Well done, the press conference seemed to have served its purpose... Fool the Rubes. This is a civil lawsuit not a criminal action. There are no charges.
But she knows that. She also knows that idiot Trump supporters won't know the difference. You should ask yourself why you support people who not only deliberately fool you but do so because they think you're stupid. Well, she was right in this instance.
cococandy: Except for Raum who has whatever his reasons may be for continuing to support Trump, none of these other Trump minions on here even have a personal experience with the inflation he’s causing right now.
Right! Forgot for a sec, but puts in perspective their arguments.
basilico: I e already posted I stand corrected. In any case it was the WH Spox who said that , I'm yet to see a retraction. Have you heard her retract?
Why do I give a shit if she retracts. I didn't believe her to begin with. She is not an authority for me.
But she is to you and she lied to you. You should do a deep dive as to why all these people you consider authorities are always lying to you. And why you continue to believe and repeat things without doing your own research.
basilico: Foolish . Where was it debunked about 50 million for condoms to Gaza. Condoms that Hamas attached bombs to and sent them floating to Israel hoping Israeli kids will pick them. You are beneath a mad man It was the WH spox who said that could you give his whole statement .
Trump also said "fight like hell" . He also said "fine people". The media cut off the context to accuse him of saying the opposite . It's like me saying "I am foolish enough to believe Ijebos is normal". Then someone just quotes the part "I am foolish ".
Now Today, it's not Gaza in the ME but Mozambique though you were so confidant yesterday. Because your overloads told you.
basilico: Did you miss this in the same presser or that little matter of condoms going to Mozambique instead of Hamas is more important.
Samantha Power increased her net worth in 4 years as head of USAID with $23 million. Trump has given DOGE the go ahead to investigate these bureaucrats who seem to be very savvy investors.
I've been consistently right, you? Just a conspiracy nut. You need help.
Most of his policies so far have been inflationary. Inflation has already increased recently. Lower interest rates would pour fuel on the economy increasing inflation more. Don't see Powell and the FED cutting interest rates any time.
He also just added a 25% tariff on aluminum and steel similarly to what he did his first term. Going to mean every product that uses aluminum and steel will see most likely see an increase. It's a rather silly proposal giving we are still fighting inflation.
budaatum: When they do what Android17 is doing I just let them be because I know their strategy is to go on their merrygoround of not understanding to waste ones time.
If he read he'd see I've already said Potus, be it dump or Biden, will do whatever they can to get around what scotus says, and if that potus breaks the law they'd be held to account, and if not like Biden didn't they wouldn't.
I even posted examples to show potus being brought before the law to hold him to account. And some will hold him to account, while some will say he done right already. And I don't expect dump to not try to find a way around when they try to stop him like Biden did.
But its maga. Thought is too complex for some.
I don't even understand that he is trying to say. I think he may believe SCOTUS said all Student Loan relief was illegal. And somehow Biden got around that.
But SCOTUS said the initial particular manner in which Biden was trying to give Student Loan was unconstitutional as it needed new Legislation from Congress.
Android17: I did NOT ask you for precedence. I said your response will help set the precedence here -> [this thread] for some of the other abject town-criers, when the current POTUS, pushes through with his own policies if BLOCKED by the SCOTUS - Just like Biden did.
That's why you should just answer questions directly like honest people do.
Again, pick up the US Constitution. Then read and understand how a bill becomes a law. And then what power the President has. What you are writing is not making sense but you don't know it's not making sense because you don't know enough about you are talking about.
It's like the government preventing me from building a house with toothpicks, and I then decide to build it with bricks which is the Government preferred method. And you say, woah he pushed through on building his house with bricks even though he was told he couldn't build it with toothpicks. So, he disobeyed the government!! And then you tell me that it will now be precedence that people will build their houses with bricks after being told they couldn't build them with toothpicks. That is how asinine what you are trying to say is but you don't know enough to know it.
Android17: By the way, EM said he may have been wrong on the location of the delivery of said condoms but concluded that the USAID should not be spending $50M on condoms for whatever reason. Therefore, there is no victory lap between whether it was Gaza or Mogadishu. It is still a waste of $50M.
How much was spent on Condoms? Where was the money spent? What proof has he shown you for either? So, what is the waste? You don't really have any information but true to form have decided to start making conclusive judgements. It seems you never learn.
Musk doesn't know where the money was supposedly spent, he doesn't know how much it was, doesn't know the purpose of the funds, has already lied once, yet this time we are supposed to believe him? Elon Musk is not an authority on budgeting or health care. You may want to get your info from people who are.
Android17: Will you answer questions directly? What do I have to do with the piffle you have here?
