[quote author=lee.ann93]my prd -33291 - 039 and my IMEI is 357174042501876 blackberry bold 9780 ... and could you explain how to use the code u gonns give me please thnx[/quote]5087904748258006 Insert non default Sim and reboot
Trac: ***********This [however] will be my last technical post on NL. It is time-consuming and not productive. I will be trivial henceforth with minimal interaction. The “thread” should spare me on this. It is a complex question but [I] won't let it off the hook. A disclaimer: it is NOT for everyone. If engineering phenomena disturbs you, do not proceed.
It is impossible to straighten this answer without thermodynamics. As some of us are familiar with, it is a protracted and deductive science. The comment written contradicts itself. Insomuch that is void of logic. My initial post on this thread has the answer BUT “everyone” condemned that I made the principle complicated. Meanwhile, I had scratched nothing. Those that understood in its entirety need no further explanation. Those without a clue need no explanation.
To answer the first [and only] question:
Torque != Efficiency
That alone renders the whole question as misplaced. Regarding your question and context, I can’t figure the relationship. If you know it, please give me the mathematical expression with the associated principle(s)/law(s) and I will work with that. However, I do know where you are coming from; a perspective fashioned by mainstream media. I will take the extra length to define “constraints” for the purpose of this objective. It will be lengthy but quantifiable in details. Torque by definition is the integration of force in distance (Force * Distance) or mass in acceleration (Mass * Acceleration) and efficiency of a plant has to do with the ratio in work output relative to the heat input of the working fluid.* Efficiency in this discussion is subdivided into three isolated conditions. Thermal efficiency (in a heat engine**) is the fraction of the heat input that is converted to net-work.
The second law of thermodynamics – Claucius: It is not possible to construct a device that operates in a cycle*** and produces no effects besides the transfer of heat from a lower temperature body to a higher temperature body. The second law of thermodynamics – Planck: It is not possible for any device that is dependent on a cycle to receive heat from a single reservoir and produce a net amount of work.
The definitions have been taken care of and the appropriate laws presented.
No engine or system with a hot exhaust is efficient. None! It is how reversible in process the system is that matters. The internal combustion engine is a closed-system and it is greatly dependent on how reversible**** it is. The less reversible, the more the inefficiency. It has nothing to do with high torque equating efficiency. The turbine is a sub-system. It has nothing to do with the closed-system; for a closed-system does not interact with any of its surroundings besides its immediate surroundings. Any expansive-medium**** that has the addition of heat to it will never exceed the temperature difference in reciprocal to the highest temperature in percentage. That is E = [((Th – Tl) / Th) %]. This is known as the Carnot efficiency. As long as the addition of heat is to the expansive-medium, it will never exceed that efficiency. Furthermore, no heat engine cycle can ever be completed without losing some heat to a lower temperature sink. This is the root to the efficiency and your fuel economy. You want minimal heatloss to increase overall efficiency. The less heatloss, the closer you get to 100%. The maximum theoretical efficiency gotten from a gasoline (spark) engine is 25%. You’ll be lucky if you ever get such efficiency. In similitude, it is as an candidate took an exam and made 18%. That is an epic fail. You’ll be shocked the efficiencies of today’s engines. Things did not get better. Also, the higher the number of cylinders, the less efficient the system will be due to irreversibilities. Irreversible****** processes are higher.
Truth is: mainstream media has not communicated core information. It’s partly because everybody must understand and this is a phenomena that cannot be understood by everyone. As I script this, it’s difficult to express this without going deep plus a lot is omitted. Thermodynamics and Heat-Transfer are sub-genres/disciplines/pillars of Hyper-Physics and it's not shallow.
Unimaginable! As sensitive as the matter is, they are NOT getting it correct. There are many more. They are not obligated by law to disclose the core.
Don’t fall for the horsepower-torque misconception. In a partial differential mathematical expression, you can freeze a variable and begin to work on the corresponding variable (torque/economy). I hope you caught my drift there. It is wishful thinking that things will change without a heavy price. There is new technology on the shelf. It’s not coming now. At the moment, a test-run is being conducted; a vehicle has been released to forbid you from servicing your own vehicle. You’ll be breaking copyright laws. If it succeeds, then it becomes the norm [moving-forward]. If not, then something else. It’s a business and they want to remain in it.
That is your answer. The gimmick behind the turbines as a turbocharger is another matter. That requires discussion of intimate motive energy and utility principles of the internal combustion engine and it’s purely scientific; because of “low-level” details. It’s unneeded since efficiency has been defined above. In summary, it’s nothing but flexible air-fuel ratio in conjunction with pulse per ignition cycle (duty load). Hence, the word, ingenuity.
What I have disclosed can be proven by anyone that has sound-knowledge of thermodynamics and they can spot the areas that I have left off (omitted). It is full-proof and cannot be bent. However, due to the nature of the content, it requires application of the knowledge and interaction with people to grasp the totality. It's not possible to compress it all as a post.
Let me leave a caveat: vehicles are not going to be engineered efficient for you. There is no profit in that. That burden is left to you. The offer was presented [somewhere] between the forties and sixties and other interests were chosen. It did not matter because it wasn't about them (the me-generation). Talk to old-men/mechanics - they have a different understanding of what the motor vehicle is. Sincerely, they know more about cars than our generation does.
*-------Working fluid is regarded as fuel **------Cyclic device - an energy converter that uses approximately a fraction of its converted energy e.g. I.C. engine ***-----Temperature differences as it goes high and low. This is known as cyclic processes ****----Processes that can be reversed without leaving a trace to its environment *****---Fuel as it expands in its surrounding ******--Processes that cannot be reversed Th - highest temperature of the working fluid Tl - lowest temperature of the working fluid Heat-Engine != Internal Combustion Engine - It is a cyclic device. The IC is a heat-engine
Guy calm down, shey na the same Thermo wey I read for school you come made these ambigious? SMH
Phones › Re: Free Blackberry Unlocking Codes (NOT BLACKBERRY 10 DEVICES) by femi4: 8:06am On Jan 04, 2014
