₦airaland Forum

raumdeuter:
You sound like a reetard. How many people have taken turns in beat you down and point out the failure you are?

So, did you figure out the definition of 'reinvest' or not?
You posted the same quote about 4 times without even understanding what it said
I can't with you Captain Intellectual Dishonesty. Well, since you did attend (online) go to Harvard Extension school. I should call you Dr. Captain Intellectual Dishonesty.
🤣🤣🤣🤣

Livelystone01:
I should be the one to grow up when you are the one who always deviate from topic by throwing insults?

You really have a lot of work to do on yourself.

Classic narcissistic behavior.
You've been running around saying everyone is brainwashed, but when called on it, and asked to backup that view with facts now I am the one throwing insults?

Shut up.

raumdeuter:
Of all people who post on this thread, Don't you notice he is the odd one out? He is not normal. You should feel sorry for him. Thats why he is over 50yrs and no child no partner, That he why he posts about phantom GF everytime

If you say you have someone who went to US-Russia meeting , he will tell you one of his GFs was also at the meeting

Livelystone01:
Imagine someone who's doing well for himself behaviour this online? I don't think anyone will be too angry like that. He is not normal.

Can you look back at the posts before his response?

Imagine everyone took time out of politics to engage in business discussions. No one even cared about whatever sides they were on, they contributed like normal humans. Only one thing will make someone that unhappy, and unhappy life offline.

It's like a support group for people I've recently destroyed.
Raumdeuter instead of wasting your energy on this teenage girl "let's gossip about this person who's smarter and cooler", invest it in actually making your arguments smarter.

You two sound like losers right now.

Raumdeuter did you ever google the definition of "reinvest"? 🤣🤣🤣🤣

Livelystone01:
You are everything I posted. You think you have a mind for war? I have seen how you have been destroyed time and time again over here. If you really have a life, you wouldn't keep proving me right about your life.

I have seen all you can do, but have you seen what I can do?

You think throwing insults is what a true war looks like?

I chose to ignore you in the past because I do not think attacking each other over ideas and views but you have always wanted a direct war. You can bring your war on please, I want it. Maybe that's the only way this can end.

I know I have given you enough responses to you today to make you feel better, I still have the key to decide how it will end.

Look at every post you write.
You think by repeating something that is untrue it makes it true.
It's the same way you deal with all your discussions here.

I wrote you a lengthy post breaking down all the prosecutions asking you to post prosecutions you thought were selective and biased and the rational.
What did you write.. Nothing.. I'm sure you were drooling on your phone though...
Grow up.
Focus on facts and not that flowery bullshit both sides nonsense.

Livelystone01:
Imagine someone who's doing well for himself behaviour this online? I don't think anyone will be too angry like that. He is not normal.

Can you look back at the posts before his response?

Imagine everyone took time out of politics to engage in business discussions. No one even cared about whatever sides they were on, they contributed like normal humans. Only one thing will make someone that unhappy, and unhappy life offline.

The fact you think what I post is angry means you aren't used to defending your positions vigorously.
You may want to try it.
Will make you smarter.

Livelystone01:
You know the picture your posts presents?
A man who's so lonely, self consumed by his madness and foolishness of his actions that he sees everyone who's not supporting his bad views as an enemy. The truth is, after you still express your paranoia online, you will return to reality to face the consequences of your bad decisions.

I see how you've been decimated by people here, I feel for you sometimes but I have seen why they shred you every time, you are always looking for fights even though you get dunked.

I know why you do it though, you try to use it to forget reality, but one thing is sure, you will still log off to face your battles.

I won't add to your self torture, I am not going to increase your beatings here.

I know you crave for my responses due to the fact that I am civil and unlike the others who mess up with your head, I may give you what you crave for but it won't be like before.

The picture my posts presents is someone who took you to the woodshed to murder your nonsensical bothsiding bullshit.
I get decimated here? Just like you did to me? Lol.

