₦airaland Forum

bemeruca:
I think you did not understand what you responded to 😀

Like the exact time you say you were in the US?
You said you were in the US at 1:27am on May 6th. You posted your photo Album of May 6th. Again, tell us when you were in the US on May 6th. If the photos are actually yours, did you teleport from Canada to the US and back to Canada?

benalvino3:
It's 1:27am here. I have already slept and now awake as the time difference is huge. I took this during the day and I am gonna take same spot again

benalvino3:
That's is enough. But ijebos is dumb, he will continue is goofie talking point. Disagree with him and he will say you have never been to the us

bemeruca:
That you will never know. We Nigerians are not specific with our travels.
eg. When I was in Boston. We don't want winchy winchy people like you to start plotting.

But I like that you get triggered anytime you hear I am in this country and I like it as it is 😀

Yeah, not specific, unless when you are being specific.
You say you were in the US on this day, but the pictures you posted were of Canada.
Lol.

benalvino3:
I left my village to the country he makes too much noise about.

bemeruca:
Keep telling yourself that till you are admitted for depression

When again did you land in the US?
Was it before or after you claimed you'd never visit/live in the US?

I think the US has to acknowledge a simple fact. By Occam's Razor, Trump is a Russian asset.
Can anyone say a Russian Asset would be doing something different than what Trump is doing?
From destroying US's relationship with European allies, destroying US's relationship with it's regional allies, cutting off all US soft power in USAID especially in developing countries, destroying US research and development, tanking the US's economy and hurting Ukraine?

If Putin had a checklist of how to weaken the US, it would be exactly what Trump is doing.

bemeruca:
How is it not different? They shouldn't be here in the first place

Here as an Nigeria?
Cuz you aren't in the US no matter how many times you try to lie about it.

raumdeuter:
Can someone explain the politics and economics of this tariffs for example

Before Trump was there a tarrif by America on Canadian goods and was there a tarrif by Canada on America goods? If yes what was the percentage of what was going to both countries

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Ballzproblem2:
4bn to search for cure for cancer,that would have been better off used to subsidized cancer patient treatment ,so you want to tell me every year 4bn is spent on on researching cancer cure no breakthrough since the initiative started,my dear all this emotional blackmailing no go work.

Sorry, I was talking to you as if you were educated. My fault.
You should really invest some of this time to becoming familiar with some of the stuff you talk about instead of being reflexively Pro-Trump.

Below quantifies just the yearly financial costs, not even the cost of life of the many people who die yearly.

The national cancer-attributed medical care costs in the United States are substantial and projected to increase due to population changes alone, according to the Medical Care Costs Associated with Cancer Survivorship in the United States article, published in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention (1). National costs for cancer care were estimated to be $190.2 billion in 2015. Assuming constant future costs, we project costs to be $208.9 billion in 2020 (2020 U.S. dollars), an increase of 10 percent that is only due to the aging and growth of the U.S. population. These cost estimates include cancer-attributable costs for medical services and oral prescription drugs. National medical services costs were largest for those diagnosed with female breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancers and non-Hodgkin lymphomas. National oral prescription drug costs were highest for those diagnosed with female breast, leukemia, lung, and prostate cancers. The differences in national costs reflect prevalence of the disease, treatment patterns, and costs for different types of care for the different cancer sites.
https://progressreport.cancer.gov/after/economic_burden

Android17:
What part of "I'm not interested in convincing you to believe anything" don't you understand?

I saw 2 people on NL argue about Biden's cognition. The leftist retařdinho was insisting Biden was sharp as a tack and only suffered occasional slips due to his age. That person quoted Jake Tapper and legacy media as proof that EVERYONE who met with Joe testified he was as healthy as health could be. No matter the arguments made by the more logical right-leaning person, the leftist never agreed.

Do you think said leftist has changed his mind today? What do you think would have been the clincher?

Yup, that's my new MO when debating fools who cape for legacy media.

You must argue with very stupid people that you think each and everyone of your diversions work.
You've employed mostly of all of them at this point.
Next time research the stuff you write so you won't spend the next 100 posts making up bullshit rationales for not being able to provide evidence that doesn't exist.

