Joseph1013's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Joseph1013's Profile › Joseph1013's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 (of 184 pages)
TheGoodJoe:It's not by age. Zidane is a rookie coach but see how he lashed the legendary Ancelotti and has been bossing the league and CL. Or who is the small boy? I don't rate Rodgers. Celtic is not such a good judge. The competition in Scotland is poo. I would have taken him seriously if he broke records with Celtic at the Champions League. Bournemouth is a fantastic team and the experience he will have playing such an attacking style in England against top teams will catapult him, if he does well. |
BIRDS EVOLVED FROM DINOSAURS Since 1870, paleontologists have suspected birds evolved from dinosaurs but, apart from archaeopteryx, the evidence has been hard to find. In 1995, a site was discovered in China that is a treasure chest of dinosaur-bird intermediate species. So now there is no longer any reasonable doubt--birds evolved from dinosaurs. Another god gap slammed shut. http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/dinosaurs-living-descendants-69657706/?no-ist |
TheGoodJoe:Very good consolation post. |
tbaba1234:I'm even saying that the poor touch was present when Manuel gave him playing time last season. |
Icon4s:I watched Kelechi from U13 to U17, and he used to have a good first touch. The poor touch was not even present during the 2014 City pre-season. It's a travesty that the wonderful city ground would make a player worse in such an aspect. It's very strange to me, sincerely. Does anyone think I'm wrong, apart from the only city fan obviously? |
tbaba1234:Frank Ribery? Alexis Sanchez? Xavi? Sneijder? Lahm? Arshavin? Silva? Mata? Pirlo? |
TheGoodJoe: Again, you're giving me a straw man argument. If a player does well for a new club after being frustrated at his previous club, you say it's the bench that improved him plus his hardwork. If the player does not do well, he did not learn drills. LOL What's the proof that those who were stagnated by the bench were lazy? |
TheGoodJoe:You're impossible. If we ask you why KVB shone at Wolfsburg when Mourinho did not believe in him, you will say he was learning drills. I can see you saying same for Lukaku. KVB and Lukaku have not told anyone they were learning drills. They have said Manu times that they were frustrated at Chelsea and had to go to places that would recognize their talents because Mourinho treated them badly. But left to you it's the drills that worked the magic. But if we ask you why Borja, a Barca prodigy flopped after getting trained from one of the best academies and learning from some of the best players in the world, you will say he did not wait to learn drills very well. Same for Afellay. Same for Shaqiri. These players stayed long in clubs that did not give them opportunities to play competitive matches and by the time they left, they could no longer hold the football stage like had been envisaged. Do you sincerely speak from both ends of the mouth or are you in just to suck the life out of mere mortals like us? |
jamel9: No be small thing. |
I have left the disgraceful politics section of Nairaland and have shaken the dust off your feet of its tribalism. But make no mistake, I absolutely am interested in politics and economics of Nigeria. One of those I love to read is Professor Pius Adesanmi. Not saying I love everything about him, I don't. For one, were we both in America, we would have pitched our tents in different camps. He, a social liberal, while I am in the conservative libertarian side. But you know the way Nigeria is, there are only two sides. The oppressor and the oppressed. Both of us are in the camp of pointing out how the antics of the oppressor and showing the oppressed how things do not have to remain like it is. So it is in this light that I share this article. Make of it what you wish. I can also draw the religious parallels and it will fit like a glove. So choose how you receive it. Here: ------------- Plato’s Allegory of the Cave |
maidaboi:He used to have a fairly good dribbling ability during his U17 days, and he showed glimpses of that during the Pellegrini era, though regressed. From what I have seen this season, the little dribbling ability he has has been drilled out of him. He now lacks that confidence of taking out outfield players. Another indictment of the Pep era on the young man. |
komekn:There are late starters in football. Not everyone who shines as a teenager makes it. Freddy Adu, Cherno Samba, Dominic Adiyiah, Nii Lamptey, etc show us things do not always go according to path. That's why I often hesitate to say that so and so player will be the highest goal scorer in Super Eagles or this person will become Nigeria's captain. Life happens. I can wager that some of those you listed WILL flatter to deceive at the end of the day. And there are those who shone in their late twenties. Marco Materazzi, Ole Gunnar Solsjaer, Rickie Lambert, Ian Wright and even Luca Toni are good examples to show that there are indeed late bloomers. I am afraid for Awoniyi, but your assumptions of him based on your examples are pedestrian. |
