₦airaland Forum

MindHacker9009:
➜So what did Jesus ask his father to forgive the Roman soldiers for

Oh! So, you don't know the details of the sin yourself but are quick to compare it to that committed by Judas, why? Do you at least know the detail of the particular sin committed by Judas?

Ojuntana:
I always prefer that people read their links before dumping it on me Read the second one and find out for yourself if sperm are produced in bone marrow Lazy youth

Are you certain you read my response well with your eyes open to see that the second set of links addressed an issue entirely different from the first?

MindHacker9009:
➜Judas help Jesus to fulfill the mission his father sent him to fulfill and even though the Roman soldiers mocked him and cast lots for his garment and they were not repentant, yet Jesus forgave them, but Jesus could not forgive Judas and his own people and the teachers of the Law by just say father forgive all his people for they kwon not what they are doing.

Exactly what was the sin committed by the Roman soldiers—foreigners—, and where in the Law of Moses is this sin detailed?

Ojuntana:
➜You believe virgin Mary conceived Jesus without a man but you disbelieve that woman was made from man? Is it not same bible that records both events? How do you accept one but reject the other.
So can you give an example of a disc reproducing via parthenogenesis? A cell reproduces it's kind through splitting in a process known as cell division. Am example is mitosis if the cell that occurs in amoeba and other unicellular organisms.
No sperm is produced in bone marrow. Sperm is produced in the testicle...

Virgin births have been confirmed in some animal species including some alligators. https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/09/world/crocodile-virgin-birth-parthenogenesis-scn/index.html

Also, scientists have been able to coax sperm cells out of bone marrow cells https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna18095147
https://www.discovermagazine.com/health/how-close-are-we-to-making-babies-from-bone-marrow

Ringstonermasks:
I plan on travelling soon for a master degree but it going to be impossible to bring my wife along as she is in active service in the Military. I have not shared dix plan with her, just contemplating on the idea, although am sure she would advise me not to... What do u think?

Why do you care what we think abeg? She is your wife and you know her better than anyone here does. So, this should be you considering your situation to decide whether or not to leave without her. Also, even if you took her with you or let her remain while you traveled out, what guarantee do you have that whatever it is you may be afraid of would not happen whatever decision you make? 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

dahmie2013:
➜A site that promotes ponography. Sex workers use the site.

Oh, I see! So, the wife is indeed irate that her husband has chosen to live as a gigolo!

missjekyll:
You married a man without integrity. Lazy to boot. I am sorry but you are both incompatible. Your core values are 2 parallel lines.

Lazy ke? The man has established himself as a gigolo and now makes money according to his wife, yet you dey call am lazy.

oritameta:
➜He has always been transparent with me with what he earns online. Last November, he earned over 2K dollars. The money is good but I don't feel comfortable knowing he is retweeting onlyfans girls. We a serious fight in early December and I had to call our Pastor to address the issue. He is a member of the choir. He stopped in December. he even changed the style of his content but they didn't get views like the contents he was posting before.
➜He called me two days ago and told me he was going back to posting his regular stuff. I called the Pastor and he told the Pastor that the Assistant Pastor was a top official in one of the brewing companies but He still preached often. He mentioned another Deacon that owns a restaurant that doubles as a Night club.
➜Yes he makes good money from the platform he uses to get ads from these onlyfan girls but I asked him if it was okay if I was posting pictures of naked men on my social media. He said it's not his personal page. According to him, the only reason he liked Twitter from the jump was because he didn't have to show his face. He even encouraged me to open a new twitter account and start posting. so that we can both make money posting these adverts. I have decided to leave him. I cannot be with a man that his comfortable posting such stuff. I have told him when he decides to stop, he knows where to find me.

1. Are the pictures he retweets those of underage girls or something?

2. Religion ehn! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

3. So, your reason for wanting to leave has more to do with the fact that your denominational leaning no longer fits in with his denominational leanings, right? Christianity boasts of over 45,000 different denominations with essentially no unity between people of the different denominations so clearly, I can see how you would believe it right to divorce him on this ground.

Victor Uwaifo's skin was like a baby's at 90 even with videos plastered every where revealing otherwise?

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Africans ehn! Who do una this nonsense!🤣🤣🤣

1MILLIONLiGHTS:
AND THE MARINE KINGDOM HAS ALREADY LOST.

