Johnydon22's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Johnydon22's Profile › Johnydon22's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 (of 489 pages)
Nice. . . This should be in the science section tho |
Thanks frank, i for one has decided not to say anymore |
Wonderfully constructed, captivating and beautiful and very inciting. . .Unfortunately a religious mind wouldn't pay mind to it, we have done our best to show out these flaws in religions but the answer always remains the same. . .Hope all reads this |
Great0:Am surprised you asked this question because it was already answered on the very post you quoted. . read carefully. " i think that has to do with you recognizing a particular action... Humans are perceptive entities therefore recognize seemingly similar events..Your brain is in charge of both dreams and memory, so recognizing a particular event that has been dreamt is just plain coincidence" I had a dream where i was married, won't i still marry?. . .maybe eventually when i get married i would say my dreams manifested in real life, i think some superstitions are plain laughable |
Continued
[img]http://www.readmanga.eu/files/11906-201284-7.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.readmanga.eu/files/11906-201284-8.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.readmanga.eu/files/11906-201284-9.jpg[/img] [img]http://www.readmanga.eu/files/11906-201284-10.jpg[/img] |
And by burning churches and mosque what exactly do you hope to achieve? Violence never solves violence, it only escalates it. . .I think you should leave the churches alone because for someone claiming to be peaceful, burning churches and mosques will make you equally as violent, unthinking and fanatic as those you accuse |
I will stand for the Old woman, help the nursing mother hold her baby for a while. She is young and can manage, the wounded guy is young too can equally manage but the old lady could fall for standing long. the other guy Hmmmm don't really know what to do about that one |
Blossom023:I am Johnysky, the writer of MY FATHER's WIFE 1 and 2, When the tides of the heart changes, Adventures of Johnysky and many more i haven't posted yet . . . Please which story exactly are you talking about?? |
This really shouldn't be in the science section |
Great0:**Face palm** #sighs .. .. .. seriously |
Great0:Dreams manifest in real life... lol... i think that has to do with you recognizing a particular action... Humans are perceptive entities therefore recognize seemingly similar events. . . Just like people recognize shapes in clouds. . . . Dreams are illusions projected by the brain and nothing more...Remember the activity (dreams) takes place in your brain which is in charge of memory |
Blossom023:lol...yes i am. I'm the Johnysky.. Are you surprised? |
Great0:You see why i make you out to be daft? Any perceptive individual would have already seen the answer where i said "Illusionary projection by the brain" I am not obligated to answer every jack and harry which ever question that pops out of his head let alone daft ones like yours. . .When you don't know that dreams are just "Illusionary projection as a result of brain activity" what else would you know.. I am really sorry but you have shown to possess childish brains showing religion has practically disrupted your brain. Yet again let me see if you will ask me what dream is again after i have said it here |
UyiIredia:Since you do not know your criteria that determines a designed universe, isn't it better you just drop the argument to avoid more of your assumptions Nonsense. Just because it's non-physical doesn't man it's nothing. Time, love and beauty are non-physical, they aren't nothing. Hahahahahaha i am damned. . TIME is a human concept that determines duration not an entity. . just a concept (an idea) LOVE is an emotion and not an entity.. BEAUTY is a concept to depict a view that is pleasurable to the eyes, views are physical and therefore beauty is dependent on the physical and again beauty is not an entity.. Have you seen why i said you are still young at this? when you start comparing human ideas like time, love and beauty to a supposed living entity (GOD) shows you are still new to the world of logic. . unless you would say your concept of god is not a living entity but just an idea after all This shows how your bias clouds your judgement. You believe that the universe could always have existed. When I assert the same of God you insist He must have had a designer.Nope the universe is the combination of everything there is and to assert a source for the universe still means that source is part of the universe. By employing an independent source which by definition there is no way you could have known brings the chain of infinite regress into play. . since an entity independent of the universe made the universe, it must also mean an entity independent of that entity made that entity and so it spans into the chain of infinite regress. But since the universe is EVERYTHING in existence, it takes only common sense to know whatever was, is and will be still are part of the universe. Actually, assumptions aren't delusional. Science itself typically involves assumptions. We also assume many things in everyday life.Scientific method: Study, experiment and observations. . . its blatantly distinct from this your ASSUMPTIVE method which is plain delusion. . there you go, you just agreed all your assertions and claims of a designer are just assumptions What is the evidence that shows life arose and evolved naturally ?Everything around the universe and the universe itself is nature. life is part of nature and so is nature..every PROCESS in the dimension of nature is nature. . .You live in a natural universe and ask how NATURAL life sprang forth in a NATURAL universe... Thats a huge cognitive blunder if you ask me... Since you agree life is NATURAL, your question already is self answered unless you would like to argue life isn't natural |
frank317:Its called ASSUMPTIONS |
