₦airaland Forum

bemeruca:
To add someone to the system they have to go to a contractor, to delete they have to go to a contractor. Are you stupid? Does that look like an efficient system to you? Hahahaha

See, you don't even understand why the records have the dates they do and the first thing your feeble mind thinks of is to delete them.
He wants to know if a system that was designed probably 90 years ago in Cobalt is efficient.
Lol
Maybe the fact it was designed ~90 years ago or they want to replace it may give you some clues.
You're a regular MENSA candidate aren't you.. \s

Again, poof, there goes all pretense you understand any of this.

Android17:
Chemical Engineer.

Anti-science? You better ask about me.

There is a reason some people you see here don't touch my posts. Nobody wants to be reminded about all their posts from 2020.

Let's leave it at that.

If you want me to make a fool of you as always, look for something stupid to post about the nonsense they packaged to you fools as science.

You can invite the best epidemiologist you know to post through your account. I'll make a laughing stock of said person. Preferably, get Fauci. I've been looking for his arse for a while now.

Honestly, you don't sound well.
You have an inability to know when you've made a fool out of yourself.
Seems one of the components of narcissism - grandiose thoughts.

Don't need to ask about you, I've learned everything I need from the posts of yours I've just read.
You're prone to making up bullshit about a topic you really don't understand and then spending your time arguing and gaslighting when facts prove you wrong.
Why would anyone want to engage with you in any serious way?

Go back to telling us all why the bird flu doesn't exist and why our "packaged science" is wrong.
I bet you're a flat earther as well.

bemeruca:
Stick to recording time spent on Nairaland with spreadsheet. You know nothing

You're an example of why you never hire a Trumper.
There's a lot of rather stupid assumptions you make in your comment about the database and how it is used.
Then you go on to assume that somehow your knowhow is greater than the government contractors who charged 9 million. And that the administrators choose to keep the database this way instead of just hitting delete.
You should go bid the contract and charge them 1 million just to hit delete.
Well you'd have to probably be in the US first.

bemeruca:
Mumu takes my word literally. On this forum you can edit your post and it does not cost you 9 million. Nobody interact with database directly. Fool, you are too old for this.

Let's leave crap in the $system cos it cost dollars to remove them even if not removing them might cost more

And you continue.
Poof, there goes the idea that you have any experience in databases or coding

CaptainGo:


My brother, in this life, learn to think for yourself. Don't swallow everything the media tells u hook, line, and sinker.

You may want to take your own advice.
How does this action help the US?
It doesn't.
The US is weaker today than it has ever been.
China is sitting back, laughing.

bemeruca:
It does not cost 9 million to press delete button. Those records should he up to date all the time
B
Your kind will run Nigeria to the ground and run to another nation

And poof, there goes the idea that you have any experience in databases or coding.

basilico:
This is not correct . Those not listed as dead?

It is not correct.
You got fooled again.
You are low IQ to get repeatedly fooled by stats that look nonsensical.
Payments are automatically not even made to people older than 115.
Garbage in, Garbage out.
https://apnews.com/article/social-security-payments-deceased-false-claims-doge-ed2885f5769f368853ac3615b4852cf7

cococandy:
Right. Except that in this your imaginary techtopia that you’re salivating about, you would probably be used as biofuel. Because according to the man who your idols seem to be influenced by, that’s what unproductive people are good for. You’re not even a half decent yahoo boy. I don’t know how much coding you can learn to make yourself useful to them. Don’t get too excited.


Look at the depraved mindsets of the people your idols associate and want to model the society after

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Android17:
No single bird flu anywhere. Nobody bought the bs.

They may later try again with climate flu or some other sh!t. These niccurs is ridiculous.

For a supposed Chemist you post some crazy anti science stuff.
Doubting the bird flu is some nutty sh*t.

cococandy:
Well republicans are on the internet (in their typical believe anything they hear pattern) spreading the news that they’re going to get $8,000 refunds from all the money Elon is saving for them 😃.

Maybe when they don’t get it, that will wake them up? Idk. Those of them regretting their votes all over the internet could be said to be on the verge of a breakthrough but you can’t trust that they won’t chose their hate in favor of communal wellbeing next time.

How can Democrats counter the misinformation to the rest of them?

How do you counter misinformation to someone who believed Trump when he said Elon is the head of DOGE and then turned around to say Elon isn’t a part of it. And said person doesn’t have any questions or concerns but goes along with it?

