₦airaland Forum

bemeruca:
The guy with lice brain ijebos is asking me how is it a sweetheart deal. A guy that commits several serious crime and on top of that they are giving him immunity for nothing... How is that not a sweetheart deal?

Ahh, you've moved on after basilico of all people had to tell you you were wrong (even though he was only 75% right himself) about the judge striking down the deal. How does that feel? If I have lice brains and am clearly smarter than you, what's inside your brains? lol

I gave you a homework assignment to help you evaluate if it was a sweetheart deal. You clearly didn't do the assignment and are still using a word you don't understand and were propagandized to believe. Here it is again. In order to say something was a sweetheart deal, you invariable have to be able to compare the deal to a deal wasn't a sweetheart deal.

IjeBos:
And it was a sweetheart deal how? Explain with examples of similar situations with people receiving worse treatment for the 2 actions below.

1.) Tax Charges - Show me examples of harsher treatment for individuals who have paid back the taxes they owed with penalty. In your example explain (compare/contrast) Hunter's situation with that of Roger Stone. Explain how hunter got a sweetheart deal given that Roger Stone didn't have any criminal exposure.

2.) Gun Charge - Show me examples of people getting harsher sentences for lying on the gun form by stating they did not take illegal drugs who have not committed a felony. In that answer explain why Boebert isn't under investigation now for video of her vaping even though she owns guns.

BornAgainCow:
Someone called Timesup clearly fvcked your mother. That your poor, lonely and abused mother. That’s why you can’t get him out of your head and trying so desperately to tie him to me for God knows what reason lmao.

basilico, tell me, what would you consider someone who uses God for his lies? Christian or Not? Asking for a friend. 😂😂😂

BornAgainCow:
Look. Just look at him. 3 posts mentioning me since I last logged in.

Bro just drop this act of you being a highflying Harvard graduate earning millions. You are easily the most jobless guy on this thread. The Only one who has time for creating excel spreadsheets and diagrams for NAIRALAND 😂😅😅

Abeg I have some work to attend to tonight. Maybe I get back to you later in the morning.

Jobless low self esteem pr!ck

Ahh, I get why you're scared of logging back in with Timesup2345. You don't want to be connected with all your previous terroristic statements, like bombing Nigerian Universities because you hate education or wanting to see everyone in the US dead. I think the time to worry about those statements was when you made them.
It must have been hard for you to make that choice vs. giving yourself another like.

You're a sick person. A wannabe terrorist who is mentally unbalanced, has multiple personalities and seeks affirmation from random people.

IjeBos:
You got the whole crew together. (MentalCase98, BornAgainCow, NotoriousThug, Wonderman76) and added SlyFoxx211
What happened to Timesup2345 and Shellaking4real? C'mon use them as well. Drive up that like count.

See Mental illness.

I see you took my advice and got Shellaking4real into the action. Don't leave Timesup2345 out of the fun. I'm sure 7 likes instead of 6 will make you that much more popular. 😂😂😂

SlyFoxx=Timesup2345, MentalCase98, BornAgainCow, Shellaking4real, NotoriousThug, Wonderman76

BornAgainCow:
No. Also all the ones who publicly ridicule you here. I guess they are all me too 😂😅

Delusional fvck. Go get a shrink.

You have 100 personalities, your lies tell lies and you are talking about someone being delusional and needing a shrink 😂😂😂
Holy nuttery.
I can't.

BornAgainCow:
And oh yes, maybe not a direct call but I indefinitely have my channels to Tinubu whenever I want. Doubt this if you like bro.

Unfortunate for you I’m not from a politically inconsequential tribe of Nigeria.

You're clearly incapable of knowing the truth from the lies that fill your head. You can peddle whatever bullshit you want on this forum. But, I know who you are, name and all. You ain't shit.

Think about this, you spent all night logging into usernames to like your own post. Sounds like something someone who ain't shit would do right?

BornAgainCow:
The only movie playing is the one where you claim to be this high flying, globe trotting, Ivy League educated, womanizing play boy but somehow spend 85% of your waking hours arguing with strangers on nairaland and investigating usernames and login times with your excel sheet 😅😅😅

You have no idea how much we laugh at you here bro. If you did you will probably hush disappear

Yeah, I bet you Timesup2345, MentalCase98, BornAgainCow, Shellaking4real, NotoriousThug, Wonderman76 and the other 100 personalities in your head sit around and laugh at me. Lol. 😂😂😂😂😂😂

You are a NUTT.

