TV/Movies › Re: Naruto Information by kimco(m): 11:45pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
WackyJ1: Every small thing kimco will call it attitude.
Kimco do you know that i have been using my phone to reply you for the past two weeks? I have been doing the tedious work just to counter you so you've got no excuse... dude it's okay...we settled it. c'mon. |
TV/Movies › Re: Naruto Information by kimco(m): 11:43pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
WackyJ1: Lol. What if i may ask is the difference between a class level of Rasengan and the S class level and what is the proof of the difference of even the existence in the manga? Please also note that Konohamaru learnt it fully from naruto without any mention of S class or A class and except you're saying that Konohamaru is better than kakashi, who accomplished more than Konohamru at the same age in learning A class shape manipulation then you're insulting Kakashi. You're implying that kakashi could not advance it to S class level after copying it. For you to copy a technique the way you say that kakashi copied it then it means the person now has an indepth understanding of the technique so whether kakashi could do the shape manipulation to S class level is up to his abilities therefore for you to imply that kakashi a certified genius could not do what naruto did because of limited ability is an insult. You must have a good explanation why. read the panel rapmike posted. it's right there. plus I didn't even know that all ninjas must have the same abilities. so please tell me...are u saying that every jounin shud be able to do watever a chuunin does? hmmm i did not know that. thank u. WackyJ1: Yes minato created the rasengan but i mentioned that he did it from the idea of the tailed beast bombed. It's not the exact same jutsu it's just made to look like it using the principle of compression of chakra in the tailed beast bomb. So you can see that the developed definition still holds. "Minato developed the rasengan from the idea of the tailed beast bomb" wow..jux wow...wacky i made this very point for chidori and rasengan and u didnt even look at it. now u're falling on the same argument? unbelievable. u've become something else. |
TV/Movies › Re: Naruto Information by kimco(m): 11:39pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
Tosyn007: Your tsunami theory isn't valid cos its something you aint prepared for, an accident,
kakashi said he copied Sasuke not the jutsu.. the point was the water...not the tsunami itself the water for christ sakes. we can bathe with it but it's can be destructive. whether u are prepared for a tsunami or not it'll destroy u. the point being water. this point is to invalidate ur point that they used chakra so more of it shudnt hurt them. tosyn...hmmmmm |
TV/Movies › Re: Naruto Information by kimco(m): 11:36pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
rapmike: Nah? I am almost completely sure dat he met d sharingan when he said copy. Y because d rasengan is a very difficult jutsu 2 create which u cnt get by just observing sm1 do it, u must train and practice a lot to get it . Saying dat he meant copying like dat is like saying dat u saw an ant's eye with ur naked eyes. Nt happening here. how about this:- he saw it practised it and from there....met his limit and decided to create one that he cud complete. |
TV/Movies › Re: Naruto Information by kimco(m): 11:32pm On Nov 04, 2013*. Modified: 12:24am On Nov 05, 2013 |
Tosyn007: Keep contradicting yourself, earlier...you said he copied Sasuke, now you're saying he copied the jutsu..
