₦airaland Forum

bemeruca:
The guy who is an expert in dildos is here 😂😂

Homosexuality on your mouth.
Like mentor, like mentee or should I say like father like son.

raumdeuter:
You are cute when you are jealous

Do you have an alter ego name that your white BF refers to you by or he sticks with Felicia?

raumdeuter:
I am over 60, Almost 120, why are you keen to reduce my age like you do to yourself at over 50yrs

Your name is posted in a thread here. I'm trying my hardest not to bump that post, but keep lying and everyone who wants can look up your age themselves.

raumdeuter:
You are cute when you are jealous

Do you have an alter ego name that your white BF refers to you by or he sticks with Felicia?

You're almost 60 man.
And homosexuality is always on your mouth.
Read the ish you just wrote again.
I can't even imagine the life lessons you impart on your children.
Imagine them logging in to Nairaland and seeing what their father does with his time everyday.

We see how well you mentor Bemeruca here.
I bet you'll be in Seattle to see Chris Brown too. (who tells a lie that can be easily checked)
Bottom of the Barrell people.

bemeruca:
You know that woman I am seeing in Seattle who is making IjeBos go crazy? Yesterday, we discussed politics. It started with her wanting us to go see Chris Brown when he is close by, then Mack Lemor and Ed Sheeran to Gaza and Israel.

This is some psycothic stuff.
Who really makes up a whole life in the US?
Raumdeuter, who is almost 60, isn't acting as a mentor but is really uselessing this guy.
People really need to stop enabling this stuff.
It's beyond the pale.

raumdeuter:
Actually that was me a while ago when I was slimmer

That's not your pic, but I don't disagree that person would be slimmer version of what you look like.

Honestly, you older man, having a big belly isn't the flex you think it is.
Look into Ozempic, I heard it works.

raumdeuter:
You are crashing out real bad this Monday morning

How was the weekend, Is everything okay between you and your BF?

One lie gets shut down you move to another lie. Abi?
Usually, it's the almost 60 yo guy who feels he needs to lie and then lie some more about homosexuality on a Monday Morning is the one crashing out.

raumdeuter:
How can you look at my picture on my profile and say I am 60yrs old, That my picture actually looks better than your that you posted

What's crazy is that that dude in your profile pic looks almost like you in real life.

raumdeuter:
How can you look at my picture on my profile and say I am 60yrs old, That my picture actually looks better than your that you posted

No matter how many times you post it, wont make it true, Trump does not hate black people, Those of us who are around 120yrs old remember a time when he was a favorite of blacks, from politicians to regular folks on the street

Emotional broken 50yrs olds who are bitter at life wont change that

So, you denied your age, your faith (Christianity), that you have kids and that you voted for Trump 3 times.

You seem to be embarrassed that you are closer to 60 than 50 and spend your time posting the nonsense you do and don't want anyone to know who you are because of it.
I would be embarrassed if I were your age as well.
Honestly I would be embarrassed if I were over 20.

But your name is on this site is verified by you.
When you decided to be a troll and post a fake pic of someone, they decided to post your real pictures. Again verified by you.
And the rest is easy to find for anyone looking.
Noone has to believe me, the posts confirming it are easily accessible on this site.
I've re-posted it already
From that, anyone can google your name and see your Ozempic needing almost 60 y.o. picture.
You've been on this site for at least 2 decades and want to now pretend you are in your 30s.

Now, I've told you how I know you are almost 60, why don't you tell me how you know I'm over 50?
You can't because like all your posts, it's a lie.

raumdeuter:
Emotional broken 50yrs olds who are bitter at life wont change that

Bwaahahahhah @ Raumdeuter talking about himself.
Because between us two, only one of us is over 50.

So, the White House pool won't be covering the White House since he kicked out some of the news agencies.

I'm going to put out a crazy theory.
Trump was purposefully given stories about the mainstream media trashing him so he could get enraged and ban them.
The rational is if the Media doesn't cover him, the less the country sees/hears from him in person, the less the nutty things he does and him falling asleep will be known, the better the Republicans can do in the midterms.

Tell me why my theory doesn't make sense. lol

raumdeuter:
So you are broken and trying to find what broke you?

If you look inwards and start from home you might find the solution and believe its not random folks on the internet

Isn't this what I'm talking about reason.
You are an almost 60 year old black immigrant Nigerian man with black children who spends around 4 hours a day on this site alone.

