Gwarotango's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Gwarotango's Profile › Gwarotango's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 (of 26 pages)
amarilo:Okay I'm ibo |
APC lost that election because their votes were split between Abdulaziz Nyako and Bindow. Some of the Fulani vote went to Nyako thereby denying Bindow the chance to win. I sincerely hope the APC makes a comeback in 2023 |
ZombieTAMER:You talk as if you are a northerner. You don't know us or the kind of politics we play. Buhari's endorsement will go along way for the preferred APC candidate in the north and he understands the need for power to shift down south in 2023. The SE is set to lose out of the power equation once again |
In all fairness power needs to shift south and my preferred 2023 candidates are: President: Osibanjo Vice President: El Rufai |
ZombieTAMER:The north will vote for whoever Buhari endorses, we understand the need for power to rotate in the greater interest of the country |
FarahAideed:Then stay alive and stick to wailing. It's music to my ears ![]() |
pazienza:He was a scammer and a coward who ran away when the heat was on. Simple and plain |
FarahAideed:Then go and die |
FarahAideed:Go to court |
Akponmfet:Cownu the terrorist |
God forbid bad thing! Dialogue with a pornstarr and terrorist? Never! Why dialogue with someone whom you can easily crush? It doesn't make any sense. If Nnamdi Kanu dares step foot on Nigerian soil ever again the only dialogue he'll be having is with his 4 by 4 cell |
When the whole south rallied around Jonathan in 2011 when it was the turn of the north nobody saw anything wrong with that. In 2015 when Jonathan decided to run for reelection inspite of his earlier promise not to run, no southern elder saw anything wrong with that either. Zoning is dead and anyone who aspires to the presidency is welcome to do so regardless of his region. Simple and plain |
FarahAideed:Shut up! You can't even brake nairaland and you are mentioning naija. Online warrior |
Mary Odilli cannot sit on that panel. We all know she will vote for Atiku |
Biafra is dead and buried, and if she ever rises her ugly head again, we will crush her. |
That map is a very stupid one. Any attempt at secession will necessarily lead to a full blown war or wars for that matter regardless of which region produces the president. |
AustineE1:Rivers state is also not a Christian state either cos we have peoples of other religions residing there too, and dont tell me about Kaduna cos I lived there for almost 15 years of my adult life |
Immhotep, LZAA have you guys heard the great news? I told you it is coming. Sai RUGA ![]() |
Published on September 19, 2019 By John Owen Nwachukwu A new group known as Customary Government of the Indigenous People of Biafra, CG-IPOB, emerged on Wednesday and dragged former Head of State General Yakubu Gowon, rtd, former President Olusegun Obasanjo and Attorney-General of the Federation to a Federal High Court sitting in Enugu. In suit No. FHC/EN/CS/103/2019, coming up on October 2, 2019, the pro-Biafra group wants the court to decide on issues relating to self-determination, regional autonomy, and roles the respondents played during the civil war, referendum, among other things. The group also wants the court to determine issues bordering on the enforcement of rights of ‘Biafrans’ in their lawful pursuit for self-determination, referendum and right to establish an autonomous Biafran State within the Nigerian State as practiced by the Scots in the United Kingdom. The CG-IPOB is led by Anambra-based lawyer, Emeka Adolf Emekesiri. In an ex parte application, the group sought the leave of the court and jurisdiction to commence a suit against the defendants who were ex-Head of State, President of Nigeria and Attorney General and Minister of Justice of Nigeria. In an originating summons, the plaintiff is praying the court to determine whether the instruction given to members of the claimant by President Muhammadu Buhari, on March 5, 2016, on Al Jazeera Television that it should organize themselves and vote to have a State within a State which the group said it had accepted and complied with by organizing themselves, had created an obligation on the defendants from which the defendants could no longer withdraw. The group also asked the court to determine whether by the instruction of the defendants which the members CG-IPOB had accepted and complied with as aforesaid, now had the right to conduct their referendum and vote to have its State of Biafra as a self-governing autonomous region within the Nigerian State, just like Scotland governs itself within the United Kingdom of Great Britain. “Whether, notwithstanding and in the absence of any directions, instructions, promises or offers from the defendants, the applicants have the legal and inalienable right to self-determination pursuant to Articles 19 – 25 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act, Cap A9 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 2004 (Cap 10 LFN 1990) “Whether it is an offence and unlawful contrary to any provisions of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 or of any other law whatsoever for the remnants of the Biafrans