₦airaland Forum

pansophist:
President Xi earned his rightful place as the number one. Very accurate.

But I do not think that businessmen can be tagged “powerful”, because with a stroke of pen from politicians, all their wealth and influence can turn to zero instantly.

Just look at the multibillionaires that President Putin turned to almajiri when they crossed the line (e.g, Mikhail Khodorkovsky), and many fled Russia to go seek asylum elsewhere.

To be powerful, you need to have absolute control over a totality of institutions, and business men do not have such power. Only politicians does, such as Xi and Putin.

Billionaires are like children in their father’s mansion. They may be richer than other kids, but their father can strip them off their toy instantly.

This is why you never see Nigerian billionaires from pastors to businessmen go against politicians or criticise what’s happening. They understand that their wealth will seize and their dirty can opened, with lawsuit from everywhere that will end their empire.

Celebrities also fall inside this boat. See what they did to Michael Jackson, now it’s Pdiddy and Rkelly.

Money is not power. Money is money, and power is power.

Benee1000:
For the religious guys interested in marriage or long term relationships, with religious ladies, please beware of the age long scam of their promise to fulfill all your sexual desires UNTIL after marriage. Especially the ones who claim to love you but totally avoid being sexual with you with the excuse that sex before marriage is sin. Do not fall for this seemingly upright but ultimately destructive scam, whether she's a virgin or not.

A woman's sexuality is more important than her religious beliefs when it comes to relationship & marriage.
Females are emotional beings as much as they're sexual beings, and religion doesn't change this.

A lady is a female first, before her religious beliefs.

Let me explain:

A lady who genuinely desires & is attracted to a man cannot help herself from being sexual with him, whether she's religious or not.
This genuine desire and attraction predisposes her to be in the feminine and automatically, sexual towards him.
They are incapable of controlling their lust for the man they desire, and desire, is an emotion, something felt and not intentional nor negotiated.

Have you ever wondered why sex with a lady in a highly emotional state (after a quarel, aka make up sex, or when she's excited, scared, sad and dejected, drunk, lonely etc.) is often very intense and pleasurable for her?

It's because Sex is directly proportional to a woman's emotions.

The more emotional she is, the more sexual she becomes.
The more logical or less emotional she Is, the less sexual she becomes.
The more emotionally expressive a lady is, the more sexually expressive she is (legends know this).

This is also why the easiest way to sleep with a lady is to make her Emotional.
Emotions opens up a woman sexually.
When her emotions are high, sex is not far away.

Females require emotions to enjoy sex.
And as such will seek an emotional connection with a man they're sexually attracted to.

Since desire is an emotion, and emotions opens up a woman sexually, a lady therefore can hardly control herself from being sexual with a man she genuinely desires because that desire makes her emotional, and emotions makes her sexual.

She could be a cold blooded nun to every other guy but burns hot for the man she's attracted to.
She may withhold sex for religious reasons but cannot control being sexual or romantic with him, and unless such a man can control himself, it's only a matter of time before sex happens.

Again, desire, my friends cannot be negotiated. If a lady doesn't desire you sexually, she simply doesn't, and therefore cannot attach to you emotionally.

There's always a level of emotional fulfilment and attachment in a lady when has sex with a man she sexually desires.
The strength of this attachment is strongest for the man who disvirgins her and the man who can give her earth shattering orgasms. They don't easily break up and forget this categories of men.
However, the more sexual partners a lady has had, the less the strength of this emotional attachment, and the less chance of her bonding emotionally with her next sexual partner.

A lady who is not attached to you emotionally is not a lady you want to get married to. Neither your money nor her religion can keep her loyal in such union.
This is the reason why most married women cheat, especially with their ex. They're still emotionally attached to that ex.

Moreover, sex with a lady who desires you sexually is at opposite ends to one which a lady does out of obligation.
The Former indulges her emotions, as well as her sexual fantasies, fetishes, and lustful desires, which easily takes her to the promised land (orgasm), and doesn't require stress from the man as only few minutes of penetration, or just caressing or touching her, or even just hearing his voice or seeing him, is enough to open her flood gates. It's how she feels emotionally about the guy that really matters.

The later, (obligational sex) is akin to prostitution and you go drill her hole taya before you see water, if you see at all, no matter the size of your drilling rig .
This is because it involves little to no emotions from her. She's doing it as her own duty in a business transaction. To get money or financial security from the man in return for the use of her coochie.

