FEGEITOK's Posts
Nairaland Forum › FEGEITOK's Profile › FEGEITOK's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 68 pages)
Bryanluke:I'm using QASA but it has the same problem since it uses a lead acid battery |
Bryanluke:How much did the battery cost? How much should one budget for something like this? If I recall heavenlybang also did the conversion. How much you spend Sir? |
oloet:I quite agree, thanks for your suggestion. |
GloriousGbola:Can you DM me the link? You know what the forum does to those links? Thank you very much. |
Solar people, I need help. Like many of us, I bought a "dumb" inverter. It works, but it tells me nothing beyond what is happening point-in-time. It does not record what my panels actually produce, nor can I access previous logs. My setup: two Powmr MPPT charge controllers (max PV array Voc 105 V each) feeding a shared battery bank, plus the hybrid inverter's own internal controller (max PV array Voc 85 V), which goes straight into the inverter. My question: is there a device I can install between the panels and the charge controller that will log production for me? I already know that with three separate PV inputs, a full house total means three separate devices. That is the part I am weighing. What triggered this: I recently installed a WiFi circuit breaker to meter the power I share with my neighbour, and the visibility has been eye opening. Now I want that same visibility for every circuit in the house. Honestly, I don't know how I have been flying blind all this while. Extra question for the experts: with three PV inputs, is the smarter move three separate meters, or should I be metering the battery bus instead and living with a slightly lower number? Or should I forget production entirely and just meter the load side, in which case the WiFi breakers would serve me very well? Anybody with better knowledge, abeg help a brother out. What did you do on/with your setup? |
mctfopt:Your point is valid |
FEGEITOK:For Everyone on Solar/Inverter: The Electrician Who Found the Fault Nobody Else Would Most of us on this thread have spent good money on inverters, batteries and panels. But here is the hard truth: a solar or inverter setup is only as safe and as efficient as the wiring and earthing behind it. A perfect inverter on a bad installation will still frustrate you, waste your load, and in the worst case, shock somebody. I am posting this because I found a man in Abuja who actually understands that, and I am staking my reputation on him. First, who he is His name is Daniel. He is Trade Test 1, 2 and 3 certified, and NABTEB certified. He is a qualified tradesman, not a "boy who learned small wiring." What he can do: Electrical drawings and design Full house and office wiring (done to code, not to convenience) Fault tracing and troubleshooting (this is where most installers run away) Thunder arrestor / lightning arrestor installation Earthing installation and remediation If it is electricity related, and that includes the mains side of your solar setup, he is your man. Why the solar crowd should care Here is exactly the kind of problem he solved for me, and I suspect some of you are quietly living with something similar. Whenever mains power tripped, my inverter would keep ramping up and running at about 50 percent load for no reason I could explain. On top of that, whoever originally wired the house had used a single colour of wire for everything, live, neutral and earth, which is a violation of basic standards and a nightmare to diagnose. I did the obvious first step and installed a brand new earth rod and earthing connections, assuming the old earth was the culprit. It was not, at least not the way I thought. Then I noticed something frightening: the fridge, freezer, microwave and cooker were all shocking to the touch. But only when power came from the mains. On inverter power, zero shock. That clue turned out to be everything. When I told him, he did not give excuses. He said, "Let me come and confirm." He tested the live, neutral and earth at the affected outlet, then went to the distribution board and tested the common earth, common neutral and common live. Every single one lit up on the tester, which should never happen. His first instinct was to check every outlet in the house, tedious as that would be. Then he stopped and said, "There is a better way." He decided to isolate the fault at the DB level instead. We separated each earth connection one by one and tested, until the earth stopped lighting up. That pinned the fault to one circuit: an AC switch and a looped wall socket in the guest room. Here is the part that impressed me. He climbed into the ceiling and asked me to call out from the ground which room he was standing over. I said the guest room. He traced the wires to the exact wall, came down, went straight to that socket, opened it, and there it was. Because the house was wired in one colour, whoever did the original job had bridged the live to the earth without knowing it. That is why testing live, neutral and earth all gave the same reading, and that is why my appliances were live to the touch. Once he fixed it, I switched the breaker between the AC input and the inverter back on, and the mysterious ramp-up in consumption was gone. Problem solved, completely. My inverter finally behaves the way it should. Why this matters for your setup That single bridged wire could have killed someone, and it was quietly stressing my inverter every day. If your system is behaving strangely, tripping, ramping up, appliances tingling to the touch, the problem is very often not the inverter itself. It is the wiring and earthing feeding it. Daniel is the kind of person who will actually trace it instead of telling you to buy a bigger inverter. He told me plainly that most electricians will happily show up for a new wiring job, but the moment you say "I have a maintenance and troubleshooting issue," they vanish and give every excuse in the book. He does not. My appeal to you Someone this good does not deserve to be sitting without work. Please give him jobs and support him. He is Abuja based. This is not a sponsored post. I am simply an over-satisfied client who owes him one. And if he ever gives you any issue at all, come back to this thread and raise it with me directly, and I will intervene. Name: Daniel Phone / WhatsApp: +2348062375648 Location: Abuja |