[quote author=Ballzproblem2 post=134411590][/quote]Some random guy on twitter vs the President of Harvard University where some of this research happens.
Tell me, who do you think is more of an authority?

Court Pause on Trump Cuts to Medical Research Funds Is Expanded Nationwide
The federal order temporarily halts the Trump administration’s plans to slash $4 billion in overhead costs for research at universities and medical centers into diseases like cancer.

Universities hold a starkly different view. The funds support scientific breakthroughs that “are becoming more frequent and more consequential,” Dr. Alan M. Garber, the president of Harvard University, said in a statement on Sunday.

“At a time of rapid strides in quantum computing, artificial intelligence, brain science, biological imaging and regenerative biology, and when other nations are expanding their investment in science, America should not drop knowingly and willingly from her lead position on the endless frontier,” Dr. Garber said.
...
In a legal memo related to the lawsuit, universities argued that the funds were indispensable in research, including at facilities where lab animals undergo clinical testing, for the computer systems that analyze large amounts of data, for blood banks and other expenses that cannot be directly tied to a single project.

If the funding cutbacks were to survive legal challenges, the plaintiffs wrote, “research laboratories would literally go dark for lack of electricity.”
Smaller institutions, they argued, might not be able to sustain any research and “could close entirely.”

Congress thwarted an earlier effort during the first term of President Trump to cut indirect research funding. Lawmakers added measures to budget bills to ensure that the funds remained at the levels agreed upon by researchers and federal officials.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/11/health/nih-research-funding-lawsuit-injunction.html

Android17:
Where's your evidence? Where's your evidence?

- don't quote RFK Jr- he is a quack
- don't quote Scott Perry - he is a conspiracy theorist

- Susan Rice said she didn't speak to Zelensky. See. I provided evidence.

I fear you don't understand how this evidence thing works.
Well, it's actually clear by now that you don't understand how this evidence thing works.

Android17:
You're correct.

LOL

You spend hours and hours writing pages of blather whenever you get asked for the evidence for some claim you make.
If you are as logical as you say you are instead of wasting all that time explaining why you won't post your evidence, why don't you spend less time and just post it?.

Isn't that how logical debates work. You make a claim and you back up that claim with evidence?
You seem to be content with the "making claims" part and fail spectacularly with the evidence part.

Android17:
I'm incredibly devoted to logic, emotionalists or more specifically, emotional blackmailists will have a hard time coping with me. That's just a fact.

Like I said, I can't post evidence to someone who has no history of changing his opinions even when demonstrably wrong.

That guy can insult a player and call him carry-along even when said player has now been voted best player in the world. How do you argue with someone like that?

A lot of words to say "you don't have the evidence because it never existed".

Android17:
Here's proof Susan Rice didn't lie: she said she didn't lie

Gee, the proof the laptop is fake is 51 FBI agents swore an oath. Any other thing is a conspiracy theory.

Add that to ABSOLUTELY FALSE, NO GENETIC MODIFICATION, NOT MANMADE.

LOOOOL

It's clear he's asking you to post the evidence you clearly said you had and relied on to make your allegations.
But you're still playing your games, speaking out of turn and then writing books instead of simply posting the evidence you say you relied on.

Good piece on why everything that Musk doing is illegal

Gift link <https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/04/opinion/elon-musk-trump-constitution.html?unlocked_article_code=1.1k4.7bkr.qCrhFpwI4ubV&smid=url-share>

There Is No Musk Exception in the Constitution
...

Mr. Musk’s power also is squarely at odds with concrete constitutional provisions. While the Constitution is largely silent on removal — Mr. Trump’s arguments that the Constitution gives him limitless power to fire are atextual — the document is quite specific when it comes to appointment.

Supreme Court cases make clear that individuals who serve in “continuing” positions and who exercise “significant authority” on behalf of the United States must be appointed consistent with the Constitution’s Appointments Clause. As far as I can tell, Mr. Musk hasn’t been.