DOES THE APPEARANCE OF DESIGN PROVE A DESIGNER? The teleological argument for God, otherwise known as the argument from design, goes back at least as far as Socrates. It is the idea that we see evidence of design (or the appearance of design) in nature, and design presupposes a designer. Indeed, given the extraordinary complexity of nature, such design presupposes an extremely intelligent designer. The strength of this argument is that it is logically sound--it does not rely upon a logical fallacy as many other arguments for God do. But that does not mean it is valid... One problem is that "evidence of design" or the "appearance of design" are hard to define. In fact, I have never seen anyone attempt to define these terms. Instead, proponents of this argument rely on analogy. They may say (following William Paley), if you see a watch lying on the ground you have no problem determining that the watch was designed but the rock next to it was not. Of course, we KNOW how watches are produced. We know they are designed by humans. But can we extend this analogy to other complex things when we do not know how they were produced? If complexity is the criteria for "evidence of design", we could look at snowflakes. Snowflakes are all different but are all six-sided, have complex designs and have astonishing multiple symmetries. Could billions of snowflakes be produced by CHANCE and all meet this exacting specification? Well, yes. We understand in great detail how snowflakes form and it is an entirely natural process. Some proponents of the teleological argument might complain snowflakes are a poor example because they have no function--they may say there is evidence for design when a thing is both complex and performs a function. OK, we could look at a river. Rivers perform the function of transporting water to the sea and are part of the complex hydrologic cycle. Despite bends and twists and passing through different types of geology, sometimes for thousands of miles, rivers are always designed with a decline to permit water to flow, and with river banks to constrain water to a particular path. They are an engineering marvel. Of course, we know how rivers form and it is an entirely natural process. So, complexity and function do not necessarily imply intelligent design. What about living things then? Living things are far more complex than any snowflake or river, perhaps they are evidence of design? Indeed, living things are orders of magnitude more complex than a pocket watch and they have many parts with specific functions, such as pumping blood or providing vision. Can we assume a living thing is designed in the same way we can assume a pocket watch is designed? No, we can't. Living things are produced in a unique way that makes them unlike anything else. Living things come about through reproduction. Reproduction has nothing in common with manufacturing. Watches are made of manufactured parts and assembled into the final article. Living things begin as a single cell and develop through cell division and differentiation. Watches made to a single design are identical but reproduction ensures offspring are different from their parent(s). Every living thing comes directly from a very long chain of prior living things but pocket watches do not. So the analogy between a pocket watch and a living thing breaks down--these are two different categories of things and we cannot simply assume the two categories have similar origins. It would be like looking at the category of things called celestial bodies and determining that they come about by a process of accretion caused by gravity and then assuming that the category of things called soft drinks also comes about by accretion caused by gravity. Yes, this is absurd but so is assuming the categories of manufactured things and living things come about in the same way. The way to discover the origins of living things is not by making a false analogy but by tracing back the very long chain of prior living things to see where it takes you. So far as we have been able to do this, we find no evidence for design--but we do find evidence of gradual change and increasing complexity over eons. |
TheGoodJoe:Bros, gently na. I dey observation zone before but my body no fit hold this your latest yarn. So Pep is responsible for Nasri's performance at Sevilla? Haba. Why you dey do like this na? You mention Caballero, but are always silent on how drilling spoilt Bravo's life. Drilling, drilling, drilling...yet he has become one of the season's biggest flops. Goldfish80 don talk am tire say Delph na proper baller before City, he even shared videos, yet you continue to run with Pep created Delph talk. Why na? Aguero recent spike is Pep? Chai...Aguero has always been the go-to person before Pep arrived. We can even argue that this is one of his worst seasons. Why na? Yaya Toure has been a Man City legend since Pep threw him out of Barcelona. This is his worst season in England yet. But you still say he has remarkably improved. Why na? |