This is why the sex an olosho gives to a client is very different from the one she does with her boyfriend that she loves and is sexually attracted to.

For a female, sex borne out of desire (validational) is for her, to please herself, while sex due to obligation (transactional) is for the man, to please the man and get his resources in return.

Which one do you think you will enjoy more? The sex you beg or pay for and she agrees to so that peace will reign, while she barely partakes and simply lies down like a bag of beans as you pound away with a handy bottle of lubricant as drilling mud ,
or the one she looks forward to, begs you for and brings her A game so she can satisfy her sexual cravings with multiple orgasms?

The first is just like masturbating, but with a real person. The sex is like eating food to cure hunger but didn't savour the meal.

For the second, the pride, pleasure and satisfaction when a man cums after he has made the lady orgasm is on another level.
You feel like a king, the lady adores you and she feels like a Queen.
You satisfied your hunger, savoured the meal, and you look forward to the next meal.

If you are made to wait for sex, you will eventually discover that the sex was never worth the wait.
Because what you get at best after that wedding is obligatory sex, of which as soon as she gives birth to the first child, she fulfils only sparingly, because no woman really enjoys obligated sex, and that child is insurance of her financial security from you, while your obligation to provide as a man increases with each new birth.

Ever heard of women having sex time table for their husbands? This is the origin, obligation, void of desire. Desire can not be negotiated, it is spontaneous.

Moreover, since there's no emotional attachment involved in obligatory sex, the day you default on your own part of the deal (financial provision), or when she considers it insufficient, that is the day you lose your value and respect to her, including her loyalty to you.
She may not show it immediately, but with time, nagging, disrespect, disregard, sex deprivation and even cheating will creep into that marriage. she may even elope with your children sef.
Peace of mind will be very far from you, and your journey as a philosopher will be on full throttle . That is If she doesn't kill you so she can inherit your resources and go be with the man she really desires.

No man with a better past dies a simp.

So beware guys. If she demands that you must wait until after marriage for her to become sexual with you, abort mission.

Her marriage demand is not borne out of righteousness but rather a need for the security of your resources.
She's codedly offering sex in exchange for the resources that comes with your commitment.

Marrying such a lady is like marrying a prostitute, albeit a religious one, with you as the only customer, that is if she decides to be loyal to you.

Prostitution isn't about having multiple sexual partners, but wanting to be rewarded for sex. It is a mindset.

Marriage in itself, has little to do with love, it's all about resources. To make a man accountable for a woman and her offspring.
While this is necessary as a woman needs resources to properly cater for her offspring, a man don't need to be married to a lady to experience her love and sexual side.
That sexual side of her comes naturally when she meets a man she's genuinely attracted to.

Marriage doesn't automatically make a woman sexual towards you.

A lady who genuinely desires you won't even bring the idea of no sex without marriage to you, because
1) she would be so scared of loosing you to other ladies who wants you, especially when you're high value.
2) A lady has little to no control over her body for a man she sexually desires.
Only the man does. Only the man can determine whether sex will happen or not.

What she'd rather do if really serious about being chaste before marriage is to beg you not to take advantage of her sexually and help her keep herself whenever she's with you.
She knows she can't help it, and you only have to make the move for sex for it to happen.

Some ladies will even make the move for sex themselves, put their hope in you to resist, and will genuinely blame you when you fail to resist.

A lady who insists on a no sex before marriage most likely has other options, certainly doesn't desire you sexually, and definitely cannot attach to you emotionally.

A man who has to win a woman's affection, is already playing a lost game, and he'll pay dearly for it, when whatever won and sustained the woman's affection is no more.

A woman's affection, while very rare and priceless, comes free. It's a gift. Gifts are freely given, not bought.
However gifts are giving to those who are found worthy.

But here's the corollary;

No female proves her love for a man through sex or the promise of sex. The existence of prostitution should reveal this to you.

Sex to a lady is either for her pleasure, a service to be rendered for a price, a tool for manipulation, or a weapon for destruction.
If a lady is clever enough, all can be applied at the same time, to multiple men.

Sex is never a proof of love, neither is the offering of virginity.

Love is proven through giving and making sacrifices.
However, sexual attraction comes first, because while women can be sexually attracted to a man they don't love (their crush), they can only love a man they're sexually attracted to.