The truth is facts don't give a fux about your feelings, neither do I.
You came here with some bullshit theories. You should have been able to vigorously defend them without crying.
You weren't able to defend them and now you are crying and trying to get personal. You're clearly following the path of a loser.
Next time invest some of this energy into initially thinking through the bullshit that is in your head, so you wouldn't be always made to look the intellectual fool.

You want to get personal, just remember I can be a savage intellectually and in any other way when I need to be. Thread carefully.
Better choice is to go back to pretending to ignore me or ignoring me while talking about me or whatever childish shit du jour.

Livelystone01:
Ok, you do not deserve a response.
I tried conversing thinking you can be redeemed but you are so insecure that you cannot engage without exposing your paranoia.

You can keep your madness away, I don't need to respond to you anymore since you can not engage in discussions without fooling yourself.

This guy said redeemed. As if somehow I needed redemption and you could be the one to give it to me. Lol
Mfer, go redeem yourself and shake that propaganda out of your head.

Is that what you thought you were doing, conversing?
Lol.
No, you were just parroting right wing talking points you don't understand.
What did you post that would make me or anyone wiser?

But this is exactly what I expected from you.
Exactly what low IQ people do when they get challenged on their talking points they spew out without actually thinking about.
They run. Easier to run when you realize you can't really compete. Because you have a deficit of knowledge and ideas.
Run away ... Run away and try that brainwashed nonsense on your other low IQ friends.

raumdeuter:
But Trump is racist

Lol.

raumdeuter:
Trump is not a Republican, he is a demagogue. Few years ago he was democrat. Most of his views are not even republican views. I even believed he was planted by the Clintons in the Republican party to scatter our party. He is a close friend of the Clintons, donated to Hillary and they attended his wedding.

He is simply a Trump candidate who represent himself and his fellow racists, Most of the white Blue collar democrats are now going to vote Trump. This shows he is not appealing to Republican but to those who want to take their country back

Livelystone01:
You always falter at the end to bring in insults but I will ignore.

What about Hunter's drugs issue, the bribery issue and others?

Only you responded because your other fellows understand this but you will never accept.

Trump's J6 issue and other issues. Why did they not prosecute him between 2021-2023? Why wait until he's almost sure of his candidature before pressing the issues?


Like I said before. You guys have never called out one wrongs from your camp but you will still call others names for speaking out.

Isn't that the case of being brainwashed? Not being able to see anything wrong from the programmers?

No, your post is the case of being brainwashed.

I gave you a litany of actual facts about the prosecutions.
You reply with a whataboutism about Hunter's drug issues.
So then,
1.)Why don't you tell me why Hunter Biden should have been charged for the drugs. Include the exact crime, evidence the prosecution had and the statute of limitations on it.
2.) Tell me why he should have been charged with Bribery and evidence the prosecution had. Include the exact crime and the statute of limitations on it.
I'll even help you with #2. There is someone currently sitting in jail right now who pled guilty and was sentenced for 6 years for lying about that Hunter Biden bribery allegation. That is how uninformed you are.

Trump was in fact charged in 2023.
But, you are in fact making my point. If there was selective prosecution it would have been filed early. Cases are complex and take time, but still; Garland wouldn't have waited to file the charges. By waiting it ensured Trump would be able to push them off and play political games with them. Like he did.
I mean Jack Smith even filed the charges in Florida where Trump lives instead of DC where he would of had more favorable judges and a better Jury pool to convict him.
Yeah, sounds like trying to come after someone.

So, you have still not even pointed out one instance of selective prosecution. And went through the details and shown why. Why?
You still have not disputed anything I've posted about Hunter's cases. Why?

Why because you don't know anything about the cases. And you can't because they are fact.
What you know is what you heard on right wing media and allowed to fill your head.
You didn't use your brain.
You didn't do your own research.
You didn't understand what you let fill your mind and what you constantly ramble on about.
That is the essence of someone brainwashed.

So what you do is come here with that brainwashed head of yours generalizing about shit you don't understand.
I called it when you first starting writing.
If you had any iota of evidence Biden's DOJ was biased you would have presented it like I did.
But you don't.
So shut the fuk up about it and stop pretending you're nothing more than a Right wing parrot.
All you have is generalized BULLSHIT.