Is there any sign of a functioning human brain in that equation? They’re are long gone. Mentally compromised.
You just have to wait for the disease to run its course.

They are really saying they will get $8,000 checks?
Lol. That's good propaganda though.

Absolutely right, you can't trust that people will get it together by 2027.
I think Dems have to acknowledge Republican propaganda is very good.
And I don't think they are ready to engage they way they need to.
Haven't seen any sign of it yet, granted it is still early.

descarado:
This place belongs to seun osewa, not Nigerians living in America. The day he don't want anymore, he will kill the site. Anybody can post anything he or she desires. It doesn't belong to you, mister.

Yes, and you do a good job of posting misinformed brain dead conspiracies.
Why are you proud of that?

cococandy:
That’s the kind of environment they thrive in unfortunately.

I gotta admit, the propaganda and lies Elon is pushing out is effective.
It doesn't matter if it gets corrected or called out a day later, a lot of people already have heard it.
Not sure how the Dems will counter it, but need to find a way.

This thread is going to shit.
Too many nutters posting nutter misinformation.
It's starting to read like a Twitter feed.

basilico:
You think we are stupid? You are justifying why immigration especially illegal is important and redefining inflation.
Inflation. Too much money in circulation chasing too few goods

We can say if govt issued a mandate that everyone has to shave his hair and beards every 2 days , the cost of shaving would increase causing inflation.
Take your BS elsewhere.

Your definition is related to Demand-Pull inflation.
What I described was Cost-Push inflation.

You seem to have gotten your Econ degree where Android17 got all his others.
Please don't respond to my posts trying to correct me with shit you have 0 understanding of.

Difficult situation.
Not the banks fault.
How does the bank know it's not a scam whereas you are trying to get something for free?
The person should return the money but how does he not know it's not some form of fraud?
Court is probably the best answer but why is the deposit amount 20% of the amount. Should be a set fee for every case.
Seems the courts are the one ripping you off.

basilico:
Everything must be blamed on Trump policies, whether it's the slightest reason his name must be sullied.

This really isn't complex.
There's less labor so companies are forced to pay more to compete for that labor.
They now have an increase in costs.
They will choose to pass on the increase in costs to the consumer by raising prices.
Increased prices is what inflation is.

But I assume your Masters in all things Bullshit knows better.

Good discussion about USAID and what DOGE did.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDOJ0y99mr4

In a legal brief, the White House now says Musk has no authority to make decisions in DOGE, is not DOGE's administrator nor an employee of DOGE.
Seems they realized what they were doing was illegal and now are backpeddling some.
So now the question is, if Musk isn't in charge, who is?

raumdeuter:
Democrats found a way to push the ACA through but didnt find a way to cut defence spending. If it was that important to them they will find a way

What law is Trump breaking currently to cut wasteful spending through DOGE?

The Republicans are for what protects the country, We dont have any war that directly affects Americans, The country is in huge debts yet Democrats want to keep up govt spending to things that do not affect the average American

We could see your outrage at cutting pottery in Morocco, EV in Vietnam and Sesame street in Iraq, Like Trump said, we will seek to end the war in Ukraine and save on the tax dollar spent there

You can continue to wail and cry your eyes out

Yes, Obama came to office after Bush(Republican) caused the Great Recession.
In his first 2 years, he stabilized the economy, stabilized the banking system, protected US auto Manufacturing then passed the ACA.
Unfortunately in a recession Government spending is a good thing, even military spending.
His first 2 years wasn't the moment for it.
But Democrats tried before then and after that.
Where have the Republicans been on cutting Defense spending? No where.
Because the dirty secret is that a lot of these Military bases and programs are situated in Republican states.

Trump also was President for 4 years.
What happened in his term?
Did he cut Defense Spending? No
Did he cut the deficit? No it went up.

If you don't understand how the US government functions, you shouldn't be posting here.
Google the Impoundment Control Act.
Congress controls the Purse. Meaning they control how much you can spend or not spend.
Because not spending money ona program is in essence a line item veto of a law Congress passed.
Trump can't cut congressionally approved programs as they are the law. Not funding them is tantamount to cutting them and is breaking the law.