THE RESURRECTION - A FARCE On this glorious Easter sunday, I watched as people well-dressed go to church. In the tranquility of the environment, I used the opportunity to watch the last episodes of the first season of the TV Series, Billions, before continuing with Philip Tetlock's book, Superforecasting. While catching a break, I switched on the cable TV and stumbled on a pastor explaining some of the historical factors that in his view lead to the conclusion that Jesus arose supernaturally. He proceeded to lament the "sinfulness of the human heart that denies the evidence for the Resurrection." This kind of rhetoric is common in evangelical and fundamentalist circles, but I am not sure the pastor understood how inflammatory it is. By using the word sinfulness, he is not merely claiming that we unbelievers are honestly mistaken, but that we are willfully mistaken and are therefore subject to divine judgment for our decision. I am sympathetic to believers who complain about Dawkins' insensitivity and ridicule, but a posture that attributes willful, eternally punishable sinfulness to the majority of the world's population is in my estimation far more provocative. All the much more so in light of the likelihood that few who make such statements have studied in any depth the arguments against their position. Let me address three common arguments made in the favor of the resurrection of Jesus. First, it is often claimed that the disciples' willingness to die for their faith in Jesus' Resurrection proves that they actually saw the risen Jesus. People are never willing to die for what they know to be untrue. But the assertion that Jesus' disciples died for their faith has no historical foundation; it is mere hearsay. We have no historical grounding for the martyrdom of even one of Jesus' disciples. All details regarding their manner of dying emerge years later in accounts that are far removed from the actual events. Even if it could be proven historically that some of the earliest disciples were martyred, we would still be unable to look into their minds and know they died specifically for their belief in Jesus' Resurrection. Joseph Smith was murdered by a mob in 1844 in Nauvoo, Illinois. Latter Day Saints believe he was martyred for his unwavering conviction that God revealed himself through golden tablets that Smith had discovered in 1830. Many non-Mormons believe he was killed because he was a criminal. If the facts are so readily disputed for a relatively recent and well-documented event like Joseph Smith's death, how can we say with any confidence how or why Jesus' disciples perished, let alone what was in their minds when they died? Second, it is claimed that Jesus' disciples could not have experienced a mass hallucination to convince them of Jesus' Resurrection. You will hear apologists say that hallucinations are individual occurrences and that by their very nature only one person can see a given hallucination at a time, that they certainly are not something which can be seen by a group of people. They say since an hallucination exists only in this subjective, personal sense, it is obvious that others cannot witness it. This may not be obvious to Christian apologists, but in fact such occurrences of mass hallucinations are historically well documented. Mass sightings of the Virgin Mary are common, and apologists, especially protestants are unlikely to attribute all of them to actual manifestations of Mary. For example, on June 24, 1981, six children reported an appearance of the Virgin at a hilltop near the town of Medjugorje in Bosnia-Hercegovina. She has continued appearing regularly to these individuals since that time, and millions of others have made their pilgrimages to the site to experience visions, healings, and other supernatural events. Could it be that the power of suggestion is at play? Note that I am not here arguing that Jesus' followers necessarily experienced a mass hallucination, but I am merely establishing its possibility, contrary to the assertions of Resurrection apologists. Third, it is claimed that if the anti-Christian Jewish authorities had wished to disprove Jesus' Resurrection, they could have simply exhumed Jesus' body and paraded him through the streets of Jerusalem for all to see. However, the New Testament mentions no public proclamation of Jesus' Resurrection until seven "short weeks" after Jesus' alleged Resurrection (See Acts 2:1, 24. Pentecost, the Feast of Weeks, fell on the fiftieth day after Passover (Deuteronomy 16:1-12)). If there was concern about the deterioration of Lazarus' body just four days after his death, then Jesus' body must have been unrecognizable after seven weeks. Parading such a decomposed body through the streets of Jerusalem would have proven nothing. Material Recommendations: 1. Robert Price's collection of essays entitled Jesus is Dead. 2. Online video debate "Licona vs. Carrier: On the Resurrection of Jesus Christ" |
Elparaiso: ![]() |
TODAY IS 'GOOD' FRIDAY: Because a LOVING God needs the blood of his son(no, his own blood) before he could forgive his children. |
Squawka Football @Squawka Wilfred Ndidi's game by numbers vs. Atletico: 100% take-ons 6 clearances 4 aerial duels won 3 tackles won 3 interceptions |
WHEN YOUR GOD IS REAL If your god exists and your religion is true, does this give you an obligation to help others who do not share your beliefs? If you saw a child floundering in a shallow pond, you would surely feel obliged to make an effort to save its life but how much greater is your moral obligation if you see a multitude of people headed to an eternity of unimaginable agony? Could anything possibly be more important than saving them? So why don't all religious people dedicate their lives to saving those who worship fake gods or no gods at all? Why do most religious people shrug their shoulders and say people are entitled to their own beliefs? Are we really so selfish and wicked? This is hard to understand. Perhaps it is because you feel it is too hard to convince others that their beliefs are wrong and yours are right. But if your beliefs are true and you know they are true, it should be possible to pass that knowledge to others. After all, if you cannot do that, how can you be sure your beliefs ARE true? I don't know why religious people are so selfish. Perhaps they will tell us. But I do have my suspicions. I suspect they don't do this because they are not really sure their own beliefs are true--they just find them agreeable and hope they are true. They have faith. And how can you expect to convince others, if all you have is faith? |
