₦airaland Forum

brownjulie:
48? but she looks 28....happy birthday ma, may God bless your new age

why u dey lie like this huh broad day light for that matter. Fear God oo

she be don dey resemble wizkid.. spermatozoa sha.

airmark:
That has been my major concern. You may have best defence and midfield, if your attackers wont pull the trigger in crucial games then it's a big problem. Gomes saved watford too , though. But most of those long thrusts from fab should have been clinically executed by our attackers.

I really like what fab4 is doing recently. Pato is a good shooter it's just his fitness that is the problem.

airmark:
We had opportunity to buy strikers who wouldn't cost up to 20m , we did n't . We went to Brazil to bring pato now he is not yet match fit. An injury proned striker at that. Diego Costa with his epileptic form should have buried at least 2 goals today. Our attack once again failed us big time. Hiddink needs to work on hazard goal scoring confidence in the attacking third areas. Beating man utd is a must for this team.

The team are playing fine it's just the shooting skills that is still missing.

Chelseafan1:
Is Watford gonna defeat us tonight again.... we are playing absolute nonsense.

The problem is playing matic and mikel together. It ain't gonna work.

Na today Lassa fever dey Naija. Naija sef

cruzita:
why cuppy dey like bring out tongue like bulldog for all her pic

Too much BJ. Nor be her fault.

Xavi>>zidane. No disrespect to zidane but Xavier is a daddy for midfield matters.

Ibime:
Benefits of playing in the best team seen in our lifetime. I think he deserves 2 or 3 of those. The others are just carry along. One of those seasons was absolute ojoro. Im sure Pique also has multiple entries.

Dont forget Lampard was 2nd in WPOTY when Chelsea was dominant.

If Iniesta came to Chelsea at Lampards peak, he woulda been asked to play in the pivot just like Ballack who was one of the top 3 AMS in the world when he moved to Chelsea.

Likewise if Barca had been successful in signing Lampard, they would have pushed Iniesta to the left wing to accomodate him.

Like I said, only a mad manager who already has a dominant midfield and attackers would choose Iniesta over Lampard in AMF. Iniesta is good enough to demand a place in the team, but he will find some other position to accomodate him. The currency of a nigga who will score you 27 goals and get you 20 assists guarantees you trophies in that Barca team.

Sound reply, no more no less.

Chelseafan1:
Lol....Barca fans are already mad @ Dmcdad for falling for Hensben's tricky question...I have stopped arguing Hazard with anyone till further notice.


But I still think it isn't fair if that guy is judged solely because of his number of assists and goals scored when great players like Iniesta, Robben and Ribery weren't all that great statistically.

To each his own abeg.

You don summarize the point I dey try make when I brought up lampard vs iniesta comparison but nonsoroyalty a.k.a likes button think say I change topic.

dmcdad:
[s]
I asked a simple question and you are digressing.

Zizou vs Lampard, who is/was the better footballer?[/s]

Cc: Ibime.

TRASH TRASH TRASH.. Trying to save face. Remy, Henry bla bla bla..

dmcdad:
At this juncture you should know stats doesn't tell he true or whole picture. Your fellows with better understanding of footie know that.

So what now tell if stats becomes meaningless at this juncture?

nonsoroyalty:
u will do well to stop quoting me i have no business with a yaba left patient

ineffectual buffons.

nonsoroyalty:
dmcdad is the cause of all this he shouldnt have answered that question there by falling into the dudes trick of changing the topic

I nor change any topic if you observe very well but for were. Abeg just stick to your 'liking' of anti-Chelsea's comment because Na the only thing wey you good at in this thread be that.

ollah1:
And how many assists? ?

Ask google.

ollah1:
Fab is a better goal scorer than iniesta but does that make him a better player??

Besides he also played as a false 9

Why not? I thought you guys said stats is everything or e nor matter again? SHAME to you sentimental buffons. Apologies to iniesta but I just have to use your name to scold I diots on here.

ollah1:
And that made him to score his first goal of the season 2 days ago from the spot?

No that made iniesta to have 2 goals or so in all competition last season.

ollah1:
Ohh it's now assists. Nope he won't cos after passing it go the attackers, they would pass it to the goal scorer.

oh so you are aware barca midfielders work for attackers yet want hazard to be scoring for fun in epl when he is the one behind creativity in Chelsea. Have you ask yourself why FIFA categorize him(hazard) as midfielder in their balon de or shot list while Neymar as an attacker.

ollah1:
U claim to be a barca fan yet u are abusing barca fans
Can't u see see are really a complete dunce?? I mean a mofo, btw. Why did you go trophyless in 2007/2008? Ain't that year included in "always"

I have to insult the ones on this forum because they reason with their anus. They are barca bandwagons a.k.a glory hunters. F** you and your repeated question.