BornAgainCow:
My guys on the big man’s team Will ensure Nigeria hears about his 😉

The movies that play in your head.
I would think Tinubu had a red phone in his office that you could reach him directly on. 😂😂 Didn't you say he begged your family to run? 😂😂
I can imagine you sitting in the dark with your notebook of alt usernames, scribbling new usernames and new passwords and crossing off old ones that are banned. 😂😂

I'm dead. Your nuttery is killing me. I haven't laughed like this in a long time. Do more. 😂😂😂😂😂😂

This guy is sooooo insecure he logged into 5 accounts so he could boost his like count and seem "liked" on an online forum. You are not WELL.

😂😂😂😂😂😂

BornAgainCow:
This fool gets sooo butt hurt by people liking posts criticizing him that he turns into Dick Tracy 😂😂

Jesus you are Jobless I swear.

Ask yourself why you had to log into 5 monikers to make it seem that people liked your posts. Ask yourself the amount of broken, lack of self worth and mental illness it takes to think to do that and then waste the time actually doing.

Holy shit. You're Nutz.

BornAgainCow:
Congratulations. A bunch of nairaland monickers were apparently online recently.

How does that change the fact that you have exposed PO as a woman beater? 🤪🤪

Btw why didn’t you also include all the other monickers you claim are me?

Jobless fool

That SLyFoxx211 takes the cake. 51 seconds online huh?
See Mental Illness
You are a f*cking NUT.

BornAgainCow:
😅😅

But I see not Timesup in your fabricated screenshot 😂😂

If you’re so sure that is me then why didn’t you include that one hahaha.

You do know the last seen is recorded. You did all this just to like your own post. 😂😂 Holy shit, you are NUTZ.
I know you also register and use all your usernames to Report people to get them banned.

BornAgainCow:
Why doesn’t your father do better than beating your mother up like Emmett Till every night?

How f*cking nuts is he?

You got the whole crew together. (MentalCase98, BornAgainCow, NotoriousThug, Wonderman76) and added SlyFoxx211
What happened to Timesup2345 and Shellaking4real? C'mon use them as well. Drive up that like count.

See Mental illness.

BornAgainCow:
I no longer even feel the need to argue with you.

You are clearly the result of being born with too many blood clots in your brain due to your father’s heavy punches on your mother whilst you were in her womb. You should be used as a specimen in a Ted talk against domestic violence. If anything I just feel pity for you now.

Love and light bro.

PS: I didn’t even read your post in its entirety. Harvard really needs to do a better job teaching is students the art of comprehension.

Slyfoxx/TimesUp you can do better than 4 likes. Why don't you log into or create a couple more alt usernames and get the like count up to 10.
How f*cking nuts are you?

Edit. Up to 5 now.. You have more in you.
I so called it. See my previous post.

IjeBos:
Yeah, that's slyfoxx.
These are more of SlyFoxx's recent "new" usernames so you can know who you are talking to.
SlyFoxx = Timesup2345, MentalCase98, BornAgainCow, Shellaking4real, NotoriousThug, Wonderman76

I'm sure there are others, but I'll leave it there for now.
It's actually sad one person can be this nuts and have this much time on his hands. Nigerians have to get rid of the Mental Health Illness stigma.

bemeruca:
But the deal was bad, she rejected the deal as a result of that. What was the deal bad for? It was bad for justice because corrupt ideots wanted to play the justice system.

Everyone knows what happened and they say that the judge struck down the deal but mumu will be mumu, ijebos think we are saying she uttered the word or she passed such judgment.

Find better thing to do. Your obsession with mumu is getting out of hand.

And it was a sweetheart deal how? Explain with examples of similar situations with people receiving worse treatment for the 2 actions below.

1.) Tax Charges - Show me examples of harsher treatment for individuals who have paid back the taxes they owed with penalty. In your example explain (compare/contrast) Hunter's situation with that of Roger Stone. Explain how hunter got a sweetheart deal given that Roger Stone didn't have any criminal exposure.

2.) Gun Charge - Show me examples of people getting harsher sentences for lying on the gun form by stating they did not take illegal drugs who have not committed a felony. In that answer explain why Boebert isn't under investigation now for video of her vaping even though she owns guns.

You clearly live a life where because you have idiots around you, you think that the nonsense that comes out of your mouth carries some force of fact. I'll beat how stupid you are into your useless self.

bemeruca:
But the deal was bad, she rejected the deal as a result of that. What was the deal bad for? It was bad for justice because corrupt ideots wanted to play the justice system.

