₦airaland Forum

danloadpark:
Their aim plans should work well. Starts from around 3900 annual. Infact, Any of their aim plan will work fine.

You just have to take note of the resources attached. If you think you will be using a lot diskspace, their bloom plan is best deal. It's around 6K/mo.

Aside that, any of the aim plan is pretty good. And you can chat up their support live chat for directions. They are responsive.

Hope that helps..

Thank you very much. That helps tenfold.

I would get in touch with them to make sure everything checks out with my needs. CS would be crucial because if not for price constraints, I'd prioritise the service with the best docs, and dev experience. Firebase and Vercel has spoilt us all

danloadpark:
Usijali Hosting is a good one. You should use them. They support node js.

Quite reliable, I'll recommend.

Thank you for your reply.

I've checked through their plans and I'm not sure which one particularly supports nodejs. I'm new to putting things on paid hosting service (🙂).

I aim to host a backend for a mobile app. If you can give me the name of their suitable plan for this, and a yearly cost estimate, I'd greatly appreciate.

henryweb:
💯 %
Yes it does on telaHosting

Hi, I'm interested in hosting a nodejs app with telahosting.

From the plans, I see that the pricing are tied to cPanel tiers or levels - such as Starter, Elite, Pro.

Which would you recommend and what's the difference? The nodejs app will be something standard and it's going to serve a mobile app for now. No website planed yet.

Thanks in anticipation of your reply.

mubarak89:
Thanks. Will look at it

Hi,

Please, did you come across a suitable node js hosting service? Can you share your experience? Thank you.

Psady:
No true Arsenal can stake or repeatedly beat their chest they are through to the next phase of knockouts, they know their history with getting that last disappointment when it's all seem done and dusted.Madrid will fight it all out during the second leg that I can predict freely.

You're yet to recover from the emotional damage.

Classless, distasteful jokes. I didn't find none of them funny.

MrNipplesLover:
If na hyenas or wild dogs handle that cow, una go know say this one is just like romancing...

Since it is human-animal (not animal-animal), una fit condemn am...

Of course, the man is now a Hyena and wild dog.

That’s what happens when you follow people who are guided by the whims and caprices "the spirit."

Richcreed:
Have you ever wondered why Russia invaded Ukraine in the first place?

Its on record US spent over 175 B while the EU countries also spent almost same amount.
Putin said he wants peace,he has achieved his aim, Donbas is free same as other regions where ethnic Russian have been.consistently killed since 2014.prior to Putin invasion.

Russia traded.with Iran,China and NK in ammunition as members of BRICS using her own resources.

Both Ukraine and Russia used foreign military mercenaries. North korea got real war battle experience which they never expeeienced before while Ukraine used active military personnel and veterans.

War is a big business the warmongers of US military complex and European leaders want the war to continue so as to keep looting the fund meant for the war as well as bring Russia down while Russia wants no more fighting.

I just realised I'm talking to Putin.

Richcreed:
Thats what really happened through the whole meeting.
whatever the case, Trump doesnt want to spend more money supporting Ukraine,,over 350 billion spent by USA alone not to talk of other contributions from EU all to fight a single country,
Russia is already winning the war,Russia has already taken possesion of 25% of Ukraine,an area that is richest in mineral resources,.so what is the point in countinuing fighting?
ITrump.want to recover all American spending in the war and it seems zelensky is not ready for that .

Yeah, what's the point of continuing fighting? They should drop their arms and surrender for Putin to imprison their men and rape their women.

Trump is well-known for being a broad faced lair. America has spent around 120 billion. Roughly same amount as Europe altogether. Though they have being generous, but let's not exaggerate figures when we refer to them.

They're not all fighting a single country. It's Russia Vs Ukraine. Russia has had support from North Korea - both man power and weapons - Iran, and China.

Maybe the war and Americas stance truly wakes up Western Europe. They have outsourced their defence to America to enjoy their money in other areas. If they decided to militarised their countries again, Russia will only have advantage over them in terms of population, not military hardware.

Richcreed:
Think Trump was aggressive to Zelenskyy for no reason?

Watch the whole talk.

Timestamps below.

Zelenskyy was emotional.

Interrupted Trump.

Called Putin names.

Raised his eyebrows.

All before Trump checked him.

And he called Vance a bitch.

He wasn’t ready for peace.

