₦airaland Forum

Antichristus:
Sorry village man. You have no data no browse, no access to world news on BBC, VOA, CNN and other outlets. Keep displaying your ignorance and naivety.

Sorry Brainwashed ignoramus, all those sources you mentioned are well known fake news media. Keep displaying your ignorance and naivety

FAKE NEWS

Whyem15:
.
The yankees don't have the monopoly of anti satellite missiles and they have lots of sattelites to lose than Iran's single one.
Iran should do quick and launch more to concentrate on the most aggressive countries in the world.

Iran don't have the capability to shoot down any US satellites

manuel4real:
onazi 26years, dem Neva born me b dat

Lol

wirinet:
Which doctor or even sane human would suggest you inject disinfectant into the body of a living thing not just humans to cure any infection? Your lord and master just just heard that bleach kills viruses and other germs, and immediately suggested that people should start injecting bleach. What are disinfectant used for if not for killing germs on surfaces. Disinfectants had been used for in hospitals for centuries, no one was crazy enough to suggest people drink or inject it. ( well, until stable genius came along ).

The one that got me laughing until my children started asking questions was this;


So, supposedly we hit the body with a tremendous, whether it’s ultraviolet or just very powerful light


See Trump's light therapy below

That's it!! no doctor suggested injecting people with disinfectants neither did Trump!! It's your fake news media that is misleading you liberals with bullshit!! Trump is not a medical expert so he was asking the experts if this was possible. He clearly says it's up to them and the medical doctors to check that out. Asking your experts about the possibility of something is not the same as telling them to do it.

socialmediaman:
Attached is a paragraph from the link you sent. Does that look like the task force was suggesting injecting people with chemicals and UV or Trump was suggesting?

We’re all aware that chemicals kill the virus, that’s no news, that’s why we’re using hand Sanitizers and disinfectant wipes... what was preposterous was that the president himself was suggesting something that has no scientific backing whatsoever

He asked the experts if it was possible so Is that enough reason for you all to start spreading fake news that he suggested people should be injected with disinfectants? Do you not see the difference between someone asking if it's possible to make an injection from something and the fake news headlines that says he said people should be injected with disinfectants?

Nairalandmonika:
That guys seems brainwashed

You're the one who is being brainwashed with fake news

Nairalandmonika:
Did Trump said disinfectant should be injected in people or not?
I don't even know why I am arguing with you.
If u follow Trump press conference and u still think he's normal then there's something wrong with you.

He didn't say anyone should be injected with disinfectants and if you still believe all the rubbish you're been fed by the fake news media then there's something wrong with you.

wirinet:
This is the quote the controversial part of the transcript;



So where is the part CNN faked or misconstrued?

I am sure you cannot the the parts I redded.

They are deliberately trying to make it look as if it was Trump's suggestion to use those as Chloroquine treatment when he was simply referring to what other experts said they observed in their studies. You can't see the big difference here? He even went on to ask Dr. Birx if she had heard of those studies so from where did they get the headline that Trump suggests injecting people with disinfectants?
And you can see clearly from the statement that Trump was saying what he told the experts when they told him about the studies. You can see him clearly saying
"And I think you said you’re going to test that too. Sounds interesting, right? " And "so it’d be interesting to check that so that you’re going to have to use medical doctors with, but it sounds interesting to me. So, we’ll see, but the whole concept of the light, the way it kills it in one minute. That’s pretty powerful." So where did he suggest injecting people with disinfectants?

Nairalandmonika:
I have watch the full video, you obviously don't watch Trump press conference, that's how Trump talks, Trump wasn't asking a question, he was suggesting. Let's even agree he was asking a question, is that not a stupid question from the president of the United States.

Lol, you are telling a Trump supporter that he doesn't watch Trump's press conferences and he doesn't know how Trump talks? If I don't watch his full press conferences, then how did I know that the version that is been shared by the fake news media was misleading and deliberately cropped to leave out the context in which he was speaking?