safarigirl:It's not much of a news. The boy just wants to go to the U20 world cup and that we cannot cap him before then. Let's wait till after the world cup. |
Rohr: Friendly with Germany in the Works https://outsideoftheboot.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/image003-2.png The Franco-German coach of the Super Eagles Gernot Rohr says a host of friendly games have been lined up for the team later in the year, to help them in competitive games. Nigeria will be heavily involved in AFCON 2019 and World Cup 2018 qualifiers later in the year, starting from the AFCON qualifiers against South Africa on the 10th of June. Already test games to put the team in shape for more daunting and challenging games have been arranged, with coach Rohr eager to test a host of players before using them in competitive games. Rohr confirmed talks are underway to play two friendly games in France, where the team are expected to hold a training camp later in the year, revealed talks are underway for a high profile friendly game with the German national team. ”We have made contact with top executives in the German FA about a friendly, so we could play them”, Rohr said in an interview on Brila FM. http://owngoalnigeria.com/2017/04/10/friendly-game-nigeria-in-talks-with-world-champions-germany-rohr-confirms/ |
THREE LIVES TRUE STORY #3 Mrs C: 50 years of age, devout Christian, widower, from Lagos, Nigeria Mrs C was such a stellar school student that her extended family made a great fund-raising effort to pay for her to attend university in the United Kingdom. She secured a place to read English at the prestigious University College London. She graduated with First Class Honours in the summer of 1994 and returned to Nigeria as a family celebrity--she was the first person in her family to attend any university, let alone a famous overseas one. Mrs C didn't just return to Nigeria with a degree, she had met a Zambian man in London and she returned home pregnant. Her family hastily arranged a wedding and by 1995 she was married and blessed with a baby daughter. Mrs C did not want to work for anyone--she wanted to run her own business and someone she met in London was going to make that possible for her. At a Christian Circle she attended, she met an American businessman who was in the UK for a short course and they got on well. She told him of her idea to set up an orphanage back home. He agreed to provide part of the funding to get it off the ground and promised to introduce others who would contribute to running costs. By the end of 1995, Mrs C had purchased a large, run-down property in a rural area near Lagos and work was in progress to turn it into a home for up to 40 children. Within six months, the building was ready, the orphanage was officially registered and admitted its first half dozen children. The next two years went extremely well for Mrs C. The orphanage become well-known and respected. It filled to capacity and the American donors were generous, allowing Mrs C to pay her bills and have a good surplus that she took as her own income. With her husband employed as a handyman and driver, the couple lived well and even managed to buy an almost-new Toyota Land Cruiser all-wheel-drive vehicle. Mrs C was very religious. She spoke to Jesus every single day at midnight--it was her ritual. He gave her advice and reassured her whenever problems arose. She knew all her success was not her own doing but was due to Jesus pulling strings and making things go right for her. She felt hugely blessed and very happy with her life. Then something terrible happened. In late 1998, her husband was driving the Land Cruiser alone in the early evening when he was forced to stop by carjackers. A witness said she saw two cars box him in and bring him to a stop. As men approached his car he jumped out and ran. In his panic, he ran into the path of a lorry carrying a load of steel bars. The driver could do nothing to avoid him. Mrs C's beloved husband died on the spot. When her husband died, Mrs C was pregnant with her second daughter. But this pregnancy was nothing like her first. She had terrible morning sickness and felt constantly tired and unwell. She couldn't understand it--she was the same and her baby had the same father, so why was the pregnancy so different and so horrible? She suspected three of the children in her care. Two girls and a boy had been nothing but trouble since they arrived. They didn't do as they were told like the other children and showed no fear. They always stuck together as a group and often refused to join in activities with the others. When she spoke to these three, they would sometimes refuse to answer her or would even walk away as she was talking to them. She hated they way they looked at her--they should be grateful for everything she was doing to help them but obviously, they were not. Mrs C thought these three