₦airaland Forum

HenryStarlife:
Just make money brother no matter the government, we go still survive, They don’t care about us, na MJ talk am nor be me

Correct Guy... You day Active on update jooor

The issues you listed reflect concerns many Nigerians are discussing right now. Some of the points are largely factual (though numbers change frequently), while others are interpretations or political conclusions. Let’s break them down objectively so you can see what is true, partly true, or debatable.


---

1. Exchange Rate: “$1 is ₦1,400”

Nigeria’s currency has depreciated significantly.

In 2023 the government unified the foreign-exchange market.

The naira lost value afterward due to market forces, high demand for dollars, and limited foreign reserves.

At different times the rate has moved around ₦1,300–₦1,700 per $1.


So the statement is generally true depending on the date.


---

2. “£1 is ₦1,850”

Because the pound is stronger than the dollar, the naira value is higher.

The pound has indeed traded roughly ₦1,700–₦2,000+ at different periods.


This claim is within a realistic range.


---

3. Diesel ₦1,300 per litre

After fuel subsidies were removed:

Diesel prices rose sharply due to global oil prices and currency weakness.

Prices have fluctuated widely between ₦900 and ₦1,400+ depending on location and time.


So this is plausible/mostly accurate.


---

4. Cooking Gas ₦1,400 per kg

LPG prices increased due to:

currency depreciation

global gas price changes

transport costs


Prices around ₦1,200–₦1,500 per kg have been reported in many cities.

This is close to reality in many places.


---

5. Inflation is high

This is true.

Nigeria’s inflation rate has been among the highest in decades, driven by:

currency depreciation

fuel subsidy removal

transportation costs

food supply issues


Food inflation especially has hit households hard.


---

6. Petrol ₦1,050 per litre

After subsidy removal in 2023:

petrol prices rose dramatically

prices vary depending on region and station


At some points petrol has been around ₦900–₦1,100.

So this claim is reasonable depending on location and timing.


---

7. Minimum wage ₦70,000

The federal government approved a new minimum wage around ₦70,000 to replace the previous ₦30,000.

However:

not all states or private companies implement it immediately

inflation has reduced its real purchasing power


This is true in policy terms.


---

8. Electricity “zero or non-existent”

Nigeria’s power supply has long been unreliable.

Challenges include:

aging infrastructure

gas supply problems

transmission limits

distribution company issues


While electricity is not literally zero, outages and limited supply are common.
So this statement is an exaggeration but reflects real frustration.


---

9. Abductions and Terrorism

Nigeria still faces security issues including:

insurgency in the northeast

banditry in the northwest

kidnappings in several regions


For example, groups like Boko Haram and Islamic State West Africa Province have carried out attacks and abductions.

So the concern about insecurity is real, though the exact numbers vary depending on the incident being referenced.


---

Are These Lies or Truth?

Most of the points you listed are based on real economic and security challenges, though:

some numbers fluctuate

some statements are political interpretations

some are exaggerated expressions of frustration


So it’s not accurate to call them all lies, but they are selective highlights of negative realities.


---

Reasons Some People Still Support the Current Government

Supporters of the administration led by Bola Ahmed Tinubu usually point to several arguments:

1. Economic Reforms

They argue the government is attempting difficult reforms:

removal of fuel subsidies

foreign exchange market reforms

tax system changes


Supporters say these are painful in the short term but necessary long term.


---

2. Infrastructure Continuity

The administration continues projects started previously, including:

railways

roads

power projects

port modernization


Supporters believe infrastructure investment will boost growth.


---

3. Long-Term Economic Strategy

Policies aim to:

attract foreign investment

stabilize the currency

reduce government spending distortions


Supporters argue the economy may improve once reforms settle.


---

4. Security Efforts

The government claims military operations have:

eliminated insurgent leaders

reduced territory controlled by terrorists

strengthened intelligence cooperation


.. SO TELL ME WHY I SHOULD VOTE FOR THIS GOVERNMENT 2027

This is absolutely *outrageous*! How can a man who knowingly imports fake drugs worth *1.2 BILLION* naira, drugs that could KILL innocent people, get away with only a measly *N2.5 million fine* and a *30-day community service*?! This is *nothing short of a joke*.

The judiciary, which is supposed to be the last line of defense for the common man, has become *a tool for the rich and powerful*. The so-called *justice system* has shown once again that it is for sale — only the highest bidder gets any real punishment. Meanwhile, the lives of innocent Nigerians, who trust the healthcare system, are at risk. What happened to justice for *the voiceless*? What happened to protecting the people? If someone is willing to profit off of selling *fake drugs that harm and kill* people, they should be sentenced to life in prison, or even worse.