2:00 Trump compliments Zelenskyy

4:00 Zelenskyy calls Putin a terrorist

12:00 Trump cracks joke with Zelensky

13:56 Zelenskyy interrupts Trump

17:20 Zelenskyy throws his hands up in seeming frustration

19:00 reporter asks Zelenskyy why he’s not wearing a suit

19:22 Trump commits to sending arms to Ukraine

19:41 Zelensky raises eyebrows and rolls eyes at Trump’s statement

22:55 Trump takes the edge off of the suit question by joking with Zelensky that he likes his outfit

23:49 Zelensky contradicts Trump and keeps painting Putin in a negative light

24:19 Zelensky says Putin will never accept ceasefire and pushes for American security guarantee

25:55 Zelensky says Putin hates Ukrainians

27:00 Zelensky says Putin should pay all reconstruction costs

29:19 Zelensky shakes head as Trump speaks

32:22 Zelensky says Putin wants to annex Poland

32:30 Zelensky says Putin will attack America

33:00 Zelensky interrupts Trump

39:19 This is when Trump went on the offensive by calling out Zelenskyy hatred for Putin and started to escalate
39:14 Vance says Zelensky has been disrespectful, and conversation continues to escalate

42:40 Apparently calls Vance “suka”, meaning bitch, under his breath.

You don't have to like how Trump handled this, but don’t buy into the story that he ambushed or kick zelensky out.

You're very funny you know.

If there's a stronger feeling than hate, I expect Zelensky to feel that for Putin.

Of course, Trump will bring that up because he loves Putin.

Hateful Trump is talking as if he's Jesus spreading love through the lands.

lexy2014:
since you belong to this section and you know the answers to the simple questions, I am surprised that you cant any of the questions.

Pls try again:

How was he disrespectful?

What is his attitude that you were angry about?

I've asked him same question but he can't decide for himself what's disrespectful about Zelensky responses right until that Vance guy went on a tangent about him not being thankful.

BondRiv:
The highlighted is a talking point from liberal mainstream media. Zelensky was way out of line before Vance's intervention. You need to watch the full meeting without any infused narratives. Perhaps on C-SPAN or something. The disrespect started before that and was what prompted the VP, who was fed up with the nonsense to push back. I don't know why some of you can't think for yourselves. This is why you are always misinformed.

Again, you choose to ignore my first sentence and beat around the bush. I clearly challenged you in my first post to point out the moment Zelensky started being disrespectful.

What was disrespectful? Don't play fools with me and come around and say something vague again. Or can't you make your own mind up about what's disrespect and what's not just before Vance went on a rant about gratitude?

You who claimed to watch the video can't come up with a decisive take or position on when Zelensky became disrespectful. So much for thinking for yourself.

BondRiv:
Zelensky was very disrespectful. I was angry with his attitude. I don't know what he smoked or who coached him, but he is messing with the wrong president. He must have taken a cue from Macron and Starmer's interruptions of Trump and went overboard with it. Like Trump said, the U.S. has made Zelensky a strongman in a war where ordinarily, without the U.S. he wouldn't last a day.

Please, point out the disrespectful actions of Zelensky today during the meeting.

The flashpoint started when the VP accused Zelensky of being unthankful for US support thus far. Like, that's actually a ridiculous thing to say and care about for a US VP in that moment. There are so many evidences of Zelensky saying thank you on his official socials, even just before that meeting.

Zelensky was actually responding to the VP's assertions that it's Ukraine and not Russia who don't want peace and diplomacy. Zelensky explained the reasons Ukraine can't just trust the diplomacy and peace Putin agrees to. Putin has broken several other "peace" brokered through diplomacy since 2014.

Suddenly, VP was accusing him of being ungrateful.

werisetogether:
Thought this sort of meeting was supposed to be behind closed doors

Unless the media is also being used as a negotiating gambit to wear down Zelenskyy

Trump certainly knows how to play his cards...

The argument was unfortunate to have happened in tewthe media. They would have gone to a close door section to have the real negotiations.

The VP was the instigator of the row. He baited Zelensky into a fighting match.

Gboom:
He has passed that level

What level Let's wait and see where he eventually ends up before talking about level. There are so many clubs below the top six in the EPL that Lookman wouldn't start for because they have better left-sided wingers already.

Chelsea has got a lot of slightly above average players already, we don't need another one.

Gboom:
If he can join Liverpool, it will be better with their playing style, he will shine

And sit on the bench

He didn't say it's not a major tournament. The Euros is far weighted than the Copa America in balondor conversations. Sentimental support won't change reality.

Ablesam171:
Jamie Carragher might not be the best of pundits (you'll know this, if you follow UEFA Champions League football match day on CBS) but I'll say he's right on this one. Even CAF hardly use AFCON as a criteria for winning African Player of the Year. Since i started watching football as a kid, I can't pinpoint a particular year that an APOY won the award because of their performance on the biggest tournament in African football.
So una expect outsiders to say una mama food sweet when una no dey rate una mama food.