This is my post:
ust respond to that post. I don't need any other thing you have to say. I'm trying to establish the precedence for instances where a POTUS could be blocked by the SCOTUS, and still find ways to implement his policies by leveraging the already baked-in-the-law policies he can re-implement like Biden did. Simple.
Piffle? You mean like this post? What does it even mean? It's almost like reading the Jabberwocky
Android17: I'm trying to establish the precedence for instances where a POTUS could be blocked by the SCOTUS, and still find ways to implement his policies by leveraging the already baked-in-the-law policies he can re-implement like Biden did. Simple.
This whole quote shows a fundamental misunderstanding of US laws(esp. surrounding Student Loan forgiveness) and Supreme Court rulings. You are basically asking for precedence of POTUS following the Law (I guess it may seem odd given Trump). You also don't seem to understand what the Supreme Court found illegal about Biden's Student Loan plan yet here you are arguing something about it. Honestly, I can't even make heads or tales of what you are trying to say.
Android17: Now that you've been shown what I said in my last rejoinder, can you respond to my posers?
Like I told Budaatum, just answer the questions directly. I don't need your preamble.
I've giving you enough information to help you on your way to actually speaking not out of ignorance. You have google right? If so, google the programs the revised Student Loan relief was based on. Find which ones were not legal. Hint.. none were. The premise of all your arguments on this topic is flawed because you've chosen to try to have a conversation on a topic you haven't studied. I would assume you're goal here would be learning and not just standing by misinformation you find online.
Musk says "Some of the things I say will be incorrect".
How many people in this thread spread this 50 million dollars for Condoms in Gaza? The US is going to have to tackle the misinformation that is being spread at a dizzying pace.
Android17: Let me tell you my M.O. I discuss civilly until people want to go down and dirty. Depending on my mood, I can be incredibly nasty. Just take note as your reputation precedes you.
Let me start where I started with Budaatum. What did he mean here? I read what you have above. It is a lot of nothing. If I devise a plan to forgive student loans, find them summarily challenged in court, and SCOTUS returns them unconstitutional, should POTUS:
- Do what Biden did in this post if he did what you have above?
What you have above clearly is not a workaround, I agree. He simply revisited the other student loans he already knew existed but were not being implemented properly, found better ways to implement them, and was able to forgive more loans. Is that your argument? Let me be sure I've summarized it.
If so, how does that compare with the post below? There's a video for it too. Notice he says "tried to BLOCK me".
If you wanted to discuss civilly, you would have spent time actually learning about what Biden did so you could discuss. What you did here is spread a lot of propaganda, which is so often the case in this thread and in the US right now.
What I posted is not a workaround and is what Biden did. What I posted and what Biden did is not inconsistent with what he wrote in the tweet you linked. And the post was written in a way to make sure it was not inconstant.
The Supreme Court tried to stop me [from implementing my promise to relieve Student Debt] But they Didn't stop me [because] I've relieved student debt for over 5 million Americans[who were eligible under existing programs], I'm going to keep going [finding ways to legally relieve student debt].
Biden's problem and the Democrat's problem is he/they expects/ed people to actually read and understand policies before making assumptions. That's not where the US and clearly this thread is in this day. You didn't seem to.
Android17: Before going off on another tangent. What part of the article you cited don't you agree with?
Is it POTUS's duty to develop a workaround (that is not explicitly explained) except saying "we came up with one to still disobey SCOTUS' order"?
I like to follow arguments logically.
This is a silly take untethered from what actually happened.
Biden created a plan for student loan relief. The Supreme Court found that plan unconstitutional. He then went and made sure the student loan relief programs that were already in law were being implemented and those students who were eligible for that relief received the relief. The goal of some of these programs Congress passed was to get people working in fields that didn't pay a lot.
There was no workaround. He followed the law.
You've spent a lot of time arguing something you heard on right wing propaganda that you don't understand.
raumdeuter: He wants Canada to be a part of the US. There is an option where Canadians voluntarily vote to become a part of the US
Your stupidity is legendary without knowing how Trump wants to achieve it, you already claimed its an annexation
Lol. Volunteering/voting to be part of the US would still mean Canada is being added to or incorporated into the US and so the US would still be annexing Canada.
How many times have you failed at simple vocabulary now? Google the definition of annexation. Share it with Bemeruca and Basilico and maybe you 3 can figure it out.
raumdeuter: Show where Trump said he would annex Canada
Annexation is the incorporation of land into another jurisdiction. Trump saying he wants Canada to be the 51st state means he is saying the wants to annex Canada. The means of how that happens doesn't matter. Again, Trump saying he wants Canada as the 51st state means he wants to place Canada in the jurisdiction of the US or annex Canada. All the same.