But no! This man gets *nothing* more than a slap on the wrist, while our hospitals overflow with patients who now have to suffer from the consequences of this man’s *greed and wickedness*. This is not justice. This is a *mockery* of the very idea of justice! The system has failed us. *Nigeria is dying*, and it feels like we are heading straight into *an abyss*. How long will this continue? How many more lives will be destroyed while the rich and corrupt walk free?

This is a *dark day for Nigeria*, and a disgrace to the judiciary. Shame on the judge who allowed this travesty. *Nigeria, where are we heading?

Renowned Nigerian human rights lawyer and lead counsel to the Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Ifeanyi Ejiofor, has described the recent deployment of United States troops to Nigeria following bilateral security engagements with the Federal Government as a significant and welcome development.

In a statement titled *“Monday Musing: When Allies Arrive — Why the Deployment of United States Troops Signals a Turning Point in Nigeria’s War Against Terror,”* Ejiofor characterised the move as a strategic shift in the country’s fight against terrorism. According to him, the presence of experienced American forces—backed by advanced logistics and operational capabilities—signals a heightened level of international commitment to addressing Nigeria’s worsening insecurity.

He dismissed criticisms of the Nigeria–United States security partnership, arguing that collaboration between sovereign nations is a standard and necessary feature of modern counter-terrorism efforts. With violence reaching alarming levels, he maintained that Nigeria should not be treated as an exception in seeking external support.

Ejiofor expressed optimism that the partnership would enhance intelligence gathering, improve operational precision, disrupt terror-financing networks, and expose those enabling violence from behind the scenes. He further noted that sustained attacks on rural communities and worship centres underscore the urgency of decisive action to restore public confidence and reinforce the State’s authority to protect lives.

Commenting on opposition from certain ideological groups, Ejiofor suggested that prolonged insecurity has too often been politicised. He argued that the time has come to end the exploitation of national tragedies for sectarian or partisan interests.

According to him, if the collaboration succeeds not only in neutralising armed groups but also in dismantling the broader networks that fund, recruit, and propagate extremism, it would represent more than a military intervention—it would mark a structural turning point in Nigeria’s security landscape.

“History,” he concluded, “will not remember the loudest critics, but those who stood firmly for the protection of human life.”

Ohhhh Forgiveness when Many Nigerians are struggling with rising food prices, economic hardship, and unreliable electricity. In this context, when President Bola Ahmed Tinubu speaks about forgiveness, it raises important questions about accountability and leadership.

Citizens are not just looking for apologies; they are looking for clear solutions to hunger, inflation, insecurity, and power shortages. What Nigerians need most right now are transparent policies, measurable improvements, and visible efforts to ease the burden on ordinary people.

History has shown that leaders, including former President Muhammadu Buhari, faced strong public criticism over economic and security challenges. These moments remind us that leadership is ultimately judged not by words, but by outcomes and the real impact on citizens’ lives.

Rather than focusing on forgiveness alone, the priority should be rebuilding trust through action — stabilizing the economy, strengthening institutions, and ensuring that governance directly improves the welfare of Nigerians.

Constructive criticism is not about personal attacks; it is about demanding better performance, accountability, and tangible progress for the country.

God help Nigeria .. Amen

Notwithstanding the situation that El Rufai has found himself, he is the cause of it. A man that talks too much will not know when he ends up telling his enemies his plans.. and this is the case of El Rufai, how can you go on national TV and tell the world that you tapped the phone of the NSA.. it's a very reckless statement and even if it were true, he has just lost his secret weapon and his element of surprise. I don't care what happens to him ohh, na him go thief money and him mouth no gree close.. my own is that the EFCC should focus the same energy and get other politicians that have stollen money as well.. Nobody that commits crime is above arrest.

The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), Nigeria’s leading anti-corruption agency, has long been seen as a beacon of hope for citizens striving for accountability and transparency in governance. However, over the years, its reputation has come into question due to the perception that it has been selectively targeting individuals based on their political affiliations. A recent spate of events, especially surrounding high-profile politicians, raises serious concerns about the agency's impartiality and its role in the country’s increasingly polarized political landscape.

#### A Rising Tide of Tension

The recent detention of Nasir El-Rufai, former Governor of Kaduna State, by the EFCC has once again thrust the agency into the spotlight. El-Rufai, a prominent figure within Nigeria’s political circles and a senior member of the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), was questioned over an alleged N432 billion corruption investigation. His interrogation on February 12, 2026, has led many Nigerians to question whether the EFCC is engaging in a legitimate investigation or merely playing political games.