Livelystone01:
Yeah, the Biden admin wasn't politicized but they started pushing for cases against a man who was their political opponents.\

You mean they investigated a guy who broke laws and then dared the DOJ to come after him by committing obstruction making it hard for them not to.
A man who then decided to run for President as a way to stay out of jail when they did.
You can search for my post her, when I said that I was 100% sure he was going to run for President where some people said he wasn't.
I said the singular reason being he wanted to stay out of jail.
He did run and he is out of jail.
People like you turned off your brains and your critical thinking skills.

Livelystone01:
As much as I dislike the leadership style of Trump, this alone should make any neutral person to look deep into the mortality of the Dems.

As for Hunter, this case was only taken to court when it became exposed beyond the cover and it was apparent that the FBI had kept the cases out of the public themselves. How do you claim neutrality with the way things went about Hunter from 2020-2024? Even the end of it all was distasteful to even career democrats. The pardon? After he had made some declarations as better? Why would he even pardon his own family members? No one is even talking about this.

1.) Hunter's first case was a Gun Case. They said he lied on a gun form about being an addict, bought a gun, had it for1 day and then threw it away.
There are few cases where any person was charged with this crime who hadn't committed a violent crime or was arrested for some sort of felony drug distribution.
In fact this case was so ridiculous, the gun owner who sold Biden the gun, forged the gun form. What did he get? A plea deal to tesitfy against Hunter Biden.
Biden's original plea deal that was overturned was even harsher than anyone in a similar situation would get.
Now how do I know this?
I read a lot of the court filings. I researched similar cases. And I read articles from non partisan career prosecutors who prosecuted similar case.
Can you find many similar cases where someone was prosecuted for lying on the form without a concurrent charge for a violent offence or a drug distribution one? No you can't.

2.) Hunter Biden's tax case
Again, he was prosecuted harsher than anyone else in his similar situation.
There are relatively few cases where someone has paid back the taxes he owed and still been prosecuted criminally.
Most aren't prosecuted at all and if anything happens it's a civil case.
Look up Trump's friend Roger Stone's case.
He owed more money to the IRS than Hunter did. They brought a civil case against him to get him to pay the taxes.
How do I know?
Again, I read a lot of the court filings. I researched similar cases. And I read opinions from non partisan people who have prosecuted similar cases.
Do you have many similar cases was someone was prosecuted even though they paid back their taxes? No you don't.

3.) Trump's Jan 6th Case.
That was inevitable yet still slow walked by Merrick Garland.
Just go and watch what Republican Mitch McConnel said during Trump's impeachment.
He said there were criminal remedies to handle this. McConnel is not a Democrat.

4.) Trump's Document case.
Biden's DOJ gave Trump every opportunity to turn over the documents.
It wasn't until Trump committed obstruction, lied about having the documents and directed his employee Nauta to lie and hide them did the DOJ have to prosecute.
Trump dared them and by the rule 'no-one is above the law', they had to take him to task.
Again, this was slow walked and every opportunity given to Trump to turn over the documents he took.

Livelystone01:
The so-called media houses are all jokes. They control what people should hear and they have even made a statement like that in the past. CNN, Fox, CNBC, AP and others are the same .
Let's be honest, the media is the brainwashing machine of the Dems and GOP.
Whatever is going on now is a fruit of the root that was planted since 2020.
You can't use a system to frustrate others in the past while crying foul when the same system is being used against you in the future.

You see the difference between you and I?
You are exactly what you are complaining about.
You've let propaganda and right wing media fill your head.
Did you research the cases? No
Did you read opinions from non partisans who prosecuted such cases? No?
Do you even know the actual details of the cases? No?

Do you have any reporting from anyone that Biden even spoke to Garland about these cases or directed him to go after Trump. No. Cuz he didn't.
I'm sure if he did, he would have told him NOT TO PROSECUTE HIS fking SON.

