Kainene77's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Kainene77's Profile › Kainene77's Posts
gebest:What for? |
alexlee50:First of all, even in the context of the full speech, the statement is moronic. Even primary school children in the Middle East know that the wealth gap in many African countries is one of the biggest problems these countries have. While the political elites produce people richer than people in well-developed countries, enjoy healthcare abroad and their children are educated in the most expensive schools and universities, the masses suffer. Secondly, it does not change the fact that while under his administration oil revenues were growing, he failed to establish reserves that would help the country to cope with a falling oil prices. He and his wife stole as if there is no tomorrow. And I am yet to see a leader abroad who gives out platinum cell phones as gifts on his daughter's wedding when the masses suffer. Thirdly, much needed structural reforms have not been put in place even though he was in the best position to adopt such according to him: “I am proud to say that while I took over a Nigeria that was the second largest economy in Africa with a GDP of $270.5 billion in 2009, I handed over a Nigeria that had grown to become the largest economy in Africa and the 24th largest economy in the World with a GDP of $574 billion. Fourthly, he obviously is not aware of the difference between GDP and GDP per capita. Fifthly, thunder strike me if I defend any of the people you have mentioned above. The day I will defend any Nigerian politician, is the day when they will diagnose me with amnesia. The politician I would defend has possibly not been born yet or at least I have not met such yet. |
What is your point? |
alexlee50:So in your thinking, I can't criticize Jonathan and Buhari at the same time? Nonsense! Your former president praises himself for having made ONE man one of the world's richest people when more than 50% of all Nigerians suffer from poverty and you come here to defend him? This is ridiculous. |
alexlee50:Anyone who criticizes Jonathan is an APC zombie? Seriously? For your information, I have never supported Jonathan and I have never supported Buhari. |
South Korea's economy grew rapidly under Park. The military leaders, with little previous political or administrative experience, and lacking a developmental program, later turned to the economists and planners for assistance. The Economic Planning Board was established in 1961. A program of rapid industrialization based on exports was launched. The shift in orientation was reflected in the First Five-Year Economic Development Plan (1962-66), and the subsequent second (1967-71), third (1972-76), and fourth (1977-81) five-year economic development plans. Park's policies encouraged private entrepreneurs. Businesses were given powerful incentives to export, including preferential treatment in obtaining low-interest bank loans, import privileges, permission to borrow from foreign sources, and tax benefits. Some of these businesses later became the chaebol. Toward these ends, the currency was drastically devalued in 1961 and 1964 and import quotas for raw materials eased. Private saving was encouraged by raising interest rates and funds were borrowed from abroad. Exports also were encouraged by direct subsidies; all taxes and restrictions on the import of intermediate goods that were to be used to produce export products were removed. As the existing industries--textiles, clothing, and electrical machinery, among others--had been stagnant owing to a lack of imported raw materials, these policies produced immediate results. These developmental programs required enormous amounts of capital. As the level of United States assistance had stabilized, the Park regime turned to "financial diplomacy" with other countries. The normalization of relations with Japan in 1965 brought Japanese funds in the form of loans and compensation for the damages suffered during the colonial era. Park made a state visit to the Federal Republic of Germany in 1964 that resulted in the extension of government aid and commercial credits. The availability of funds and the increasing level of exports elevated Seoul's credit rating, making it possible to increase borrowing in the open international market. Further, the conflict in Indochina stimulated economic growth. Seoul's export drive also owed much to the availability of an educated labor force and a favorable international market. South Korean businesses discovered that they could successfully compete abroad. As idle capacity was used up and the demand for new manufacturing investment rose, increasing numbers of foreign investors were attracted to South Korea. Foreign exchange earnings improved as export and foreign receipts rose. The government also took steps to increase tax revenues and stabilize consumer prices. Much of the price stabilization program was carried out at the expense of farmers, who were forced to accept the government's policy of low grain prices. Agricultural development lagged behind until 1971, when the government shifted to a policy of high grain prices and inaugurated the Saemaul undong (New Community) Movement aimed at improving the farm village environment and increasing agricultural production and income. Official statistics indicated rapid economic growth. Substantial successes were achieved under the first two five-year economic development plans. The manufacturing sector provided the main stimulus, growing by 15 percent and 21 percent, respectively, during the two plans. Domestic