But El-Rufai’s case is not the only one raising eyebrows. The ongoing investigation has sparked widespread speculation that the EFCC’s actions are not entirely based on fighting corruption but are instead politically motivated. This is further fueled by the fact that several high-profile figures linked to the APC, including members of the current administration, have seemingly been spared similar scrutiny.

The governor of Bauchi State, Bala Mohammed, issued a stark warning to the EFCC in a viral video, accusing the agency of pursuing politically motivated investigations. He alleged that opposition figures, particularly those not aligned with the APC, are being unfairly targeted. His comments, which included a threat to "declare war" if the persecution of non-APC members does not stop, underscore the growing frustration with the EFCC’s alleged bias.

##Selective Justice: A Dangerous Precedent

The core issue here is selective justice—a principle that undermines the very foundation of fair governance. The EFCC has been accused of going after opposition members with vigor while turning a blind eye to similar offenses committed by members of the ruling party. Critics argue that this selective approach not only damages the integrity of the EFCC but also harms the credibility of the entire justice system in Nigeria.

One of the most glaring examples of this double standard is the refusal to go after certain high-ranking figures within the ruling APC, despite widespread allegations of corruption and mismanagement. These figures are seen to benefit from their party affiliations, with the EFCC seemingly reluctant to probe them as deeply as it does opposition figures. This undermines public trust in the institution and fosters a sense of injustice among Nigerians.

Moreover, accusations of using the EFCC as a political weapon to silence opposition are not new. Many have long suspected that the agency is being used to intimidate and discredit those who do not support the current administration. In this light, El-Rufai’s detention and interrogation could easily be seen as a strategic move to weaken a key opposition figure, rather than a genuine attempt to root out corruption.

The El-Rufai Case: Hacked Phones and National Security

Compounding the controversy is the case of El-Rufai's alleged involvement in the hacking or tapping of the phone of Nigeria’s National Security Adviser. If these allegations are proven to be true, they would raise serious concerns not only about the security of the nation's top officials but also about the country's cybersecurity infrastructure. The irony of a nation’s top security officer being compromised by internal leaks is staggering, and it speaks volumes about the depth of Nigeria’s insecurity problem.

Yet, as much as El-Rufai may need to answer questions regarding the hacking allegations, the broader issue is one of transparency and equal treatment under the law. The EFCC and other security agencies like the Department of State Services (DSS) must show that they are committed to justice for all, regardless of political affiliations. If El-Rufai is found guilty of any wrongdoing, he should face the full extent of the law—just as any other individual would. But the question remains: will others in similar positions face the same level of scrutiny, or will they be shielded by their political ties?

#### Yaya Bello and the Kogi Scandal: More of the Same?

El-Rufai’s case is far from the only example of questionable figures seemingly escaping the long arm of the law. Consider the case of *Yahaya Bello*, the former governor of Kogi State, whose administration has been linked to the embezzlement of millions of dollars. Despite significant public outcry and growing allegations against him, very little has been heard from the EFCC regarding any substantial investigation into his wealth or actions in office. This glaring lack of action contrasts sharply with the agency’s aggressive pursuit of other, often less influential, politicians.

Bello’s case is particularly troubling given the vast sums of money that have reportedly been siphoned off under his watch. And yet, for many Nigerians, the silence surrounding his case is deafening. The failure to pursue such high-profile cases creates an atmosphere where the EFCC’s credibility is further eroded and the agency becomes increasingly viewed as politically biased.

Similarly, former Kano State Governor *Abdullahi Ganduje* has been publicly caught on video stuffing bundles of U.S. dollars into his trademark "babariga" (flowing robe) in what can only be described as a blatant act of corruption. Despite the clear evidence and widespread outrage over this scandal, the EFCC has once again remained notably absent in its investigation of Ganduje’s actions.

#### A Call for True Accountability

These high-profile cases are just the tip of the iceberg. There are numerous other instances where politicians from the APC have been accused of embezzlement, theft, or financial mismanagement, yet the EFCC appears hesitant to hold them accountable. This selective justice, where those aligned with the ruling party are seemingly protected while opposition figures are relentlessly pursued, undermines the very purpose of the EFCC and breeds cynicism among the Nigerian populace.