Marry a lady whose fertility is highly guaranteed (young virgin), can raise your children properly, can manage a home with the resources at both your disposal, and will be a useful companion, and not because marriage is the only way to have sex with her.

If a lady is not sexually into you, just forget about her other qualities and dey your lane.

Don't make the grave mistake many good men make by saying "she'd make a good wife cos she's a good person, and sex is not that important to me".

There's a big difference between a wife who finds you as her lover and a wife who only sees you as her husband and father of her children.
One makes a happy home irrespective of circumstances, and the other makes a peaceful home as long as you can provide.

Finally, A lady's personality and investments (financial, emotional,time, etc) in you is a better precision Instrument that should be used in your calculations to prove her worthiness for your commitment.

However, dealing with the female is a gamble. And while you can predict the odds of an outcome from your calculations to know where best to stake your commitment, nothing is guaranteed.

The only way a gambler is guaranteed not to lose is not to stake.

gentlegiant95:
I wouldn't have had a problem of continuing to smash but I'm concerned about my health, she has said different times that she can't let me use a condom on her. I got her to do an sti test after I saw the dirty chats with the guy she says is just a friend, now I want her to do another one after the recent chats I saw of her. I mentioned it to her to run the test and she rebuffed it saying she's clean, doesn't have money and other excuses. I want to bring it up again in the coming week, because salary will be paid, how do I go about it

gentlegiant95:
I wouldn't have had a problem of continuing to smash but I'm concerned about my health, she has said different times that she can't let me use a condom on her. I got her to do an sti test after I saw the dirty chats with the guy she says is just a friend, now I want her to do another one after the recent chats I saw of her. I mentioned it to her to run the test and she rebuffed it saying she's clean, doesn't have money and other excuses. I want to bring it up again in the coming week, because salary will be paid, how do I go about it

gentlegiant95:
Guys i have a question; I usually hear that women are very good at hiding the different men that they're seeing from each other, how true is that? I ask this because there's this lady I'm in a "relationship" with, I have evidence that she's seeing other people, I have even seen a dirty chat of her and someone she claimed is just a friend in the past, stopped talking to her,she begged me n after sometime started seeing her again. As a result of that I decided that I won't fully commit myself to the "ship" cos I'm not the only person in her life. So she basically carries the whole thing. Calls me daily or every other day, I barely call. She has invested in me in different little ways, cooks for me, parted with her cash etc. I wanted to know could it be that I'm her best option, in spite of the fact that I'm younger than she is, though I'm not financially stable yet. I don't even have a place of my own yet, we regularly meet in a hotel, which sometimes she contributes to the bills and also brings food for me or buys stuff when she comes. What do u guys think?

Martinez39s:
See how men keep deceiving themselves. Who told you that love and trust must always go together? Loving someone doesn't mean you must trust the person. The idea that love and trust must go together is just a manipulative tactic that uses your feelings for a woman to make you an unsuspecting sheep to her and her manipulations. If you think I am wrong, then I dare you to do the following:
(1) Never get a DNA test on your kids because you trust your wife/babymama since you love her.
(2) Don't ever check her phone and social media accounts when you have the chance because you trust her since you love her.
(3) If you have money, take her overseas, marry her there with a marriage license, live there, and expect her not to torment you and use the misandric system and family courts against you. Do all these because you trust her since you love her. Mteww.
(4) If she says she is a virgin, keep spending on her and don't verify her claims until on the wedding night (that's if she lets a silly beta cùck like you service her promise land) because you trust her since you love her.
(5) Grant your wife/ babymama/gf unsupervised and unrestricted access to your bank accounts and property documents, and even buy (or change) all your properties in her name and except not to be screwed over in future because you trust her since you love her. Some of you can't even trust your kids with your bank accounts yet you think love and trust must go together.

I can go on and on. As I have said, love and trust are independent of each other. The romantic love a man has toward a woman is based on his feelings and perception of the woman. On the other hand, trust is based on evidence and reasoning except where you can't help it. A teacher can only trust a student to ace WAEC if his/her academic record has been outstanding; such trust is not based on his love for his student. If you tow this path of "trust and love go together," you are setting up yourself for brutal manipulation and grief. Ask men before you. As I have said the idea that love and trust go together is just a manipulative tactic that uses your feelings for a woman to make you an unsuspecting sheep to a her and her manipulations. There is a reason why fraudsters and scammers try to elicit trust from their potential victims: they want you to be an unsuspecting sheep so you can be too easy to deceive.