IjeBos's Posts
Nairaland Forum › IjeBos's Profile › IjeBos's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 (of 300 pages)
benalvino3:Did you mean the Nigerian nation? Because the entire US nation does not support the SAVE act. But you have never stepped foot in the US, though you like to pretend. |
cococandy:Crazy story! |
cococandy:They are trying to deport this woman(person who seems to be assimilated to the US while doing a necessary job) while given White Afrikaans an expediated path to the US. Maybe Raumdeuter can explain why this would be if not for racism. |
bayelsaowei:A party of cowards with more allegiance to themselves than the US. |
Iyobaba:I knew what CSP was, you didn't. I already posted who and what CSP is and what they are trying to push. You're close but still not there. Find out what narrative the lawmakers who asked him to testify were trying to peddle and then you may finally understand. This isn't a new thing. Republicans regularly pull these types of shenanigans with "expert witnesses". They expect people like you to hear catch words (expert) and automatically believe what you hear next. It's one step up from what Raumdeuter and Basilico do: Go on twitter and just listen and then post nonsense from whatever rando they find on their feed, "expert" moniker or not. When I was a kid I learned the 5 W's and How. Who, What, Where, When, Why, and How. Also to question what bias a person may have and what narrative they are trying to sell me. Try those and maybe you won't be getting fooled by "experts" from fancy sounding think tanks. FYI, I am an expert from "I know everything about Everything" think tank. So, I must be right. /s |
Iyobaba:1.) Again, bamboozled was the wrong word choice. It may mean confused, but it's connotation (I'm helping you with new words) is confusion based on trickery. 2.) Now you're getting there. Let's go further. a.) What is the CISP? What think tank is that and what is their background? b.) What senior US government officials, members of Congress and state attorneys has he briefed. c.) What research and writing has he done? 3.) You were bamboozled but not by me. This is the playbook of the right and people like Ted Cruz. They trout out some "expert" from some think tank with a name that sounds impressive "Center for Security Policy". But that expert is generally some nonsensical person willing to say whatever these Right wing nuts want. But now that that "expert" is spouting "nonsense" in a Congressional Hearing, it gives it gravitas. The next step is for Ted Cruz to go on TV and say "See, this expert, from this place with this impressive sounding name said _______". So, now Fox News and other right wing places report "An expert in a Congressional hearing said _________" and further launder the BS. And then someone like you hears that, doesn't do his/her own due diligence, believes it and regurgitates it like you did here. 4.) I say all this because when I first heard about the hearing days ago it sounded very suspect. So, I went and googled who the guy was. And not surprising he was what I expected. Below is Google AI description of the Center for Security Policy. 5.) In fewer words, I have a problem with Ted Cruz pulling this stunt, the BS analyst he used to pull it and people like you who don't use the most basic of critical thinking.
|
Iyobaba:1.) Bamboozled is the wrong word choice. The connotation is wrong for your usage. You meant 'confused' but I'm sure you wanted to sound grandiloquent but instead chose the wrong word. 2.) Most Psychologists are licensed and have professional and educational qualifications. Is a "counterterrorist analyst" licensed? Again, what makes him someone I should listen to? What made him someone you chose to listen to? I think the premises of one of our arguments is flawed and it's not mine. 3.)No, I have an issue with someone posting nonsense just because another nonsense individual said something and called himself an authority on it. Let's try it this way: I'm a "people who aren't real counterterorrist analyst" analyst. And I'm telling you that he is mostly bullshit. Now since I've crowned myself an analyst in this, what I say is Gospel right? Make sense to you now? |
Iyobaba:So what gives this "counterterrorist analyst" an expertise, authority or any credibility in this field that I should take his word as Gospel or even believe what he says? I'm sure you researched him right? If Ted Crux brings a witness to the table, that says something dubious like this, you can take it to the bank it's most likely a mal actor. |
Raumdeuter, looks like dragging the country into a war by choice, illegal tarriffs (have you figured out who pays the tariffs yet?), corruption and general incompetence really don't improve the Economy. Well, at least America is still respected on the world stage? Right Raumdeuter? /s
|
From this: raumdeuter:To this: raumdeuter:Clearly, you realized how idi.-o.-tic you sounded and decided to change your language and thus the meaning of what you wrote. Fyi. words have meaning. "focusing" and "Investigative approach" is not detaining/arresting people to ask them question absent individualized suspicion. You are as duplicitous as you are undereducated. And duplicitous means deceitful since you struggle with vocabulary and reading comprehension. |
raumdeuter:This post though . Raumdeuter is talking to a dude, who writes English like it was his 3rd language, can't conjugate a basic verb, and now uses ChatGPT to write his posts because he is so embarrassed at how illiterate he is, about "anything beyond ba ba black sheep is complex". How utterly clueless. Oga, writing a sentence with verb tense agreement is complex for Bemeruca.t. My gosh, I can't. God, I'm dying over here You are jester. |
raumdeuter:Captain save-A-Racist doing his best impression of racist country bumpkin lawyer. You may want to revisit (my fault visit, because I'm sure you've never read it) the Fourt amendment. What you describe may or may not be sexist, but it is illegal. Police can't stop and detain swaths of people based on demographic characteristics alone without individualized suspicion. Like I said, I don't think I've read one intelligent post of yours. |
raumdeuter:Ur like a piñata, everyone takes turns beating on you because you make it so easy to. Then you get emotional and start crying. I've never meant someone who spends so much time online yet never says anything intelligent. The thread jester. |