What Nigerians need is not just the detention and interrogation of political figures like El-Rufai but the equal application of the law to all politicians, regardless of their party affiliations. The EFCC must prove that it is genuinely committed to serving the people of Nigeria, not a particular political party or agenda. Only then can it regain the trust of the public and fulfill its mandate to fight corruption.

Nigerians deserve better. They deserve an EFCC that is truly independent, one that will go after corrupt politicians no matter their political leanings or party affiliation. The agency must show that it is not a tool for political warfare but a genuine force for justice.

As it stands, the EFCC’s credibility is on the line. Arrest and investigate all those who have stolen from the people, regardless of their party affiliations, and prove that your mandate is to serve the Nigerian people, not political elites. If the EFCC fails to do this, it risks becoming just another cog in the political machinery, no longer capable of holding those in power accountable.

#### The Way Forward: Restoring Trust in Nigeria’s Institutions

For Nigeria to move forward, its institutions must be built on a foundation of fairness, accountability, and transparency. The EFCC, as one of the most powerful tools in the fight against corruption, has a pivotal role to play in this. However, for it to maintain its legitimacy, it must prove that it is not a political instrument but a body committed to justice for all Nigerians, irrespective of their party affiliation.

The case of Nasir El-Rufai is not just about one individual; it is about the integrity of the nation’s institutions. Whether or not El-Rufai is guilty, Nigerians need to see a system that treats all political figures equally and fairly. This is the only way to ensure that the fight against corruption is not tainted by political bias and that the EFCC remains a credible institution in the eyes of the public.

Ultimately, the EFCC must prove that it is not merely a tool for political warfare but a steadfast ally in the pursuit of justice for all Nigerians—regardless of party affiliation or political leanings. Only then can it restore faith in the nation's quest for a fair and just society.

It is indeed ironic—and troubling—that someone in such a high-security role, like Nigeria's National Security Adviser (NSA), would be vulnerable to a breach of their personal communications, such as a phone hack. This raises serious questions about the competence of those in charge of a nation's security infrastructure, especially when the person involved is supposed to be at the helm of the country's national defense and intelligence.

1. **Lack of Personal Cybersecurity Awareness:**

The NSA's phone hack could indicate a lack of basic cybersecurity practices. It's a significant red flag if someone responsible for overseeing the country’s security infrastructure doesn’t practice secure personal tech use. Leaders in such roles should be fully aware of threats like phishing, malware, and other forms of cyber intrusion. That they fall victim to these risks might show a lack of proactive vigilance. This is concerning because if the individual is careless with their own security, it raises doubts about how well they’re overseeing the country's security systems.

2. **Incompetence in Implementing Cybersecurity Measures:**

A hacker accessing the phone of the NSA (or any government official) could point to significant weaknesses in both personal and institutional cyber defense. If the NSA can’t secure their own phone, it calls into question the efficacy of the cybersecurity measures they’re responsible for implementing at a national level. It's possible that the national security apparatus is outdated, underfunded, or just generally ineffective, leading to vulnerabilities at every level of government.

3. **Mismanagement of Sensitive Information:**

Mobile phones are often the repository of sensitive, private data, including official communications, intelligence reports, and personal information. A breach like this could expose the NSA to blackmail or other forms of manipulation. The consequences could extend far beyond just the individual—it could impact the nation’s ability to respond to national security threats in a timely and effective manner. So, if an NSA figure cannot keep their own phone secure, it suggests a broader systemic issue with how sensitive information is handled within government departments.

4. **Irony and Trust:**

It becomes a matter of trust—how can the Nigerian public trust a person who holds the keys to national security if they themselves are vulnerable to cyber threats? Trust is one of the cornerstones of any nation's security operations. If a public official fails to demonstrate the minimum competence expected for their position, it inevitably undermines national confidence in that person’s ability to oversee defense and intelligence operations effectively.

5. **Exposing Systemic Failures:**

This also highlights deeper systemic failures within Nigeria’s national security infrastructure. If the NSA can’t even prevent a basic breach, then it raises questions about the level of investment in national cybersecurity systems, intelligence gathering, and crisis management mechanisms. The country might be underestimating the importance of cybersecurity or simply not prioritizing it, leaving the entire nation vulnerable to more sophisticated cyber attacks by hostile actors, including terrorist groups, cybercriminals, or even foreign governments.

6. **The Hypocrisy:**

The hypocrisy in all of this is glaring. The NSA should be leading by example in terms of ensuring top-level cybersecurity and intelligence operations. But the very person in charge of securing Nigeria's national defense can’t even secure their personal communications. How can they effectively counter international espionage, terrorism, or internal corruption if they can’t prevent their own private data from being compromised?