The Appointments Clause — part of Article II, the source of Mr. Trump’s virtually boundless conception of presidential power — sets forth two methods of appointment of what are called “officers of the United States.” “Principal” officers must be nominated by the president and are subject to the advice and consent of the Senate. For “inferior officers,” the Constitution allows Congress to give the appointment power to the president alone — that is, without Senate confirmation — or to the head of a department, or to the courts of law. Inferior officers must be subject to the supervision of someone other than the president; if you report directly to the president, you’re a principal officer.

This means that the individuals who wield the most authority — principal officers — are subject to both the public scrutiny and the check that is supposed to be imposed by Senate confirmation.

Mr. Musk appears to be wielding significant power, as evidenced by his presence at the administration’s first cabinet meeting last week. He was the first to speak after the president’s introduction. He boasted about pushing federal employees to respond to an email about their work, inveighed about the federal deficit and casually disclosed that his team had inadvertently canceled funding for Ebola prevention — an error he claims was quickly rectified, but may not have been. The email he mentioned appears to have been dashed off without advance warning even to the cabinet
...

Ballzproblem2:
name anything tangible the Dems have achieved with all their useless funding,usaid is a large embezzlement scheme, same goes for the unwinnable war between Ukraine a Russia ,there homeless people littered all over the states but Democrats care more about war far away from their shores .

Huh?
USAID was a bipartisan effort that was funded through Congress.
The current Secretary of State Rubio was a huge proponent of it. Going as far as to say it needed more funding.
Every programs has some corruption but USAID was probably one of the more tightly accounted for programs.

I see Ukraine differently.
1.) We should be paying Ukraine for what they are doing. They are fighting a war against Russia, weakening them and we are not losing any troops in the process.
2.) We eventually want Ukraine's minerals and grains. At a minimum we want to keep them away from Russia.
3.) We also were able to send Ukraine a lot of our old decommissioned weapons and clean up those stock[iles.
4.) Though we allocated the funding to Ukraine, a lot of that money was spent making weapons in the US. In fact it was spent in a lot of Republican districts making those weapons.
5.) The war has allowed us to test our weapons against a geo poltiical adversary who was supposed to have good weaponry. It also allowed us to see how new battles will be waged. Indispensable knowledge.
I'm sure that's how the politicians who gave the money saw it as well. And I don't think it's a terrible use of money if you're thinking it from that perspective.

You talk about homelessness, how do you want to fix that without funding?
Google the GI Bill.
The VA.
A lot of the programs that are so indispensable in our lives that you don't even know benefit you, the Dems created through that funding.
Once they are cut, you'll understand. But you should understand what it's like as I assume you've lived in Naija at some point.

cococandy:
Right. At this rate, we’ll get to the point where no one can get any services or benefits that we used to take for granted as Americans then when he doles out a nugget of goodwill, we’ll be expected to applaud and praise him for it.

They’re just getting this poor sick kid and his family mixed up in their mess when he should be resting up.

Exactly and that's what pissed me off the most.

Ballzproblem2:
propaganda but bunch of white Democrats politicians wearing Ankara scarf and kneeling for George Floyd is what then? Real sympathy ,open your eyes I'm not here to support Republicans or Democrats ,but it won't take anything for Democrats to simply clap it is inhumane full stop ,they dealing long term blow to their image in case you don't know.

It is what they believe.
If a person performs/speaks what they do and believe in, what is that?
Dems genuinely believe in those causes.
Trump is cutting funding to Cancer Research, pardoning J6 felons who hurt police officers, and screeching about rape while being credibly accused of Rape. His actions do not match his words.

I'm not arguing the clap.
Dems are trying to fight a battle with someone who lies when he is talking.
They are unaccustomed to fighting this way and will make some mistakes.

I'm saying that you should do your research and if that image meant so much to you, you should support the policies and programs that allowed that child to live.
Trump is cutting those.

Ballzproblem2:
clout chasing or not a simple clap will suffice , this is Trump last term ,he has absolutely nothing to gain from for propaganda.

He has nothing to gain yet he is still doing it? LOL
He still has to keep people on his side or his party will lose the midterms.
If they lose Dems will gain subpoena power and can investigate all his scams.
That alone is enough to keep the propaganda going.