You're almost 60 yet spend your life trolling on Nairaland.
You're a black Nigerian with Black children yet supports a racist person who hates Nigerians and non-white immigrants.
Let's not include all the nonsense you write here daily and leave it those two facts. If that was all someone knew about you, would they say you had a fully functioning ability to reason?

Real talk, honest question, if you met someone like you would you think they were a well-adjusted person who could reason?
If people in your day to day saw the stuff you posted here would they respect you more or less?
Let's just call a spade a spade.

This thread boy.
We have Nigerians who live in Nigeria, arguing for no regulation, corruption, and now a non-independnt press.
It's one thing for people like Raumdeuter who have taken all this stuff for granted, but for people who live the worst of it?
Being MAGA or wanting to be MAGA(don't live in the US), really breaks one's ability to reason.

I just realized I assume MAGA at one point had an ability to reason. Maybe that's my bias in still believing the best in people.
So, is it the classic chicken and egg principle.
Which came first, the lack of reasoning which turned them to MAGA or MAGA which broke their ability to reason?

bayelsaowei:
Wahala plenty o.

😃😃🤣🤣😂😂

Republican Values and all.

raumdeuter:
Did they sign the deal under duress?

Huh?
You don't think the world's greatest superpower threatening you is not duress?
My gosh.
I swear you post just to see yourself post because nothing you write makes sense or seems reasonable.

budaatum:
If only they had what they call a DEI.

Thought the same. Needed diversity in that room.
Whatever their intent was, it is a terrible ad.
Once you see the kkk hat or someone being hung, you can't unsee it.

bemeruca:
Keep complaining, I will continue to point out your lies. When you cannot refute it, sound the AI alarm

He said refute.
You must mean refute as someone does when a baby starts throwing feces on the wall

There is nothing to refute. Your post is clear you have little understanding of the US jury system.
And I'm no explaining it.
You may want to start with reading the jury instructions in this case and going from there.

raumdeuter:
They just signed a deal with the US

Maybe people who make decisions are not emotional snowflakes and they consider what's good for their country versus insults unlike emotional and unstable men

A country signed a deal to give a country that threatened to destroy and take them over, that could destroy and take them over, more benefits than the already beneficial deal they initially signed because that country just likes the other country.
And because they signed the deal that means they harbor no ill will at the way they were treated or threatened,

-Logic according to Raumdeuter

bemeruca:
Evaluating competing explanations and drawing reasonable inferences from evidence is precisely part of deliberation (his job)

He says he had no doubt about her criminal responsibility and when he was discussing different possible theories, the others interpreted that as him having doubt.

"I have no reason to believe 11 people are lying" of course!!! You can stick to your false choice.

You don't know better than the judge who questioned them individually, and this issue arose; the defence was making noise about it that the holdout guy should be removed, but the judge did not remove him.

You trying to sound intelligent by using AI to write your posts always takes me out.
Having your AI written posts make little sense makes it even crazier.
How does someone write something using AI that is so incoherent?

raumdeuter:
Greenland deal is between US Denmark and Greenland the 3 agree but somehow a leader somewhere who isnt involved in hating the US

Unless the leader is emotionally unbalanced which we wont put past some

Yes, I generally hold in high regard people who bully, insult and want to take over my country just because they can. /s
Insufferable.

IbeOkehie:
And Mr wwwtortoise...here's an unassailabe argument that shows that the PARAMETERS of IQ or intelligence is genetically determined.

Every measure has determined that MALES produce a greater number of individuals with extremely high AND extremely low IQ than FEMALES.

Females are predominantly AVERAGE IQ or intelligence or under the statistical bell curve.

The major and some would say THE ONLY difference between the genders is GENETIC. It can't be blamed on culture, environment or anythings else.

The OUTPUT also confirms the stats. The highest earning nurses are CRNAs.....it requires quite rigorous mental and physical capacity. For whatever reason, 87% of nurses are women but 40% of CRNAs are men

There's more men in prison than women...people in prison are generally very low IQ.

Harvard President Larry Summers lost his job for pointing out these stats in an informal speech given to a women's science group or something.

The female SCIENTISTS agreed the data is correct but objected to his TONE or him saying it at all.

That's the USA, in these times.