children might have something to do with her difficult pregnancy but she wasn't sure, so she took no action. However, her husband's death settled matters for her. She concluded the only explanation for so much misfortune was witchcraft. She decided to take her suspicions to Jesus. At midnight, one day after her husband's death she discussed everything with Jesus. Jesus consoled her and she felt better and stronger. Jesus told her the children had powers because of demon possession but they could be restored by exorcism. I won't describe any of the detail of what happened to the children. I only need say Mrs C requested help from a pastor and two assistants and they locked the children in a room and exorcised them over a period of five days. All the children suffered injuries and one, the youngest child, a five-year-old boy, was admitted to hospital. The police became involved in the case but no charges were brought, I have no idea why not. However, word of this incident did get back to Mrs C's sponsors in the USA. The Americans were horrified and Mrs C was asked to step down from her position at the orphanage. That was the turning point in Mrs C's life. She was angry and upset to be treated like that by fellow Christians but, more importantly, she was homeless, alone and broke. In the 18 years, to bring this story up-to-date, Mrs C has never managed to find a job. She and her daughters have stayed with friends and family but she is essentially itinerant and homeless. She has borrowed money and started a succession of businesses but they have all been badly planned, badly managed and under-funded. They have all failed and left her in debt. Her life is not as it promised to be back in those heady days of 1994. NOTE: I don't know Mrs C personally. This story was related to me by her eldest daughter. TWO THINGS YOU KNOW AND ONE YOU DON'T Here are two things you know: 1. Humans have invented and worshipped thousands of gods over a few millennia. 2. Humans find invented gods completely convincing and satisfying. Here is one thing you don't know: 3. Is the god the ancient Hebrews wrote about in the Torah (now worshiped by Jews, Christians and Muslims) one of those invented gods or a real one? Stories from across Africa by Mr Flavell |
Danycrusoe:Thumbs up! |
TheGoodJoe:You like going around in circles. You say player A is sleek and player B is not. I ask how you know a player is sleek and another is not, you say you don't care about generally accepted definition of football terms and that your knowledge is through years of watching football and that you have no outright definition source you can give me deriding Google in the process. When boxed to a corner about register in football, you say other commentators refer to sleek players and that shows you're correct. I say fine, and told you that those commentators regularly say player B is a sleek player. You say they are wrong and that if I watch player B, I cannot say he is a sleek player. Bros, have you eaten this afternoon? |
TheGoodJoe:LOL. And how many times have we heard commentators say Messi made a sleek move or is a sleeky player? Just say you don't watch enough matches and are not in tune with why and how terms are used in football, and move on. It's not as complex as you are making it seem. |
TheGoodJoe:Wrong move! No matter how many years of watching football, you cannot define a goal outside its accepted definition. Even Infantino cannot unilaterally tell us he has his own meaning of dribbling outside of what the football community knows. Millions of 'Na wa' will not change anything. Until you can tell me your reference for what a sleek move is or who a sleek player is, you can't ask me to tell you one. We have to be on the same level to start a discussion about it. |
TheGoodJoe:Oh, so you just cooked it up. If a word sounds interesting to you, you just start using it without caring what it means? Bros, terms in football, like any other profession have definitions. You cannot say you cook up what a dribble is. Or passing. Or goal. All of them have definitions. Same thing applies to the term sleek in football. You cannot use it outside its accepted definition. Else, the whole sport just becomes a disorganized affair. |
TheGoodJoe:Dont tell me you just cooked up the definition. What is your source of this prettywoman sleekness of footballers? |
TheGoodJoe:You don't know what sleek or flair really means. Let me ask you: Where did you get your definition of sleek? |
TheGoodJoe:But he understands what sleekness is na, may be more than you. You say Messi and Maradona are not sleek, but see this review by EA sports: "Game developer EA Sports has announced a new feature to its upcoming football simulation video game “FIFA 16” that had gamers really excited. Apparently, the game will already give players the ability to make the signature sleek move of Argentinian football superstar Lionel Messi." Flair and sleek are synonymous. |
TheGoodJoe: Hmmm...if you are googling articles to support your drills, what's wrong with him using Google to get articles to support his views. |
TheSuperNerd:I don't trust this report. There is no quote from him. It is someone told somebody that he told somebody. Let's contact him ourselves and ask him. These journalists often have their own interests. |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ... 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 (of 184 pages)
