Kayjordan's Posts
Nairaland Forum › Kayjordan's Profile › Kayjordan's Posts
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 (of 17 pages)
Your submission is clear and well defended, but the "place" being referred to in my argument is "Heaven" - and you refer to it as a non-trial abode... If so, "Lucifer," as the interest of discussion, was in Heaven during his trial and he failed his test in Heaven. Shouldn't it be fair to conclude, the Hereafter (Paradise) is still a place of trials as opposed to what you defended? honesttalk21: |
Yes, that's real faith with enough answers to prove it is. But if there's no evidence of substance, It's just basically floating faith, not concrete faith. Because there seems to be too much religious drama over a "feeling" called faith. I ask these anti-christ questions not to ridicule religion, but to understand if you feel things mentally to conclude there's a God or if you just follow the narratives people tell you and assume there's God... MaxInDHouse: |
The true worshiper as you may call it, should remain loyal to God even when broke. If such worshiper doesn't stay loyal to God in financial crisis, then such loyalty to God is attached to money than God Himself. A true believer as you call one - that reads the Bible and listen to the sermon, should remain loyal to God in all situations without test. MaxInDHouse: |
True to the fact, money doesn't buy happiness. But poverty doesn't create happiness either. The middle class are experiencing both sides of rich and poor. So, the situation is what it is. But if a man has an opportunity to be rich either through talent or opportunity, he should take advantage of it and not be bound by religious rules of scarcity. That's my opinion. MaxInDHouse: |
Yes, but in reference to my previous question in quote: "If Lucifer who was "rewarded" with beauty, could be distracted and corruptible, and thrown down the path of Hell - then what absolute guarantee is it, that the very "reward" God denies on earth, but promises in eternity, His saved-souls will also not default in character on receiving their rewards each? How would you answer that? Please note: Goodness is separate from reward. honesttalk21: |
Hmm! This is interesting! If the "other side," is not a place, but an "emotion", then, is that the ultimate consequence God promises? There are so many billionaires in the world today doing just fine with or without God - no suicide, little or no disappointments and merry life... How do you explain that? MaxInDHouse: |
I accept the correction. You said: "These are the very words of Jesus Christ not my own opinion so going by what Jesus the only begotten Son of the one and only true God said there is no real comfort now and his disciples shouldn't seek such comfort otherwise it's the other side they will see!" What's the "other side" if i may ask, since everlasting life is here on earth, and principles of heaven and hell don't exist? MaxInDHouse: |
In my opinion, "Islam is slightly a more accepted RELIGION regardless of extremists attachments to it - if all you've written is true. A religion that respects the rights, the will of man without judgment, is considered a religion of peace. But if a religion judges, assumes or imposes its will on others, its a religion of war. This is why neutrality is important. If you do collective-good in society, you need not be attached to Christianity, Islam or Buddhism, to be considered GOOD, for you are already doing what a thousand preach. honesttalk21: |
You made a memorable line - "Allah would have given everything for nothing". This excerpt, shows a need for strong faith - a strong will to hold onto a promise even when in doubt sometimes. Discipline is way of life and encouraged in daily practices... but the question is, why should there be a reward in the Hereafter other than here? If earthly reward is distracting and corrupting, why then is such kind of reward delayed and offered in a Holy Kingdom called Afterlife? If Lucifer who was "rewarded" with beauty, could be distracted and corruptible, and thrown down the path of Hell - then what absolute guarantee is it, that the very "reward" God denies on earth, but promises in eternity, His saved-souls will also not default in character on receiving their rewards each? honesttalk21: |
This is a subjective belief. Other religious believers think Buddhism, Christianity and Taoism is Supreme... Who is the True unifier of all religions beyond our human imagination? I guess that will be a tough question. honesttalk21: |
This interpretation you've provided, is similar to Humanism. In basics, you imply prayer should be reserved for salvation and one's self, should endure the hardship of the earth. In many faith, hardship on earth is seen as the testing ground of righteousness - if one proves righteousnessness on earth, without praying out of suffering, he may qualify for everlasting life in His Kingdom. These are strong interpretations of both Quoranic and Biblical messages. But what evidence has any one shown, that an eternal life exist beyond the books? Why would anyone wish what is said unto a teacher, "A teacher's reward is in heaven", unto their own life? How unfair would it be, for believers to suffer on earth, and realise no eternal life nor it bliss exist afterward? honesttalk21: |