I can't be quoting all the fake news brainwashed liberals up there trying to spread fake news up there about what Trump said about Lysol and UV light with regards to the coronavirus. They are busy sharing a cropped and deliberately misleading video that leaves out the context in which Trump was speaking.

He was referring to what Under Secretary for Science and Technology at the Department of Homeland Security, Bill Bryan had noted earlier that in their studies observations were made about how the virus reacts to certain things including UV light and various chemicals. Trump was just saying from their studies, if it was possible to make an injection out of certain chemicals or UV light then it could be effective because their studies showed the virus reacted negatively to them.

This is the full transcript of the press conference including Bill Bryan's comments,

https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/donald-trump-coronavirus-press-conference-transcript-april-23

socialmediaman:
Where was the suggestion made, and who made the suggestion, if he wasn’t the one suggesting it? By the way that’s not what a president says publicly if there’s no research backing it up... because millions of people rely on what he says, don’t be surprised if some people are already trying it at home because the president brought the idea on the table

He was referring to what Under Secretary for Science and Technology at the Department of Homeland Security, Bill Bryan had noted earlier that in their studies observations were made about how the virus reacts to certain things including UV light and various chemicals. Trump was just saying from their studies, if it was possible to make an injection out of certain chemicals or UV light then it could be effective because their studies showed the virus reacted negatively to them.

This is the full transcript of the press conference including Bill Bryan's comments,

https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/donald-trump-coronavirus-press-conference-transcript-april-23

ThinkFreely:
ok now get off my mentions.

Fück off!!!

ThinkFreely:
Sorry, you are a trump supporter. Most of them don’t usually reason like a normal human being.
I understand your case

Sorry you're a liberals supporter, most of them are brainwashed lunatics and brain dead zombies. I understand your case too

Nairalandmonika:
Na so, u explain the context in which Trump was speaking.
And if u fail to make a meaningful explanation may Thunder strike u.

He wasn't suggesting anything, he was just talking about what Under Secretary for Science and Technology at the Department of Homeland Security, Bill Bryan had noted earlier that in their studies observations were made about how the virus reacts to certain things including UV light and various chemicals. Trump was just saying from their studies, if it was possible to make an injection out of certain chemicals or UV light then it could be effective because their studies showed the virus reacted negatively to them.

This is the full transcript of the press conference including Bill Bryan's comments,
https://www.rev.com/blog/transcripts/donald-trump-coronavirus-press-conference-transcript-april-23

that's if you can read because I know that liberals are lazy readers and that's why you are easily bamboozled by sensational headlines. You better take your time to read the full transcript or watch the full video of the press conference and may thunder fire you too if you dare tell me that it's too long for you to read

Nairalandmonika:
Did u just watch the video I sent u, what does that have to do with CNN?

I don't need to watch your cropped video, I watched the full press conference live so I know the context in which the president was speaking not the cropped and deliberately misleading version you're being fed by fake news liberals.

ThinkFreely:
Icant believe you and disbelieve cnn, bbc, aljazeera and other top news outlets. You are a nobody.

Neither can I stop believing what I watched with my own eyes and believe what you claimed you saw on your fake news outlets. You are an inconsequential nonentity.

ijedeikorodu:
Trump owes tens of millions to the Bank of China — and the loan is due soon

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/24/trump-biden-china-debt-205475


Donald Trump is warning “China will own the United States” if Joe Biden is elected president.

But Trump himself is tens of millions of dollars in debt to China: In 2012, his real estate partner refinanced one of Trump’s most prized New York buildings for almost $1 billion. The debt includes $211 million from the state-owned Bank of China — its first loan of this kind in the U.S. — which matures in the middle of what could be Trump’s second term, financial records show.

Steps away from Trump Tower in Manhattan, the 43-story 1290 Avenue of the Americas skyscraper spans an entire city block. Trump owns a 30 percent stake in the property valued at more than $1 billion, making it one of the priciest addresses in his portfolio, according to his financial disclosures.

Trump’s ownership of the building received a smattering of attention before and after his 2016 campaign. But the arrangement with the Bank of China — and its impending due date in 2022 — has gone largely unnoticed.

