₦airaland Forum

sonmvayina:
But God first commandment that he gave to Moses is "i am the LORD your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt and out of the house of bondage, You Shall have NO OTHER GOD before me"

This neans no intermedary or mediator...

When did God change his mind? Or are you referring to another God ?

Read Numbers 23:19.

We pray to God in Jesus’ name because this is the only way God has approved for us to approach Him. Jesus said: “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.” ( John 14:6 ) Jesus also told his faithful apostles: “Most truly I say to you, If you ask the Father for anything he will give it to you in my name.”— John 16:23 .
in phil 2:9 the bible say due the prize Jesus paid, God himself gives him name above any other name that at the mentioned of that name alone all knees most bow and all tongue most confess that Jesus is lord

SMAN chairman most hear this

sonmvayina:
Just as praying to jesus is too....

It is all paganism rebranded. The worship of mother and son. Like it was done in the levant in ancient times..

we christian don't pray to Jesus, we pray to God through Jesus.

Get your fact clearly

SisterFire:
...and when u get to heaven you shall beat her up or hate her for giving birth to jesus

You are so naive, illiterate and delusional

you should have back up your clam with bible chapter and verses.

Nnamdi kanu will soon join

kukuh is a PDP card bearer,

thank you chukuma Bello

APC = PDP, Prove ?
ANSWER
Since we know they are both parties, The 2nd "P" in PDP is a constant and so may not be included in the equation. OR we may as well say APC"P" = PD"P"
"P" = Party
Divide both sides of the equation by the constant "P".
Resulting in APC = PD
This means that if A+P+C = x, Also P+D must be equal to x
Meaning A+P+C = P+D
Using the alphabet A -Z numbers, whereby A = 1 and Z=26
Substituting letters with their corresponding numbers.
A,P,C = 1,16,3
P,D= 16,4
A+P+C = 1+16+3 = 20
P+D= 16+4 = 20
Therefore APC = PDP

praying to marry is a sin again God. it not biblical, it idolatry

let them try again, we will soon get it right

yes, buhari

its not biblical, woman should learn in silence

But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name:
John 1:12 KJV.
once you acknowledge and believe in jesus as the son of God, you become the son of God too

Apply balm on affected areas, jonathan advise trump

the covid 19 should first be tested on government officials, if the are safe the vaccine is good but if they die the country will be safe

she never meet my girlfriend

apply balm on affected places, buhari advice Ekweremadu

Na only bobrisky fit give me advice this year wey I will listen

Na only bobrisky fit give me advice this year wey i will listen

as it is now Na only bobrisky fit give me advice this year wey I will listen

I don't know why inec is yet to de-register pdp as a political party

Fahdiga1:
This man is more presidential than this lifeless cow we have now

The OBJ and Atiku's govt built 3 very critical infrastructure in their 8yrs in office - Bells University, ABTI-American University and the Obasanjo Presidential Library.
The first 2 were built to allow Nigerian students defy ASUU's wicked long strikes and read books from the 3rd.

add me 08136473758

All of creation is waiting with eager longing for the day when the children of God—those who are in Christ (Romans 3:26)—will be revealed as who we truly are (1 John 3:2). That's what Paul wrote in the previous verse. Now he explains why the creation longs for that day when God will reveal His children, and Himself, in glory.

The creation, meaning all God has made, is suffering. It is subject to something described using the Greek word mataiotēti. This term implies something warped, perverse, sickly, weak, or false. This futility—or "frustration"—came long ago, when sin entered into the world. God did not create the world this way, and creation itself did not choose this. The trees and streams and animals and sky did not choose an existence of frustration. Rather, God subjected creation to frustration in response to Adam's sin in the garden of Eden. God did not design creation to suffer. That hardship came after all was meaningful and "very good." This warped, struggling existence came about when God cursed all of creation in response to human sin (Genesis 3:14, 17–19).All of creation is waiting with eager longing for the day when the children of God—those who are in Christ (Romans 3:26)—will be revealed as who we truly are (1 John 3:2). That's what Paul wrote in the previous verse. Now he explains why the creation longs for that day when God will reveal His children, and Himself, in glory.