Ineffectual buffons thinking they know it all because they support barca.

ollah1:
U need ur head checked and u need to understand simple sentences. Ur mate claimed with lamps goals and assists, trophies was always guaranteed. How come you went trophyless in 2007/2008 season?

No barca fan claimed with Messi et al goals barca was always guaranteed of trophies.

yes he is 98% right(which is exclent) for using the word "always".

Ineffectual buffons.

Ibime:
There was a time Barca was chasing Lampard.

If they had got him, they would have elevated him to the status of a Neymar when he scatter them with goals and assists.

The year we had Ancelotti playing tiki-taka football here, Lampard scattered 27 goals and 20 assists.

I think he would have reached 35 goals playing for that Barca team.

imagine that one called dmcdad said iniesta is shoulder and way ahead of lampard. Base on what na.

ollah1:
U should ask urself that. I guess Chelsea didn't have any trophyless seasons right. U r indeed on sambisa weeds

so barca never go trophy-less since. Huh

Ineffectual buffons- guardian's paper

ollah1:
U will be flogged again like u were. I won't be one to do that tho. Just a wait for a while. Just a lil while

sentimental comment is not flogging. Should I take someone that said boateng>terry serious huh. (Of course you will agree with that). Birds of same feathers

Sentimental/ineffectual buffons.

ollah1:
Oh really. How come Chelsea don't always win trophies??

Chelsea don't always win trophies? Are you on trams before typing this?.

Ibime:
If a manager already has a stable midfield who dominate possession, he would be mad to choose Iniesta over Lampard as his AMF.

Lampard's 27 goals and 20 assists will guarantee him trophies every year.

You see why I nor dey gree for this people. All of a sudden stat nor matter again when I mention lampard vs iniesta. I like Chelsea and barca(my two favorite clubs for years now) but I'm not a sentimental bigot.

bigkesh:
Its really lovely when Barca fans try to tell us stat don't matter

Shey u dey see why I nor dey agree with this people. All of a sudden stats nor matter again when lampard vs iniesta is been mentioned. If someone can rate boateng above terry what does that tell you Chelsea fans on here.

Nonsoroyalty, homesteady, sleekdot, make una come out here.

Shameless sentimental lots.

ollah1:
He needs support from his fellow Chelsea Fans and a ploy to move away from the initial discussion. Hommie should just stick to his hen's business

which support? Or na una dey find support. I be one man mopol. So I ask again, lampard vs iniesta who is the better footballer? Note: both are AMF.

Oh stat nor matter again since lampard murder iniesta in that aspect of the game but it can be use when it comes to hazard vs Neymar comparison abi.

Sentimental buffons.

dmcdad:
Iniesta is head and shoulders better than Lampard.

And before you come up with your stats, answer my own question: Zizou vs Lampard, who is/was the better footballer?

na God go continue to punish you and others who use stats to rate Neymar above hazard. You see una life for outside now huh. Btw, Zidane and lampard played in different era. Lampard vs iniesta is the perfect comparison in this scenario. I repeat, make Oluwa punish all of una wey dey use stats rate Neymar above hazard. No apology.. Wtf. If I may ask what make you think iniesta is better than lampard because stats shows otherwise(according to sleekdot and his comrades inducing you).

Sentimental buffons.

dmcdad:
As in ehn... The thing just tire everybody. Even him fellow Chelsea fans don tire for the matter.

Since players play in different leagues and shouldn't be compared, then the Balon d'Or should be stopped since the winner would always come from a certain league. Or is the Balon d'or not a perfect way of player comparisons? Why has Messi (or Ronaldo) won it albeit just playing in La Liga?

Balon d'or should b3 scrapped then. Wouldn't you agree @hensben?

Now answer this question: lampard vs iniesta who is the better footballer?

Note: both are AMF player.

BarcaBlood:
Lmao so this hensben dude has brought his asinine "different league" to this thread. For fvck sake how can a sane human think in this manner ?

Now answer this question; Lampard vs Iniesta who is the better footballer?

Note: both are AMF PLAYER.

sleekdot:
Whats the name of the injury he has from August to December? Is it an ankle injury or Menstrual pain?

because not only has he been playing for Chelsea, he has been playing for Belgium as well

'I am convinced that his current groin injury related to the hip injury he sustained earlier this season. These injuries happen because he plays a lot of games.
-eden's father.

Chelsea players were off form except maybe Willian. The question is can Neymar play to his potential in such situation. Barca under tata martino comes to mind.

Still Hazard=Neymar till there is a proof that one is better than the other while playing in same league.