That aside, when Sasuke copied the jutsu, he did it the exact way he saw it with his sharingan, did Naruto did his the same way? Please say yes... this is sooo difficult. tosyn...okay lets say he copied sasuke.. what of sasuke did he copy? was it his looks? no...was it his dressing? no....it was his lion barsge combo tech. how is this difficult to understand? it doesnt matter what naruto did....my point isnt the jutsu it's the words that came out of kakashi's mouth. he called it a copy. if he can call naruto's own a copy... y cant he call his a copy too? THATS THE WHOLE POINT. PLEASE STOP MAKING ME REPEAT MYSELF. |
Gaming › Re: Nigeria Is Not Included In FIFA14 Even After Winning Afcon 2013 by kimco(m): 8:06pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
|
Gaming › Re: Nigeria Is Not Included In FIFA14 Even After Winning Afcon 2013 by kimco(m): 8:02pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
haibe: if you read his post well, you will notice he plays pes 2014 and I guess with no issue, its safer to say he bought a fake pes 2009 cd than to say his lappy isnt capable. they still do that? wow. dat wud be painful. sorry for the misunderstanding. |
Gaming › Re: Android Games Of The Future! MOGA Power! by kimco(m): 7:58pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
Junior360: kolidave; [nice one buh dis games take a lot of space memory and megabytes]
It takes time yes, but with a wifi connection it's quicker. Your should also expand your RAM to at least 2.5GB for better gaming experience. do u mean sd card? if not please explain further cos i know u can't expand ram on ur phone. it's a fixed thing. |
Gaming › Re: Extremely Disappointed With PES 2014 by kimco(m): 7:51pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
jmaine: . . .I just tire for the guy. dear sire ur prowress over the english language is heavily admired. no hard feelings tho... |
Gaming › Re: Extremely Disappointed With PES 2014 by kimco(m): 7:44pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
GustavoFring: Kimco = Eric cartman.
lol
Pure Troll.  lol i try. was fun tho. gotta admit. |
TV/Movies › Re: Naruto Information by kimco(m): 7:41pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
Ihedinobi: ^^ Dude, I'm sorry if I sounded like I had an attitude. I wasn't mad or anything. I only wanted you to know how troublesome you can make discussing with you. I usually take the trouble to do all that copying, pasting etc the first few times but it gets unreasonably tedious after a while.
Just try to be more considerate of the people you're discussing with. I don't expect that it's just the two of us that use our phones for NL. There might be others as well. sure. |
TV/Movies › Re: Naruto Information by kimco(m): 5:29pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
Ihedinobi: Bro, I hardly Nairaland on my laptop but I still do it. Unless you just want to scuttle the discussion, you really should find the patience to do it. It's why I stopped engaging you several pages back. It was way too much work to go copying the whole post, pasting, deleting, adding the quote tags just to answer your counters.
If you can't do it, just leave the discussion alone unless the people you're conversing with can deal with it. Me, I can't. guy this afternoon with this attitude. hmm i'll try. |
TV/Movies › Re: Naruto Information by kimco(m): 3:45pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
Ihedinobi: Kimco, please "quote" correctly the bits of posts that you are responding to so that other posters can respond to your counters effectively. When you place your responses within your quote of another poster's post, it is very troublesome to isolate your counters and respond to them.
To quote parts of a post use " i know how to do dat. im on a fon. do u know tedious it is to do so on the fon? pardon me but until i get gud internet on my pc here in the village... u have to make do with this method. welcome tho. |
TV/Movies › Re: Naruto Information by kimco(m): 3:40pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
rapmike: So u likened copying notes and a simple taijutsu move 2 copying d rasengan? Kimco,really? I am nt arguing dis again pls, unles u state d difference btw copying a note and copying d rasengan. oh dear...rapmike come back to my side and be protected. it not the copying...it the fact that kakashi called it "copied". if he can call that copy is it far fetched to say he didnt mean sharingan copy when he was talking about rasengan? thats my point. thank you very much. |
Gaming › Re: Extremely Disappointed With PES 2014 by kimco(m): 3:30pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
jmaine: What manner of clownish display
How does the tripe post above counter my assertion that more sales = better acceptance under normal conditions. are those tears i see man...calm down. i made no attempt to counter. cos if u had a " brain box" u'd know more things account for more patronage. more sales= better acceptance =/= better product. lol u're soo easy. i dnt even need to do nun and u'd start crying. do u come with batteries too or solar powered[img][/img]
|
Gaming › Re: Extremely Disappointed With PES 2014 by kimco(m): 3:29pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
dp |
TV/Movies › Re: Naruto Information by kimco(m): 3:06pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
topcy90: It's monday hummm I just read page 304-308 and i was surprise kimco was able to take all these hit that is the reason why madara fit him well. Interesting how pple are arguing a lot anyway dats GOOD, Wednesday is coming sha be prepared every1 lol. shinra tensei. improved madara. |
Gaming › Re: Extremely Disappointed With PES 2014 by kimco(m): 3:03pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
jmaine: Please make your post more discernible with less tear shedding episodes.
