₦airaland Forum

Fenrir:
Mate, at least my mum wasn't a runs girl to buy a loaf of bread to feed her scrawny offspring

Oh no, your mum was more than that.

She was a legendary slut whose escapades transcend our known reality. 🥹

On your mother's gravestone will be written "The Unknown Prostitute", and even beyond the grave, your mother's ghost will forever remain in hell getting stuffed by sex-starved demons. 😂

Fenrir:
I've more than proved you wrong

A whole fucking country that believes a woman's family should be compensated just because that child was born female

Does anyone pay for your tiny tingly todger to marry you?

At this point, you're just chasing the wind.

When you're ready to articulate how payment for bride price is indicative of intrinsic human value, ring me up.

In the meantime, let's keep talking about the pathetic travesty of your existence. 😂

Fenrir:
Oh little boy, you'll have to do better than that 😅😅

I've said on here before I killed my parents at 13 and was emancipated

Self defence against pagans

Do better, dig the knife right in or don't try at all,

And FYI Europe doesn't do bride prices

That's an African thing and Asian thing and middle Eastern thing

Okay. You went through trauma and that's why you're a middle aged piece of shít scum with mommy issues. We know this already. 🥱

What else is new? 🤔🤣

Fenrir:
Oh little boy, you'll have to do better than that 😅😅

If this is the best counter you can come up with, then you're beneath my stronger attempts. 😂

Fenrir:
Your kung foo and logic are flawed young one

Then prove the logic wrong and stop shedding crocodile tears already.

Fenrir:
Lots of you men say that yet when you get married you all end up spit shining a Nigerian dads dangly bits

Your comments become less coherent the more I engage with you. It's just bitter insults intertwined with embarrassing logic and a penchant for boring mom jokes.

It's obvious you're suffering from some kind of trauma. Your mom's wanton escapades as a global slut must have hit the family hard. No wonder your "father" (in quote 😂) swapped your cock-hungry mother for a bottle of snuff and added you to the bargain for a pirated jersey of Paul Pogba.

Your "father" wasn't any better himself. The unmotivated lackey you call father is the biggest drunk in Norway who allowed your mother pay her own bride price from her anal bonuses. 😭😭😭😭

Fenrir:
How have you proven me wrong?

Obviously you're clueless. Quelle surprise.

Fenrir:
When you grow up and get married little boy, do you or do not pay a bride price?

Proving that your whole country believes women are born with value

And I told you that this is not evidence if value.

What you're describing here is not intrinsic human value. You're describing social arrangements that treat women as transferrable assets. True value is autonomy and capacity for impact in the society, regardless of gender. If value means what others are willing to pay for you, then like I said, in your worldview, a woman is no different from the ancient slaves.

The fact that certain cultures practice bride price doesn't make it philosophically valid.

Fenrir:
Even if you marry an ex prostitute like your dear old mum

You still have to pay her love-vendor dad a bride price since you are all still obsessed with social expectations

I'm not obsessed with social expectations. If anything, I'm a non-conformist.

But it's funny though, watching you claim that women have inherent value but still insisting that this value must be purchased. Your brain cells are clearly not in alignment.

And by the way, you can keep reeling out the wanton escapades of your mother from her secret diary, but it still won't make me feel any pity for you. I've read it all from start to finish. It's already general knowledge that no woman living on this earth can ever match the legendary whoredom of that grotesque ugly midget you call a mother.

There's a list of her clientele in her diary where we can get the names of her cheap customers and begin an oral interview of those who bleeped that short hoe in the anus and those who went in straight.

Then perhaps we might have half a chance to know the REAL owner of the inferior sperm than won the race to flagellate your mother's diseased-ravaged ovum. 🤮

Fenrir:
And yes I am

I crave chaos
I need chaos

I need fighting
I need arguments

I'm neuro divergent

But the only fucking fighting a Nigerian man will do is fucking words

None of you will use fist and fury

Well 1 tribe will but they are not boxers, dambe is brawling and that's no challenge

All that power but don't know how to use it
That was a truly disappointing ruck, they are too easy to piss off and take apart

I need battle 😫 this country is a paradise but you men have no real fight in you at all

Punk, stop telling me sweet nothings and explaining yourself like a chick owing money to her daddy pímp. 🤣🤣

I gave you two choices.

Let's talk reasonably like gentlemen and dissect your arguments with logic and reason

OR

Let's leave reason and logic out of it and start up a shítstorm.