The problem with the US is people like you can vote.
People who are wholly uninformed and so consumed with their love of their racist party, they repeatedly write nonsensical posts like this.

raumdeuter:
Trump currently does not have more than Biden and Obama had in their first terms and he was able to at least start something and do something

Obama and Biden controlled both Houses when they were sworn in for their first term and what did they do? Nothing

So sit this out while someone who has the willpower to do something at least attempts to do it. Not just sitting down twiddling thumbs and saying we will cut waste without doing a single thing

Again, most of what you write is misleading at best.
Biden never had a filibuster proof senate.
And Obama had it for partially in his first term and used it to pass the ACA. He lost it less than 2 years into that term.

The willpower you are talking about is the willpower to break the Law.
Presidents cannot impound (not spend) money already passed into Law by Congress.
It takes congressional power to gut programs.

You are saying Presidents in the past didn't have the willpower to break the law and this one does?
Yes you would be correct.

If Republicans wanted to cut the Defense spending, why didn't they work with Democrats who have always wanted to cut Defense spending?

This whole Trump thing is weird.
The things Republicans have always been for and fought for, that Republicans have voted for, whereas it be Defense Spending, a Muscular Foreign Policy(wars), they are suddenly against.
And it is the Dems fault, who have always been against them, for not cutting them/stopping them fast enough.

Up is down and right is left.

Generations ago, I'm sure Trump would have tried colonizing Africa.
That Trump believes he can openly negotiate for another country without the country there in this generation is insane.
I'm not sure what the US is doing here or what message they think they are giving the world.

raumdeuter:
Quick question, If Pentagon was this important to Democrats, why didnt they do something about it for the past 12 out of 16yrs they had power?
If Democrats were there for 12 of the past 16yrs and didnt do anything to the Pentagon you kept shouting about then they have no right to scream when someone is doing something or anything

Why do you come to a discussion board and write the same misleading thing over and over?
Do you think it makes you sound smart?
Do you think it is a winning argument?
Or are you getting paid for how many times you write it?

I always assumed the goal of a place like this was to have honest discussions that elucidate understanding.
Repeatedly writing something that you know is misleading at best doesn't do that.

Only Congress can cut spending or gut programs. As when Congress passes a bill and it is signed by the President it is law.
For Democrats to cut Defense spending, they not only have to pass a new law eliminating the program (which is tough without a Filibuster proof Senate), it would also have to be signed into law by a President.
So the Democrats would have to control the House, the Senate and the White House. And they would have to control the Senate by 60 votes.

Everyone of your posts is some form of trolling.
Not sure why you invest energy writing them.

Android17:
Yes Foxnews is legacy media.

Yes, you are indeed dummer than Basilico thinks.

Do you know the original screenshot is from your CNBC link? And that if I was to scroll through your Foxnews link I'd see the same thing I'm showing to you?

Do you know how stupid you have to be not to even know when you don't know what you are talking about?

Like, how dumb can you really be?

Military aid is a SUBSET of Security Assistance. Do you actually know what that means or do you need urgent medical attention?

The Security Assistance covers economic, defense and military support. This is another disinfectant and bleach argument.

Stop and actually think before typing.

Do you know why your legacy media would rather call it a military aid vs security assistance?

Like I said, from defending Hunter to proving you are incapable of layered reading. You're bummy.

Everyone's understanding is wrong except the person who just learned the word "security assistance" 1 hour ago?
You should see a psychologist for that narcissism you have going on there.

Android17:
Can you show where I said a plea agreement is a petition?

Here. You're spinning so hard, you seem to be having a hard time remembering your bullshit.

Android17:
They are all petitions, silly.

<<< After furiously googling "what is a Plaintiff and a Defendant for dummies">>>>

Android17:
Funny enough. Thanks for helping me catch the error in my post. Yes. I just meant the defendant defends himself against the charge, petition, argument brought. So he is the one that signs the plea agreement. Not the plaintiff or prosecutor.

You're welcome, I'm glad I could make you smarter on this.
People usually get smarter after talking to me.
Unfortunately for you you still sound like you have a 5th grade understanding of this.
I guess better than not having any understanding as you previously demonstrated.
In the future, you might want to do your research first so you won't sound as dumb as you have the last few pages.

Android17:
Do you know why it is called a security assistance rather than a military aid?
Do you know why the eediots you listen to at CBNC and the rest of the legacy media conveniently framed it a military aid vs security assistance?
Stop pretending you even understand what is being discussed. I'm talking A and you are bringing up countries to change the topic.