frank317:You really have time by answering that question. . . I am selective this time on the type of post i reply not daft questions. . . an illusionary projection by the brain is what the guy is asking me what it is. This is why some atheist regard theists to be idiotic |
UyiIredia:(this will be the first assumption) First you will have to determine what an undesigned universe will look like, point out the factors that you think helps your case that the universe is designed. . .we'll see how good that will help you ![]() I would tell you that designer doesn't have to be complex, being non-physical it isn't composed of various parts.(second assumption) And then your designer claim simply would be dismissed because non-physical and has no parts amounts to NOTHING. . .it really isn't worth arguing over Finally, I can simply assert that this even-more complex entity always existd just as you assume of the complex universe.(third assumption) It is settled then, the universe can always have existed infinitely backwards and therefore doesn't need this your complex entity to exist. . . . and this part eliminates your designer entity entirely... So you see, this really is not an good argument at all, unless you are dishonest.Yeah everything you just stated up there ranging from things you may come up to argue for your designer is clear enough to show everyone that its all a blatant show of ASSUMPTIONS. . .and am sure that assumptions is the greatest form of delusion . By the way, saying houses are inanimate, or that 'organic matter are known to reproduce' doesn't help your case. It simply shows how much more complex living things are compared to houses.It shows organic matters are able to develop, multiply and evolve without this your designer being in the picture. lets assume a designer actually designed the universe, first there is no way you could know anything about it only assumptions, thats why i took time to give a detailed labeled tag of assumptions to all the points you thought you could assume up to argue for your designer hypothesis. Very funny you really need to step up your game because with all this you mentioned its not hard to discern you are still learning. |
KingEbukasBlog:And somehow i no longer know the meaning of secularism and i chose to use atheistic. . and then you employ nicki minaj and co what type of discussion is this exactly I was stating the obvious .... so tell me if a christian tells a story of how he turned many atheists he preached to , to Christians... will you believe it without questions . Be sincereAnd what exactly is there to dispute? That the atheist didn't turn Christian or an atheist can't turn theistic? Seriously sometimes the assertions you bring are disappointing |
UyiIredia:And somehow an even more complex entity like god doesn't require a designer?. . . talk about comedy... Organic matters are known to reproduce on their own, house can't because they are inanimate.... Again comparing an organic matter to an inanimate object shows exactly who the foolish one is here |
KingEbukasBlog:I think you have an issue with plaetton's story why don't you take it up with him. You have once pulled out a link on an atheist woman that turned christian during one of our discussions, i never disputed the story i only pointed out millions of christians turn atheistic everyday. For plaetton's story, i am not disputing it because he never claimed preternatural feat just like i didn't dispute yours... If he made a supernatural claim you would have seen me rubbish it outright but it was not. If he had made a preternatural claim and no one disputed it then your rants would have been justified but obviously people actually may take you to be clowning around raising unnecessary rants... Sometimes some things are not just worth being discussed...After all i too had been to the seminary |
KingEbukasBlog:Am so sure i never commented on plaetton's story to assert the affirmative but somehow your wild imagination pulled a flimsy assertion based on your assumption out so you can rant... If you can show me a post where i applauded plaetton's story or asserted i believe the story then i will take you serious but if you can't then its obvious ![]() You sound very angry and frustrated.... why? Again you are comparing claims of supernatural and a day to day tale?...lol.. |
krattoss:Lol thats the barracks basketball court na. . . the army slogan there shouldn't stop me from taking a nice pretty picture naaa |
KingEbukasBlog:Hahahahahahahaha Here we go... |
KingEbukasBlog:Hahahahahahahahaha now you are trying to compare claims of preternatural events to the story plaetton told? . . lol.. you need help |
vfactor:It only means your fore bears had ancestors Taaa make una go sitdon. Una be conditional atheist, people wey become atheist cos of hardship. I am looking for real grounded and logical atheist!Hahahahaha abi, check my picture well. . .my life is comfortably beautiful. . . whoever reads your post can see you are still a toddler to the world of logic and reason... Do you need a lesson? |
the english needs to be sliced.... and again why should they pay for tasting they didn't buy naa... if you taste a product and you dont like it, you be on your way na |
vfactor:From their fore parents too If u re open minded enough u would get my analogy.which i have seen and addressed more than a hundred times. . i am very familiar with your line of thought |
Greatfes17: [size=16]You are chocking and on the verge of dying; i have two options. (a)Give your CPR or (b) Pray for you..[/size] which do you prefer? |
vfactor:What then do you mean by first biological?… If you can mention to me what the first biological matter is then i will tell you how it came about By the way the title said to all God-believers. So how am I derailing the thread?Yes you are because the question is totally different from this whole junk of flawed analogy you threw in from no where |
onetrack:Exactly [size=16]You are chocking and on the verge of dying; i have two options. (a)Give your CPR or (b) Pray for you..[/size] which do you prefer ![]() |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 (of 489 pages)

. Belief , and belief and practice are just the same.