Pay attention to what he does not what he says.
This is a good discussion of what is happening because he cut funding to Congressionally approved organizations overnight.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-kD5tljceqM

cococandy:
I’m neutral about the ones who didn’t applaud. If they saw it as the clout chasing photo op that it was, I understand them not wanting to participate in the charade. Trying to use a sick kid to show the country that those who didn’t clap don’t love the country while simultaneously taking away chances for sick people to get better leaves a bad taste in the mouth of anyone with discernment. Maybe if people stopped entertaining his insincere photo ops, he will stop doing them And focus on things that don’t hurt the country.

Nicole Wallace said:


I get that she’s attempting to make a point about the Jan 6 cops who lost their lives to suicide following how Trump and republicans fvkced tbem over after the insurrection. I had to quote the full statement so we’re not walking away with the impression that she’s wishing suicide on this particular baby.

But left to me, since it’s involving a kid, I would have kept it cute and simple and wished him well. We’ll talk about the cops who died by suicide another day. Not this moment. I do believe in an appropriate time and place for everything. So in my impression it was distasteful.

Yeah, I would have left it alone as well.
But it's tough as this is all propaganda. And attempts to normalize him.
Finding the line is going to be hard the next few years.

raumdeuter:
You are here whining again shows how joyless your life can be. You are a perpetual victim anyway

You saw families whose daughters were killed by criminal illegal immigrant, no sympathy for them
You saw family of those whose dad(a police officer) was killed by criminals you couldnt bring your miserable self to show sympathy for them
You saw a boy who survived cancer and was made a honorary officer, you couldnt bring your sad self to applaud

That is why your life is in shambles

70% of Americans applauded the great speech yesterday, Only you and your fellow brainless cohorts could see negatives in it

Everytime I read your posts I find it hard to believe you graduated college.
The cognitive dissonance and non sequiturs in your posts always make me feel 2nd hand embarrassment for you.

You read like someone who is paid to defend nonsensical things but can't really so just writes nonsensical posts.
The problem is you're not paid... you just write nonsensical posts.

If Trump lost on freezing Congressionally appropriated Foreign Aid, he will lose on freezing Congressionally appropriated Domestic Spending.
Foreign Aid is a place where the constitution gave him some power.
I want to read the ruling when they make it, but allowing a President to do this is akin to a line item veto.
Why would Congress negotiate anything if the President can then choose what to fund, sending money to parts of the country he wants to.
Would make negotiations in the Congress mute.

Trump Administration Live Updates: Supreme Court Denies Bid to Freeze Nearly $2 Billion in Foreign Aid
Share full article

Foreign aid ruling: The Supreme Court rejected President Trump’s emergency request to freeze nearly $2 billion in foreign aid on Wednesday morning, saying a lower court judge “should clarify what obligations the government must fulfill.” Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the three liberal justices in a 5-4 vote. The case focuses on the U.S. Agency for International Development and aid the administration halted on Mr. Trump’s first day in office. Read more ›
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/03/05/us/trump-news

raumdeuter:
A child just survived cancer, to suspend your insanity and to clap for a child who is experiencing a once in a lifetime opportunity and you decide to throw a tantrum

The 12yr old and Laken Riley was murdered by illegal immigrants who were released by Biden admin, They have all been captured again and border crossings are down to a 35yr low

Trump just suggested making it a death penalty offence to kill a police officer

We know you are incredibly stupid that and useless in life

Per CBS and CNN about 70% of Americans were impressed with the speech but you and your fellow lunatics are the minority n America and will continue to be depressed

Your someone who loves propaganda enough that it makes you to be a defender of White Supremacists.
He put out a person to gain your sympathy and here you are running your mouth about it like the fool u are.

Ballzproblem2:
You have to different kind of evil not sympathetic with a terminally ill child,to make matters worse a black child, this is the party ignorant Africans/black Americans defend here everyday.

It is propaganda.
Trump is literally cutting aid for cancer research. How many children will be affected.
He is cutting aid for life saving medication around the world. How many children have died or will die?
His HHS secretary is recommending viatimes for measles outbreaks where 1 child who wasn't vaccinated already died.