The revelation complicates one of Trump’s emerging campaign attacks against Biden: that the former vice president would be a gift to the Communist country and America’s chief economic rival.

You can see how stupid fake news can be and liberals will still gulp it down because they're all brainwashed ignoramuses. How can a headline say "Trump owes" then when you go on to read the story it says that it was his real estate partner that borrowed money from China. So if your business partner borrows money to execute a contract you gave him then you're the one owing? I am sure you didn't even read beyond the headline before rushing to post this story here because TDS won't allow you see clearly. Just like basilico said up there, "Liberals never know what truth is even if its staring at them point blank. Their truth is whatever they have been brainwashed into thinking."

ThinkFreely:
Bro, we saw the video.

Bro, we also watched the full press conference not your fake news edited version

Nairalandmonika:
I bet u don't even know any other media outlet in the US apart from CNN, because u see people dey shout fake news, u sef follow shout.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnDBq64VS2I

CNN is fake news and if you don't know that by now, then you're an irredeemable ignoramus

JAMO84:
I miss seeing a real president at the white house

Obama was an idiot in chief, not a Commander in chief

ThinkFreely:
Open it, a video was attached. It’s even trending on twitter in the United States.

Trump didn't suggest it, he said a suggestion has been made by some medical experts to that effect then he asked Dr Birx if she has heard about it. This is complete fake news by CNN to be saying it was Trump that made the suggestion.

Fake News by fake news CNN

helinues:
$1,200 check When an average monthly rent in USA is $850.

Can you imagine this clown who has not received a Kobo from his own government criticizing a government that actually gave all her citizens 1200 dollars? Is this not stupidity of the highest order?

Obrigardo:
No you are the clown. Clowns make a lot of noises and needless praises even for the most foolish things thats so basic and common sense. Your hypocrisy is like sunlight, because clowns have no shame.... There must something you will say to defend this corruption. People like you shouldn't be anywhere near something that can outwardly display your cowardice

After trying for hours to make any sense out of this your epistle of gibberish, sorry I failed to make any.

budaatum:
I love the reasoning. Take credit when stock is rising all over the world but when they plummet its nothing to do with you because they have plummeted all over the world. Its like looking through one eye.

Trump must have missed a trick for never taking credit when stock was rising all over the world, though I bet I just haven't found he did.

I asked you a simple question, what exactly did Trump do to affect the global oil prices downtrend? Please answer and stop pestering me with nonsensical liberal gibberish

budaatum:
On the way up it was Trump! Trump! Trump! Now it's on the way down it's "just market forces of demand and supply".

Yes because it was deliberate government policies that were responsible for the growth but the downtrend is as a result of a universal epidemic crises that you can't blame Trump for. It's happening all over the world not only in the US, to blame Trump for a universal trend is the highest form of ridiculousness. The most ridiculous is trying to blame Trump for the oil price downturn. What in the world did Trump do to bring down global oil prices? Can you please tell us?

ijedeikorodu:
"We assess Russian President Vladimir Putin ordered an influence campaign in 2016 aimed at the U.S. presidential election. Russia's goals were to undermine public faith in the U.S. democratic process, denigrate Secretary (Hillary) Clinton, and harm her electability and potential presidency. We further assess Putin and the Russian Government developed a clear preference for President-elect Trump."


The report released yesterday was confirmed by the Senate led Intelligence Committee - whose leader is Senate GOP - Richard Burr.
Another point, it seems that majority of Republicans on the Intel committee voted for this report which means they agree with it, because Republicans are in the Majority on the Intel Committee in the Senate, and without their votes, this report would not have been issued or passed.
This now begs the question, with all these information, why did the Senate GOP voted in February to acquit Trump during the impeachment. Why is the report so heavily redacted?

Only a matter of time before Richard Burr is labelled anti-Trump and as usual Trump fans will still insist that is all "Fake News" and its the "Democrats out to get Trump."

What was the so called Russian interference? How did they interfere and what effect did it have on the election results?

ijedeikorodu:
It looks like everything Trump is involved in goes down.