Good Luck to Nigerians.

Do you really wake up in the AM to run a crusade that men are smarter than women?
Weird people in this thread.

This is MAGA whenever they are presented with Facts,
She lies, gets cornered, pretends she doesn't know what she voted for, but is ultimately embarrassed.

Maria Elvira Salazar gets DESTROYED for taking credit for bringing money to her district from bills she voted AGAINST!

This is hilarious 😂 pic.twitter.com/wrgSHUEdca

— Chris Nelson 🏝️🇺🇸 (@ReOpenChris) September 18, 2026

cococandy:
If they lie about it enough it’ll change the truth and suddenly what is will no longer be:

Trump will no longer be this crazy, lying pathetic failure of a president.

If they close their eyes tightly and cross their fingers as they recite the lies, reality might change 😄🤣

I always think to what end? What is their goal for running cover for a crazy person who is making their life harder?
Of course, boils back down to them being super emotional people whose emotions are irrational tied into Trump being seen doing well.

budaatum:
You and I are acting as jurors on the decision of the jury on this case, and there is no reason whatsoever for us to agree. But it would be very stupid of me to claim you should have voted as I do, or that you are not considering the evidence if you do not agree with me.

The prosecution did not prove its case beyond the reasonable doubt of 11 jurors, and the defence failed to convince one juror. Still, the jury has done its duty and I am very satisfied with their collective decision.

The prosecution can after all retry the case, though I can see more than one juror holding out if they do, and just for the sake of it.

I'm trying to separate myself from the jurors and focusing on what their job was.
Their job was to set their biases aside, follow the law and vote based on the jury instructions whether they liked the law or not.
He told the other jurors he had reasonable doubt (have no reason to believe all 11 are lying when they said that) and by his words "was trying to figure out theories" (not his job). Therefore, he should have voted not guilty by reason of insanity.
It's binary.
You don't' have reasonable doubts about what the prosecution said, guilty.
You have reasonable doubts about what the prosecution said, not guilty by insanity. That was his job.

Now he could have decided he didn't like the law and even though he had reasonable doubt, just nullified the jury by voting guilty (without insanity). But he should be honest about that.

So, I do appreciate the convesation. From what I know of you, I think your justice minded, so your opinion here had to make me reevaluate why I thought what I thought. And I did. And I've come to the conclusion that you may have a bias here (no disrespect). Because I can't reconcile with what I believe is your justice mindedness, with what you believe about this case, with the fact of the case (as presented to the jury).

raumdeuter:
I think he is winning on that because less and less Americans now trust in the media unlike before

When you don't challenge them publicly they run in their silo unchallenged

One of the biggest things that happened in the last 15yrs is demystifying the legacy media unlike before where their words would have been authority

Yes, we know you listen to non-legacy media and mostly everything you write in this thread is truthful. /s
We have a percentage of people who live in the US who are lied to daily, can't figure out they are lied to daily or don't seem to care.
And those people went and voted for a man who is taking a wrecking ball to the US.

I can't believe anyone sees what's been happening the last 2 years and says, yeah the problem was the legacy media.
No, the problem was the indoctrination from places like Fox, Twitter and new media like Joe Rogan.
In fact the legacy media was 100% right about Trump. Trump's lies, craziness, the corruption, getting us into wars. etc.etc.

raumdeuter:
Hated by who? Denmark or Greenland the 2 concerned parties who just signed a deal with the US? Or who

Cost? What did it cost the US

No, they are loved by the country they spent almost two years trashing and saying they will take over.
And the US is also loved by the rest of the world who saw the US doing this to them and the same to other allies.
Everything every leader like Carney says, the sentiments of people who live there and the polls in those countries are all wrong.
Raumdeuter knows better than all available information and rational thought.

You MAGA are insufferuble.
You live in a delusional world and think you can lie your way out of reality, and make everyone else live in your delusional world as well.

raumdeuter:
The art of a deal

Trump did it again

What did he do?
And what was the gain vs. the cost?
The US already had a broad military agreement with Greenland (1951 Defense of Greenland Agreement) in which they could have done most if not all of the things they wanted.
I'm sure this adds some to it, but the US probably could have gotten the same without making us hated around the world.

budaatum:
Canada would shake their head at Greenland's diminished sovereignty.

