₦airaland Forum

huxley: Why is Nigeria one of the poorest nations on earth in spite of its wealth in natural resources?

Because Nigeria is too much into alien foreign religions

Kuns: It was Judas on the cross not Yashua El Massiah (who christian s are calling Jesus the Christ).

According to the book of Hebrews 5, 6
"As he saith also in another place, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedec." Anu kept his promise ,  the same way he provided a sacrifical scapegoat for Issac ,  The Most El Alyun Alyun El (Olorun oba patapata) ,  he did the same for Yashua according to his brother in the Book of Barnabas.

It was Judas (6-33) A.D.  that die on a tree or cross not Yashua.

That's why they removed the book of barnabas from the bible.

All christians ,  then you will overstand where Paul was from and about.

Paul was not a follower of Yashua ,  he was about creating his own religion which is called Christianity today. Acts of Apostle 11: 26 " And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch. "

Yashua did not call his followers christianity or christians, Christianity was a religion Paul created in Acts 11:26.


This Yashua I speak of is not the pale-skinned straw like hair being christians worldwide worship today.

I am talking the Yashua like one whose hair was like wool, and skin like brass burnt in a furnace. I am talking about the Black Jesus ,  not no Albino (a curse).The  Jesus worshipped today is the false christ.

See, how false make people of the same country disrespect ,  over an albino that don't look like you. This is a maddess ,  anyone worshipping the pale albino ,  you are doing satanism.

Don't believe me o, check it out for youeself.

Your bible said his hair is like wool ,  does your Yashua aka Jesus have woolly hair? If not ,  is his feet like brass burnt in a furance (black)? If not, ,  you are into another Yashua according Galatians 1: 6" I marvel that ye are so soon removed from him that called you into the[b] grace of Christ unto another gospel[/b]: "

If your Yashua aka Jesus doesn't look like you ,  you have problem ,  serious one.

Where can we buy the book of barnabas?

https://api.ning.com/files/0O2xtKCJCOA21fm-uapWhSknHUJai6eAgGMZKirkeSIkDs6x29I8NpTjGrGRkQxzsO-xiONm9x5sLJy0XA8fDlKXIFQaIjS4/IMG_9146.JPG

[img]http://74.54.19.227/news/201/20102008.full.jpg[/img]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fq7EL-8rVg0

US authorities say former Liberian leader Charles Taylor worked
for its intelligence agencies, including the CIA

https://i150.photobucket.com/albums/s115/BrothaJ_IMages/brothaj_images%202/brothaj_images3/brothaj_images4/brothaj_images5/newpic.jpg

Yashua

There is NO letter "J" in the Hebrew, Arabic, Greek and Latin language! The letter "J" as this letter did not exist some 2,000 years ago. The letter "J" is only 500 years old. If Jesus was a Jew and there is no letter J in the hebrew language then his name could not have been Jesus. It is all a fabrication; The Jesus Story was taken out of ancient Tamare (falsely called Africa and Egypt). These are the records of Haru (Horus) mixing with Greek, Roman, Hinduism to give you the Jesus story. Basically the Jesus story was based on the life of the ancient African Haru (who the Greeks called Horus) and they mixing it with their mythlogies to create a new religion. His was done by the PISO FAMILY. Do your own research to Investigate Josephus Flavius Piso.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cOOrGsouiXk

Suspected Islamist Gunmen Target College, Killing At Least 50 Students

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z25V6ZHdJOs

Islamic extremists terrorists attacked an agricultural college

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnREo7CdUzo

[size=15pt]Why They Hate Robert Mugabe[/size]

If they are secret agents how will you know?. They do not have identification badges

Most Nollywood movies tend to potray a foreign vs traditional religion scenario where the foreign is good and the traditional is evil. As long as we accept the Gods of others, we accept an existence of servitude. When we finally remember that our own kingdom has been taken away, when we finally look to ourselves as our own Gods, then and only then will we be free of this spell of ignorance which have lead us into slavery and servitude to others and their Gods. The only way to return to where we were is to undo that which was done, There must be unity between all our people, if not physically then at least mentally. We must have a agenda for the future, an agenda that will better the lives of all our people.