Lost how? Olukoya, many years after he started this delusional campaign against his marine kingdom, is still telling you that the marine kingdom in his head is still destroying the lives of his members, but here you are lying to us that it has lost. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Even Satan wey una don been dey fight since Olukoya started telling his tales continues to win against you all. Don't you see this endless cycle of delusions that are meant to lead you all nowhere which is exactly where you remain? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Truvelisback:
No.

He was not naked on the cross?

themanderon:
It's very much true. The Advent of social media has made it easy for them to easily enter your head and your home. Dangerous creatures from hell sent to destroy men and lure them into eternal doom.

Nonsense!

fasterwell:
➜You are right about anybody in flesh and blood to be a human. But is that also applicable to the lady who walked out of the sea and said if you see mammy water never run away?

Woman(flesh and blood) is not a woman but a mammy water? 🙄🙄🙄

She walked out of which sea? How many seas have you seen since you were born? Where did this idea of freshwater mammy water come from again abeg? You go see ignorant human dey talk say him see mammywater for inside river or stream ignoring the fact that the original mammywater myth only links the species to the oceans/seas — salt-water habitats. 🙄🙄

fasterwell:
Hello Everyone. I saw a post here that says the Marine kingdom has released strange women to the world and I can confirm that this is true but like someone already commented, it happened a long time ago and the effect is what we are seeing today.
My personal revelation
Some years ago I had a revelation about the forces pushing fornication on humanity and the negative effect this is having on the body of Christ especially. In that revelation, I saw myself rising up with a jet speed from the deepest part of an ocean and when I was approaching the surface, there was a lady dangling her naked body just over my head and she obviously knew I was coming up through that direction. I believe she took that position in a bid to seduce me but unfortunately for her God spoke to me and said, these are marine spirits using fornication to destroy humanity. Immediately I heard that, I quickly pushed her over my head and by the time I finally emerged at the surface of the water, what I saw my mouth couldn't describe.
It was a festival of sex on a beach. The men sleeping with the daughters of men were not humans and the ladies sleeping with the sons of men were also not humans. They were so many yet some of the women who are obviously not humans were seen using their hands to work on themselves because there was a limited numbers of men in the beach.
One might be wondering was it just for the sexual pleasure or was there something behind their actions. Of course there was something very spiritual behind what I saw and I will explain. Sex is a ritual and the earlier we understand this and become very careful with it, the better for us all. In every ritual performed there is a reason and there is also an expected result after performing the rituals...

See the wicked damage that religion has done to the mind of a seemingly ordinary human being. This 2025, OP, please seek professional mental health counseling for your own good!

Nachmonides:
➜It's the same question we can ask concerning other disciples Jesus sent to teach others to teach. Paul was simply teaching as he learned. Functioning in same thing.

Stop derailing the thread already and focus on the primary here who is Jesus Christ and His Gospel which is the foundation of the eternal Kingdom of God of Israel. 🙄🙄🙄🙄

HolinesstodLord:
➜I am past belief. I am in knowledge. I know who I called Jesus Christ and Who I call God. But it starts with belief. Do you believe in the only son of God, Jesus Christ?
➜If you do, then be holy for God is holy.

So, who you call Jesus Christ and who you call God are completely different entities from the ones declared in the book you pretend you believe in?

2. How do you define Holiness/Sinlessness if you reject the ideas put forth in the book you freely add/remove/change at will?

omooba969:
➜Lol , the black man is a curse onto himself I swear.

He is just evil to his own kind is what.

Nachmonides:
➜Haha, this is a conclusion of his activities. If we say you went to point a, b, and c. We can come to a conclusion that you went to 3 points. Would you then say it was never said that you went to 3 points?

Show how you reached this conclusion. What points a, b, and c?

Nachmonides:
1. Paul and Jesus: Paul’s teachings align with Jesus’ message,
➜ extending the Gospel to Gentiles after Jesus' resurrection. He doesn't contradict Jesus but helps apply His teachings in broader contexts.
2. Authority of Jesus’ Words: Jesus’ words are the ultimate authority. Paul’s writings clarify Jesus' teachings, especially regarding Gentiles, but always must align with Christ’s message of salvation for all.