savings rates grew and exports expanded significantly. A new economic strategy emphasizing diversification in production and trade proved generally successful in the 1970s. Under the third plan, the government made a bold move to expand South Korea's heavy and chemical industries, investing in steel, machinery, shipbuilding, electronics, chemicals, and nonferrous metals. South Korea's capability for steel production and oil refining rose most notably. Refineries for zinc and copper and modern shipbuilding facilities were constructed; automobiles began to be exported to a few markets. The plan sought to better prepare South Korea for competition in the world market and to facilitate domestic production of weaponry. The quadrupling of oil prices beginning in 1973 severely threatened the South Korean economy, which depended heavily on imported oil for energy production. Construction contracts in the Middle East, however, provided the necessary foreign exchange to forestall a balance-of-payments crisis and to continue the high rate of growth. The growth-oriented economic strategy emphasizing exports inevitably produced side effects. Although the government previously had been able to manage these side effects and effectively surmount various economic crises, the situation began to deteriorate in 1978. The emphasis on exports had produced a shortage of domestic consumer goods that was exacerbated by the increasing demands brought about by rising wages and the advance in living standards. Price controls imposed on producers of consumer goods discouraged the manufacture of these goods. Meanwhile, the inflow of dollars rapidly expanded the money supply and inflation became a serious problem. According to a Bank of Korea report, consumer prices rose only 14.4 percent in 1978, but most observers agreed that the actual rate was near 30 percent. The high rate of inflation continued into 1979. According to a report issued by the Economic Planning Board in August 1979, the average household's cost of living had gone up 26.3 percent from the previous year. Although wages had been rising rapidly during the previous several years--spurred by shortages of skilled and semiskilled workers--the rise in wages began to slow down. The average wage increased 12 percent during the year preceding August 1979. To address these ills, Park had replaced the economic team in the cabinet in December 1978 and adopted stabilization measures entailing the lowering of the growth rate: a stringent tight-money policy; a switch of investment capital planned for heavy industries to light industries producing consumer products; a reduction of price controls to encourage more production of consumer goods; and assistance for the poor. But these measures caused a recession, produced a succession of bankruptcies among small and medium loan-dependent enterprises, and increased unemployment. http://countrystudies.us/south-korea/15.htm |
alexlee50:Which one is my governor? ![]() |
CollinsMD:When did Jonathan plead with the governors to save money? Source, please. |
qtx:I laugh in Swahili. The economy was stable? Why then does Nigeria suffer more than any other country from the falling oil price if the economy was so stable? EVERY other oil exporting country put money in their reserves because it is a WELL KNOWN fact that the oil price can fall abruptly and considerably. Mr Ex President didn't know it? We are back to square zero because the country's ability to react to the falling oil price was crippled by the last administration. We are back in the beginning only God knows how long it will last.Indeed because Buhari is not doing the right thing either. |
Yseone:SO the father says that it the son's turn to make money for his children but it wasn't his job to make money for his children? Better think before you comment. To comment is not compulsory. |
emmasege:I will blame all of them instead of defending anyone based on my tribe. GEJ was clueless and so is Buhari. |
alexlee50:My governors? |
HirstMOG:My? |
One question Mr Ex-President, where is the money that was made when the economy was booming? Where are the savings that would help Nigeria and Nigerians make it through the rainy days? Why did other governments build up reserves, why didn't you? I am not sure who is more clueless, you or Buhari but you have this in common, cluelessness. |
jameseva:Who told you that? |
mineANDurs:You don't want him to devalue but you want him to bring the Naira down to the official value? Does this sentence make sense to you? |
It's Obama's fault. ![]() |
4C2215131:I don't think of it as brutal. I think it is honest and fair and helpful. |
hassan85:This is not true. The Naira was losing value rapidly at that time. And again, devaluation was not the issue, depreciation was. |
Creative and funny. |
Slapsticker:Never ever do that unless you want to torment her. Such a sentence will fuel hopes and she will suffer longer than necessary. 4C2215131:Exactly! 1000000 likes. |
swagsguy:It has been falling and rising and falling and rising but the Naira has not gotten any stronger. ,we should focus more on how to improve the production capacity of our refinery and more should be builtIt won't change the decline in demand on the world market considerably. ,diversify agriculture,Agreed. work more on d power sectorWithout money to invest? |
swagsguy:So if you "unlink" it, the problem is solved right? ![]() |
Controversialad:A weakness it is indeed and the symptom of intellectual laziness. |
