₦airaland Forum

smallsmall:
I hear he is on Cocaine, 90% of the time?
The guy cannot secure his own Country, despite the whole NATO and EU military strength behind him, against just Russia, in the last 4yrs, now he wants to secure the Gulf?

The Green, little thing that plays the Piano with his tiny Prick, thinks too much of himself, because Sleepy Joe made him think he is the one fighting Russia, when in actual fact, it is US, EU/NATO combined.

He keeps his own Children in London, Wifey in France, hsi Parents in Israel (he is Jewish, by the way), himself hiding like a Rat in some secret Bunker, but is wasting away the Life of a whole Generation of Ukrainian Men, making their Women resort to prostitution in the EU and Gulf Countries.
What a disgrace.

Beautifulday:
He is an expert in warfare. His CV is currently the most updated after Israel and Russia.

Everybody will tackle their own first. This is common sense.

JuanDeDios:
Everybody will tackle their own first. This is common sense. But as he's tackling his, a smart person will be assessing the situation and there are countless scenarios when you'd help your neighbour too as you're tackling yours. For example, let's say your fire is very big and your neighbour's own is tiny and your neighbour has 13 children. So you (assuming you're smart) will put on your steel-toed work book, stamp out your neighbour's little fire with your feet and then ask him to ask his 13 children to take their buckets to start pouring fire on yours. Countless other scenarios too.

PrinceOfLagos:
You're scared that his experience will put the terrorist country of Iran in a tight corner ?

Islamic Terorists will always be put to shame .

JuanDeDios:
How does it not concern him? Shaheds supplied by Iran have been used by Mr Putin to murder Ukrainians in large numbers. He's also trying to keep attention on his country, as it risks being forgotten now. Plus he has genuine expertise dealing with Russia and Friends that he can trade for favours.

Toktee:
Go and ask your drug kingpin in aso rock how he intend to end hunger, insecurities and darkness in nigeria.person wey him house the burn he no the chase rat....
How do you mean Iranian matter no concern him when it's Iran that's supplying Russia with drones and experts to kill Ukrainians?
Did you just come back from the past?

Lordly13:
Didn't you read the news;

1. Russian advance has slowed down drastically.

2. Russia haven't taken any territories since February to March.

3. Ukraine has been having major break throughs in taking back territories from Russia.

4. Ukraine has unblocked all the water ways block by Russia military.

He's already winning the war, Putin is losing it.

‘Ukraine has expertise concerning sea waterways, and the defence and reopening of maritime traffic,’ says president. What we know on day 1,500

Volodymyr Zelenskyy offered on Thursday to provide Ukraine’s expertise in dealing with freedom of navigation in the Black Sea to those countries considering how to keep the strait of Hormuz open amid the conflict in the Middle East. The Ukraine president, speaking in his nightly video address, said the foreign minister, Andrii Sybiha, had taken part in a virtual meeting devoted to reopening the strait of Hormuz, attended by about 40 countries. “Ukraine has relevant expertise concerning sea waterways, and the defence and reopening of maritime traffic,” he said. “If [our] partners are ready to act, we will consider how we can strengthen them, how we can apply our expertise, knowledge and technological potential.”

Russia’s army recorded no territorial gains on the frontline in Ukraine in March, for the first time in two and half years, AFP analysis of data from the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) showed. The Russian army’s advances have been slowing since late 2025 due to Kyiv’s localised breakthroughs in the south-east, and losing ground in March and February on the southern section of the frontline, between the Donetsk and Dnipropetrovsk regions, the analysis showed. Across the entire frontline, Ukrainian forces managed to recapture 9 sq km in March.

Mynd44:
But they can still change their minds later. The president's deadline isn't contitutionaly binding on these people

"The court further ordered that the sum of $62,500 and €36,020 be returned to the nominal complainant within six months''

A Lagos State High Court sitting in Ikeja has convicted and sentenced Olumuyiwa Teniola Idowu and his company, Tennyvans Nigeria Limited, to a total of 30 years’ imprisonment over fraud involving $62,500 and €36,020.

In a statement by the EFCC, the judgment was delivered on Monday, March 30, 2026, by Justice Ismail Ijelu, who found the defendants guilty on a six-count charge bordering on stealing and failure to declare assets.

The offences were said to be in violation of Section 285 of the Criminal Law of Lagos State, 2011, and Section 27(3) of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) Act, 2004, which deal with non-disclosure of assets and refusal to declare properties.

One of the charges presented in court stated:

“Olumuyiwa Teniola Idowu and Tennyvans Nigeria Limited, sometime in 2012 at Lagos within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, dishonestly converted to your own use the sum of $62,500 (Sixty-Two Thousand Five Hundred United States Dollars), being the cost of caterpillar parts, property of Rene Theodorous Johannes Brouwers of Brouwers USA Trucks and Parts.


Another charge stated: “Olumuyiwa Teniola Idowu and Tennyvans Nigeria Limited, sometime in 2012 at Lagos within the jurisdiction of this Honourable Court, dishonestly converted to your own use the sum of €36,020 being the cost and shipping of a DAF truck, box trailer and two (2) tippers, property of Rene Theodorous Johannes Brouwers of Brouwers USA Trucks and Parts B.V.”