Everyone knows what happened and they say that the judge struck down the deal but mumu will be mumu, ijebos think we are saying she uttered the word or she passed such judgment.

Find better thing to do. Your obsession with mumu is getting out of hand.

I think you missed the instructions. "Not an article that summarizes what the judge said". This should be easy. You've written a lot of words and posted a couple of articles incorecctly summarizing what happened. But still no court transcript with the judge striking down/saying she won't accept the deal. I'm trying to teach you how to think critically. You clearly need the help. I even amended your assignment.

IjeBos:
So, post a link to the Court transcript that says the judge "struck down" or "won't accept" the deal. Not an article that summarizes what the judge said, the actual quote from the court transcript. Backup the bullshit that you talk.

Your next post won't have any such thing, because you can't. You can can't because it didn't happen. Semantics to you is when people give you facts that don't align with the "pseudo-facts" you've been fed. Why don't you post another NY post propaganda piece to make your point. You're a propaganda pin head. The most useful of idiots. You talking to basilico calling someone a fool. You got jokes.

basilico:
The judge did not use the actual phrase (I'm stiking the deal down) .
The deal no longer holds anyway . But the coon wants you to show where those words were uttered. He then walks away claiming the 'deal being struck down' has been debunked
How do people live with that level of foolishness?

Yes, you are right. benalvino/bemeruca was wrong. And when he was called out, as usual, he deflected, backtracked, spun like a top, twisted like a pretzel and played his normal games so he wouldn't have to admit he was wrong, again.
The deals was not struck down by the judge. In fact the judge made a point of saying she was neither rejecting or accepting the deal.

So why use the words "struck down"? Because the connotation of the phrase eludes to some power heavy handedly canceling it. And thus they want you believe the narrative that the "Judge struck it down", because the deal was "bad". Purely propaganda. Propaganda that benalvino bought into, as usual.

But the Judge didn't strike down the deal. The deal failed because the prosecutors bent to political pressure. In fact there is evidence that the prosecutor most likely lied when he said the "deal" didn't include foreign lobbying charges. In the emails discussing the deal, they agreed to that. So, the judge's job was to probe to ensure the defendant knew what he was pleading to. And so when she asked if the deal included Foreign lobbying charges, the prosecutor most likely lying, said no. Because of that and the language in the diversion agreement, the judge wanted 1.) to be briefed on the language and 2.) for them to go back and discuss it more. So she moved her decision.

More Republican hypocrisy.

bemeruca:
Blash Blah Blah

Here is what you wrote:

bemeruca:
A fool will always be a fool. Let him defend hunter and Biden. This is how he was playing semantics with the sweetheart deal when it was struck down.

I think you missed the instructions. "Not an article that summarizes what the judge said". In fact the article you posted proves my point. The judge did not "strike down" the deal. You've seem to have morphed again.
You've written a lot of words and still no court transcript with the judge striking down the deal. I'm trying to teach you how to think critically. You clearly need the help.

IjeBos:
So, post a link to the Court transcript that says the judge "struck down" the ruling. Not an article that summarizes what the judge said, the actual quote from the court transcript. Backup the bullshit that you talk.

Your next post won't have any such thing, because you can't. You can can't because it didn't happen. Semantics to you is when people give you facts that don't align with the "pseudo-facts" you've been fed. Why don't you post another NY post propaganda piece to make your point. You're a propaganda pin head. The most useful of idiots. You talking to basilico calling someone a fool. You got jokes.

bemeruca:
Wrong on what? Are you this stupid or you get incentives to win arguments on naira land.

I asked you a simple question, because you think words are always literal when you choose to believe your delusion.

Again, if the plead deal did not die why has everything change and no deal instead hunter is being charged? Are you this daft?

So, now you've morphed to "did not die" from the "the judge struck it down". Let's try this again:

You made the claim the judge "struck down" the deal, so back it up. This is what I posted.

IjeBos:
So, post a link to the Court transcript that says the judge "struck down" the ruling. Not an article that summarizes what the judge said, the actual quote from the court transcript. Backup the bullshit that you talk.

Your next post won't have any such thing, because you can't. You can can't because it didn't happen. Semantics to you is when people give you facts that don't align with the "pseudo-facts" you've been fed. .

And as expected, you didn't. Because you can't. Because you are wrong. The judge did not strike it down.
I don't engage with people not smart enough to not always be wrong, yet too egotistical to admit that they are always wrong, so they twist themselves in pretzels massaging their wrongness.