Volksfuhrer:China is no longer a communist state in the traditional sense. In a communist state everything is owned by the government. There is no such thing as private property, private ownership or enterprise. People are not allowed to travel or study abroad. Nowadays, Chinese people have private properties and private enterprise. Chinese people travel and study abroad. The Chinese have adopted the free market theory propagated by the West for a long time, which led to an opening of their markets and closer and stronger bilateral relations with the West. So the examples you gave about Britain, Spain, Germany and France are abysmally wrong! The last time I checked, Germany was no longer a fascist state: the Nazi's are long gone.So since the Nazi regime is gone, Germany has no enemies but the fact the the old US presidents retired long time ago does not lead to better China US relations? ![]() I'm sorry you are the one who ran out arguments.Didn't you say they had about 40% of all votes? It is not even the majority of all votes. ![]() You also stated that "China and the U.S are close allies in opposition to North Korea's Nuclear program". Damn!!! Who exactly do you think has been undermining UN sanctions against North Korea all these years? If you don't know it's China, then you are out of your depths. The West have always known this, except you. China might be miffed at the bogus display of North Korea's ballistic missile tests, but she's not opposed to a secret North Korea's Nuclear program. China is North Korea's godfather![b]The United Nations Security Council has adopted five major resolutions since 2006 that impose and strengthen sanctions on North Korea for [/b]continuing to develop its nuclear weapons program and call on Pyongyang to dismantle its nuclear program “in a complete, verifiable, and irreversible manner" and refrain from ballistic missile tests. The first two resolutions were passed shortly after North Korean nuclear tests in 2006 and 2009. The third came a month after North Korea successfully launched a satellite in December 2012. North Korea is prohibited from such launches under previous UN Security Council Resolutions because the technology in a satellite launch vehicle has potential dual use applications to ballistic missile development. The fourth was passed after North Korea’s most recent nuclear test in February 2013. The most recent was adopted in March 2016 after a nuclear test and satellite launch early in the year. The resolutions since 2009 furnished UN member states with interdiction authority, calling upon states to inspect North Korean cargo within their territory, and subsequently seize and dispose of goods prohibited by UNSC Resolutions. https://www.armscontrol.org/factsheets/UN-Security-Council-Resolutions-on-North-Korea So where and when exactly did the Chinese make use of their veto to stop sanctions against North Korea? ![]() It's amazing that you don't know the difference between posturing and real intent.I am sure Xi himself told you that. ![]() Be that as it may, I stand by my words that the West have been our enemies (adversaries, if you must) and it's time we tried new allies. If that offends you, so be it. But you need not use chicaneries to buttress your point that the West have always had our backs.Where did you read that I have a problem with Nigeria "trying" new allies? And who said that the West had your backs? |
Volksfuhrer:So you actually think that when two countries fought wars in the past then they must be eternal enemies? ![]() So Germany still hates France and Great Britain because the defeated Hitler more than half a century ago? So you think that Spain hates Great Britain because Queen Elizabeth I defeated the Spanish King? ![]() President Obama and president Xi have met recently to discuss the South China Sea conflict as Obama is concerned that the conflict may escalate but he certainly did not challenge China on this issue. Moreover, China and USA are close allies in opposition to North Korea''s nuclear program. Gosh! Your argument about China being an influential member of the IMF is ludicrous because Western countries have been "appointing" the chief executives of this institution for ages. The United States and some Western countries for instance have over 40 percent of the controlling shares in the IMF and the World Bank. In fact, these two institutions operate as extensions of the U.S government foreign policy!Those who pay more, have more votes. Fair enough. And it does not change the fact that the IMF consists of 188 member states so who exactly has been sabotaging the development in Africa? The whole world? ![]() Your international politics truly sucks. Gerhrarahier meehn!When people run out of arguments ... |
theV0ice:Lessons learnt. |
musicwriter:Yeah, I am spying on behalf of the Obama administration because Obama has sleepless nights that Nigeria made a deal with China. ![]() |
musicwriter:You have not yet defined what the "true African mentality" is and soon you will ask for my name and credit card number. ![]() Explain what the "true African mentality" is and how I am a victim and stop beating around the bush. |
musicwriter:How am I a victim? |
Gext: ![]() Whatever they smoke, I don't even want to come near it. It seems to impair the brain region that is responsible for logical thinking. |
musicwriter:First of all, I am African so I don't need your African point of view. Secondly, why do you have a problem with my questions when you know so much? Rhetorical question. Thirdly, this is a clean discussion. I am very matter-of-fact oriented, it would be nice if you joined me. |

? what of the gains from the single treasury account