I'm ready when you are. 🫠

Fenrir:
1) Norwegian so viking ancestors

War in my blood
Fighting in my blood

Madness is forged into my heart

Madness and irrationality is not the virtue you think it is. It just means you're lacking in both pure intellect and emotional intelligence.

Fenrir:
2) you can win an argument one of two ways

By being right

Except you've been proven wrong, but you don't want to talk about it.

Fenrir:
Or
By pissing the other person off so much they give up and Bleep off

Lol. I wish you knew my previous moniker on this forum. 🤣

I excel in trolling. I just don't feel the need to do so, unless I detect that my opponent is really too stupid to take a hint.

Like I said, say the word and let's get the party started. Enough of the chit-chat, sonny.

Fenrir:
Like I've said before on here

IM DYSLEXIC!!

but I've got phds in all your fake cultures and traditions going back to your fucking origins

Had a successful military career and a multimillionaire so I was able fully retire at 33 currently 39

You like off the equivalent of £50 maybe £60 a month if your lucky, so who bad at life and failure?

Definitely not me

95% of you men are born here
Raised here
Die here

Stuck here

More women leave Nigeria than you men because we see their value and we actually take care of them

Who comes here for Nigerian men?

Your insecurity is showing. Who called your achievements into question? And what does that have to do with this discussion? 🤔

Like I said, if you're itching for a verbal war here, then say the word. I'll meet up with you, and we can sling shít all over the thread for as long as you want. 🤷🏽

Fenrir:
Different nationality moosh

I just live in Nigeria

You're not a Nigerian. I heard you loud and clear the first time. There was no need repeating yourself.

Fenrir:
And women are born with value even your fake culture says that and your ancestors

BRIDE PRICE!!
Is there is equivalent for a man?

Yes women are born with value its just that value lowers the more men they Bleep that why all your wedding traditions and culture are based virginity

No, that's not value. That's treating women like commodities meant to be purchased. You really do lack self-awareness. The only thing you've proven here is that humans have always been treated like commodity since time immemorial.

I'm sure according to your logic, a woman is no different from a slave. Such barbarity and backwards thinking from a fellow who claims affinity to Western values.

Fenrir:
And don't forwarding shit on the Internet, get off your lazy male Nigerian fucking ass

Go to a library in your country and pick up a book, or text or scroll written by your fucking ancestors in their own fucking words before the fucking Internet and learn the fucking truth

The whole fucking human history says women are born with fucking value and men make their value

A simple question and your brain crumbled and you started ranting absurdities. 🤦🏽🤣🤣🤣

Shouting "fucking" every two paragraphs won't help you escape the poverty of your position. But critical thinking will. So you can keep tearing out your hair and slamming your face into the wall. You're just wasting your time.

It's only modern nancies men like you that ask women "what do you bring to a relationship" that think differently

Man up
Grow some balls
Do your fucking duty and then maybe you'll get your little willy wet with some pussy

The real Nancy boy cum loser here is the dude who thinks he can only gain attention and love from his partner through economic servitude. I would pity you for having such a depressing slave-like mindset, but with the way you've been ranting and hurling inanities all over the thread for no reason, it's safe to say that you're a piece of shít who doesn't deserve better anyway.

For the record, I'd advise you for the last time to temper your tone. You might not be able to take what you readily dish out.

If you're tired of calm, honest debate and want to play the game of dark vulgar insults, then just let me know, and I'll adjust myself accordingly. Fair warning though, I don't hold back, and nothing is off limits.

Thank you.

Wow. That's crazy.

Biodun556:
Since childhood, I have observed that mothers do prevent their children from going to the toilet after eating even though they are pressed.

Ignorantly, some mothers believe that their children will passed away the food their children just ate, in other to prevent waste of food, they stopped the innocent children from defecating after eating. Even some educated mothers are caught doing same.

Lol. First time I'm hearing something like this.

African moms are funny sha. 🤣

Fenrir:
Norwegian not Nigerian

Aiit then.

Fenrir:
Typical

1) a Nigerian gay bringing gays into a topic about women

Your petty insults only reveal to me that you're an amateur and a juvenile delinquent when it comes to mature conversations, and in a way, I guess that makes my job easier because I don't have to expend much brainpower.

So try harder.

Fenrir:
2) throughout all of history men have provided for women, and protected women in the most part except for the dark ages

Someone didn't get the memo about the naturalistic fallacy and the pitfalls of biological determinism. 🤦🏽🤦🏽

It's gon' be a long day with this one.