FEGEITOK:Abuja Houseowners and Builders, Read This: The Man Who Saved Me From an Involuntary Manslaughter Charge I rarely post recommendations, but this one I am staking my reputation on. If you are in Abuja and you need an electrician who actually knows his trade, keep reading. First, who he is He is Trade Test 1, 2 and 3 certified, and NABTEB certified. That means he is not a "boy who learned small wiring." He is a qualified tradesman. What he can do, in his own field, is basically everything: Electrical drawings and design Full house and office wiring (done to code, not to convenience) Fault tracing and troubleshooting (this is where most so-called electricians run away) Thunder arrestor / lightning arrestor installation Earthing installation and remediation If it is electricity related, he is your man. Why I am vouching for him: the shocking truth Let me tell you what he actually did for me, so you understand this is not empty praise. I had a maddening problem. Whenever mains power tripped, the inverter would keep ramping up and running at about 50 percent load for no reason I could explain. On top of that, whoever originally wired the house had used a single colour of wire for everything, live, neutral and earth, which is a violation of basic standards and a nightmare to diagnose. I did the obvious first step and installed a brand new earth rod and earthing connections, assuming the old earth was the culprit. It was not (or at least, not the way I thought). Then I noticed something frightening: the fridge, freezer, microwave and cooker were all shocking to the touch. But only when the power came from the mains. On inverter power, zero shock. That clue turned out to be everything. When I told him, he did not give excuses. He said, "Let me come and confirm." He tested the live, neutral and earth at the affected outlet, then went to the distribution board and tested the common earth, common neutral and common live. Every single one lit up on the tester, which should never happen. His first instinct was to check every outlet in the house, tedious as that would be. Then he stopped and said, "There is a better way." He decided to isolate the fault at the DB level instead. We separated each earth connection one by one and tested, until the earth stopped lighting up. That pinned the fault to one circuit: an AC switch and a looped wall socket in the guest room. Here is the part that impressed me. He climbed into the ceiling, and asked me to call out from the ground which room he was standing over. I said the guest room. He traced the wires to the exact wall, came down, went straight to that socket, opened it, and there it was. Because the house was wired in one colour, whoever did the original job had bridged the live to the earth without knowing it. That is why testing live, neutral and earth all gave the same reading, and that is why my appliances were live to the touch. Once he fixed it, I switched the breaker between the AC input and the inverter back on, and the mysterious ramp-up in consumption was gone. Problem solved, completely. Why this matters That single bridged wire could have killed someone. I can finally trust that my house will not make me guilty of involuntary manslaughter. He told me plainly that most electricians will happily show up for a new wiring job, but the moment you say "I have a maintenance and troubleshooting issue," they vanish and give every excuse in the book. He does not. That, to me, is the whole difference. My appeal to you Someone this good does not deserve to be sitting without work. Please give him jobs and support him. He is Abuja based. This is not a sponsored post. I am simply an over-satisfied client who owes him one. And if he ever gives you any issue at all, come back to this thread and raise it with me directly, and I will intervene. Name: Daniel Phone / WhatsApp: +2348062375648 Location: Abuja |
TemporaryHansel:Something similar involved a bank whose name begins with G. A while ago if you may recall. This is why being rich and powerful in Nigeria is so different from being rich and powerful in the West. |
I Tdoctor:The first example. I think that connector between the one coming out of the ground and the one housing the panels is too short and too thin. I may be wrong |
Ballzproblemm:Had a long battle with cancer. And lost. |
nwakibie3:Report to Police CRU. Google Police CRU They are on WhatsApp and Twitter |
Greetings to the gurus in the house. Please, I’m looking for a solid battery charger that actually has a working desulfation/repair mode. My battery is acting up and I want to try reviving it before I think of buying a new one. Please recommend brands you've used that I can easily find in the local market (Oshodi, Ladipo, or Jumia/Konga). Budget-friendly but durable options preferred. Thanks! |
kpankpangolo:This is so true. I know of such a case. The ex-wife is so traumatized she keeps begging him not to. When it became too much she blocked him from contacting her everywhere |
FEGEITOK:In a significant escalation of events, Mr. Architect has reported me to the Force Intelligence Department IRT people in Abuja. They have sent an unofficial invitation to me to appear before them. Will update the house as events unfold. |
FEGEITOK:One more benefit of RCP
|