You spent 4 posts here arguing against the definition of a word because you have so and completely become a Trump sycophant. They need to do a study on the minds of people like you.
raumdeuter: When did Trump tell you he is going to annex Canada? He said he will like Canada to be a part of the US. Has he shared the process with you for you to assume its an annexation
Will it be a voluntary decision by Canadians?
Like I said you are too stuppid to understand certain things. Stick to the blah blah blah inferiority complex and victimhood, that suits you better
Here let me post the definition of annex again. To add Canada as the 51st state would be to annex Canada.
I don't even need to insult your intelligence, you are doing a great job of it yourself.
happney65: “There’s nothing to buy. We will have Gaza.”
President Trump was asked about his plans to “take over” the Gaza Strip during a meeting with Jordan’s King Abdullah II at The White House.
How far "Muslims for Trump"? una never see anything..
Insanity. He keeps making the US weaker and making Americans less safe around the world.
TRUMP: “We are going to have Gaza, we don't have to buy it. There is nothing to buy. It's a war-torn area, we are going to take it” Reporter: “Under what authority?” Trump: “Under US authority”
raumdeuter: Where was this anger when Biden pardoned his corrupt son who was found guilty by the legal system under him
Eric Adam's became guilty the moment he spoke about illegal immigrants ruining his city and taking resources away from his people who are largely black
You now see how you have no brain and swallow everything the media tells you
Blah Blah.. Some Intellectual Dishonesty Blah Blah Blah Some Gaslighting. Blah Blah Blah Some Lying
Trump did the same thing his first term and it was one of the components of the inflation we saw in 2020. I did make some good money on US steel stocks though.
This is a great example of the purpose of DEI. It was to expand the pool of applicants so people who wouldn't normally get targeted would be represented. In this case the Army loses out on some of the top Black talent. Incredible that anyone who lives in this country like Raumdeuter is still defending this.
U.S. Army General Rips ‘F*cking Racist’ Decision To Stop Recruiting at Black Engineering Event
An active-duty general in the U.S. Army blasted the Department of Defense over the decision to cease recruiting efforts at a prestigious event honoring Black engineers.
Under Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, the armed services have eliminated or rolled back programs and outreach deemed steeped in diversity, equity, and inclusion. On Monday, Military.com reported that the armed forces will no longer recruit at the annual Black Engineer of the Year Awards.
“This is one of the most talent-dense events we do ,” one Army recruiter told Military.com on condition of anonymity. “Our footprint there has always been significant. We need the talent.”
nateevs: I don't give a phuck about the process it takes Uncle. If the leader of the largest economy and military in the world says another sovereign nation should be annexed.... and when asked to clarify, they double down and say it is real, other nations consider that a direct threat. Simple as ABC.
If you like, gaslight yourself into Jupiter. It is what it is. A threat.
raumdeuter: According to CNN just now, Trump has told the DOJ to process the pardon for Eric Adam's who was indicted by the Democrats
The racist Trump is the one pardoning a black mayor The far right Trump is the one who ordered the first step act that released many black men from jail
The racist Trump gave historical funding to HBCU
You are celebrating the pardon of a corrupt politician because he is black? What kind of nuttery is this?
Something seems to have broken in your head a while ago.
Now you're trying to pretend you were just joking and really aren't an English illiterate. Good Luck. Everyone here has read your posts, well the non-ChatGPT ones.
raumdeuter: Trump says Canada will be the 51st state, have you asked how he will do it before jumping like a retard to claim he is threatening them?
If Trump has not threatened them with invasion what is your moronic self now waffling about
You should be asking Trump that question shouldn't you? While you're at it ask him how he is going to build luxury towers in Gaza without US troops. Well, I would also tell you to ask him about Greenland, but he already said he would use force if necessary.
It's like he serves you shit, you eat it, tell people it was chocolate cake and then he serves you another helping.
bemeruca: An English teacher who cannot write a good sentence
When you take a step in(Into) the US, take a US history and Government class(Where is the comma? grin grin) and alas learn English, you may then have an opinion of the Separation of Powers that isn't laughable.
1.) "Take a step in the US" means to take a step while in the US. Meaning, when your feet touch US soil. Exactly as it reads. 2.) No comma is necessary in the second instance.
This is my point about you being English illiterate.
raumdeuter: Now that you have quoted the video, tell us the threat. Is it that he will invade Canada?
There are 2 ways Canada can be part of US, either forceful takeover or voluntarily by Canada
Which one has Trump promised?
Maybe you should pose that quesiton to Trump as he keeps saying Canada will be the 51st state while Canada keeps saying they won't.
You will continue to play this intellectual dishonest game until Trump says something else and then you will change the goalposts andfind another way to gaslight. Go play with yourself and your intellectual decificient brethren Bemeruca.