₦airaland Forum

nuelsam:
i tell u bruv....... I don't know why its hard for em to just understand the post, i guess they're bent on defending the girl.

Biglittlelois:
What if she is actually just posting it without any thought of you at all?? Its obvious the pictures got to you that's why you came here to whine about it, you can always block her you know.

HellVictorinho:
I don't really find the national anthem.......?
Actually,I wonder what Nigeria's call is.

TheArranger:
@bolded- Its actual meaning (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Simulation_hypothesis).

TheArranger:
Simulation hypothesis simply states that we are living in a simulation.

TheArranger:
What

You guys are implying that it would be impossible to say that nobody created us if the sim hypothesis was true and i demonstrated that is not the case.

TheArranger:
I disagree with this one. If the universe is infinite, then everything that is possible to happen will happen. Then brain-in-a-vats will emerge from dumb matter. It is extremely hard for brain-in-a-vats to emerge from dumb matter, but this process will have infinite amount of time to happen.

shakmati:
I like NnennaG6's musings. A point I would like to develop is the certainty of everyrhing if we are in a simulated environment. That means the ceator(s) know the exact response to every action as it is in the codes. What if it is programmed that if the character believes in the existence of the creator, it gets upgraded at the end of the level to ....... Lol. What if the characters were programmed to think and act the way they do. Just the way the particle responds 'not knowing' if there will be human presence or not. Are we then really agents of free thought?

Crazy musings @johnydon22. It's mind blowing thinking about how many levels of reality could exist out there. In recent times I have found myself dreaming of events that would occur the next day. Has my programme been tweaked to give me an advantage or was I programmed to do this before now.? I totally agree that this our reality is never all there is to reality. The levels of reality might be more than we can fathom with the limited processing power of our microcosm of a universe. I however also believe that we are products of a creator. That means we are from the thought process of a superior being. If there is a part of the code that gets me translated from merely participating on the interface to being part of the creator, won't that mean eternal life? *crazy thoughts* lol

Now, consider again the futility of the characters in this simulation trying to fully comprehend the creator if the creator does not include that possibility in the simulation. Interesting topic really!

NnennaG6:
So i was watching a movie about a week ago titled "The Thirteenth Floor", and its been on mind for quite some time. Now i've come to a conclusion: We are living in a simulated reality and experiments already carried out prove it.

Crazy right? If that caught your attention stick with me a while and I'll walk you through it.

Particles react one way when being viewed by a human.

Particles react differently when not viewed by a human.

PROOF:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DfPeprQ7oGc

Particles fired down experimental tubes unaware if a human would be at the end, measured at the start of the tube and the end of the tube.

When there was a human at the end the particle acted like there would be a human at the end even when it didn't know there would be because it would only find out in the future if a human was present.

When fired down the same tube with no human at the end to watch, the particle was measured acting the way it does when no human is present at the beginning and at the end, before it could possibly know there would be no human present.

PROOF:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7Z_TIw9InA.

Just like when you are looking down a road in a computer game, everything that's behind you in said computer game isn't there because it's not on screen, the particles aren't "on" because you are not looking at them, if you then turn around they are on, you can't however catch them unaware that you are going to turn them "on." they know in advance. This is how all particles work.

So what would need to be true if this were a simulation. One day the world would just start like a computer turning on. It would be off one minute and on the next kind of like a big bang.

What else would be true? The entire world we exist in would be entirely mathematical because it's held on a computer and is made up of code. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_universe_hypothesis

The world would be entirely made up of coded laws, like gravity, enersia and there would be a speed limit just like the speed of light, because there is a maximum speed at which a computer can run like all computers. When traveling at the speed of light we believe time slows down, just like when you are near large amounts of mass such as a black hole. Why would time slow down? Because of the limitations on our simulator. Traveling at the fastest speed possible and being next to large mass would require large amounts of processing power taxing our simulation slowing it down.

Would we see computer code in the world we live in? We've already found it. String theory which is earths best mathematical explanation for the world we live in has computer code in it.

PROOF:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cvMlUepVgbA

This is a computer simulation.

Having established this,
1)If we were in a simulation then doesn't that follow that the creator(s) of that simulation should be GOD(S) to us?
2)If the creators of simulations are considered GOD(s) are we GODS too if we can create them?

cc Ihedinobi3, LordReed, MuttleyLaff, Hermes019, Anas09, IAmSabrina

shadeyinka:
Time isn't a creation!
Time resulted because of the physical world. It's simply the interval/duration of wait between two physical events.

Nothing is a "Proof of God"!

I believe you define quails as :
Individual instances of subjective, conscious experience.

We all have subjective experiences such as intuition, trance, dejavus, sometimes vision and even auditory.

To me, it's an evidence that perception may not just exist using our 5 senses. Maybe we have other senses other than this.

Like:
How does a chicken know it should brood on her eggs?
How do they figure out how to mate?
How do some animals use the earth's magnetic field to navigate?

Yes!

The only problem is that we (humans) can only measure cause and effect relative to our universe. We don't have any yardstick to describe what happened before the big bang.

This is an interesting question.
BUT
Just slow down a little and you'll understand.

Time is a measure of interval between two or more physical events. The physical universe happened at the big bang time T=0 and it started from a pin point and the universe is still expanding today.

Now, time isn't absolute: it's a measure of interval between physical events where the starting point is always T=0 and ending at any further time later. Like a track race is always measured from time T=0

In other words, if you can set a reference time before the big bang, you can measure times before the universe.

God predates our time T=0 and that is why He could be the cause of the Universe

shadeyinka:
Very good question.
1. God exists beyond time as the first "cause" that generated "events" : this looks like a statement and yes it is! For there must exist a first "cause" that led to every other physical things.