Stop with the performative politics and use your mind for a sec.
Look at the issues not at the shiny propaganda that is shoved in your face.
If you care about black children who have cancer, look at whose policies will help them the most.

raumdeuter:
Never seen such a disgraceful display like the Democrats pulled yesterday

Democrats wouldn't clap for the families of Jocelyn Nungaray a 12yr old rapped and murdered, Laken Riley raped and murdered, the 13-year-old DeeJay Daniel who survived brain cancer, or the girl who had a head injury after she got spiked by the ball from a male trans athlete nor for the kid of a fallen police officer admitted into West point.

The only time Democrats applauded was when Trump mentioned the money sent to Ukraine

Only idiots like you fall for this performative politics.
Trump cuts cancer research yet gives a child which cancer an award. Let's clap.
Trump releases J6 convicted felons who beat down cops, but praises the kid of a fallen police officer. Let's clap.
Trump just had the Tate's released, has been credibly accused of rape, has people on his staff accused of Rape and Domestic Violence yet cheers the family of a 12 year old who was raped and murdered.

His propaganda is solely for idiots like yourself.
Keep clapping for him like the buffoon you are.

basilico:
Make it a good story. From eating eba in PH to driving a Range Rover in Washington.
Fairy tale?

Jealousy ingrained with idiocy will kill you.

I don't do stories, just facts.
Bemeruca even included a view of his amazing view (roof tiles and all). /s

benalvino3:
Haha, it is good to admit that I can move about, in and out and enjoy myself in luxurious hotels as I please. Life is good. I took BA direct to Nigeria. I am not you who branches.

I want to order some good delicacy, you can come and join me. Meal, eba and protein alone is 18k. Should I take photos for you

If you want I can come to Manchester just so you hang yourself. Lol, NDDC scholarship, tell us your story. People like you who work at Zara and struggle to make 100 pounds gambling on crypto are the loudest. I know that you haven't left the UK since you get in. You are stuck.

See my view, I wrote your name on the window. Should I tell you how much a night cost? How much a meal cost? Life sweet even in Nigeria.


Should I show you more just to make your skin burn?

Android17:
You're silly if you think I would do your homework for you.

Why is it every time anyone asks you to backup the bs you say, you always have a rational why you won't?
Isn't this schtick getting old?

bemeruca:
You are the one taking photos of a meal a man bought for you on a date. You are 52 years old 😂

Remember the days you would post pics of you in rundown motels with the free water they'd give, bragging about eating delicacies of eba and protein? Yeah, good times.

ugodson:
Just pray we all dont be a victim. Imagine you have an international flight (mind you they have checked your account balance either through text or bank app you will have no choice abi you go miss international flight just for 300k?

Yup, it's their preferred hustle for everyone you might meet up until you get on your flight. Put you in a situation where you are weighing costs. Cost of paying them off vs. cost of missing your flight.

Had a similar situation with an airline customs agent who wanted me to pay 300k (waited 15 minutes before the flight left to give me that offer) to get on a flight because he said I didn't have a visa I knew didn't need (visa on arrival).
Unfortunately for him I had time(was comfortable spending another day in Lagos) and a ticket which I could easily change.
Returned early enough the next day to speak to everyone I needed to and I know for a fact he had a very very bad day.

bemeruca:
This does not excuse your foolishness

Nothing more foolish than a 419er spending his life pretending he lives in the US.

raumdeuter:
Only idiotss expected that an economy that took 4yrs to ruin would be fixed in 5 weeks

“When I win, I will immediately bring prices down, starting on day one.” -Donald J. Trump

I wondered why one of Trump's first actions was to lean on Panama over the Canal.
Here it is.
Always follow the money with Trump.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/04/business/blackrock-panama-canal-ports-hutchison.html

raumdeuter:
Check the timeline of JK Rowlings you will see its filled with insults from trans activists trying to shut down a woman and feminist for standing up for women

https://x.com/jk_rowling

Back to talking about anything but the economy and price of eggs.
Wonder why?