jabberjawz:My account of events is complete, unembellished, and I have left nothing out; my line-by-line breakdown and response to the MOU will be shared here. I did not leave out the part that I part-paid for the documentation fee. Could it be that the promise to pay the balance upon contract award is turning the architect from a service provider into a partner in the business? At least service providers can see that a debt does not automatically translate into equity in a business. Posting this here gives service providers a chance to see the client's perspective and conduct themselves accordingly, ensuring they don't miss out on transformative opportunities. Let me keep mute on the hiring another service provider until I see the response to the line-by-line breakdown of the MOU, although that is an option that is very much on the table. |
FEGEITOK:"The architect I engaged is effectively demanding access to the proposal I authored. Yesterday, he requested a copy, stating, 'I believe the document is 100% done, please send it to me so I can equally review.' I ignored this request. However, he followed up today with a more directive message: 'Please send me the final document you prepared [with] every detail that you submitted.'" For those who may not understand this, let me explain what is going on. Additionally, since this thread has been helpful to me, I am sharing it to assist anyone else in a similar situation in the future. We have not yet signed the MOU because I have promised him a forensic line-by-line breakdown analysis of his MOU. I want to professionally, narrowly, and slowly reset boundaries, avoid hostility and any implied partnership of any kind, so I won't just say no, directly. Scope Capture: He wants to see exactly what I promised the client so he can argue that his work covers those specific deliverables. IP & Leverage: If he possesses the final proposal, he can claim that the concept was a joint effort, reinforcing his claim to "Partnership" status and the 1. What he is actually asking for (not what he says) This is not a neutral professional request. An architect engaged to do design, documentation, and supervision does not need: (a) my commercial proposal, (b) my client-facing narrative, or (c) the full “every detail” submission unless: (a) he is a co-proposer, or (b) he is trying to insert himself into the commercial/client relationship, or (c) he wants materials he can later argue he “contributed to” or “relied upon.” This is outside scope! 2. Legal Implications #1: Ownership and IP I own: (a)the client relationship (b)the project (c)all commercial documents He only owns what he creates for me, and even that is assigned back to me. By requesting my authored proposal, he is attempting to access IP that is not his and for which he has no contractual entitlement. 2. Legal Implications #2: Independent contractor boundary. His wording — “equally review” — is dangerous. That phrasing is consistent with: (a) a joint author, or (b) a co-lead, or (b) a partner-level reviewer It is inconsistent with: An independent architect service provider. Courts look at conduct, not just contracts. Repeated insistence on “equal review” can later be cited to argue: “In practice, we were acting as joint principals.” Additionally, acting on that request lends credence to his "we are partners" narrative. 2. Legal Implications #3: Non-circumvention risk. This is the most serious risk. A full proposal: (a) reveals my pricing logic (b) reveals my value positioning (c) reveals my client's expectations (d) may contain contact pathways or cues Once he has it, he could: (a) “clarify” things directly with the client (b) reuse language or structure in a parallel approach (c) claim familiarity with the proposal to justify direct engagement The non-circumvention clause protects me after breach, but prevention is better. Conclusion In litigation terms, this is probative behaviour. He is not entitled to: (a) my proposal (b) my pitch document (c) my commercial terms (d) my client strategy (e) my full submission package Unless: the document is expressly listed in Schedule A as something he must work on, or I request his input on a defined excerpt. |
durodee:How big of a step down did you install at your place? |
GloriousGbola:Maybe another issue is that he wants me to handover the full quotation |(architectural and non-architectural) for his QS to create a professional bill of quantity and I have not done so! He has been asking for days and I have said the document is not ready He may need the money |
rmx:1. Initial Engagement & Site Survey (Bill #1) I met the architect while he was supervising a renovation near my former residence. We have no familial relationship. I initially engaged him to survey a site and assist with 3D visualizations. He quoted a consultation fee for the site visit, which I paid immediately. 2. 3D Visualization Negotiation (Bill #2) Following the visit, he submitted a bill for 3D visualizations. I deemed the quote excessive and paused the engagement. He followed up repeatedly, prompting a negotiation on price. I informed him that unless he accepted my counter-offer, I would wait for the contract award or seek alternatives. He eventually agreed to my figure, and I paid him in full for the 3D visualizations. 3. Documentation & Scope Expansion (Bill #3) I questioned whether his output covered all technical requirements. His response was unsatisfactory, so I conducted independent research and identified missing documentation. When I requested these specific documents, he presented a third, substantial bill. I agreed to draft a contract to cover this specific scope—not to offer him a partnership. 4. The MOU & Profit Sharing Dispute He drafted a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) requesting a percentage of the project contract in addition to his documentation fee. I instructed him to send the draft with the percentage left blank for my review. Upon review, I identified several significant issues. I informed him that I would prioritize finalizing the proposal documentation before addressing the flaws in the MOU. 5. Market Survey (Bill #4) He also conducted a market survey, constituting a fourth distinct billable item. It was after the market survey that this issue of partnership arose. Summary of Contribution: To date, his contribution is limited to paid services: (1) Site Consultation, (2) 3D Visualizations, (3) As-built designs, and (4) Market Survey. My Contribution: I retain sole responsibility for the project's success, including business development, stakeholder meetings, proposal defense, and all strategic efforts required to win the contract. And while the duration of his MOU is limited to between now and when the project is paid for and executed, my obligations to the client continue for a minimum of 1 year from the date of project handover; he is not part of that. He just wants to make a quick buck and be on his way. |