What you do do is claim to be in the Middle while spewing right wing talking points.
Spare Me.
If you want to be in the Middle, go be informed so you cans speak from some facts.

cococandy:
Not just the US consciousness but internationally by the type of comments you can see on this forum.

Esp. in Nigeria. Always shocking.
I sometimes sit back and wonder if I'm missing something.
Upside is I don't see it as much from friends in other countries.
But Republicans did a very good job in their propaganda and in it's reach.

Livelystone01:
💯

The media madness of 2020 upwards changed my mind about many things.

Right now, as an Independent, I don't care what the Dems cry about, they should face what they dished out to others but used the media to paint them as beautiful.

Some of the people making noises here supported same thing when the last administration did them.

Hypocrites everywhere.

Posts like this show why the US is trouble.
You've heard the Biden DOJ was politicized but haven't seemed to have used your own wisdom to understand if it was the case.
Attorney General Garland was weak and dithered.
Biden regretted appointing him.
They even prosecuted the son of a sitting President months before an election on charges most people wouldn't even be charged for.
There is no comparison between Biden's presidency and what Trump has done these few weeks alone.
You can just compare how many Assistant Attorney Generals resigned under Biden vs. Trump.
The ADA Trump appointed to look over the NY office resigned as she thought the Trump DOJ was politicizing that office.

People say if Fox News existed when Nixon committed his crimes, he would have never been impeached.
Posts like this make me believe it.
The amount of disinformation that has seeped into the US consciousness is mind blowing.

raumdeuter:
You might have to consider getting an education beyond 3rd grade cos you are incredibly dumb, Read the below slowly or ask someone educated to read and explain to you

The Pentagon would cut military commands in Europe and the Middle East, as well as several programs long deemed critical while preserving or increasing spending in 17 priority areas, including border security, according to a memo obtained by POLITICO.

Repeating it won't change the meaning.
Something is really not well with you.

Maybe 'reinvest' was too hard a word for you.
What about 'redirect'?
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/pentagon-orders-budget-revamp-redirect-50-billion-toward-trumps-defense-2025-02-19/

When some Defense Budget money is redirected the Overall Budget is not cut. It stays the same.

Android17:
Was Kamala leading in all the polls? Did she have that record number in Iowa? Did you enjoy her CBS special? Hope you sprinkled some cheese on that word salad.

You are a pity case. There's no one so blind as those who will not see.

The same Russian disinformation campaign laptop is incontrovertibly real. But your opinion about Biden did not change. Education does not change a fool. New information cannot change a fool.

IjeDross. IjeDunce. IjeUseless. IjeCursed.

A fool at 50 is a fool forever whose children will also be fools. IjeScumbag. You are a fool at 50+.

My guy, you're a nutter.
A seemingly unintelligent one at that.
It makes you more susceptible to misinformation and propaganda.
You honestly sound like you should be in a straight jacket taking meds.

And fyi, "it's a fool at forty is a fool forever".
Do you get anything you post here right?

You seem a little emotional there.
Lying and being an idiot isn't a great combination.
Just a warning, I believe in reciprocity.
Don't start crying when I insult you in kind.

raumdeuter:
You dug those defence spending cut which is equal to spending from your asss as usual?

Way to display your ignorance as usual

You are just too dumb

One of my favorite shows as a kid.
You might want to start watching it.
Seems you're struggling with reading comprehension.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OAIW5se_cxg

raumdeuter:
You dug those defence spending cut which is equal to spending from your asss as usual?

Way to display your ignorance as usual

You are just too dumb

It is literally in the article you posted.
Or do you want a definition of the word 'reinvested'?

At this point Harvard Extension School should give you a refund of their tuition. What was it $800?

raumdeuter:
Open your eyes and read properly. I am trying everything to spoonfeed you even though we know you have below average intelligence

The Pentagon would cut military commands in Europe and the Middle East, as well as several programs long deemed critical while preserving or increasing spending in 17 priority areas, including border security, according to a memo obtained by POLITICO.