who survived the war with their descendants to identify themselves as Biafrans by indigenous identity, and display their native flags and emblems and Biafran trademarks on their properties and products as they do now whilst remaining loyal to the Government of the Federal Republic of Nigeria as Nigerian citizens. “Whether it is lawful for the Defendants to harass, molest, arrest and detain the applicants for identifying themselves as Biafrans with their native emblems.” Other things the group also wants the court to decide are: “whether the amalgamation of the applicants with the peoples of other ethnic nationalities in the South and North by the British Government to form one country called Nigeria was with the consent and agreement of the indigenous peoples of the lands. “And if the answer is in the negative, whether the Order-in-Council 1910 – 1913 made by the British Government to create Nigeria in 1914 was null and void ab initio for lacking legitimacy as it could not form the basis of the Nigerian Constitution thereby, rendering the amalgamation invalid. “Whether by the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1963 which took effect on 1st October 1963 and remained in force until midnight of 30th September 1979, the defendants were right to seize and confiscate the assets, properties, money, and all the treasures belonging to members of the claimant by promulgating the Abandoned Properties Act of 28th September 1979, while the 1963 Constitution was in force, being more than nine years after the war and after the declaration of “One Nigeria” while regarding members of the claimant as Nigerian citizens but depriving them of their properties, money, and assets. “And if the answer is in the negative, whether the defendants are still justified to withhold the said money, properties and assets belonging to members of the claimant. “Whether the defendants were justified to violate the International Humanitarian Law and the Laws of War known as the Geneva Convention 1949 (to which the defendants acceded to and ratified on 20th June 1961) by bombing the Biafran civilians, killing the Biafran civilians and using starvation to kill the children, women and the elderly of the civilian population of the indigenous people of Biafra in the war of 1967 – 1970 in order to win the war. “Whether the right of self-determination provided under Article 20 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act overrides and supersedes the provisions of Sections 1 and 2 of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 pursuant to the Judicial Authority in the case of IGP v ANPP (2007) 18 NWLR (Pt. 1066) 457 at 500, Para B–C. “Whether it is lawful for the defendants to marginalise, persecute and discriminate against the claimant’s region of the South East and South South of Nigeria by refusing to develop their region, refusing to revamp their seaports, refusing to dredge their River Niger and other inland Rivers to the sea, and threatening to shut down or downgrade their International Airport at Enugu. “Whether it is lawful for the defendants to acquire a Radio Licence and set up a Radio Station for the Fulani herdsmen and pay them or offer to pay them the sum of N100 billion without doing the same thing for members of the claimant who are also Nigerian citizens, and if the answer is in the negative or affirmative, whether the Defendants’ acts in acquiring the said Radio Station for the Fulani Herdsmen and paying them or offering to pay them the sum of N100 billion without according the same favour or privilege to members of the Claimant being equal citizens of the same country constitute a violation of Section 42(1)(b) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 and therefore, unlawful. “Whether the Defendants by registering Nigeria as a member of the Organization of Islamic Countries (OIC) in 1986 and licensing an Islamic Sharia Bank in Nigeria under the 1999 Constitution contrary to Section 10 of the Constitution of Nigeria have violated the Constitution and turned Nigeria into an Islamic country; and if the answer is in the affirmative, whether the members of the Claimant have the right to dissociate themselves from the Defendants and refuse to be called the citizens of an Islamic country in the exercise of their right to freedom of worship, freedom of association and self-determination as a people.” https://dailypost.ng/2019/09/19/biafra-court-told-prosecute-obasanjo-gowon-others-determine-whether-igbos-remain-nigeria/ Mynd44 lalalisticlala |
Wike did it to a mosque in 'Christian' Rivers state, El Rufai is paying back in "Islamic" Kaduna state. All these religion people sef |