Fenrir:
3) when I said marriage was designed for women but men get more out of it

Patriarchal what is that exactly fucking that

What is this? You really need to keep your emotions in check because it seems your blind rage is causing you to construct incoherent sentences.

By the way, it's hilarious how you keep insisting that men benefit more from a system that is designed from women? That's a very funny design flaw, don't you think?

Marriage is "designed for women" and yet men control the wealth, property, and legal rights? Do you even read before hitting "submit"?

Fenrir:
4) women get bleeped, do most of the housework most times, give kids, are mostly submissive, do what the husband says

This is shockingly misogynistic from a guy who was playing Captain Save-A-Hoe just seconds ago.

Fenrir:
Men just have to protect and provide, so we get more out of it, idiot

This comment here says a lot about who's really embracing anachronistic gender ideologies between the both of us, colonizing someone's entire existence and calling it charity.

Fenrir:
This is just the African and middle Eastern attitude in you

Do you know how insanely juvenile and illogical these comments make you out to be? 🤔

Fenrir:
The rest of the world says differently and majority rules mate

This is an ad populum fallacy. Popularity doesn't determine truth at all times. Oh god you're really terrible at this. 🤦🏽😭

Fenrir:
And as for dna tests all births

If that child is not the husbands, he doesn't sign the birth certificate, it's divorce and the woman gets nothing because she cheated

And that husband is not on the hook for the baby

And we're back where we started: how does this resolve the damages done, emotionally and psychologically? Do you think it's so easy getting rid someone you've spent so many years with?

Fenrir:
You don't know what's going on in the west
Women fought for true equality and that's what the government's are giving them

Dude, you don't know shít about Western feminism. Just stop already.

Fenrir:
Paternity fraud will be crime with a prison sentence

Again, medicine after death. 🤦🏽🤧😭

Fenrir:
If a woman gets pregnant from a 1 night stand that man will no longer be responsible for that child unless he wants to because she chose to sleep with him unprotected

And lots fucking more

Like divorce and child support now if the father gets custody the women have to pay child support to the father

I can only plead with you to go back and read my original response to you because you've really gone off on an absurd tangent here.

I'm challenging three specific arguments in your write up:

1. "Men are supposed to take care of women because they're stronger"

That's not how it works. I'm under no obligation to bend my back over for a woman if I don't need to. That's why I cited the naturalistic fallacy from Wikipedia.

Besides our environment and standards of living have come a long way since the ancient times. Women needing protection was paramount when we still lived like bushmen and power was exerted solely through physical force. That's not the way things are today. Our global societal evolution has brought mental strength, intelligence, creativity and resilience to the forefront. We rely more on our brains now than just physical strength, and I'm not aware of any study that significantly asserts the intellectual superiority of one gender over the other.

2. Legal systems have put failsafes in society to protect men's belongings in case a marriage goes awry. That's fine. But you're acting like the men wouldn't have to deal with the trauma and heartbreak of losing someone they thought they'd spend the rest of their life with.

3. Your ambiguous description of "value". You have not sufficiently demonstrated how a woman is born with "value", and a man is not. I was expecting you to come back with a solid rebuttal detailing your explanations, not this sad response where you just repeat yourself over and over again.

Fenrir:
And for 5 maybe she's not talking financially, maybe she means a man that stand up for her, a man that will fight for her, a man that has her back when she's in danger, a man that makes her feel safe in one of the most dangerous countries in the world for women

But that never enters your heads here because you're a nationality of men with glass jaws and the run away from a fight mindset

I will assume you're not a Nigerian man because if you are, then I wonder why you'd willingly insult yourself with blanket statements like this?

Fenrir:
And for 5, you fucking weak sap men are biologically built to take care of women

We are built to protect and provide

Textbook naturalistic fallacy.

Some people use the phrase, naturalistic fallacy or appeal to nature, in a different sense, to characterize inferences of the form "Something is natural; therefore, it is morally acceptable" or "This property is unnatural; therefore, this property is undesirable." Such inferences are common in discussions of medicine, homosexuality, environmentalism, and veganism.

The naturalistic fallacy is the idea that what is found in nature is good. It was the basis for social Darwinism, the belief that helping the poor and sick would get in the way of evolution, which depends on the survival of the fittest. Today, biologists denounce the naturalistic fallacy because they want to describe the natural world honestly, without people deriving morals about how we ought to behave (as in: If birds and beasts engage in adultery, infanticide, cannibalism, it must be OK).