You might want to start with googling the definition of a cut.
It's like saying because I cut $30 of steak from my budget but added $30 of shrimp, I've cut my food budget.

I guess that is that Harvard Extension school logic.

basilico:
I almost flung my phone to the wall after your opinion about NYT and Wapo being truthful media.
You border on insanity I swear by my cockerel.

You should wonder why you are consistently wrong on factually issues.
You should also wonder why everyone here thinks you're a conspitorial nut.

I don't think you are in the position to tell anyone what they should or shouldn't be reading.

descarado:
If that guy is an alternate to Android17, he must be very good then at disguise.
CIA or FBI need him ASAP.

Very good at posting conspiracy rants?

raumdeuter:
So instead of President Trump getting new money for the projects, he decided to cut from Pentagon and Democrats are wailing

I know reading comprehension can be hard for someone with low IQ like you. See the below

The Pentagon would cut military commands in Europe and the Middle East, as well as several programs long deemed critical while preserving or increasing spending in 17 priority areas, including border security, according to a memo obtained by POLITICO.

So, they have not cut Defense Spending. They just shifted the money.
~800 Billion Budget today to a ~800 Billion Budget is not a cut.
Or do I have to show you the definition of what a cut is.

wtf is wrong with you.
Don't you get tired of the Bullshit?

raumdeuter:
Hegseth the defence secretary proposed a cut, which Republican countered it? It was Chris Coons a Democrat who countered it

This is coons full statement.

These cuts are not just ‘low impact items’ — they will impact troop readiness, research and development into cutting-edge weapons systems, and even hang our special operations forces out to dry, all so that President Trump can fund his useless ‘Star Wars’ missile defense program. Republicans are slashing defense spending right to the bone, and [Vladimir] Putin and Xi [Jinping] are celebrating.”

Looks like you didn't read it.
This isn't a cut, this is a cut of certain programs so Trump can spend it on the "Star Wars" missile defense program which most people think is not worthwhile.
So the Defense budget will largely remain the same except cuts to programs that would have better Defense objectives than "Star Wars".

Dems have always been for Defense Budget cuts. Republicans have run on Democrats being weak on Defense because of them for time immemorial.
Pretending otherwise is what your trollish intellectual dishonest side does best.

raumdeuter:
nateevs I see you are one of those clamoring for Pentagon budget cuts

Oya the cut Pentagon budget cut Pentagon budget is here

Now Lets see who are the ones who want the defence budget bloated

Same intellectual dishonesty.
Republicans(who control both houses) have a budget this year that increases Pentagon Spending.


From the article you posted:

The scale and speed of the cuts, totaling $50 billion, marks a dramatic shift in U.S. defense policy and will likely set up a battle with Congress, where Republicans had planned to increase Pentagon spending as part of a package aimed at enacting Trump’s broader agenda.

In the memo, Hegseth outlines cuts that are twice as severe as the sequestration budget reductions imposed in 2013 — the last major cuts to the Defense Department — and equivalent to double the amount that congressional Republicans had planned to add to the Pentagon budget.

The memo does not protect weapons systems that the Pentagon had previously designated as among its most critical, including Columbia-class submarines that are set to enter service within the next decade, space-based systems, a range of manned aircraft, as well as troop deployments to a number of regions, including Europe and the Middle East.

Android17:
No, YOU are the news.

Go and look for truth for yourself.

Compare all the news sources if you must. Then rationally decide what truth is by assaying the logical arguments put forward.

Stop waiting for the media to inform you. They are paid to lie. They are paid to misinform. They only go with their donors.

Legacy media is funded by Big Pharma for e.g so don't expect them to be honest and dispassionate about Big Pharma.

Just the same way Nigerians don't believe NTA news when discussing the presidency. Same logic.

The guy says he is the News, then writes post after post of unfiltered conspiratorial nonsense.
I think you are a good example why people should be reading things like the NYtimes and Washington Post.

basilico:
I saw right through you I doubt your knowledge of economics. I've asked your opinions several times politely.
Forex trade and Investments you are OK. Other matters economy,don't see any substance from you .General knowledge and politics. Zero.