Thanks. . . .Ayam waiting. awww sweet child...ur tears are delicious. sorry i said u sucked tho. didnt know u were hurting much. sorry. and if u think popular is better then im sad for u. seriously. |
Gaming › Re: Extremely Disappointed With PES 2014 by kimco(m): 3:00pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
lalaboi: @kimco
This thread is about PES 2014. The game you referenced is PES against fifa. Fifa is feeding you BS? How about what the same company, PES has been feeding you? and NO that 9year old game is nowhere near better than fifa 12 or 13 at that. jmaine this here is what i meant by hippocrisy. this very point. the epitomie of it. in wikipedia this wud be a very gud example. he talks about fifa in a pes thread...something i have no problem with. but then goes on to say that. and the fact that u agreed with him makes u a hippocrite too. sorry i said u sucked at the game. internet stupid terms u know. i read our convo and it was gud until that happened and u went along with it. can't blame me. |
Gaming › Re: Extremely Disappointed With PES 2014 by kimco(m): 2:52pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
jmaine: You seriously need to stop carrying out a pseudo proxy battle with me by mentioning others when replying my quotes.
I only address those points directed at my post and not what others say.
I don't like moving in endless and needless circles, cos that is exactly what your doing. My Symbian analogy was very apt, concise, clear and very transparent to those with a good brain box on their shoulders. So you need to carry out a self appraisal and take corrective measures.
Yes more patronage signifies acceptance, better is subjective at an individual level.
And i totally believe Tactical defending smokes legacy defence when mastered. No apologies. jmaine: Hello bruv, please slow your roll right there .No soccer game has better real life customized goal celebrations than FIFA current editions. And the gameplay of FIFA is superb .
I remember fooling people several times who thought they were watching a live football match when in actual fact we were playing FIFA 12 with our control pads hidden.
No defending supercedes tactical defending in FIFA if mastered, and that's a huge fact.
It makes no sense glorifying a 9 yr old forgotten game .We are talking about FIFA 14 Vs PES 14. this is what u said. also in to counter my pes 5 defending argument. then went ahead to take lalaboi's side for protection. u come into a pes thread...talk about fifa get replied with anoda pes game and u go crying that we're werent talking about old games, accuse me of dwelling in the past, quite shoddy ain't it...u myt even say hipocratic. look at u two. u arent yhe only guy that said tactical defending so when i mean others please dnt u cry for attention. |
Gaming › Re: Extremely Disappointed With PES 2014 by kimco(m): 2:31pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
lalaboi: I don't even remember anyone saying Tactical defending was "The best". Wasn't it which was one harder to play with? and how the legacy defending/tackling is just automated, making it easier?
I know Kimco from several threads and arguing is one of his hobbies. I just refuse to start writing epistles for someone who just wants to argue at all cost. jude4us: I found out dat most lazy ppl go for PES (Excuse my use of d word "lazy" . They just don't want to chase d ball on d pitch demselves. They want it all done for dem; shots, rebound, dribble, attack and what not. That's why they r always wiped when they get to play FIFA. this is what someone said and i told him he must have been confused cos what he described was fifa. he proceeded to use tactical defending to help himself and i used pes 5's defending to make him see that tactical defending wasnt all dat and we shudnt settle for mediocrity if a 9 yr old game can provide better. was that wrong? instead i get called out for dwelling in the past. was told dat as a fact my laptop was too old to play the new games. i even agreed with jmaine on legacy vs tactical defending. now im the bad guy. i see. wierd place. |
Gaming › Re: Extremely Disappointed With PES 2014 by kimco(m): 2:05pm On Nov 04, 2013 |
jmaine: I called PES O5 a forgotten game and you came rhyming about the active communities supporting.