— Steven Pinker[6]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturalistic_fallacy

Fenrir:
And so utterly foolish to not understand that marriage was designed for women but men get more out of it and there only 2 risks in marriage for a man

Then you don't know the basics. Marriage wasn't necessarily "designed" for any gender in particular. Although, if you really want to stretch it, there are more solid arguments to support the idea that marriage as an institution has been a patriarchal and inherently misogynistic institution for millenniums.

Fenrir:
1) raising a kid that not his, but mandatory dna tests at all births which will be law in America and Europe soon

Medicine after death.

Fenrir:
2) financial, a woman marrying man just divorce him later and take half his shit that is solved but a pre nuptial agreement

The emotional and psychological baggage nko?

Fenrir:
But women can be be sexually abused
Beaten, killed, marry a fucking deadbeat that'd fucking broke, marry a man that gets her pregnant a few times then abandons her to raise the kids alone and much more

Women have a right to know a man can take care of her before getting involved with him

Non-sequitur. These comments are giving serious "Captain Save A Hoe" energy. No offense.

These concerns are legitimate concerns, but where you flop logically is using them to justify material expectations. Orientation and better legal protections that don't perpetuate economic dependency can be arranged.

Fenrir:
And you have it backwards in this country

Women are born with value
No boy is born with any value he makes his value by getting of his ass and making himself a man

Good education
Good job
Masculine

BEING ABLE TO PROVIDE AND PROTECT

But Nigeria has no men except when another nationality visits

What type of philosophy is this? I'm not aware of this. Actual human value in the conventional sense, is tied to capitalist achievements. It is not exclusive to anyone on arbitrary distinctions, and it's also not a birthright. If you can kindly provide an academic source that supports this concept of value you've written here, I'd love to read it.

The irony of your response though is that you came out swinging at Nigerian men, supposedly in defense of the characterization of women in this thread, but you ended reinforcing the exact same structures that restrain feminism without knowing, and that is what has prompted my response.

I'll leave you to figure it out for yourself.

OnionBandit:
The boy fit be creemeenal, but trust Peter Hoebi supporters to get emotional because he was their star boy when their fraud Messiah visited Lagos.

Except you have proof that the boy is a criminal, then this comment of yours is just nothing but sour grapes.

GanagiBitrus:
Not excusing Nigerians' greed & quest for quick money, but Govt also has responsibility to protect her citizens.
SEC & other agencies shouldn't be licensing & allowing such dubious schemes to operate, & scam Nigerians.

Solid comment. Unfortunately you don't really expect frauds to checkmate other frauds.

Samantha125:
What kind of house?🤔🤔🤔

Bungalow

kingxsamz:
😂 It's only people that eat very lightly that think 5 wraps is too much.
Those are the people who eat two slices of bread and still feel overfed.

You just described my elder sister.

Sometimes I look at her eating and get so annoyed. Like in your mind you're satisfied. 🤦🏽🤣🤣

doggedfighter:
You ate 5 wraps of fufu and you are laughing ?😳

Minus joke I think 5 is the standard for able bodied men wey tear eye. 😁

Even me I eat 5-7 on average on a good day. I recently reduced it to 3 to save cost. I can take up to 10 depending on the level of hunger (if I haven't eaten all day for instance).

People who know me personally, from friends to family, know me as a chief consumer. 🤣

DeepSight:
It's not really about having a better theory because I accept the fundamentals of the ToE. I just acknowledge that it has unresolved issues.

Fair enough. I appreciate the honesty.

Personally, I'm not too deep in the field of natural sciences so I can't claim full understanding of the ToE. I was bred in the social sciences, so I'll probably have a better shot at debating international policies and legal rights. 🤷🏽

The only gripe I have with people arguing the ToE in this religion section is that most of the time, the theory is often used as a crutch by Christians to attack atheists, and I've never understood that logic because personally I don't give a shít about the theory. It didn't lead me to become an atheist and frankly, it bores me to death.

But somehow Christians think shooting it down automatically validates their Bible stories - a very primitive type of thinking rooted in false dichotomy (an actual logical fallacy). 🤦🏽

I give the atheists a pass on bringing it up because at least they're rightfully juxtaposing it against the Bible's tale of creation, which sounds even more ridiculous and convoluted.

DeepSight:
Being a person who believes in the spiritual though, I am inclined to believe in some sort of guided evolution as opposed to that which is strictly limited to natural selection. That is better able to help us with something as complicated as the evolution of the eye for example.

This is strictly within the realm of subjectivity, so I'm not going to argue this paragraph with you. As for me, I feel no need to accept the existence of a spiritual realm.