BornAgainCow:
She was never an escort; that rumor has been debunked but even if she was, so? We should now crucify people for their past? So very liberal of you 😂😅

Hypocrite liberals. You in particular have the intellectual capacity of a housefly so I’m not really surprised by your shallow thinking.

Go fvck your mother bro.

The wannabe terrorist SlyFoxx/Timesup graces us with his "intellectual capacity", with such intellectual terms as "Go fvck your mother bro". At one point wasn't your alt moniker Timesup crowing about hating education and wanting to bomb schools in Nigeria? Fun times.
basilico and bemeruca/benalvino maybe you should come here and tell us all how much of a Christian, degenerate wannabe Republicans (don't really live in the US) like slyfoxx/timesup truly are.

And as to Boebert. The person who reported the claims and who Boebert called a liar, filed a defamation suit.
Here is part of Boebert's motion in resposne:

“Representative Boebert’s statements were made in the context of a heated, partisan, reelection campaign,” it says, noting as a comparison that “The First Amendment was adopted, after all, by colonists whose first major protest of the Stamp Act was to burn effigies of British politicians in central Boston.” She concludes, “Accusations of falsehoods are, for good or ill, a time-worn aspect of American political campaigns. Listeners hear such accusations for what they are: rhetoric, not defamation.”

and the response from the person who filed the defamation suit:

“In the attached affidavit, signed under penalty of perjury, Boebert does not deny being a paid escort, having abortions other than in 2004 & 2009, dancing nude, or illegal drug use as we alleged in our past (website) posts. She obfuscates these points by providing parsed denials with words we never used.”

Yeah.... So, debunked? Not so much.
If the judge allows the suit, which seems plausible, should be a fun deposition.

bemeruca:
Because words are always literal.

Let me ask you. How was the deal? Is it still pending or it has changed to something else?

Even a starfish can get this but it's unfortunate for you.

You made the claim the judge "struck down" the deal, so back it up. This is what I posted.

IjeBos:
So, post a link to the Court transcript that says the judge "struck down" the ruling. Not an article that summarizes what the judge said, the actual quote from the court transcript. Backup the bullshit that you talk.

Your next post won't have any such thing, because you can't. You can can't because it didn't happen. Semantics to you is when people give you facts that don't align with the "pseudo-facts" you've been fed. .

And as expected, you didn't. Because you can't. Because you are wrong. The judge did not strike it down.
I don't engage with people not smart enough to not always be wrong, yet too egotistical to admit that they are always wrong, so they twist themselves in pretzels massaging their wrongness.

bemeruca:
A fool will always be a fool. Let him defend hunter and Biden. This is how he was playing semantics with the sweetheart deal when it was struck down.

So, post a link to the Court transcript that says the judge "struck down" the ruling. Not an article that summarizes what the judge said, the actual quote from the court transcript. Backup the bullshit that you talk.

Your next post won't have any such thing, because you can't. You can can't because it didn't happen. Semantics to you is when people give you facts that don't align with the "pseudo-facts" you've been fed. Why don't you post another NY post propaganda piece to make your point. You're a propaganda pin head. The most useful of idiots. You talking to basilico calling someone a fool. You got jokes.

bemeruca:
Propaganda piece? hahaha, a simpleton says, so it has to be.

Yes, propaganda piece. And to make my point, I found the document both you and the NY post piece relied on. And it's worse than I expected.
Here it is:
Sixth Progress Report on the Implementation by Ukraine of the Action Plan on Visa Liberalisation
https://www.eumonitor.eu/9353000/1/j4nvirkkkr58fyw_j9vvik7m1c3gyxp/vk036jhcb1zg

This is what the report is on, Action plan on Visa Liberalisation:

I. INTRODUCTION
The EU-Ukraine Visa Liberalisation Dialogue was launched in October 2008. In November 2010, the European Commission presented the Ukrainian Government with an action plan on visa liberalisation (VLAP). The VLAP sets a series of precise benchmarks for four ‘blocks’ of technically relevant issues, with a view to adopting a legislative, policy and institutional framework (phase 1) and ensuring its effective and sustainable implementation (phase 2). The benchmarks need to be met before Ukrainian nationals holding biometric passports can enter the Schengen zone for short stays without the need for a visa.2

As I said, how many times was Shokin's actual name mentioned? 0
And the 2 mentions of General Prosectors office?
-"On 30 November, the General Prosecutor appointed the head of the specialised anti-corruption prosecution."
-"A specialised unit to coordinate investigations into money laundering and terrorism financing was set up on 2 September 2015 in the Department of Supervision in Criminal Proceedings of the Prosecutor General."