I assume Fox NEws is legacy media as well...
But we all can see how well listening to "non legacy media" is working out for you
😂😂😂😂😂

Android17:
When you find out that the person on the other end knows more than you and can write down everything you know on a mustard seed, learn to shut up.
Like shut the fvck up already.

Why would I shut up when schooling you is soo much fun?
Are you not embarrassed yet?

Android17:
They are all petitions, silly.

Hey dumbfuck, a plea agreement is not a petition.
Noone is petitioning the court for anything.

Android17:
The petition, charge, case or argument against Smirnov is brought forward by the prosecutor- DOJ
The person who defends himself against the charge is called the defendant or plaintiff.

Do you even understand who a plaintiff is in relation to a defendant?
You would be embarrassed to have written this if you had even an iota of understanding what you were talking about.
You continuously write the dumbest shit and smile in your ignorance.

Android17:
It is the defendant (Smirnov) that comes to a plea agreement.

What in the world of mad people are you talking about?

I asked you to post how the court came to sentencing Smirnov for 6 years after finding him guilty. Let's see if he played any role with respect to the laptop and all the other pieces of evidence that linked Biden to Burisma.

I've given you everything you need to educate yourself and not sound like a fool.
If you want to continue to sound like a fool that is your business.
If you want to learn about how the US courts work, plea agreements or what really happened in the Biden case, all you have to do is read.
It seems you prefer bullshitting and sounding stupid instead.

Android17:
You will learn to look both ways before crossing me.

This is culled from your link:

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/16/trump-administration-broke-law-in-withholding-ukraine-aid.html

It is called a Security Assistance. And before you say it is merely semantics, this is the disparity between the 2. One is a subset of the other.

So stop trying to feed us waffles for supper.

Do you even know the lying media and retards at CNBC called it military aid? It was to hoodwink foolish people like you. Buahahahahaha. Keep parroting their talking points. You look and read, silly.

This guy is going to die on the hill of semantics he doesn't even understand.
What the fux are you even talking about.
Did you even read the shit you linked?

He blocked two tranches, aid the Defense Department was supposed to deliver and aid the State department was supposed to deliver.
Both tranches were for military spending, thus the military aid.

In June, the Pentagon announced plans to provide $250 million to Ukraine in security cooperation funds for additional training, equipment and advisory efforts to build the capacity of Ukraine’s armed forces. The U.S. State Department separately planned to provide $141 million in aid.
...
The Defense Department’s tranche was set to include sniper rifles, rocket-propelled grenade launchers, counter-artillery radars, electronic warfare detection and secure communications, night vision equipment, and military medical supplies and treatment. The department previously included counter-sniper equipment, Humvees and tactical drones as well.

The State Department funding included $115 million for a broad array of purposes, to buy American-produced weapons through the Foreign Military Financing program, but also to provide advisers and training to boost Ukraine’s NATO interoperability: English language labs, medical equipment and improvised bomb simulators. The funds could also pay for spare parts, sustainment and training for previously purchased U.S. gear.

https://www.defensenews.com/congress/2019/09/25/what-you-need-to-know-about-the-us-aid-package-to-ukraine-that-trump-delayed/

This is going to be my last post on this.
You're following the Bemeruca, Raumdeuter path on this. Gaslighting and lying some more when you get called out for Bullshitting.
You've reached the, "you are an idiot with nothing intelligent to say" level for me.

[quote author=Android17 post=134187973]Why were you posting what Smirnov was charged with? What does that have to do with the court's interpretation about how the guilty judgment was arrived at?

That should teach you to stop commenting on issues that are clearly above your pay grade.[/quote]

It was a plea agreement.
Google 'plea agreement' and you may answer your own quesiton.

Again, take your own advice on "commenting on issues that are clearly above your pay grade".

Android17:
When you are done wasting your own time, you will point out where in my post I called it military aid.

If you cannot, will you accept that you typed rubbish? If I ask you to prove that that aid is exclusively military aid, you will run away. Always indulging in topics that he is clearly at sea with.

Grow up. You sound childish.

You didn't call it military aid.
But it was military aid. Hence the big issue.
It was military aid intended to help them fend off Russia.
You don't even understand what you are posting on.
Reflect on your own statement on wasting your time.