FOLYKAZE: Took a glance through the bible this morning, I was stucked exactly at Genesis 2:9, i read little further to Genesis 3:22-24 where 'tree of life was mention. The first bible verse stated that God planted the tree alongside tree of knowledge while the second verse state that God removed the tree for man to search for it.

What exactly is this tree? Where is the tree at present? Is it literal or symbolic?

The Fir or Evergreen Tree is often referred to as “The Tree Of Life” because when all the other trees shed their leaves and die in the Winter, The Evergreen or Fir Tree remains green in color as if it’s still Spring or Summer. This Tree is also called a “Pine Tree”. The book of Jeremiah mentions the Modern Tree of Good & Evil which is evergreen (be it spring, summer, fall or winter, and the tree is also referred to by some as “The Tree of Life”. But read what the Bible says about the Christmas Tree. The LORD called those who ritualize and worship the tree HEATHENS!

gistdrill: pls sci/tech i want you guys to help me in nominating me of the Nigerian bloggers awards...

go to the link http://nigerianblogawards.com/register2013.php .scroll down to Best Entertainment Blog and insert gistdrill..com

i would really be happy if nairaland members nominate me...it your man gistdrill...i would bring the crown to nairaland...i promise...

You should use your own Domain name for your blog it will look more professional and you will have greater chances of nomination.

striktlymi: Lol!!!

If we want to go by that principle of who first owned the land then it would mean that no one would own some lands in some Countries, especially when almost everyone is a settler on that land.

The principles guiding ownership of lands is enshrined in the Zimbabwean constitution and by that constitution the whites were the legal owners of the land.

If we want to go by that principle of who first owned the land then it would mean that no whites can own some lands because no whites can explain "How did the British acquired their lands in the first place?. Did the Britishs came from Europe to Zimbabwe with land titles?. Whites cannot own lands that were stolen in the first place. If you used brute force to get a land then legaly you do not own that land

striktlymi: The British invaded Zimbabwe and acquired their land just like they invaded a number of other Countries. The point here is that the invasion of British is quite immaterial to the discourse because the said lands does not belong to the Crown any more. It belonged to Zimbabweans, though whites.

Even the constitution of Zimbabwe recognized their rights to ownership of the said property until Mugabe decided otherwise. If this was a case between Zimbabwe and the British then I would have kept my cool but what we have here is a case where a minority group is being discriminated against on the basis of skin colour.

Ok this is where we disagree, what you see as a futility is for me the more important point. How did the British acquired their lands?
Now when using the words: their lands, I am talking about lands that were originally in the hands of Black Zimbabweans. How did the British acquired the Zimbabwean lands?. Who have been cheated, killed for their lands by the British invaders on the basis of skin colour?

striktlymi: That's Nigeria and I believe the analogy also applies to various countries.

But let us stay in Zimbabwe. How did the first whites who invaded Zimbabwe by killing Africans "acquired" these Zimbabwean lands?

striktlymi: I do not quite agree with the above. The land use decree of 1978 vested all land ownership to the Government. This does not mean that the Government stole any land from anyone.

As long as a people come together to promulgate a working document, known as the constitution, of which everyone in the society is subject to then whatever the constitution dictates is necessarily binding on all members of that society.

which country are you taling about?

striktlymi: Now you are trying to avoid my question...

The fact here is that, blacks own lands in the US just like their white counterparts. A move by the Government to forcibly take these lands from them would be seen as a gross misuse of political power and I am quite sure that the black world would condemn the act in the strongest term possible.

The white landowners of Zimbabwe acquired their land 'legitimately', though under colonial rule and in circumstances one would tag: unfair. They became citizens of Zimbabwe, developed these lands, and made sure these lands are profitable which is also very beneficial to the Zimbabwean economy.