Lol, you're a clown. Trump has over 500 businesses and you're talking about this miserable few that didn't work out. You better Google the Trump organization before you start posting nonsense here. Can you show me one single person in this world that has over 500 businesses and none of them failed, just name one person. Even you that has not achieved up to one percent of Trump's empire, can you honestly say you haven't failed at some things in life? Yet you will open your mouth wide and call someone like Trump a failure? Someone that has conquered in many different spheres of business and still joined politics and conquered? Clown!!!

ijedeikorodu:
Russia interfered in 2016 election to back Trump, not Clinton, new Senate intelligence report confirms

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory/senate-panel-backs-assessment-russia-interfered-2016-70266714?cid=clicksource_4380645_10_heads_posts_headlines_hed

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/04/21/senate-intel-report-confirms-russia-aimed-to-help-trump-in-2016-198171

A new bipartisan report from the Senate Intelligence Committee reasserts the panel's position that Russia launched an "unprecedented" election interference campaign in 2016 to help Donald Trump defeat Hillary Clinton.

The Senate Intelligence Committee is chaired by Republican Senator Richard Burr of North Carolina.

The 158-page, heavily redacted fourth volume of the Senate Intelligence panel's ongoing investigation into Russian election interference and the US government's response to it undermines the president's years-long campaign to frame the intelligence community's 2017 assessment that Russian President Vladimir Putin sought to aid Mr Trump as a "hoax" perpetrated by career US intelligence officials who do not like him.
The 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment (ICA) is "a sound intelligence product," the Senate report concludes.

Tuesday's report also keeps Mr Burr's committee at odds with Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee, who concluded in their own 253-page report in 2018 that intelligence officials exhibited "tradecraft failings" during their investigation and assessment of Russian election interference and Mr Putin's motives.
The 2017 ICA "reflects strong tradecraft, sound analytical reasoning, and proper justification of disagreement in the one analytical line where it occurred," the report concludes.

The Senate report also states that it found no evidence the US intelligence officials who compiled the 2017 ICA that found Russia interfered in 2016 to back Mr Trump were operating under political pressures or otherwise politically motivated.

"In all the interviews of those who drafted and prepared the ICA, the Committee heard consistently that analysts were under no politically motivated pressure to reach specific conclusions," the report states. "All analysts expressed that they were free to debate, object to content, and assess confidence levels, as is normal and proper for the analytic process."

In a statement on Tuesday, Mr Burr commended the intelligence community's work in 2017 and echoed its warning that Americans should be on guard for repeat efforts by the Kremlin in 2020 to spread misinformation before the presidential election on 3 November.

The Senate Intelligence Committee has not announced when it will release the fifth and final volume of its report, which, in total, is expected to be nearly 1,000 pages.That final volume of the report could be the most politically sensitive one yet, as it will focus on US counterintelligence efforts in 2016, when Russia was trying to make contact with advisers on the Trump campaign, including the president's son Donald Trump Jr, his campaign chairman Paul Manafort, and his son-in-law Jared Kushner.

Special Counsel Robert Mueller reported last year that his team found “evidence of numerous links” between members of the Trump campaign and people with ties — or who claimed to have ties — to the Russian government.
Mr Mueller, however, declined to bring any charges against Mr Manafort, Mr Kushner, Mr Trump, or any others on the campaign for their contacts with purported Russian agents over concerns that it would be difficult to prove to a jury they willfully broke campaign laws prohibiting such behaviour.

https://www.intelligence.senate.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Report_Volume4.pdf

Link to the heavily redacted documents

Lol, you guys are still drunk on this your Russian porn? You forgot to add that the so called Russian interference was just a few messages on Facebook and other social media. Yeah sure keep blaming those few messages for the humiliation of your queen killary in 2016. Start selecting another country you're going to blame for the trashing awaiting you in November now because this your Russia paranoia has become stale.

[quote author=Obrigardo post=88715443][/quote]Yeah, Andrew Cuomo has blood on his hands

Rema