If you believe what you claim, then why even mention Paul at all when Jesus Christ of Israel should suffice in this case?

2. We already experienced earlier your confusion with the use of the term Gentile, so I suggest you stay away from its mention until you really understand and accept the definition provided in Scripture rather than the religious delusion fed you.

3. If Paul's words clarify the Words of Jesus Christ of Israel doesn't that amount to claiming the disciple has become greater than the Master? I mean you cannot say you believe Jesus Christ only to contravene Him the next. Make up your mind already!

Nachmonides:
1. Jesus' Mission and the Kingdom of God: It's true that Jesus proclaimed the Kingdom of God as everlasting (Matthew 4:17), but His initial ministry was focused on Israel (Matthew 15:24). While His message was rooted in Israel’s covenant with God, His death, resurrection, and the subsequent commission to the disciples extended that message globally (Matthew 28:19-20, Acts 1:. The Kingdom, while having a unique foundation in Israel, has always been open to all who accept Christ.
2. "Dogs" and Gentiles: Jesus’ statement about "dogs" (Matthew 15:26) was made in a particular context and was not an absolute rejection of all non-Israelites. His interaction with the Canaanite woman (Matthew 15:21-28) ultimately demonstrates that faith, rather than ethnic identity, determines access to God's mercy.
➜The term "dogs" was a cultural expression, and after His resurrection, Jesus commanded His disciples to make disciples of all nations, not just Israel.....

1. Jesus Christ of Israel NEVER said anything of having an initial ministry. So, where in His statements does this idea of an INITIAL ministry which you claim come from the context of Matthew 15?

2. The absolute rejection of non-Israelites came instead from Jesus Christ of Israel's statement in which He declared that His Father, YHWH of Israel, sent Him only to the Lost Sheep of Israel, and this same Jesus Christ of Israel proclaimed throughout His Gospel that He did only that which was commanded of Him by His Father— His food is to do the Will of His Father.

Jesus Christ of Israel made the declaration regarding being sent only to the Lost sheep of Israel, not during a conversation with the Canaanite woman but one with His very own disciples.

21 Jesus went from there to the area of Tyre and Sidon.
22 A Canaanite woman from that area came out and began shouting, “Lord, Son of David, please help me! My daughter has a demon inside her, and she is suffering very much.”
23 But Jesus did not answer her. So the followers came to him and said, “Tell her to go away. She keeps crying out and will not leave us alone.”
24 Jesus answered, “God sent me only to the lost people of Israel.”
25 Then the woman came over to Jesus and bowed before him. She said, “Lord, help me!” - Matthew 15 vs 21 - 24

The statement drawing the fact that non-Israelites were the dogs as compared to the Israelites who were regarded as sheep was made by the Canaanite woman in the context. So, why do you keep attempting to belittle the proclamation made by Jesus Christ?

3. Given the fact that Jesus Christ had previously
➛ established that only those of Israel qualified to receive God's mercy by way of David
➛ warned His followers not to give that which is Holy to the dogs - non-Israelites
➛ told them to stay away from the non-israelites when He first sent them out to preach the Gospel
➛ proclaimed that His Word — His teachings and commandments — are everlasting(never to be changed, added to or removed)

don't you see how His sending them out to all nations implies He is sending them only to the Lost Sheep of Israel and not the dogs as well?

Nachmonides:
➜When Jesus said, "The student is not greater than the master" (Matthew 10:24, John 13:16), He was emphasizing the relationship of authority and discipleship. The phrase conveys that a disciple (or student) should not expect to be treated better or differently than the one who teaches them (the master or teacher). There was a context to what was said, it wasn't an open-ended statement.
If the statement "The student is not greater than the master" were interpreted as a general, open-ended principle for all teacher-student relationships, it would still be reasonable in many contexts but not universally applicable.
In the broader, more general sense, it would suggest that a student should not expect to be above their teacher in terms of knowledge, authority, or status, which aligns with the natural dynamic in most educational settings. However, it could be challenged in certain scenarios where students may surpass their teachers in knowledge, skill, or success over time (e.g., in fields where students develop their own unique contributions, such as in science or the arts).
For example:
In a traditional teaching context, a student may one day exceed the teacher in their area of expertise, which would conflict with an overly rigid application of this principle.

