAY: here is what you wrote since you seem to go through a bout of amnesia, lol:

Her contribution, I repeat, is not a determinant of his wealth. Without her contribution, he would still have made his wealth. On the other hand, without his parents contribution, he would probably be a nobody. He will end up like an almajiri. Yet the parents cannot dare ask for £21m, but you feel some gold-digger is entitled to it for enjoying his money with him. Is that fair?

dwell on that for a minute (or two), as it sure sounds to me that you are stating, AS A FACT, that anyone who has parental mentoring will generate wealth (aka a successful business).

Sagamite: When you finish answering that, tell me, which do you (from your capability of making assumptions) think will have more influence: The mentorship of parents over about 25 years from birth or an 11 year marriage of a man from his 30s.

Sagamite: Answer the gaddamn question. Stop dodging it.

Tell me, from your understanding and intelligence, what has more influence on an individual: Their nurturing or their marriage.

Gbawe: You guys can display sycophantic obeisance all you want

but it will all amount to nada because not even one of you is robustly well-read or intelligent enough to know that [b]evolution [/b]always wins and that nature abhors a vacuum i.e Nigeria in a West Africa increasingly being defined by meritocratic leadership borne of the uncompromising demand from a more enlightened and very impatient populace.

Many, many unjust and parochial systems have evolved ,throughout history, with the primary purpose of ensuring a rapacious class , very small in comparison to the majority, dominate wealth and privilege inordinately. Progressive evolution, i.e ordinary folks becoming better educated and more sophisticated, has defeated these wicked system. It is only a question of time for Nigeria. Proliferating social media and faster access to information may quicken the evolution process for Nigerians to the detriment of your messiahs and 'tin' gods. I bet the above sounds like Spanish to you olodos? You will see it at work in future but you won't understand it.

Johndoe100: Your desperation is getting pathetic. "Our sources said", "the fly on the wall told me". Is this where you have reached. Oma she Oh.

Musiwa2: if otedola record it, how is that bribe.

You see farouk lack exposure that why there is a list in the first. Why do you think I alway say I should be president. the reason is that I will be a better president than jonathan goodluck because i have lived abroad and see how they do things over here.

If farouk wanted money from otedola. He should have ask him for the money. there is nothing that says, you cant ask femi otedola for money. if you need money.

The problem now is that all of the people on that list are going to end up sue nigeria. And nigeria will loss trillion of naira all because of farouk.

https://news.bbcimg.co.uk/media/images/61027000/jpg/_61027810_44830663.jpg

Five million "test tube babies" have now been born around the world, according to research presented at a conference of fertility experts.

Delegates hailed it as a "remarkable milestone" for fertility treatments.

The first test tube baby, Louise Brown, was born in the UK in July 1978. Her mother Leslie Brown died last month.

However, delegates at the conference in Turkey warned couples not to use fertility treatment as an "insurance policy" if they delayed parenthood.

The International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (Icmart) presented its latest data on children born to infertile parents at the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology conference.

It said official figures up to 2008, plus three years of estimates, put the total number of test tube babies born at five million.

Milestone
Icmart chairman Dr David Adamson said: "This technology has been highly successful in treating infertile patients. Millions of families with children have been created, thereby reducing the burden of infertility.

Continue reading the main story
IVF success rates (based on figures for 2008)

33.1% for women under 35
27.2% for women aged 35-37
19.3% for women aged 38-39
12.5% for women aged 40-42
BBC Health: IVF in depth
"The technology has improved greatly over the years to increase pregnancy rates."

About 1.5 million cycles of IVF, and similar techniques, are performed every year, resulting in 350,000 babies, Icmart said.

Stuart Lavery, a consultant gynaecologist and director of IVF at Hammersmith Hospital, said: "IVF is now part of the mainstream, it is no longer something couples are ashamed of."

However, he cautioned that the great success of assisted reproduction techniques should not lull people into thinking they could wait to have children.

"The subtext is that if people delay childbirth they may view IVF as an insurance policy that they can access at any stage.

"Unfortunately the facts still suggest that IVF success rates in women as they get older are not fantastic."

Dr Allan Pacey, senior lecturer in andrology at the University of Sheffield, said: "I think it's significant that we've got to five million. It's far more socially acceptable than it has been over the last 10 or 20 years.

"One word of warning, we should make sure that couples understand that IVF isn't a guaranteed solution and if they're in a position to have their children earlier in life then they should try and do that.

"IVF really is something that should be preserved for those people who really need it."

emmatok: So what 'Rank' has GEJ awarded himself in the army?

Is commander in chief a military rank?

ayo jango: .


What do u mean rubbish, attitude is key in everything we do in life.
Even d Gospel describes Humility as a key factor to salvation!!!

PhysicsQED: I don't know what people see in El Rufai. What's the source of the hype?

Ileke-IdI:
I never saw them on the stage.

I heard he smokes too much weed

Omo nna to n ko Fuji o
Sunny T mo de
Idan Armani Idan Armani
Omo nna to nko Fujiiii

Beaf: Farouk bera wait very patiently until the damning evidence is provided in court.

They know the evidence will cause Farouk to be judged by the public which will create a situation where they can claim pre-trial prejudice as a result (and therefore, dismiss the case on a technicality). They think they are smart! Lol!

Fail.