2. Because we exist with consciousness, then there is no reason why God cannot exist.

3. If God was to be the "first cause", he must not be subject to the physical laws for all known physical laws existed after time T=0.
As Christians, we know God as a Spirit.

How could God have created Himself: that would have been an impossibility except God had always existed.

IHate9jerianss:
TheKingIsHere,she has spoken not
Oya,obey her command right this minute

IAmSabrina:
Lol. He's already inches closer to his coffin. But the mist of stupidity and ignorance still clouds him
Your business will be available soon

TheKingIsHere:
The mor0n will say I recruited you too.

IHate9jerianss:
Buzz off cunt

IHate9jerianss:
Hahaha...What mercy?
Do you know how I knew she was going to do nada?
She began her first few posts directed at me with threats.
That is always the giveaway of cowards

IAmSabrina:
The butthurt is real. Let's help him assuage his pain
IHate9jerianss, get well soon, we know you're hurting
[img]https://media1./images/a6c96f8e0292a23920311848c7d702e2/tenor.gif[/img]

jesusjnr:
Lol! This my own joke with another moniker dey still dey crack me up!

At least I dey transparent and honest, and no dey like one fraudster wey dey hide under different monikers with different genders dey like my own posts and comments like one Satan zombie for here whose zombism case worse pass others.

AnanseK:
And...


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5COuWtExBk

Jman06:
No reactions!

But honestly, some ladies are physically stronger than some guys. I have seen instances!

Famousbabe:
Here is the moment a young lady felt she could beat up a guy in her class. She attacked the guy while the guy kept calm and tried to avoid her troubles.

But the girl was adamant, she continued to slap, hit and kick the guy, but what happened next when the guy retaliated shocked the girl.

The person that shared the video which has gotten over 800,000 views online captioned it:

"You want to claim strong by beating a guy who is just on his own doing his thing, you later got the beating you wanted and now you are shocked he did it. Women are the most confusing creatures on this earth ���"

Watch the video HERE see reactions....

Source: http://www..com/2019/03/girl-slaps-kicks-and-hits-guy-in-class.html

hopefulLandlord:
I'm trying very hard to make sense out of this thread

ABCthings:
I decided to create this thread out of necessity
The rise of Atheists have been quite disturbing as some complete ignorant that should never be taken seriously!---Don't waste time replying them, they should always be ignored!

While others are so convincing and can end up misleading you for the rest of your life.Do your best in avoiding them--- they are Devil's workers and frustrating a Christian life is their area of speciality, Trade Mark!

One thing common to the two groups above is that they don't answer honest question but say things like the burden of proof is on...which brings us to the third kind the one that sincerly seek direction in life.They are rare though 'cause after reading the Bible with an open mind they become one of the first two.

Back to the main purpose of the thread;
I decided to pulish their names here and other info
I'll update as the spirit leads...

OpenYourEyes1:
Did you read that Wikipedia page on Hitler? If hitler was a Christian why was he obsessed with evolution and superior race thing.


Brainwashed atheists hitting the like button like typical bigots

LordReed:
The thread has become another jesusjnr spam thread. He's even created another moniker. LMAO.

Ihedinobi3:
The very first time that you address me you found it necessary to insult me as well. Very interesting.

A warped concept of free will, you say. What is the straight one and where does it come from? Are you going to make a straw man for me? I have observed that atheists in their arrogance often think they know what the Bible says and then proceed to throw straw men everywhere claiming that those ridiculous constructs have something to do with the Bible and Christians are responsible to defend them. Is that what you have in mind when you think of free will: a straw man?

As for your question, obviously not. God's knowledge of all things is complete. Nothing takes Him by surprise.

Are you now going to repeat that travesty of an argument that omniscience magically negates free will? IAmSabrina already made it, you know.

Ihedinobi3:
As for your question, obviously not. God's knowledge of all things is complete. Nothing takes Him by surprise.

Ihedinobi3:

Up to this moment, I have been trying to keep the conversation out of absurdity but "freethinking", as your kind calls it, is wont to jump straight into absurdity after huffing and puffing fails.

What does "alter our free will" mean? If free will is altered, is it still free will? This is precisely the same thing as assuming that omnipotence means the ability to do contradictory things. So, if God is all-powerful, then He must also be able to lie, for example. What do these things mean?

As for creating somebody to go to hell, see my last response to you. Additionally, you are exactly right that we were made for Him. Exactly right. Therefore, how dare anyone rebel against Him?

Look, for example, at the atheistic position. You say that no God exists. When you are asked why you believe such a thing, you claim to have no evidence of His Existence. So then, how come you exist? How are you here? Your answers end up at "I don't know, no one knows." In other words, you completely reject a perfectly reasonable explanation for your existence in favor of complete ignorance. And that is the intellectually superior position for the lot of you!

Obviously, you didn't create yourself. Obviously something or someone caused you to exist. Why does it not register with you that if anything is powerful enough to produce something as awesome and incredible as you with your self-awareness and ability to reason that even the most talented animals completely lack, then that thing or person must have a reason for you to exist? It is entirely because you want to be responsible to no one at all that you pretend that your existence is a complete mystery. That mysteriousness gives you the delusion that you might be God yourself so that you can make your own rules and do as you please.

Clearly, if God made you, then He has a right to be obeyed by you. If you don't obey Him, whether it is because you are unable to do so or it is because you just don't want to do so, He has absolutely every right to throw you into the Lake of Fire with no resulting stain on His Character. In what way are you equal to Him that you would judge Him? You simply can't since you are His product.

This is painfully obvious in all of human experience. We do what we want with our possessions, especially with the ones that we produce. Why should God not do the same?