The Trump administration’s 55-day halt this summer of hundreds of millions of dollars in military assistance and weapons sales to Ukraine was initially unpublicized . What’s now known is that the Defense and State departments, along with an overwhelming majority in Congress, strongly supported assisting Ukraine — a country attempting to fend off Russia’s inroads on its territory.
https://publicintegrity.org/national-security/timeline-how-trump-withheld-ukraine-aid/

Android17:
First, nobody mentioned military aid.

Of course you didn't because as I keep saying you're an idiot who doesn't know what you are talking about.
What fuxing type of aid did you think he was withholding, cookies and crackers?
It was military aid approved by congress Ukraine needed to fend off Russia.
Lol.
God you are a dumbass

Trump administration broke law in withholding Ukraine aid, watchdog says as Senate prepares for impeachment trial
The Trump administration broke the law by witholding congressionally approved military aid to Ukraine over the summer “for a policy reason,” a top government watchdog said.
The report by the Government Accountability Office came a day after the House of Representatives sent articles of impeachment of President Donald Trump to the Senate for conduct related to the withholding of that aid to Ukraine.
Trump held back the funds while pressuring Ukraine’s new president to announce investigations by that country of former Vice President Joe Biden, the front-runner for the Democratic presidential nomination.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/01/16/trump-administration-broke-law-in-withholding-ukraine-aid.html

Android17:
Second, Trump did not withhold any aids to Ukraine
Third, there was no corrupt motive. He simply told them he knew Joe Biden was colluding with Burisma via Hunter and he wanted the tea otherwise he wouldn't release the funds.

- he did not withhold the funds
- nothing was provided to him about Biden, yet he still released the funds
- as POTUS, he had the rights to withhold those funds
- turns out Biden was colluding with Burisma
- Trump was impeached even though he didn't withhold the funds.
- Biden was protected. First by denying the laptop story. I could go on and on.

Think of it, you deranged Trumpist. Trump was impeached for something Biden ACTUALLY did. But you hate one and defend the other. Shame on you.

Tueh.

The rest is a reiteration of the nonsense you have been posting supported by nothing.
Do you see the difference between what I do and you do.
You write nonsense, unsupported by anything but that clearly disturbed mind of yours.
I write posts supported by articles and court documents or things people call facts.

#FactsoverMentallyDeranagedNonense

Android17:
IjeDunce, a petition is not a ruling. The petition is the argument made by the DOJ against Smirnov. Read a book or something.

Huh?
Holy shit @ this statement.
I can't.
It was a plea agreement that was accepted by the court (Judge) and Smirnov was sentenced to 6 years in jail.
I get why you wanted me to post the Supreme Court ruling on the Student Relief Case now. You have no idea what it is.
You should really stop talking about things you have 0 idea about.
Lol @ telling someone to read a book while spouting off nonsense you are clearly wrong about.

So for the record, you have proven:
- You have 0 idea how the US government works and the role the Supreme Court plays
- You have 0 idea at how Us Courts work and how defendants make deals and are sentenced.
Here, this may help you with some of it:
Courts 101: An Understanding of the Court System
https://ijis.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/ijis_wp_courts_101_understan.pdf

As for the rest of the nonsense in your post.
I can't make any sense of it as it doesn't make sense.
It's clear you have 0 idea or understanding about what you are talking about here either.

Does bullshiting and rambling like this work for you in real life?

Android17:
The prosecutor was removed. (Fun fact: Trump was impeached first time for withholding aid from Ukraine even though he only threatened to. He still released the money without Ukraine doing what he asked for).

Your posts are always fill so many lies it's hard to hit them all.
It's amazing that someone can write a post that i close to 100% inaccurate. Well done, that's an achievement.

The above is one of many many I found esp. brain dead.

Trump was not just impeached for withholding Military aid. He was impeached for withholding aid for Ukraine for a corrupt motive.
The corrupt motive being he wanted Ukraine to open an investigation into Joe Biden and announce it.
Not necessarily investigate, just announce they were opening an investigation. (It's no surprise that shortly after Smirnov made his now false allegations about Joe biden bribery in Ukraine)
In the US Legal system that corrupt motive can separate legal actions from illegal actions.

Recap:
Legal to withhold aid from countries.
Illegal to withhold aid from countries if they don't open an investigation into your political rivals.

It's a minor distinction that requires a little bit of brain power and thought.
No wonder you are having a hard time with it. That thought part seems to be a struggle for you.