₦airaland Forum

Antiislaam:
And your anobi was not circumcised

babat89:
...
So that is proof the West backed the Serbs.
...

babat89:
...
Show proof they were Western backed.
...

babat89:
...
So you know, whilst Serbs were commiting war crimes, NATO and Western Special Forces were going after them and enforcing rule of law.

Enough with your conspiracies oga!

babat89:
Do you think?
Do you read?

I am sure you have a brain?

Who were the foreign invaders mentioned there?

What had the Turks done to his people for centuries.
Where the Turks impaling before Vlad or not?

Where does the word Slave come from?
Who are the Slavs?

Why do Vlad's people regard him as a hero?

Why do Eastern Europeans hate Islam?

Think, read and don't use unreasonable and silly searches to make some point.

babat89:
Why did Vlad start impaling?
Did Vlad go to the Middle East ?
Was it not in retaliation to what the Islamists had been doing to his people?

Like I said, you are a liar!

Why were Turks still impaling and skinning Greeks alive in the 1800s.

babat89:
You are a liar!

Is it the same Turks that were impaling people and skinning them alive?

What did they do to the Greeks, Armenians and in Eastern Europe?

How did Islam spread in Turkey itself?

Kukutente23:
It seems you enjoy shifting with lies. Banu Damrah were OUTSIDE Medina not within it. They were located in the Al-Abwa close to Medina but were never within the jurisdiction of Medina. It is between Mecca and Medina and Muhammad led his raids there not within his jurisdiction. You've also shifted to justifying the raids as an exhibition of state power. It is no longer to reclaim his seized properties now but to exert state power over the Quraysh who were never under the jurisdiction of his state. What you just described is called an expansionist aggression in international lingua. So you're inadvertently admitting that Muhammad was an aggressor in those raids contrary to your earlier claim that he was simply being defensive

The fact still stands that there was no means of identifying the quraysh caravan cause if there were, Muhammad wouldn't have kept missing them or attacking innocents in the misguided belief that they were Quraishi. If you have to attack everyone who makes friends with your enemies even if they don't attack you, then you're no different from Hitler or the Romans. You're simply justifying Hitler's invasion of Austria since he also claimed he needed them to enhance the strategic defence of Germany. It's same stance Trump is taking over Greenland. Trump is right then to insist on invading and taking over Greenland since he says it's for the strategic defence of the Pacific. It will be hypocritical to condemn Trump and defend Muhammad


This is why I usually don't put too much importance to your hadiths. Most are usually illogical and totally flawed. From your hadith above, it implies that the greetings is for all the earth since all the earth are supposed to be offsprings of Adam. Well, the simple question will be why only semitic tribes gave that form of greeting? Does it mean only semitic tribes are offsprings of Adam and the Mongols, Caucasian, Indos and Afro races who are like 2/3 of the earth and don't greet like that aren't offsprings of Adam? Is that not a direct conflict with the quranic verse that says Adam was the first man and all others came from him? More importantly, this greetings was being used by the pagans as we see from the Bedouin caravans recently before Muhammad was even conceived. Does the hadith then not imply that the pagans were obeying Allah in using that greetings? Why then were they roundly condemned by Muhammad when obviously they were following Allah's injunction with the greeting style



I find this laughable. So you went to Google to find why the other codes and constitutions that existed before the Medina code were defective. Why didn't you also Google why the Medina code can't be called a constitution in the true sense and see if you won't get a thousand and one reasons as well? In fact, the introductory line from Wikipedia goes thus:

The name "Constitution of Medina" is misleading as the text did not establish a state.[7] Furthermore, even the term "treaty" given to the document by many may not be entirely appropriate because of its "unilateral" nature.
But more importantly, a constitution is usually a product of a constituent Assembly made up of representatives of the constituencies that make up the state. The Medina code was solely formed by Muhammad and all other tribes were forced to accept it under threat of war or expulsion from Medina. If we're to go by your latest experiment, there's no way the Medina code qualifies as a constitution. It looks more like a royal edict or a military decree at best.

OBIDIENTNAIJA:
Devil's own religion.

Alkebula:
Islam is the religion of the devil himself . All they do is kill , rape and do drugs

Fujiyama:
^^^
Ok.

But the blood of Deborah Samuels is still calling from the ground.

Jagabanfromcali:
When will I hear this or that road being awarded in the east , just one new road , not even one new road in the past quarter of a century

skywalker240:
But a Christian girl was set ablaze in response to the sharia law
Stop confusing yourself

Tenrack:
In all this rubbish you wrote up here. Can you tell me again, why Deborah was burnt to death in Sokoto? I weep for you sentimental lot.

skywalker240:
But a Christian girl was set ablaze in response to the sharia law
Stop confusing yourself

SisterAnn:
Was it not with sorrow, tears and blood that Islam spread in northern Nigeria and across most of the world? Which kain question you dey ask me sef? Abi e get something else wey you wan hear from my mouth?

Mummy see oo 😧

SisterAnn:
They killed them because they refused to join them in the jihad. Can't you understand that? Jihad is also a fundamental duty of Muslims right?

SisterAnn:
What they did is part of jihad.

SisterAnn:
Is Boko Haram ideology not rooted in Islam?

The ones that killed people in Kwara few days ago, wasn't it call to prayer that was used to lure the people out before opening fire on them?

Moderate Muslims are not true Muslims.