Now let me play the correct track of our argument, and to show and proof why you are the wrong one here.
Kimco : Mentioned PES 5 as his favorite.
Jmaine: agreed that though he really enjoyed PES 5 on the Xbox, but its now a dated history.
Kimco: Came blasting on "his" preference of PES 5 over FIFA current editions.
Jmaine: Simply countered him and ended by saying it makes no sense glorifying a 9 year forgotten game.
Kimco: Went ballistic telling me how misinformed i am simply because there is a current cache of community keeping the dream alive.
Jmaine: Jmaine succinctly told him that having an active community maintaining a platform doesn't apply to a vast majority of soccer gamers.
He then cited the Symbian/maemo communities still active despite the current invasion of Android, IOS et al., while Symbian is officially a dead platform.
Kimco: Missed the entire point.
A very apt and sad description of yourself.
How does this desperate attempt dispel the fact that majority of gamers who pay the huge bills of soccer games have all gone beyond PES 05 & 06 to current editions. that isnt my point. u are missing the whole thing completely. others generalised that the tactical defence is the best i simply told them it's not by using the best eg in my oppinion. doesnt matter if casuals have moved on, it doesnt make tactical defending the best. c'mon man seriously. more patronage=\= better. if only ur understanding was as gud as ur grammar we wudnt be here. i didnt miss the symbian point i jux decided to get u on track. but u decided to deviate to unecessary bikering. we cud do this all da believe...i love sh1t like dis but there wud be no need. |
Gaming › Re: Extremely Disappointed With PES 2014 by kimco(m): 10:57am On Nov 04, 2013 |
jmaine: Dude stop exhibiting unusual naivety, you can't expect peeps not to mention FIFA 14 on a PES 14 thread considering the strong rivalry between both.
Labelling others hypocrites simply because we countered your post says a lot about you.
Learn how to use word appropriately and spare the nonsense.
What the hell are you saying, makes no sense. .
Dude we are talking about current soccer series and not some 9 year old game forgotten by a vast majority
If we say Tactical Defending is better than legacy defending, tell me how we defaulted in that based on current experience
You have been the dude arguing miserably trying to force feed us with your nostalgic indulgence for no good at all.
And i gave you specific reasons i preferred tactical to legacy ,while you kept yapping about that on PES 05 without tenable reasons to back it up.
You might need to wear your glasses to peruse this thread for my bullet points preference on Tactical defending.
Not surprising at all to me.
Until you show otherwise, the ignorance is fully yours and sadly embedded.
In most tech platforms, a healthy and overwhelming majority of those who purchase and play the game are those we term as casuals.
The casual tech adopters are always the majority.
If calling me an hypocrite makes you wet your pants, please be my guest and indulge yourself. oh look here a rhetoric. big grammar...nothing of value. dear sir go back and read to see if nobody said tactical defending was the best. when i made a reference to pes 5's defending being superior, i was told i didnt know wat i was sayin. even was told my laptop was old. so please forgive me for being in line. of cos i expect fifa 14 talks on here. what i dont expect is to be bullied cos i made a point. u were stating tactical Versace legacy. others were generalising. my beef with u is that u called me out for putting dem down for their generalisation...yet said nothing to the for generalising. even if pes 5 was no longer played. it wud still have things better than today's futball game. till today footbal kingdom has the best nets physics for eg. i can argue with that if someone calls fifa's nets or pes's nets the best. |
TV/Movies › Re: Naruto Information by kimco(m): 10:32am On Nov 04, 2013 |
tayoccu: Did it occur to you that it could be a translation error? ooooooooooooooooooooo. now it's translation error? i didnt hear dat when i was providing evidence to prove that he might not have copied it using the sharingan. |
TV/Movies › Re: Naruto Information by kimco(m): 10:28am On Nov 04, 2013 |
SageNaruto: Kimco and Tosyn007, there r times wen I read thru ur arguments and I wonda if we r reading d same manga. U've both managed 2 annoy, surprise, baffle, intrigue, and even confuse me wit ur words. Cos of u both, I've found myself re-reading old manga pages but I still don't knw y u can't understand and agree upon wat written on those pages. I would hav tried helping but at dis point I'm not sure of wat u r arguing about. Although, I will say dis: There is no ball of any kind at d base of a chidori. If u say Kakashi copied d rasengan up 2 d shape manipulation level and den add lightening, u would be implying dat chidori is an advanced form of rasengan likened 2 fuuton rasenshuriken. And yes, Kakashi did say he managed 2 copy it 2 dis level wen he showed it 2 Naruto but did u ever stop 2 think dat maybe he used d word 'copy' cos Minato didn't teach him d technique directly but rada he learnt it on his own after probably knowing hw it was done?!