Android17:
[Basilico],The damage you've done to their agenda is here for all to see. I know you don't need the pep talk but just like IjeDross, that guy's reputation precedes him. People that should be humble and leaking their wounds, want to play reverse psychology to hide obvious TDS and Post-election PTSD.

I'm bidding my time till Zelensky and the Ukrainian war don finally scatter like I predicted. I'll revisit some of the foolishness on display. Should be fun.

Basilico is Android17 your alt personality?
Did you create someone to come and talk to you?

bemeruca:
He couldn't even form a full url. 😂

But you could form a phishing link.
Must be proud of yourself.
Great accomplishment.

bemeruca:
Mr. Database go and sleep. you are too old to be awake

You seem to enjoy embarrassing yourself.
I've never seen anyone get kicked and made the fool as much as you do and repeatedly come back for more.
You really really do need a shame reflex.

Lol.
In the Find Out phase.
He was fine with the cuts as long it was somebody else.
Sux for him he was actually that "somebody else".

A Northern Virginia couple is hashing out their next steps after the husband, a 13-year, disabled military veteran and nearly two-year information technology technician with the Federal Emergency Management Agency, was fired Monday, as part of the newly created Department of Government Efficiency’s efforts to shrink the federal workforce.

“I voted for Donald Trump. But this is not what I was expecting,” he said. “We didn’t think they were going to take a chainsaw to a silk rug.”

The man’s wife said they also believed his 13 years of military service in the Navy and Air Force Reserves, with an honorable discharge as an E-4, would have offered him more protection against DOGE cuts.

“I recognize there are a lot of cuts that need to be made, but this is not the one that you think will happen to your family,” she said. “I encouraged him to take the job there, because he loved working for the agency, and I think it has a good mission.”

Android17:
The damage you've done to their agenda is here for all to see. I know you don't need the pep talk but just like IjeDross, that guy's reputation precedes him. People that should be humble and leaking their wounds, want to play reverse psychology to hide obvious TDS and Post-election PTSD.

I'm bidding my time till Zelensky and the Ukrainian war don finally scatter like I predicted. I'll revisit some of the foolishness on display. Should be fun.

From one nutter to another, Android17 to Basilico.
Glad you two lunatics found yourselves to share you far ranging conspiracies.
Do you also share your medication?

GloriousGbola:
its just a rounding error

what is a zero?

The more fake zeros you add the more fake savings you get.

Clearly a mistake. /s

The DOGE website initially included a screenshot from the federal contracting database showing that the contract’s value was $8 million, even as the DOGE site listed $8 billion in savings. On Tuesday night, around the time this article was published, DOGE removed the screenshot that showed the mismatch, but continued to claim $8 billion in savings. It added a link to the original, incorrect version of the listing showing an $8 billion value.

By Wednesday morning, DOGE had updated its list to show $8 million in savings, though it did not acknowledge the error or explain how it might affect its calculation of total money saved, which remained unchanged. A loss of $8 billion in savings would represent nearly 15 percent of the total savings claimed by DOGE.

Republican Susan Collins says funding freezes are unconstitutional.
But Susan Collins does what she does best - seeming concerned about Trump policies while doing nothing and supporting them.

raumdeuter:
Jut a reminder that Trump just signed an executive order to ban IVF

CNN
—
President Donald Trump signed an executive order Tuesday to develop policy recommendations to expand access to and affordability of in vitro fertilization.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/02/18/politics/ivf-access-cost-trump-executive-order/index.html

You seem to have missed the important words "your party" and "some" in the quote you mentioned.
Get back to me when Trump actually does something beyond an executive order looking for policy recommendations.
And your party supports him in doing so.
Until then, there is nothing in what you've written that calls into quesiton my post.

IjeBos:
The problem is your party isn't against extreme abortion measures. That's why it's an issue. Some are talking about a Fed. abortion ban. IVF ban. Birth control ban. Pretty nutty stuff. And they are abusing the Judicial system to do so.