The defendant was first arraigned on November 27, 2024, where he pleaded not guilty, leading to a full trial


During the proceedings, the prosecuting counsel, E. S. Okongwu, called three witnesses and presented eleven exhibits, all of which were admitted by the court. The defence counsel, Kehinde Olawumi, called one witness

In his judgment, Justice Ijelu held that the prosecution proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and consequently found the defendant guilty as charged.

The court sentenced Idowu to five years’ imprisonment on counts one to four, to run concurrently. He was also handed five years’ imprisonment on counts five and six, with an option of a fine of N1 million on each count, to be paid within six months or serve the custodial sentences


The court further ordered that the sum of $62,500 and €36,020 be returned to the nominal complainant within six months

Following the judgment, the convict was remanded at the Ikoyi Correctional Centre

Peacecore:
Complaining because it didn't favour you

cmikel:
What's is the essence of democracy when the judiciary is compromised



I don't think judges at any level should be taking houses and cars from politicians


They will sure be compromises weda its directly gifted or not.

Mandate1:
it's best for them to avoid that Wike PDP and move to another. As for the Nigerian judiciary, a travesty.

yomi531:
This Wike of a Man is something else o. He's never caught offside. Which kain person/striker be that sef

The Federal High Court in Abuja on Monday again nullified the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) convention held in Ibadan, Oyo State, in November 2025, and barred the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) from recognising its outcome, including the leadership election conducted at the event.

Judge Joyce Abdulmalik issued the orders in her judgement in the suit instituted by the faction of the party loyal to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) Nyesom Wike.

The judgement, in sync with the judgement of the Court of Appeal in Abuja delivered earlier this month, came just hours after the Wike faction concluded its version of the national convention of the party in Abuja, producing Abdulrahman Mohammed, as the national chairman, and other members of the National Working Committee (NWC).

Monday’s judgement also came while Kabiru Turaki, who emerged from the invalidated Ibadan convention as the party’s national chairman and others who were purportedly elected there as the party’s officials, are banking on the final resolution of the dispute by the Supreme Court following the defeat they suffered at the Court of Appeal.

Ms Abdulmalik ordered in her judgement on Monday that Mr Wike’s group be granted access to the party’s national secretariat in Abuja, which was sealed off after chaos erupted there over the scramble between the factions last year. The judge also directed relevant agencies to provide them adequate security to use the secretariat.


She held that the purported convention held in Ibadan between 15 and 16 November 2025, including the election of party officials and expulsion of some notable members of the party, violated section 287(3) of the Nigerian Constitution, as well as the party’s constitution and prior court orders.

“I considered the expulsion of the members of the plaintiffs as not only an affront to the subsisting judgement, but also a direct assault to a democratic and principled society” where the rule of law is in practice, the judge said.

The court held that “all proceedings, resolutions and decisions taken at the said convention, including the suspension of members of the first plaintiff, were unconstitutional, unlawful, null and void, and of no effect.”

The Mr Wike faction, through its then acting chairperson Mohammed Abdulrahman, and secretary Samuel Anyanwu, filed the suit on 21 November last year to restrain the Kabiru Turaki-led group from representing the party and to bar the police and Stste Security Service (SSS) from granting them access to the PDP secretariat in Abuja.

The defendants sued in the suit included INEC, the Nigerian police and the SSS.

The rest were PDP members and officials who participated in, or were associated with, the November 2025 convention, led by the Turaki-led faction, and other relevant bodies and agencies.

The plaintiffs sought to prevent INEC from recognising any other office address for the Turaki-led faction apart from theirs.

They also prayed the court to declare that INEC, the police, and the SSS are constitutionally bound to enforce the decisions of the Federal High Court as delivered by Judges James Omotosho and Peter Lifu.

‘Ibadan convention held in violation of court decisions’
Delivering the judgement, the court held that, in line with the Constitution and other enabling statutes, including earlier judgements, it would not shy away from its duty to do what is just in the circumstances.

The judge noted that the the main determinant of the case is Section 287(3) of the Nigerian constitution, which provides that the decisions of the Federal High Court and other courts established by the Constitution shall be enforced by all authorities and persons across the Federation.

She observed that “in spite of the judgements which have not been set aside, the 5th to 25th defendants went ahead and organised the convention.” She added that those same judgements had also been affirmed by the Court of Appeal.

She further held that a political party’s constitution is meant to be followed by its members.

The court concluded that the issues raised in the plaintiffs’ suit were meritorious and granted the declaratory and injunctive reliefs sought.


Therefore, the judge declared that the defendants “are bound to comply with and give full effect to the subsisting judgments of the Federal High Court earlier referred to.”

She held: “The first to the fourth defendants are not entitled to recognise or give effect, in any manner whatsoever, to the purported National Convention held on 15 and 16 November 2025 by the 5th to 25th defendants and their associates.

“The purported convention, including the election of officers and suspension of members, is unconstitutional, null and void.”

She also held that the plaintiffs “are entitled to remain in office and continue to use the party’s national secretariat and properties” and ordered INEC not to recognise the said defendants as officers or representatives of the first plaintiff (the PDP) or to accept any change of address from them other than the one already in its records.



She also ordered the SSS and the police to provide adequate security for the plaintiffs in the use of the party’s national secretariat.

The court also restrained the 5th to the 25th defendants from entering, using, or interfering with the party’s properties, including holding meetings or events at the national secretariat.

It restrained INEC from accepting any address for the party other than the one already recognised in its records.