It should be now clear why the NY Post didn't link the article. And again even clearer why you are the idiot you are.

bemeruca:
you are beyond stupid at this point.

these are all facts
In December 2015, the European Commission praised Ukraine's Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin for his anti-corruption efforts. This was 9 days after Joe Biden demanded Shokin be fired.

The EU report said Ukraine had made "noteworthy" progress in fighting corruption under Shokin. It praised the appointment of a new head of an anti-corruption office.

Shokin had seized assets of Mykola Zlochevsky, owner of Burisma, which hired Hunter Biden. This made Shokin a threat to Burisma, according to Hunter's business partner.

However, in March 2016 Shokin was forced out after Biden threatened to withhold $1 billion in US aid unless Shokin was fired.
Biden later bragged about getting Shokin fired, who at the time was investigating Burisma, the Ukrainian gas company paying Biden's son Hunter $1 million a year.

Shokin has denied being corrupt and said he was fired illegally due to Biden's pressure. Internal US memos show officials had recommended aid to Ukraine because of anti-corruption progress under Shokin.

The EU praise contradicts claims by Biden and others that European officials agreed Shokin was corrupt and needed to be removed.

All you do is to spread lies. You cling to the word Temporary like it changed anything. Get help and stop defending white privilege.

Whenever you write a post I'm thankful I went to good schools and was thought how to think critically. You saw my posts, I included links and quotes and I try to include1st hand sources (i.e. the actual pdf of the State Dep. briefing Biden received).
But you? You went online, googled Burisma, found the first article that aligned with what you thought and basically wrote verbatim what you found in the article.
Here is the article. (I found it by putting a couple of your lines in your post in google)
https://nypost.com/2023/09/08/despite-bidens-claim-europeans-werent-trying-to-oust-ukraine-prosecutor-targeting-hunters-firm/
And it was clearly written as a propaganda piece that you swallowed and regurgitated. What's the first tell? It's the NY Post.

So, where is this EU report your post is largely based on? Did you read it? Did you see the Shokin's name mentioned when they were praising the reforms? Or is that what the article told you it said? Are you just taking the word of whomever wrote the article? And then expecting me to take your word on it? In fact I'm 100% sure it doesn't mention Shokin by name. That's the difference between you and I. I would have found that report and read it myself, to make sure it said what the article said it said, before talking about it. And that's the reason you're an idiot who repeatedly falls prey to Right Wing propaganda.

bemeruca:
If the investigation is dormant and he is bribed. Who is likely to do the bribing? The firm that Biden and his avatar hunter are working for, right? So why then should Biden be calling for him to be fired? Before you lie, use your head at least.

That you posted this, wow. There is a huge logical flaw in what you wrote. Figure it out and you may be smarter than a 5th grader. I'll check in to see if you figured it out and thus figured out how ridiculous what you wrote is.

basilico:
The Burisma owner had his property confiscated, he never went back to Ukraine.
That is a dormant investigation?
idiot.

That happened AFTER Shokin was fired. Lol.
Please, stop type typing and figure out your own conspiracy.

basilico:
Context is a problem for you. Shokin was taken care of. Threat neutralized.
How hard is that? Getting rid of Shokin was bad? Because he was investigating them, for JB the brand to be the one behind the scheme because everyone knew why they got rid of Shokin.

Ahh.. I get it. You are really stupid. You don't understand what you posted. Holy Sh*t.

Archer is repeating what he was told by Bursima's board before Shokin was fired. The Burisma board did NOT want Shokin to be fired, because they "neutralized him". That's why the investigation was dormant. If they fired Shokin (the corrupt prosecutor), the new prosecutor may reopen the investigation.

“It was kind of pounded into our heads” that Shokin’s ouster was not desired, Archer added.

You have no idea what you are reading. That people like you exist in life makes me sad.

basilico:
Really I quoted sworn testimony. Regardless Devon Archer was being paid 83.3k per month same as Hunter.
You are a slob. He revealed a lot of Biden corruption in sworn testimony as a
Board Member of Burisma, Business partner of Hunter.

You believe wapo instead.

Idiot, it was your post. Don't cry now.
Your whistle blower's testimony which YOU posted destroyed your whole conspiracy theory. He testified he was told getting rid of Shokin was BAD for Burisma. So, how does your theory, Burisma paid Biden to get rid of Shokin, make any sense?
Be mad at yourself that you're too stupid to understand the propaganda you post.