I will never drag an argument with someone over how he believes the universe came to be, provided he or she accepts that his belief is entirely his own belief. Where I start to heckle them is if they try to establish their beliefs as an objective truth, like the way some people do here.

Also, this is unrelated to our conversation but I just want to note how profoundly ignorant some people on this thread are that they casually take the word "power" from the axiom "knowledge is power", and equate it with physical capacity.

The same people write nonsensical faith fueled diatribes here to try and disparage the idea of having "knowledge", foolishly thinking that having knowledge doesn't have any practical real world benefits. I mean, the inherent stupidity in that statement should be self evident. Lol. 😂

You seem like a pretty flexible poster in terms of thought and logic, and I respect you for it. Unlike some here who are closed off from reality by their faith, and ironically think that it is a virtue worth extolling.

DeepSight:
Many times evolutionists hide behind the large expanses of time they say evolution occurs over in order to gloss over things that will actually be impossible even in an eternity of time without guidance.

Well, like I said, I don't know jack shít about the ToE. I'm an atheist, not a biologist or "evolutionist" (whatever that means). Also I feel people often conflate "theory of evolution" with "evolution". Those two terms have different connotations.

Furthermore, I don't particularly care about the modus operandi of ToE proponents. However, a scientific theory doesn't necessarily have to be flawless for it to be plausible. Even the theory of gravity has its own limitations when you go deep into quantum mechanics.

DeepSight:
Finally let me stress that not even the guided evolution I believe in is perfect. I do not believe that the creators or instigators of this world are perfect either.

Again, I will not personally accept the idea of there being a "creator or instigator" of this world without convincing evidence. But I will respect it as your belief.

DeepSight:
Many people who think they understand everything about evolution have the same unnecessary arrogance you have displayed here.

If you don't touch upon the point that all of the evolution complimentary sexual organs must have happened in a single generation then not only do you not understand the issue, but you haven't even started to address it.

You mentioned that the evolution of sex is gradual. This is wrong for one reason. Just tell me how there would have been successful reproduction during that gradual process with incomplete complementary reproduction systems?

That's all you need to address and not whether you started studying evolution when you were two years old.

This same arrogance of yours is what has caused many professors who have asked these questions to be fired by dogmatic academics in universities who cannot admit that the ToE has problems.

The theory of evolution has problems, I agree.

Do you have a stronger hypothesis or postulate that is backed up by the evidence?

I'm reading certain comments here and I'm just shaking my head laughing. This thread is becoming hilarious and sad in equal measure. 🤧

I can't imagine the height of delusions it must take to rest on false validations, instead of actual evidence of your claims, to boost your own confidence. Throughout my entire life, I've met many people who are intelligent, or who THINK they're intelligent but when push comes to shove, they woefully show their ignorance to the whole room.

You can string up arguments that sound reasonable and enjoyable to read. Okay? People like to see that. They will clap and sing for it. So what? Does it really prove anything? Does it really contribute to knowledge in a discussion? In many ways, I actually feel pity for this type of people because Dunning Kruger is a serious condition and it has the grip of a metal vice.

Knowledge is power after all, and so is TRUTH. Both infintely superior to opinions, or anything else. I know say I get prick. Even the most astute scientist cannot deny that fact. 💁🏽

So it's funny to watch people here reveling in the euphoria of mass delusion. People love to read sophistry, because sophistry looks pretty and fanciful, even though substantially, it is nonsense. And so it can never be a reliable lead to TRUTH. Evidence will always be the best route.

Okay that's my 2 cents. Carry on, y'all. 👍🏽

kingxsamz:
Fufu is not as soft as Semo and Okra is very slippery. The only way that can work is if you dip most of your fingers (if not your hand) into the soup. Or unless the soup is thick enough.

Hmmmm. 🤔

Makes sense sha.

I always preferred fufu with soups that don't draw or are too thick, like pepper soup or some versions of Banga.

Gabrielshow24:
It's intellectual dishonesty because he used it as a basis to deem others unintelligible — basically hypocrisy, trying to flex a muscle he can't use!

Fair enough.

Gabrielshow24:
To clarify, the post you deemed it fit, I 'pretended' upon to be mine was it in any way related to the dismissal of his argument! What shall we call that type of response 🤨?

Yes, it was a response to something he stated, as a matter of fact. Attacking someone for relying on AI when you're also relying on AI for whatever reason automatically renders your point moot, your true intentions notwithstanding. If you can find reasonable justification for using AI, I'm sure Omoawoke will do the same if we start to heckle him.