The creation, meaning all God has made, is suffering. It is subject to something described using the Greek word mataiotēti. This term implies something warped, perverse, sickly, weak, or false. This futility—or "frustration"—came long ago, when sin entered into the world. God did not create the world this way, and creation itself did not choose this. The trees and streams and animals and sky did not choose an existence of frustration. Rather, God subjected creation to frustration in response to Adam's sin in the garden of Eden. God did not design creation to suffer. That hardship came after all was meaningful and "very good." This warped, struggling existence came about when God cursed all of creation in response to human sin (Genesis 3:14, 17–19).All of creation is waiting with eager longing for the day when the children of God—those who are in Christ (Romans 3:26)—will be revealed as who we truly are (1 John 3:2). That's what Paul wrote in the previous verse. Now he explains why the creation longs for that day when God will reveal His children, and Himself, in glory.

The creation, meaning all God has made, is suffering. This term implies something warped, perverse, sickly, weak, or false. This futility—or "frustration"—came long ago, when sin entered into the world. God did not create the world this way, and creation itself did not choose this. The trees and streams and animals and sky did not choose an existence of frustration. Rather, God subjected creation to frustration in response to Adam's sin in the garden of Eden. God did not design creation to suffer. That hardship came after all was meaningful and "very good." This warped, struggling existence came about when God cursed all of creation in response to human sin (Genesis 3:14, 17–19).

governor umahi, the only fright thinking governor in south east

anybody that believe in PDP is an enemy of nigeria

the three wise men were herdsmen.

i

Omooba77:
Can be like four nil ..

A place in the semi-finals of the EFL Cup is up for grabs on Tuesday night when out-of-form Arsenal welcome holders Manchester City to the Emirates Stadium.

The student meets the master again as under-fire Arsenal boss Mikel Arteta looks to ease the pressure on his shoulders with victory over his former boss Pep Guardiola.
Tuesday will mark one year and two days since Arteta left Man City to take over as Arsenal boss, and defeat to his former club may ensure that his reign does not last much longer.

The Spaniard has won the FA Cup and Community Shield in that time and so this competition offers him the chance to complete a clean sweep of domestic cups early in his senior managerial career, but those triumphs will already feel like a long time ago.

Indeed, even Arsenal's penalty shootout win over Liverpool in the last round of this competition seems in the distant past, with the Gunners having won just two domestic outings since that match at the beginning of October.

Saturday's 2-1 defeat to another of Arteta's former clubs, Everton, means that they have picked up just 14 points from 14 Premier League games this season - their worst start to a campaign since 1974-75.

Just two of those points have come from the last 21 available in the league, with Arsenal now winless in their last seven top-flight outings and with eight defeats in their last 12.

Arsenal will continue loosing until they tell us who killed 2-pac

let us consider what prompted our lord to have answers the question at first, Why our Lord should have answered this question, when He was silent as to the former, we might not have quite seen, but for Matthew, who says (Matthew 26:63) that the high priest put Him upon solemn oath, saying, “I adjure Thee by the living God, that Thou tell us whether Thou be the Christ, the Son of God.” Such an adjuration was understood to render an answer legally necessary (Leviticus 5:1)
Art thou the Christ, the Son of the Blessed? Seeing that Jesus was not to be lured into an answer, and well knowing his perfect frankness, Caiaphas resolved, in his desperation, to question Jesus plainly and bluntly. His question is twofold: (1) Art thou Christ? (2) Art thou the Son of God? The latter of these would constitute blasphemy, and the former, by showing a boastful spirit would tend to confirm the charge. Perhaps, too, Caiaphas anticipated the future, and foresaw how useful this claim to be Messiah would prove when a hearing was had before Pilate (Luke 23:2). Originally the Messiah was recognized as the Son of God (Psalms 2:7), but if the Jews had ever generally entertained such an idea, they had lost it before Jesus' day, The Messiah might of course be called the Son of God in that secondary sense in which Adam was thus called (John 1:49; Luke 3:38). But Jesus had used the term in an entirely different sense, and his usage had been extremely offensive to the Jews (Matthew 22:41-46; John 5:17,18; John 10:30-39). Caiaphas evidently wished Jesus to answer this question in that new sense which the Lord had given to the words. Caiaphas had no legal right to ask either of these questions. No man can be compelled to testify against himself, but he knew the claims of Jesus, and realized that if Jesus repudiated them he would be shamed forever, and if he asserted them he could be charged with blasphemy. Taking advantage, therefore, of the situation, Caiaphas put the question with the usual formula of an oath, thus adding moral power to it, for, under ordinary circumstances, one was held guilty if he refused to answer when thus adjured (Leviticus 5:1). When their own witnesses failed, these rulers called the "faithful witness" (1 Timothy 6:13; Revelation 1:5).

starbuck:
While my 7 years old is here chopping mama thank ma, better i show her what her mates are up

don't forget to show her what Dangete your age mate is doing to her children too