I'll repost it again for you.

Within Burisma, Archer said that executives told board members that Shokin was “already taken care of, which he interpreted as meaning his threat was blunted. “That was the narrative that was fed to the board,” Archer said. We were told that his ouster was bad. We don’t want a new prosecutor, Shokin was taken care

bemeruca:
Suspension of activity or dormant as you put it does not mean what you initially claimed that the guy was not investigating burisma.

What is the.meaning of temporarily?

Remember how you were saying the sweet heart deal was not dead that it was just suspended. Well, how far with your spinning?

You've reached the point of the argument when you've lost, you know you're wrong and start playing semantics. The investigation was dormant because he was most likely bribed. So, he was NOT investigating Burisma
As I said, Biden was following Obama State Department policy which he was briefed on before his trip. Everyone believed Shokin was corrupt and wanted him gone for the best interest of the US and Ukriane. Biden was sent to deliver that message. The message/policy of the Obama State Department. So unless you have Hunter paying Obama and all the State department employees as well, your conspiracy is stupid. End of Story.

Again, below is a clip of Biden's briefing from the Obama State Department. The briefing was released during the Trump impeachment as this whole thing was gone over in detail. Republicans are trying to rewrite history AGAIN aided by imbeciles like you.

basilico:
Liar. Shokin was investigating Burisma before he was fired. Devon Archer confirmed that in his testimony. Shokin had seized the Burisma owner properties..Note Devon Archer was a board member of Burisma together with Hunter Biden, appointed in early or mid 2015.
..

Within Burisma, Archer said that executives
told board members that Shokin was “already
taken care of, which he interpreted as
meaning his threat was blunted.
“That was the narrative that was fed to the
board,” Archer said. We were told that his
ouster was bad. We don’t want a new
prosecutor, Shokin was taken care
[/b]

Fact check:

Below is a clip from the mental midget's own post above. Burisma did not want him fired, because they probably paid him off already. Again, Shokin was corrupt. Which is why US policy was to get rid of him. Getting rid if him would have gotten Burisma a new prosecutor and a "non-dormant" investigation.

Within Burisma, Archer said that executives told board members that Shokin was “already taken care of, which he interpreted as meaning his threat was blunted. “That was the narrative that was fed to the board,” Archer said. We were told that his ouster was bad. We don’t want a new prosecutor, Shokin was taken care

Really, how do you function in real life?

Obrigardo:
Even a cow is more attached to real life than this dodo.

In case you didn't know; she was once an escort and signed up to a "Talent" service before she entered politics. So, she was kind of a trashy person to begin with.

Then the obvious thing people are burning her for, of which you know, except you want to push your brain up your ass, is that this trashy woman always touts piety, righteousness and all those anti-abortion outrage, so why would you fault people for actually classifying her as she should be?

Guy, go to sleep.

I though this was interesting. One is a private citizen never worked in Govt. The other a US Rep being paid by taxpayers. I bet you can guess which ones Republicans seem upset about.

bemeruca:
Stop lying. You lie too much

You're a fuxing idiot.
Maybe you are having a hard time with the word dormant.
Dormant:
: marked by a suspension of activity: such as
: temporarily devoid of external activity

At the time Shokin was fired, he was not investigating Burisma, because the investigation was dormant. Dormant = Not investigating. Everyone wanted him to investigate Burisma. Shokin was not.

They finally fired him, because Biden pressured them with not getting US Aid Money. The EU said they would have done the same, if they had the kind of money the US did. If he was protecting Hunter, why would he fire a prosecutor who had made the investigation dormant? This shit is not hard to understand. In fact it was Obama US policy, briefed to Biden by the State Department. Only f*cking cultish idiots like you and your nutters here keep repeating this BS. You sound stupid doing so to those with actual brains. But in your circle jerk, you're brilliant.

Below is the State department briefing material for Biden before his trip in 2015. This was produced as part of Trump's impeachment. So, all the BS right wing nuts you listen to know this exists, know they are lying and continue lying to you, because you Trumpers are uneducated idiots and they know you'll believe any BS.
https://justthenews.com/sites/default/files/2023-08/VPBidenTPUkraineMeetingShokin.pdf

bemeruca:
You cannot lie to us by using the words Fact check.

The video could be someone ignorant. We have been following what was going on. The fact that he says there is no evidence linking Hunter and Biden is a red flag already.

Just to put a button on this nuttery. This article was written in March 2016 before Trump became President. In 2016 right after he was fired, everyone was cheering the decision.