Gabrielshow24:
I don't like to go about in circular arguments. I have heard your own. It's alright 🙃. Hopefully I see you on the battlefield 😁 where we can settle the rest there—Although, I think🤔 we still have unfinished business 🙃.

You're the one who kept walking us round the circle only to keep reinforcing my point. I never intended to drag the issue any longer than necessary.

I'll see you when I see you like fantasia.

Good morning.

Gabrielshow24:
My context is totally different from that of op's. We are miles apart intellectually!

Duh. The context is different. I just said that.

As for the supposed gap in intelligence, I don't know enough to comment on that and it's irrelevant to this argument.

Gabrielshow24:
My entire theme has been against his total reliance on AI even in his own thread!
I'm sure you saw where I said "I was talking to an LLM"

So basically this is a quarrel about who uses AI more? 🤷🏽😂

Gabrielshow24:
Also, you failed to address op when he mocked others' intellect using AI! That's my bone of contention with you, your radar didn't pick up on that 🤕! You didn't deem that as intellectual dishonesty!

Did OP copy ChatGPT without reference? If no, then how is that intellectual dishonesty?

It's like when we go to websites like Britannica or Quora. Some people lift content from those sites and paste them here without attribution. Others do their due diligence and include the references.

But the bottom line is this: are the lifted articles relevant to the conversation? Do they address the topic? Are they coherent?

Some people copy paste, but sometimes even their copy paste ends up biting them in the ass because they didn't read through it properly to see subtle details or caveats that disarms them completely.

Like I said, heckle him all you want but he never hid his intentions. He has been consistent, and he didn't pretend as if those words were his.

People dissing each other about intelligence happens all the time around here, to the point where I don't even register it in my mind. If I was a petty shít-stirrer, I can literally sit here all day and point out why many people on this thread have no right to be calling others unintelligent. But then what would really be the point?

kingxsamz:
Use hand to eat Fufu and Okra? Nah.
Egusi, yeah but not Okra.

Lol. Why tho?

Gabrielshow24:
I probably missed that mention of yours.
Well, I didn't use AI to have a discourse with him 🤔.
The one you allude to was to call him out as regards his promise🤨.

Did you find any during our discourse? Nope, you can't! I don't need to stoop so low to his level!

No wam.

Gabrielshow24:
It's not an excuse to justify my own! Your yard stick is totally wrong. Your perceived act of hypocrisy is far-fetched!

Now kindly tell me, in the discourse I had with both you and him, of an instance of AI🤧.
At least, we have had conversations. Let's start from there🙃.

I want to engage you for a little while to dismiss your sentimental allusions🤨!

What part of "certain posts scattered across other sections here" are you finding difficult to assimilate?

No seriously I can pull up what I said and we'll go through it.

FiveFootNinja:
I wasn't exactly referring to this thread when I said you had posts entirely copied from AI. When I said your posts, I was speaking of certain posts scattered across other sections here.

What part don't you understand?

Gabrielshow24:
I am not relying on it to generate my comment!

VS

Gabrielshow24:
When I do use it in write-ups...

🤦🏽🤦🏽🤦🏽🤦🏽🤦🏽

Gabrielshow24:
....it is only when I am tired, busy or too engaged to type my own response!

There's a difference....

So long story short, you rely on AI. It's just a matter of context. I get your point perfectly.

As for being tired, busy or too engaged, personally I don't see why you shouldn't just take a rest and come back to respond when you want to. Personally, I've done it before. I can respond to a conversation I was having with someone last month. But anyway, that's me.

All I'm saying is you can't mock someone for relying on AI, when you do the exact same. The same way you've justified yourself here (and your reason is okay), another person can have his own justification for using AI. That's why I said you have to look at the optics i.e read the room.

Gabrielshow24:
Are you this daft?
First of all, you missed the goal post entirely by positing that I used GPT when I didn't.

Secondly, yeah, I used an LLM extension which can be construed as AI but not in the discussion, I had with op! —you are free to disprove this if you like, if it will help you sleep more🤔

Thirdly, You totally missed the plethora of different instances where your homeboy downplayed others' intellect while totally relying on GPT for answers! A serious case of mistaken identity! Your hypocrisy radar didn't go on🤔.

Lastly, You don't have anything useful to say!

Class dismissed!

You've terminated the conversation for the second time only to come back and keep repeating yourself. 🤦🏽

I don't see how anything you've said here changes that fact that you rely on AI for certain posts.

Here's a useful hint: pointing out other people's wrongdoing is not an excuse to justify yours.