The world is a place of suffering and people look up to God for relief on Earth, even when God's relief for them is in Eternity. In your informed opinion, true worship is salvation-seeking and not earthly comfort. Where does one draw the line between "heavenly/eternal prayers" and "earthly prayers"? Some believers may ask: why pray for protection on earth, when you can pray for salvation or eternal life? Why be afraid of death and pray for protection on earth, if eternal life is the true destination and reward? The only clause in the scripture that contradicts the above is this: "Thy Will be done on earth, as it is in heaven"... If suffering is imminent on earth, will suffering also be in eternity, be it heaven, hell or everlasting life of planet earth? MaxInDHouse: |
The Will of God in your religious understanding, might be non-material things. And at the same time, the "will of God" could mean, man's comfort in other contexts. Some doctrines might say, "it's the will of God for a man to be rich and not suffer". Because the meaning of the will of God is not specifically stated as this or that, Christians are likely to unknowingly assume, "will of God" is everything including money and a private jet. So there's no Christian Association of Nigeria's stamp to approve JW's sermon or interpretation as overall. MaxInDHouse: |
Servants of God ask for so many things - be it selfish or non-selfish things. But God's word is contrary - He say in the Bible, "ALL THINGS ARE POSSIBLE" and "ASK AND IT SHALL BE GIVEN UNTO YOU". But you say, "NO SERVANT OF GOD ASKED FOR RICHES"... One wonders if different writers of the Bible, had different orientations or heard God's word differently...? Some preachers would say, "believers can ask for riches" - for example in the Bible, it is written "Thou anoints my head with oil, my cup runneth over"... This very verse-line would be argued by various pastors and defended as "God is a God of Prosperity"... That's why I told you earlier, there are various interpretations... There's no monopoly of truth... Because @honesttalk21 on this very thread, also believes his religion is Supreme. So who should we unbelievers, listen to...? MaxInDHouse: |
Certainly, hardwork doesn't give expected results all the time, but it does more of the time than prayers and incantation ever does. The common saying of "Pray but put in the hardwork" - makes significant sense... Simply, because the idea of "prayer" requires something or an object to feed on. However, hardwork itself doesn't necessarily need the support of prayer to work. You can push a broken down vehicle with human effort (work) - but you can't verbally command the car to move in the "name of God"... So, physical effort is totally independent. The idea of prayer is dependent on something. honesttalk21: |
Now let me link this back to this article. If God truly gives perfect instructions, why then do people pray and sometimes don't get answers? - "Ask and it shall be given"... Is that trial and error? Believers defense would always be "God knows best". In your True Religion, some of your prayers are probably not answered - and you still use the common line defense. That's the honest reason why people (regardless if they're JW or whatever), would visit a witch-doctor to get their prayers answered. Even with voodoo, prayers too are not answered. The practical and reasonable answer is not church, mosque or shrine... it is hardwork. MaxInDHouse: |
Let me help you understand instead. You don't walk first as a baby... you crawl first. You cannot get perfect results at first try without trying out many options. You have to make mistakes and those mistakes will lead to near perfect results. Religion is not doing that. What you are doing is assuming... Yet your assumptive "right procedure" is not applicable in all religions and systems of the earth - why? Simply because your assumption of "right procedure" is not agreed on by everybody nor by every religion. Many don't use or care about your methods or procedures. But people of all religions are using scientific methods and procedures daily in many ways. MaxInDHouse: |
Science makes practical sense because it is PRACTICAL. Religious practice is what "isn't" practical. *Biblical/religious target is to know the truth. *Science's target is to know the truth. Both schools of thought have one MISSION/GOAL and that is, to find TRUTH. Believe it or not, religion is trial and error. That's why there are so many processes, teachings, religions and denominations - because all are trying to get closer to the truth. This is why I re-interate: the Bible has played it's part finding foundational truth but hasn't closed in yet - but science which is a later and more advanced knowledge, is closer to the truth even though not completely. MaxInDHouse: |