GloriousGbola:I have hidden nothing. His actions and speech give me serious cause for concern. I am seriously shopping for alternatives but will pay him for all work done to date. The only thing I haven't done is to share his chats on the issue. |
This is the MOU that the architect sent me and has been pestering my life ever since to sign it and to tell him his percentage from the project: MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is made and entered into on 2nd of December 2025 by: NAME: ARC. He who shall not be named ADDRESS: Does not matter and NAME: Me ADDRESS: Why should I put this online? OBJECTIVE Both parties agree to work together on the Bleep Project, sharing costs, expertise, and resources to make the project a success. TERMS 1. Duration: This MOU is effective from 2nd December 2025 to 31st January 2026. 2. Reimbursement: Both parties will be reimbursed for their expenses incurred before and during the project, upon submission of receipts and approval by both parties. 3. Profit Sharing: The parties agree to share profits from the project in the following percentage: - - 4. Roles and Responsibilities: Both parties will work collaboratively on the project, with responsibilities as agreed upon separately. 5. Decision Making: Major decisions will be made jointly by both parties. CONFIDENTIALITY Both parties agree to keep confidential all information related to the project and this agreement. ACCEPTANCE By signing below, the parties acknowledge that they have read, understand, and agree to the terms of this MOU. Signature Page You: _____________________________ Date: _____________________________ Partner: _____________________________ Date: _____________________________ Critically analyze this document, is this architect an independent service provider or did I bring up a co-owner? I told him to give me 7 days to complete the project documentation and he complained so I told him 72 hours from Friday and he would not let my phone rest since Friday, meanwhile I still have 3 more sections of the proposal to prepare |
GloriousGbola:Thank you. I have a video of the fire before I put it out. I have a video of the removal and repair. Maybe I need an affidavit of facts to prepare ahead of that possible day. I have the burnt MCCB as evidence, also. Thanks for referring the app to me. |
Quick and serious question: Who is responsible for supplying the MCCB inside the smart meter: the distribution company or the user? I am asking because mine just caught fire, and had I not caught it on time, it would have consumed the meter and resulted in a fire disaster. Pending your response, I am proceeding to purchase a replacement unit for immediate installation. |
darc:Shot you an email with the details. |
GloriousGbola:Check your inbox when you get a sec. |
Does anyone here draft Reflected Ceiling Plans (RCP)? In my view, lighting is 80% of a room's atmosphere; without an RCP, the design feels incomplete. My current architect states this is the work of an electrician, not an architect. However, my client is detail-oriented and expects this as part of the deliverable. I am looking for someone who can step in and provide a professional RCP. Please reach out if you can assist. Thanks. For the uninitiated, courtesy of alladiyallydotcom: "It is referred to as a reflected ceiling plan since it is drawn to display a view of the ceiling as if it were reflected onto a mirror on the floor. This way, the reflected ceiling plan has the same orientation as the floor plan associated with it. It is as if the ceiling were see-through and you could see right through it to the floor below." |
GloriousGbola:That sounds good. He requested the remaining non-architectural and non-structural documents to make the scope comprehensive, and subsequently recommended his friend to act as a Quantity Surveyor to professionalize the Bill of Quantities (BoQ). Or might it be him in disguise? However, I have decided not to share the technical documentation with him, as doing so would essentially hand over the blueprint/intellectual property for this specific type of project. Instead, I will engage an independent Quantity Surveyor. I appreciate your input and everyone else’s contributions. Thank you! |
Ferdiwar:Deye is good, but I totally forgot the brand. Thanks for prompting my memory. |
Drgreatone:Don't really know which one to go for |
bixton:First, his role is strictly limited to producing the technical documentation and supervision of the work. I have already paid a separate fee for the 'Market Survey,' which covered the time and effort required to research current prices for the BoQ. Therefore, I should not be charged again for that same effort via a percentage fee. Second, I will be handling the sourcing of all store-bought items, appliances, and electronics personally. My procurement standards require a level of due diligence—specifically dealing directly with manufacturers and authorized representatives to ensure warranties—that goes beyond a standard open-market purchase. Third, since I will be executing these purchases myself, and because the BoQ estimates likely already include a standard market buffer, these items must be excluded from the calculation of his Professional Fee. The 35% or now 20% fee should apply only to the construction works he is directly supervising, not to goods I am procuring myself. |