Basically, Rasengan = shape manipulation of charkra . Chidori = shape and nature manipulation of charkra . Fuuton Rasenshuriken = shape and nature manipulation of charkra
Now let me elaborate: Rasengan rotates charkra and changes it shape into a ball. . Chidori takes lightening charkra and shapes it around d hand of its user . Fuuton Rasenshuriken rotates charkra, changes it shape into a ball and adds wind charkra.
Note: Charkra has no shape and hence, wen it is given a shape dat is known as shape manipulation, while wen 1 or more of d 5 elements r fused wit charkra, it is called nature manipulation... lool forgive us... we're in the zone datall. however u seem to be in the convo quite well. and yess tell them for me ooo |
TV/Movies › Re: Naruto Information by kimco(m): 10:24am On Nov 04, 2013 |
WackyJ1: Hahaha. I found this question very funny. Those who have been using the rasengan including the creator himself will tell you the use.
kakashi cudnt even get to the level naruto, jiraiya and minato got. he reached the A class level. what gud is dat if u can't get ti the s class level.
Banana in this analogy is more akin to CHAKRA not what you're trying to make it seem
no i'm using it for the looks. do they look same? no but contain same main ingredient.
This defense does not make sense. 1. rasenshuriken and baki's wind blade which is more transparent? a. The rasenshuriken and danzo's wind Shuriken which is more transparent?
pointless, u're comparing it to other wind jutsus. are u sayin that if rasengan was mixed it earth by any chance u want to see the ball in the middle like rasenshuriken? wind is much more transparent than lightening. fact. its urs dat is not rly gud
2. Who says you can't see through lightning ?
science says u cant. unless u are telling me u can and have.
And a jutsu that naruto can only use twice with his sage chakra is not concentrated enough for you?
im sorry what is this. does sage mode make wind hard to see thru? is concentrated wind not still wind. or suddenly it'll become denser?
Infact it was basically explained what naruto did to the futon rasengan to turn it into the rasenshuriken, there was no way it wouldn't have had that round epicenter. also in the anime, the rasenshuriken isn't transparent, you can only see the ball from the top and bottom of the center.
what are u even saying now wacky. the wind is transparent for u to see the ball. the ball isnt transparent. chidori has the lightening. how do u expect to see the ball when the lightening is in the way? geez im trying too hard.
3. Are you implying that there is a ball somewhere in the chidori but that we aren't seeing it? exactly.
4. Why hasn't kakashi explained how he developed the chidori from the rasengan. Why didn't Guy forming ITK Mention it to the children.
guy explain what the justu was not a background to it.
and kakashi did...u jux refuse to accept.
plus did u say the chidori is a mass of UNFOCUSED lightening...and nobody tot to take tosyn on for this comment? really people..? check the manga for the shape of the chidori and see what i mean by unfocused
atleast tell me the instance it was explained |
TV/Movies › Re: Naruto Information by kimco(m): 9:59am On Nov 04, 2013*. Modified: 10:37am On Nov 04, 2013 |
WackyJ1: Lol. This is a weak defense. Did bee not fight the 8 tails?
ur point?
I do hope you understand that there was no point in time that naruto shared kyuubi chakra without modifying it for the intended recipient
oh dear refinery. what of when kyuubi gave kakashi some chakra. did he refine it too? hmmmm?