I agree, we should believe in God, a creator or something. That creator, still remains unknown. And the quickest way to put a meaning to the UNKNOWN, is to call it God. You say the bible teaches about applications (general knowledge), and science teaches how application is done (processes) - therefore you mean in essence that, the Bible is the knowledge and science is the process of the idea/knowledge... right? Okay. That is quite true, because religion is "first knowledge" and science developed from it. This also means that, science is the advanced knowledge of the Bible. So wouldn't it be better to listen to refined and modernized knowledge than listen to background/archaic knowledge? Bible knowledge = raw rice Science = cooked rice Both raw and cooked rice are important, but one is best enjoyed, one is refined, one is complete and one is more presentable, as evidence of finished work - and that is "cooked rice". And not half cooked/half baked work. MaxInDHouse: |
There's no way to disprove what can't be seen or perceived for all to see and perceive. Inventors of aeroplanes are believers, but they didn't use abracadabra or "in Jesus name" or "let there be aeroplane and there was aeroplane". They used practical scientific methods to build aeroplanes instead. Years of trials and errors gave them that knowledge. MaxInDHouse: |
Scientific explanations can be proven in both motion and still life images. I guess you've seen an aeroplane fly above you right? But I guess you don't see angels or witches on brooms fly above you? The idea of dinosaurs is not useless because it's evidently part of history. And not imaginarily part of history. If I may use that word. And you will forever sound futuristic because even your "now" miracles aren't working. MaxInDHouse: |
The good thing about scientific explanation is that, it's not postponed or hidden. But your spiritual explanation is hidden and postponed as if you are buying time to cook up answers somewhere. MaxInDHouse: |
No, I haven't seen a dinosaur in person, but I have seen photos of the specimens. That is more believable to a reasonable degree. Not the story that Jesus came in the 19th century to set up JW Organization in a land that will be greater than all nations. Jesus came and no trumpet was blown nor heard? Give me a break! MaxInDHouse: |
I understand why Jesus didn't want to advertise his powers. One could assume he was being careful or uncertain about his ability. What should be asked if JW Organization members in Nigeria are Israelites? It's very convenient to hide under the canopy of deceit. Many things people didn't believe in this world, like the universe, dinosaurs etc have been later proven to people through science after billions of years. Your religious miracles such as "everlasting life" is yet to be proven 1000 years after. In the next 1000 years, another crop of people will still be promoting Jesus is coming.. After 5,000 years, the same message by the descendants of the same crop of people will still be saying Jesus is coming to give everlasting life. Is it when a giant asteroid hits planet earth and destroys it after 100,000 years that everlasting life will finally take place? MaxInDHouse: |
All one sees in your religious rebuttal is a hopeful but hopeless messaging by mortals. You speak in future terms, when the present times are most evident. You admit your earthly organization is not perfect and one shouldn't expect miracles... So where did the "miracle of everlasting life" come from? Israelites were not perfect and yet the Israelites of biblical years (God's people) are no where to be found... No single news of oldest men and women alive in any newspaper or encyclopedia. Or perhaps, maybe God has been keeping them in a freezer for 1000 years. Look, be real with yourself. There's no hope, any JW Organization member will be alive forever, nor will go to heaven on a spiritual aircraft. Whatever you're seeing or being told by your religious teachers, is creating what is called "Barnum effect". Your doctrine is an illusion - science fiction and archaic and backward knowledge. Life in 2026 is like driving a car, while a tiny group of believers (JW) are still using chariots. MaxInDHouse: |
According to you, "Jehovah's Witnesses is the narrow road leading to everlasting life" - Yet no JW member is 300 years old on earth. You say: "people set standards for themselves as Satan insinuated" - Well, Fela set the standard for himself, as he was able to predict the Nigerian government and Nigerians attested to it - he was like a mini Jesus too. Also, I don't get the issue with politics. Even the churches do politics including your church. You have ushers, head ushers, security department, production department, junior pastors/teachers, senior pastors/teachers - and in all, there's likely still in-fighting and hating amongst you. Your denomination/church/religion (JW Organization) is as imperfect as everybody and every system on earth. MaxInDHouse: |