raumdeuter:He said compassionate about Nigeria while cows are roaming the streets of Abuja and there is double digit inflation. It seems like your insight on Nigerian politics is just as good as your insight on American politics. You voted for Trump 3 times. A man who is redefining and teaching Nigerian politicians about the bounds of corruption and incompetence. What type of olodo couldn't see Trump for who he was? You should sit in the corner and face the wall when anything Politics is discussed. |
raumdeuter: All this talk... It's ok oh. Just say you know Bemurca is lying but you don't care because he's your emotional and intellectual Bestie. He said only emotional people care if people are lying to them and trying to run scams. Everyday, you make it clearer why you are 100% Trumper. |
IjeBos: raumdeuter:You know soldier is not soldier([b]s) right? So, yes, you were lying about the racist remarks and him wishing Americans soldiers (notice the plural, you do know what a plural is, right?) die. But let's move on to what you posted. I'm sure you read the article, I'll link parts from it. Platner was a soldier and he seems to be ripping a soldier for incompetence that almost got him killed along with the troops he was leading. In the army you have to follow your superiors' orders, so if he's doing incompetent ish I would assume they would rip him. I'm not a soldier and I assume neither were you, but I'll leave it for other soldiers to call out. So, recap, You lied about something inflammatory - Platner making racist remarks You lied about something else inflammatory - Platner wishing American sodliers(plural) die You took out of context what Platner actually said about 1 soldier. If you have valid arguments, you wouldn't spend so much of your time lying and gaslighting. But that's what you do everyday in the American Politics thread. That's why everyone thinks you're the forum's jester.
|
raumdeuter:Again, this is your MO. You play this lying game when you know better or should know better. He was never on the Maine ballot for the Democrats because he was pushed out before the deadline making it official. Because he got out before the deadline, they held another truncated nominating process. The winner is the person who appears on the Maine ballot for the Dems That was not Platnar. Trump after he was found liable of rape was the Republican nominee, you voted for him again, and was elected President. Miller after abusing his g/f was the Republican nominee, won the seat, abused his new wife, broke his daughter's collar bone and after today will the Republican nominee again. You seem to have trouble with this. Democrats jettison individuals with these credible allegations, Republicans worship them like you worship Trump, Hegseth etc. etc. |
raumdeuter:It's your MO, instead of owning your degeneracy, you lie and play your dementia on repeat game. So, tell me what racist remarks about minorities did Plantar make. Also, when did Platnar say he "wishes US soldiers died in wars"? Go ahead, expose your lying self. You voted for an adjudicated rapist, who was indicted by the US DOJ for racism and who is a liar and a conman. If I was you I would maybe consider lying about other people as well. But instead of spending your big age being a liar, maybe just stop stanning for degenerates. |
raumdeuter:Platner was jettisoned when a credible allegation emerged. He didn't even win the Democratic Primary. Jettisoned. Trump is an adjucated Rapist. You voted for him 3 times. Miller was accused since 2021 of Domestic Abuse, credibly, he was elected by Republicans to his position. Now that more credible allegations have emerged, from another woman, your party still hasn't called for his removal. So, let's recap, Miller was credible accused of breaking his 2 year old's collar bone. The President you wail and nash your teeth in support of says he feels bad for him. Him, the dude who was accused by his wife of breaking their daughters collar bone in such a brutal way he left his hand impression on the skin on her shoulder. Below is your pretend "devout Christian" Republican speaker of the House on this. You are not ashamed of yourself? Oga, take a break. Your inner demon is showing.
|
raumdeuter:When he called him did he tell he felt bad for him as well? Let's recap, he was credible accused of breaking his 2 year old's collar bone. The President you wail and nash your teeth in support of says he feels bad for him. Him, the dude who was accused by his wife of breaking their daughters collar bone in such a brutal way he left his hand impression on the skin on her shoulder. You are not ashamed of yourself? Oga, take a brake. Your inner demon is showing. |
raumdeuter:One of us spends hours a day online lying and making himself look foolish, voted for and celebrated a conman, thief and a degenerate who was adjudicated of rape, and walks around sexualizing teenagers. You tell me who you think has personal values. My guy, you're like the thread jester, running around stultifying yourself daily. |
bayelsaowei:The question should be, did Raumdeuter ever have personal values? You can't forget something you never had. |
Hey Raumdeuter, do you also feel bad for this Republican Congressman who is accused of breaking his 2 year old daughter's collarbone? Why don't you tell me more about the Republican party of values. Welcome to the idiocracy where the most degenerate of men is the President and Raumdeuter's hero.
|
raumdeuter:Yeah, when did he drop out? Do you also feel badly for the guy who is accused of breaking his 2 year old's collarbone.
|
cococandy:Ha, I feel like I had this same conversation with a cousin. Was deeply diappointed. It's such a myopic view of the world esp. when your concern is not the current threats in your own country but so some far away threat that may one day engulf you, if you survive the fire that you're already engulfed in. These Nigerian churches. |
kodded:Ok, since you chose to reply, what does this "dangerous liberalism" have to do with people shooting other people with guns? |
Ishilove:What is this "dangerous liberalism" you speak of? |
Channeling Raumdeuter's nonsense talk.
|
benalvino3:I see you still got your bestie's name in your mouth. Might want to rinse it out after. |
No racism in the US, right Raumdeuter?
|
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 (of 300 pages)