The black Zimbabweans, understandably unhappy with the situation, wants the government to redistribute these lands that the whites have tilled and toiled on. In a bid to perpetuate itself in power, the government decides to redistribute these lands using brute force and no one sees anything wrong with this?

No I am not trying to avoid your question. To make it simple, Whites never owned land in Zimbabwe, and it is the same problem in the USA where 100% of the land belong to the native American, not the whites and not the blacks. Land titles have been established illegaly from stolen land that belong to the Native Americans and it is the same problem in Zimbabwe where land titles have been established illegaly from stolen land that belong to the Native Blacks Zimbabweans.The white landowners of Zimbabwe did not acquired their land 'legitimately' so in fact there is no white landowners in Zimbabwe. Whites do not own land in Zimbabwe they live on stolen lands. When whites steal lands it is never classified as using brute force, is it not strange?

striktlymi: Okay, cool!

Another question: If the same scenario played out in the united states and blacks were made to go through what this white dudes are going through, what would have been your honest reaction?

Blacks are not living on stolen lands in the united states. But in the same USA if a black steal a land from a white and try to sell it to that same white he will go to jail because in the USA it is a fraud.

striktlymi: Just one question: Are the white landowners citizens of Zimbabwe?

They are citizens but they are not landowners

striktlymi: Not trying to avoid your question but show how inappropriate it is. The thing here is that those who are being forced to give up their lands are Zimbabweans.

Yes, I agree that the colonial masters made a wondrous mess of things before they left but this does not give Mugabe the right to do wrong in a bid to correct a previous wrongdoing.

My stance on this land ish is that the 'willing seller-willing buyer' policy would have been allowed to stand considering the fact that both parties to the deal are citizens.

This is not the lands of whites and you now it very well. We should then exclude the words buyer, buy,buying, seller, sell, selling when we talk about lands in Zimbabwe. How can you sell to blacks a land that you stole from blacks in the first place?, a land that didn't belong to you?, so Mugabe is just redistributing what belong to blacks, and what he is doing is legal.

striktlymi: No man came to this world with Land in their pockets...if indeed we had pockets when we were born.

Why are you avoiding to answer the question?

striktlymi: The land thingy is just like robbing Peter to pay Paul. Who did he forcefully take the lands from: Zimbabweans; who did he give these 'stolen' lands to: Zimbabweans...am I missing something here? Or are we saying that blacks have more rights than whites when both are citizens of the same Country?

When the whites came to Zimbabwe from Europe, did they came with lands in their pockets or did they came without land?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XnREo7CdUzo

[size=15pt]Why They Hate Robert Mugabe[/size]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jQA_iCpFJ3Q

Ghana's First Female Pilot - Patricia Mawuli Nyekodzi

Patricia Mawuli Nyekodz was the first woman to be given a national flying license in Ghana. The first time she saw a plane, she was frightened but curious to know more about the planes. Her parents abandoned her and with no one to pay for aviation training, her sheer love for planes and a lot of hardwork landed her in an aviation school. She was exceptional from the rest of the male students.
This a story of hope and great motivation. This is a story of Patricia Mawuli Nyekodz

tnktosin: On point. I was able to capture the faces of five modafvckers dat collected my dough last month with my wristwatch video cam. I couldn't upload the vid simply because the checkpoint was close to my house and they saw me drive in. I no want make those boko in black trace me, you know Nigeria, na sorry go end d case.

You should upload the video as soon as possible. You have nothing to worry about, when the video is uploaded it is already too late for them

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E-hvmus-hxs

It is very easy to enter into Nigeria if there is no proper border control. Crossing the border illegally is relatively simple

[img]http://metrouk2.files./2013/09/ad_116754280.jpg[/img]

Terror suspect Samantha Lewthwaite has become the most wanted woman in the world
after Interpol issued a global ‘red notice’ for her arrest

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=57W7o9QMUKc

Woolwich Attack Pt.1 - CI5 State Fabricated... Best Evidence For You To Decide!