The Christian Association of Nigeria, CAN, Kaduna State Chapter, has raised the alarm over an alleged quit notice to demolish one of the oldest Anglican churches in Zaria by the Kaduna State government. CAN, therefore, drew the attention of the Kaduna State government to a notice to one ST. George’s Anglican Church in Sabon Gari, Zaria founded about 110 years ago. A statement from CAN State chairman, Rev. Joseph Hayab issued Thursday and made available to newsmen said, “The 7-Day Quit Notice by the Kaduna State Urban Planning Development Agency (KASUPDA), is purported to be a directive from the Executive Governor. “The notice also claimed that compensation had been duly paid to the church. The Quit Notice, which was not dated, was addressed to: House No. 27, Church House, Sabon Gari Market, Zaria which in the actual sense is St George’s Church.” The statement explained that part of the quir notice reads, “Reference to the directive given by the Executive Governor on the issue of Market development which compensation has been dually paid. However you are hereby directed to vacate your resident within Seven (7) days from now, failure to comply will leave the Agency with no option than to evict you at your own expense. (from 19h – 24 September).” CAN observed that the signatory of the notice did not include his name, but it was signed by the zonal head of KASUPDA on behalf of the zonal Manager. CAN explained, “We are alarm and apprehensive about this, if it is true that it is a directive from the governor. But we doubt much if the governor issued the directive. “This is because in February 2016, the government made moves to relocate the church to pave way for the expansion of the market, but later realized that the Church has all valid documents and that even some parts of the market are on the Church’s land. “Following the presentation of the necessary documents by the church, the matter was resolved amicably. “We wish to state categorically that no any compensation was paid to the church.” CAN wandered where KASUPDA officials got what it described as false information that compensation had been paid. CAN asked, “Or are the KASUPDA officials playing a script or are they being used by some faceless trouble entrepreneurs to provoke Christians? “It should be noted that the Church which was founded about 110 years ago, was liberal enough to allow the market in question to operate in some parts of its land. Is it now a crime to be liberal and accommodating? “How could the governor revisit the issue which was resolved amicably in 2016, by issuing a 7-day quit notice? We suspect that this could be the handiwork of some people who do not mean well for Kaduna state.” CAN called on governor Nasiru Ahmed El-Rufai to immediately investigate the purported quit notice from KASUPDA and take prompt action on the officers involved, adding, “This will go a long way in allaying fears and apprehension among Christians in the state and the nation at large. “This unfortunate notice is coming just few weeks after the alarm about the purported demolition of a mosque in Port Harcourt, Rivers state, which, upon investigations, was later confirmed to be false. “We urge the governor to take step to avert that kind of situation in Kaduna State.” Contacted, the Bishop of Anglican Diocese of Zaria, Bishop Abiodun Ogunyemi, confirmed the 7-day quit notice issued to the church by KASUPDA saying, “As l speak to you, l have written an official letter to the Anglican Church national body to intimate them of the development. “We are shocked with the development but we have all our documents which we bought the land and as it is, part of the market belongs to the Church which has been in existence for over a hundred years without any problem from any past administration in the State. “We are praying that justice will take its cause on the matter because as a Church, we followed all the legal and genuine procedures in obtaining the land and out of our magnanimous deposition, we allowed part of the land to be occupied by the market, knowing fully well that our documents are genuine.” Mynd44 lalalisticlala https://dailypost.ng/2019/09/19/can-raises-alarm-calls-el-rufai-notice-demolish-church-zaria/ |
PaChukwudi44:Biafran enemy of Nigeria spotted |
Not a single day passes by, not one where we don't get the news about their nefarious activities overseas and yet they will come here and say if only Buhari had provided jobs they will not be the need for them to go over to Asia and shame us all. Disgraceful people! ![]() |
LZAA:Wettin concern me with dis matter? ![]() |
Not a single day goes by that a flateeno won't be arrested for fraudulent crime. From today henceforth, I support the establishment of the sovereign state of Biafra. I give up on these people |
Buhari is making a big mistake by weakening Osibanjo at this time in his second term. Osibanjo is an asset to this administration who should be encouraged and empowered to perform and deliver on the policy objectives of the government. Something tells me that Bola Tinubu is behind all this |
jkendy:Abba Kyari cannot be elected president of the FGN in 2023 and you know it. Buhari's best bet is to endorse Osibanjo in 2023 paired with El Rufai as VP. Amana is sure |
[quote author=LZAA post=82351262][/quote]I think he mentioned something like you will be accompanying him on the trip ![]() |
MusaChukwudi:Ahahahahahahahaha No but on a lighter note both my RUGA clients are alive and well but Immhotep told me that he will be making the Indonesia trip just before Christmas sha ![]()
|
Straight to the guillotine! |
famzynet:Na Buhari send dem go SA do criminality? |
frosbel2:Your advice should be directed at the tribe that engages in these fraudulent acts and leave the rest of us out of it |