Lol refresh your memory Kimco, Didn't Sasuke copy Lee's lion combo technique? And you seem to forget a very vital part of copying. 1. You cannot copy a jutsu that is a hidden clan technique 2. You cannot perform a technique that you copied without the physical trainin or mental level of development needed to perform the technique. So you cannot compare kakashi who was a jounin at the time of acquiring the sharingan to sasuke who was just a genin 3. You cannot perform a technique that requires nature transformation when you do not have a affinity for that nature transformation or a tendency for it. If you try to counter no 3 remember that the only earth based technique that kakashi has been seen using is the earth wall technique, which is a low ranking technique i doubt he'll be able to perform A rank earth techniques
i applaud u for a brilliant post... i cud reply to this but i'll give u the respect and leave it as dat.
This is a big assumption. Do you have proof?
no i dont... i implied it was an assumption in the next line. u jux cut that off.
You twisted kishi's words to serve your own purpose. Why not just say that the word copy is never used in reference to the sharingan. Whenever it happens to a sharingan user it's just coincidence. Isn't the first mention of copying jutsu in naruto verse made with reference to the sharingan?
i didnt twist nun. kishi jux wrote himself into a corner and ure defending him. hardly surprising. whether the first reference was a sharingan based ability doesn't mean nothing. kakashi made anoda reference that wasn't sharingan based. thats my point. |
TV/Movies › Re: Naruto Information by kimco(m): 9:44am On Nov 04, 2013 |
Tosyn007: Done that..everything supports your claim.. but i wont hear ooo FIXED DAT FOR U |
TV/Movies › Re: Naruto Information by kimco(m): 9:39am On Nov 04, 2013 |
WackyJ1: The rasengan was made from the idea of the tailed beast bomb. The SHAPE of both jutsus resembles a BALL. The rasenshuriken was DEVELOPED from the rasengan and at the center of the jutsu is the SHAPE of a BALL
I asked Kimco to provide me the proof in the chidori that it takes it's Shape manipulation from rasengan and here's what he had to say
Is shape manipulation limited to just the rasengan alone? Kimco ALL JUTSUS combine both shape manipulation and nature transformation. The only difference is the TYPE OF SHAPE, the jutsu is being turned into, so If you say that the chidori took the shape manipulation idea from the rasengan you can only say it took the TYPE OF SHAPE not the concept of shape manipulation in general. Remember that kakashi was a jounin at that time, not An idiot bolded:- my lord... i shud have stopped right there. wacky wth. that is false pls read the panel rapmike posted. it says that the ninjas that can do both are limited. so please come again when u are sure of what u say. there are three justus shown to possess shape or spatial manipulation is bijuu mode, rasengan and chidori. name more if u dare. the shape manipulation ability closest to him was rasengan..by his own teacher. where else shud he go again...i mean seriously. |
TV/Movies › Re: Naruto Information by kimco(m): 9:21am On Nov 04, 2013 |
Tosyn007: Already showed this to Kimco but he's saying something else http://www.inaruto.net/naruto/naruto-chapter-321/3/read the part he says " a regular shape manipulation is an A class..." then he goes to say at that point he cud only copy it. this was the explanation he gave to developing the the chidori. he cud only copy/ learn (my choice) the rasengan up to the A class level and from there develop his chidori by injecting it with his lightening chakra. and for ur developed definition...on that same page it says " rasengan is a jutsu the fourth DEVELOPED…" which means he created. damn that felt gud. |
TV/Movies › Re: Naruto Information by kimco(m): 8:57am On Nov 04, 2013 |
|
TV/Movies › Re: Naruto Information by kimco(m): 8:50am On Nov 04, 2013 |
Tosyn007: According to Kimco, google, dictionary and the likes aint acceptable...seems he's saying kishi's english is not our normal english, so we need Kishi dictionary. trolling as usual i see tosyn. |