He's a great pundits and understands football well. Easily better than every other panelists on the CBS show, which is toned down in their technical analysis so that their American Audience can enjoy it.

Delaw135:
U guys would just be typing anyhow to prove yeye point, how is Lookman a worse penalty taker? He has played 4 and scored all the 4 penalty prior the game for Atalanta, even the the so called penalty taker has missed his last penalty for Atalanta, if he had scored against arsenal they would have qualified automatically now they performed abysmally in the first half of the game conceding 3goals and registering no shot on goal at their home turf without Lookman, but all the coach could do is to single out Lookman's effort?

I'm sure you're not stupid enough to expect a reply from me after that opening sentence.

dominique:
Who is saying Lookman should do whatever he likes?

That's the impression you gave off when you focus on the fact they needed 4 unreplied goals to qualify outright before the penalty. You are effectively minimizing the outcome of Lookman's action in the grand scheme of things.

What I'm saying is singling out his penalty loss as if it's the cause of their elimination is utterly ridiculous!

The interview was immediately after the game and the coach was angry and spoke emotionally. But I wouldn't say from the quote about the penalty incident, he blamed the outcome of the tie on whether they scored or miss a penalty after going 4 goals down. That'd be ridiculous and something he can't say with a straight face.

dominique:
Which crucial game? Their chances of qualifying are slim to none! Penalty win or not, they would have crashed out unless they scored 4 unreplied goals!

So, Lookman can do whatever since, according to you, they have slim chances of qualifying

If Lookman had scored, they would have had 30 minutes to score two more goals to take the game to extra time. That's a pretty good lifeline. They really had the chances to score more considering the numerous goal attempts. Certainly not unprecedented.

The issue is about discipline, sticking to the order of things and putting team objectives above personal glory here.

The coaching staff are meant to make all the necessary decisions to give the team the best possibilities of success. Hence, it'd be a dereliction of duty for the coaches to continually utilise Lookman in a right back position because it will weaken the team collectively. Likewise, appointing the worse PK taker in a crucial game wouldn't be the best decision.

Murketeer:
So it’s his fault too that they were losing 3-0 in first half ?… lookman even scored the only goal when he was brought in the second half

I didn't read where the coach blamed him for the first half results or the outcome of the tie.

The coach is not necessarily blaming lookman for missing the penalty. The coach is annoyed that lookman claimed the ball when he's not the number one choice.

Lookman scoring is not relevant. He's being paid for doing his job. Going against the coach's isn't part of it.

The coach was definitely right to lose his shitt with a player who upended the designated penalty taker in a crucial game.


First of all, lookman is actually a terrible penalty taker. Fulham fans have never forgiven him for attempting and missing a Penanka in the 94th minute of a loss.

What do you expect your coach to do? Be happy that the worse penalty taker he's ever seen actually took a penalty in a very important game?

Defense spending is all about motivation.

Russia sees producing weapons as a direct means of their survival. Hence, they dedicated a higher percentage of their GDP each year to defense budget.

Major European nations like Germany, UK and France would each outspend Russia if they commit the same percentage of their GDP to defense.

Russia is currently at about 6 percent of GDP. Germany 1.5 percent. UK like 2.3%.

The USA is subsidising security for Europe so they don't have the motivation to spending as much as is necessary to match Russia.

kingthreat:
Lol something that is common knowledge in Edo state.

Are you in the Edo state to have witness such fairytale? Just open mouth wa...

Some absolutely stupid people live in this country.

The very Dumbest set of a dumb people.

Crude stupidity.

ruphytelecom:
not available

Hi, do you have a dell xps 15 9560 motherboard?

Damieadeh:
Thanks for contacting us.
Yes available and thats the full specifications.

I'll speak with you tomorrow. Thanks.

Just read on foreign media it's about 70 people dead already.

Such easily avoidable wastage of human lives.

It's never safe to scoop petrol from tanker wreckage. So many people would also be interested and compete for it in a highly disorganised environment. In the midst of 100 people, an absent minded smoker fit dey one side dey play with lighter inside pocket. Talk less of many other less manageable ways petrol can ignite in such quantity and exposure.

Petrol is another name for fire. The risk is unimaginably high that only STUPIDITY should make you convince yourself it's worth taking.

I also see people fond of standing and watching. Like, get the 4uck out of that area. Don't pass that route, turn back or take a diversion. Let the professionals who are paid to handle those situations do their job.

I'd rather fight in the Ukraine-Russia war for a day than go anywhere near a falling petrol tanker trying to scoop fuel. God-willing, I'd like to avoid any possibility of perishing in a fire.