Will have to see the deal.
May not be too different than the current military agreement between the two.
Was surprising to me when I learned that the US already had broad military control/ability in Greenland.
Made Trump's beef with Greenland even more silly.

Budaatum, how does the law in Mass in terms of the insanity defense vary from the UK?
In the interview they suggested that in the UK, she would have gotten off without a trial. (Maybe I'm inferring wrong as well)

budaatum:
The fact he had reasonable doubt means he couldn't convict, as in, agree she intentionally committed murder or was insane.

I use convict in the sense his own opinion does not decide the case. Basically, in relation to the other jurors, he sat on the fence, which is his right as a juror.

And listening to these jurors, I now do think they might have been predisposed to find her 'not guilty by reason of insanity', but my thinking it does not in any way make it so unless I want to ignore my own bias and claim what I think in my head is the reality out there, which I refuse to do in this case.

Yes/no. That he had reasonable doubt meant that the Prosecution didn't prove their case.
The burden is on the Prosecution to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she wasn't insane.
Which means that he should have voted that she was not guilty by reason of insanity.
So, that he had reasonable doubt at all is the problem for me and makes it clear he didn't do what he is supposed to do.

It wasn't his job to offer up theories. It was his job to take the theory the prosecution presented and figure out whether he was convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that she wasn't insane when she took her children's life.

It doesn't seem like he listened to the judge. So he didn't go there and do what jurors are supposed to do.

Listening to the jurors, they all seemed like they went in there, took their duty seriously and did their jobs reasonably well.
Remember the burden was on the prosecution.

bemeruca:
Why do you believe what they are saying? These women said they are not looking for justice for the victims, the children who were killed. They are looking for justice for the killer so she can get the help she needs.

In another video, the jurors said they saw that as an opportunity to bring change for women. They don't care about the law or the judge's instructions; they were performing activism.


Don't take what they day about the holdout juror to know what really happen and who followed the law and instructions by the judge, listen to what they say about how they feel about the whole case.


I don't expect you to take the common-sense side here.

Who do you think you are telling me what to think about this?

Do you even understand the American jury system? No
Have you ever served on a Jury to have even an understanding of what their role is? No.
And are you smart enough to go and research it before opening your mouth? No

You have a propensity to run your mouth on topics you don't even have a glancing understanding of.
And then to try to pretend you do, you just lie, like living in the US.

I clearly addressed it to Buda.
In fact there are others I'd welcome their thoghts.
You, no.
I have 0 cares about your opinion on this.

Budaatum, read this article and thought you may enjoy the read as I thought was a good synopsis of what happened in the Jury room.
https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/lindsay-clancy-jurors-speak-about-deliberations-hold-out-juror/4011580/
Listening to the juror, I now do think the guy was predisposed in not finding her 'not guilty by reason of insnaity'.
I don't believe he gave serious consideration to the jury instructions.

This is from a juror in the room.

“He had reasonable doubt. He admitted he had reasonable doubt and I started filling out the forms, I was so excited," she said. "There were three forms I had to fill out, and I started filling them out. I wrote my signature on each one. And then he said, 'But I'm still not going to say that she’s not guilty by reason of insanity.'”

raumdeuter:
In 2020 you voted for the oldest president

In June 2024 you supported the oldest person running for office

When talking about politician and age related sickness, you should take a back seat

Show me any criticism I have had for anyone being old.
You don't seem to understand the difference between old vs. incapacitated and thus not being able to perform your job you were elected to.
But you most likely do, but your dishonesty makes you act that way.

You spent/spend hours of your life criticizing Biden for being old. Making fun of the way he looked, that he fell down. etc. etc.
But then you voted for the oldest man to be President.
Now you are comfortable that people lied about a clearly incapacitated McConnell not being incapacitated and he didn't step down when he was unable to do his job for 7 months.
And comfortable supporting a President who is clearly sundowning.
That is hypocrisy.

Not dishonest conversation is something you seem to have a problem with,

raumdeuter:
You care about Trumps age but not Biden age who you voted and was older than Trump. That is the hypocrisy and cognitive disonance

How old is Markey you voted for vs his opponent

Lying again.
You don't seem tp understand what "oldest elected President" means.
Words seem to be your enemy.

You and Republicans made a whole campaign out of Biden's age. While at the same time going to vote for the oldest person to be President.
That is cognitive disonance.