You must know, incase you don't know that - politics is important in every society. Without politics, there will be no functional society. Those who join politics, do so, to make societies work. So that people can be safe, businesses can function well and churches like JW, can function and derive tithe as well. Also note - there are politicians who still have great relationships with their families and friends and examples are Barack Obama who still has a wonderful relationship with his family and friends; Goodluck Jonathan who's still with his family; Yemi Osinbajo who still has his family together; Theresa May who also still has her family together and many others. Your religious teachers are Propagandists. I also think you are a POLITICIAN as well... You likely got a university degree for yourself when you were still practicing Islam. After getting your degree, you found yourself in JW Organization where you are now taught the opposite of everything you learnt in school. It would be deceit to say you believe in your religion and at the same time, still believe in science that you were taught in school. If you were a JW member when you were to write WAEC or JAMB and asked how the earth came about in Geography, that would be the day your faith would be tested - whether you would write "big bang theory" or Genesis chapter 1 for a Geography exam... If you can oppose, so many scientific explanations on here, how can you and your religious colleagues survive daily in a practical world of unbelief. If I may ask: If you were invited to a Game Show on TV to win N1million - and asked this question: "Hello Max! Here comes your question... "Name ONE Religion from the following options... "(A) UEFA "(B) UNITED NATIONS "(C) JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES "(D) ISLAM You will be a POLITICIAN if you choose Islam. And you will be an UNINTELLIGENT PERSON if you choose JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES. You know in the deepest part of your heart, what you would choose when a million naira is at stake. If you walk the path of ignorance or have an extremists belief, you will find it difficult to have friends and survive in society. If you're surviving in society with such extremists view, it's definitely not God protecting you as you would like to assume - you are probably conforming to societal norms and returning to your church every Sunday in sheep clothing (pretense). MaxInDHouse: |
My last paragraph in my rebuttal is important. If you sit for an examination with this deliberate ideology, you will certainly have a re-sit multiple times. First, Jehovah's Witnesses is a denomination in Christianity and not a whole religion as you are taught to assume. All denominations are and should be registered ®️ under the Christian Association of Nigeria. If you consider politics as a RELIGION just to win an informal argument, then it will be understandable. But if you consider politics as a RELIGION in truth and in sincerity, then it should be a major concern. I want to believe you're joking. And I also want to believe that your JW commentary of it being a Religion and the True Religion is a joke as well. MaxInDHouse: |
Very interesting to know you could fish out my interests so well. Politics, religion, business, philosophy, science and other subjects, are part of the education system in the world. Everyone is expected to have a general knowledge of all subjects. So, being read in politics, religion, business, philosophy, science and other subjects make you EDUCATED. One can be a specialist in theology and have no knowledge of other subjects One can have knowledge of other subjects and be brainwashed by religion. Nevertheless, it's also interesting to know that being born again doesn't exempt some persons from passive-aggressive behavior and emotional reactions. I'd like you to seek enlightenment beyond your religious knowledge base, the same way you investigated my political interest. MaxInDHouse: |
My goal here is to make people think. On the contrary, I'm not deceiving myself. We think differently. I'm a practical thinker; you are an abstract thinker. That's why it may feel extremely difficult to think like me. And that's why it's extremely difficult for me to think like you. Education plays a role in everything you know today. Whatever you are exposed to, determines how you think. So, you have the free-will to believe and worship anything you want to believe, regardless if it's wrong or right. MaxInDHouse: |
Fantastic question! I would say number 2, but not directly. Here's why: people in the biblical days are no different from people of today. Jesus read the patterns of people in his days and likely predicted their behaviors in the future. The natural environment of the biblical days is no different from today's environment. Same earth, same sand, same water. Jesus and other writers in the Bible saw the patterns of the natural environment and likely predicted outcomes of the environment in the future. Today, scientists, predict human behaviors, give predictive weather forecasts etc based on patterns and probability. Anything can be guessed quite accurately with presents facts in front of anyone. You can guess a paper on a table will fly away if the wind blows - it easy to predict that. No need for magic to predict that. So if you assume Jesus predicted the future accurately, it most likely coincides with what scientists already predicts. Everybody is a mini Jesus. MaxInDHouse: |
If a response is clearer, it shouldn't require further questioning. I don't totally believe in God. However, I tilt to physical inclination than spiritual inclination. Earthly activities all show physical efforts than spiritual efforts. If anyone sees a spiritual effort in any part of society, that area or community will become deserted in one minute. Everybody will runaway. And that's realistic. MaxInDHouse: |