Conclusion:

In a modern world where digital warfare is just as impactful as physical warfare, it is critically important for national leaders, especially those in charge of security, to be ahead of the curve when it comes to cybersecurity. If a person in charge of national security cannot protect their own phone, it not only calls their competency into question but also reflects badly on the entire security apparatus they oversee. If the NSA is compromised by something as simple as a phone hack, it shows just how much work remains to be done in securing Nigeria's digital frontlines. To truly address national security issues, improving digital and technological defenses should be a priority.

My people what do you think?

I use God beg Akpabio and his group of friends to allow the will of the people... We demand real time transmission of electoral results

What the Nigerian Senate is trying to do right now is very dangerous, and Nigerians must pay attention.

Under Senator Godswill Akpabio, the Senate has changed the Electoral Law in a way that helps politicians in power and hurts ordinary voters. This is not a small issue. It is a serious mistake that can cause big problems for Nigeria if it is not stopped.

The main problem is this:
The Senate removed the rule that says election results must be sent electronically in real time from polling units to INEC’s public portal (IReV). Instead of making it compulsory, they now want it to be optional.

This is wrong.

Real-time electronic transmission helps stop rigging. It helps Nigerians see results as they are counted. It helps build trust. That is why many Nigerians supported it, and why the House of Representatives approved it clearly.

By removing this rule, the Senate is opening the door for manipulation again—the same problems that caused confusion, court cases, and anger during the 2023 elections.

Let’s ask a simple question any ordinary person can understand:
How can Nigeria spend over ₦300 billion on elections and still say it cannot transmit results electronically in real time?
That does not make sense. It is either waste, dishonesty, or deliberate sabotage.

What Akpabio and his group are doing looks like a legislative coup against Nigerians—using the law to take power away from the people and hand it to political elites. If this continues, it can damage Nigeria’s democracy badly, the way poor decisions and elite control damaged other countries like Nepal.

Electoral laws are not meant to protect politicians or political parties like the APC.
They are meant to protect the vote of the ordinary Nigerian.

If Nigerians keep quiet, things will only get worse. When leaders are not held accountable, countries suffer. Democracy dies slowly, and citizens pay the price.

This is why Nigerians must speak up now.
If this is not handled well, it can cause serious trouble for Nigeria in the future.

Want to Catch them LIVE
Scare them
Secure them
Watch your children remotely


Spy
Wired
Wireless
Panoramic
PTZ
Solar Powered
Battery Powered
Speed / Traffic Cam


CCTV Here n There
CCTV Cameras Everywhere
For the Nanny, Staffs, Kids, Assets
Shop, Home, Office, Farm, Street.. School
It's all about keeping you connected to all that matters


Contact us today for sales, supply, maintenance & Installation - 07057882512

Want to Catch them LIVE
Scare them
Secure them
Watch your children remotely


Spy
Wired
Wireless
Panoramic
PTZ
Solar Powered
Battery Powered
Speed / Traffic Cam


CCTV Here n There
CCTV Cameras Everywhere
For the Nanny, Staffs, Kids, Assets
Shop, Home, Office, Farm, Street.. School
It's all about keeping you connected to all that matters


Contact us today for sales, supply, maintenance & Installation - 07057882512

Want to Catch them LIVE
Scare them
Secure them
Watch your children remotely


Spy
Wired
Wireless
Panoramic
PTZ
Solar Powered
Battery Powered
Speed / Traffic Cam


CCTV Here n There
CCTV Cameras Everywhere
For the Nanny, Staffs, Kids, Assets
Shop, Home, Office, Farm, Street.. School
It's all about keeping you connected to all that matters


Contact us today for sales, supply, maintenance & Installation - 07057882512

Now that the bush meat has started hunting the hunter. I wonder what there next step will be. But if they will hear my own, I will support any step they take to scatter APC.

The APC party is EVIL ���

Tinubu barely does interviews & attend political events, but when he does, his public statements are either offensive or meaning!ess; Not surprised about the "baba blue, blue blue, holaba" speech, it's just shamefu! that some Nigerians are too b!ind to see he's unf!t to contest.[size=12pt][/size]

Why did she no do the rituals and make money for herself instead of doing for people.. Abi she day forbid money.. hahahaha

Cau U imagine Tinubu saying that he forgives the VP. .. this guy is really a big Joker.

Baba go and rest your old bones before U quench ohhh.. Forgiveness my foot.