Post posting these religious gobbledegooks as responses for Pete's sake! I didn't ask for an explanation or for you to spew your religious lies at me. 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄

Again, I see a lot of attempts in your questions to assert the claims of the man named Paul as though Paul somehow explains away Jesus Christ of Israel when in fact Jesus Christ of Israel proclaimed in His Gospel that the student can never be greater than His master - Matthew 10 vs 24.
⚈So, who should be the one telling us what impact the teachings of Jesus Christ of Israel should have on whom — Jesus Christ of Israel Himself or some other guy named Paul who came in much after Jesus Christ of Israel already declared that His Word was everlasting and hence unchangeable?
⚈Do you consider Paul to be greater than Jesus Christ that you would suggest that the opinions of Paul should in some way impact the meaning of the Words declared by Jesus Christ Himself to all of His followers?

Simple questions require simple responses not meaningless religious droning! Stop the urge to religiously drone off.... try to see this as a simple literature analysis exercise where you are required to analyze the statements recorded in the text as written. 🙄🙄

Nachmonides:
➜Paul never taught anything except that which Jesus and those before him taught.
➜If you don't consider Paul, which of the disciples of Jesus do you then consider—or would you consider them all irrelevant?

Your question(4) suggests that Paul's statement directly contravened Jesus Christ of Israel hence the reason why I immediately asked why you feel Paul should be mentioned when the Master is Jesus Christ of Israel and the Law in the Kingdom of God of Israel is Jesus Christ of Israel. 🤔

2. If you have the Word of the Master Himself, what does it matter what the disciple said/opined? Can we please stick to the Law and Truth of God, Jesus Christ since we do in fact have His teachings to work with as it is recorded? 🤔

Nachmonides:
1. Do you believe that Jesus' mission to the lost sheep of Israel was only for that time, or do you see His teachings as having a broader, ongoing impact for all nations?
2. If Jesus' statement about the "dogs" was meant to exclude Gentiles forever, why did He later command His disciples to go to all nations, as seen in the Great Commission (Matthew 28:19)?
3. Why do you think Jesus’ instructions to His disciples to go to the lost sheep of Israel in Matthew 10:5-6 were followed by His command to preach to all nations after His resurrection? (Matthew 28:19)
4. If Jesus' claim about making disciples only from Israel was exclusive, why do we see the inclusion of Gentiles throughout the New Testament, especially in Acts and Paul’s writings (Galatians 3:28, Romans 1:16)?
5. Would you agree that Jesus' mission to Israel was a part of God's plan to eventually bring salvation to all people, as promised to Abraham (Genesis 12:3)?

1. Only for what time? Jesus Christ of Israel declared that the Kingdom of God of Israel which He established by way of the Gospel and Truth of God of Israel — A Law/Constitution— is everlasting. So, what time do you mean?😶

2. Again, Jesus Christ's statement regarding dogs— non-Israelites— did not include any mention of the term Gentiles. 😶

3. If you knew the history of the family of Jacob — Israel — you would know how He could have made such a declaration without contravening any of what He had initially declared including his explicit warning that His disciples not hand that which is Holy(the Gospel) to the dogs — non-Israelites. 🤔
...
5. Genesis 12 vs 1 - 6 says nothing of salvation to all of the World. Rather, the term used is blessed. 😶

Nachmonides:
➜Hello Kobojunkieee, I think this thread would be great. Don't derail that thread. I will not respond there. I'd have to respond to your questions with questions;

1. Do you believe that Jesus' mission to the lost sheep of Israel was only for that time, or do you see His teachings as having a broader, ongoing impact for all nations?
2. If Jesus' statement about the "dogs" was meant to exclude Gentiles forever, why did He later command His disciples to go to all nations, as seen in the Great Commission (Matthew 28:19)?
3. Why do you think Jesus’ instructions to His disciples to go to the lost sheep of Israel in Matthew 10:5-6 were followed by His command to preach to all nations after His resurrection? (Matthew 28:19)
4. If Jesus' claim about making disciples only from Israel was exclusive, why do we see the inclusion of Gentiles throughout the New Testament, especially in Acts and Paul’s writings (Galatians 3:28, Romans 1:16)?
5. Would you agree that Jesus' mission to Israel was a part of God's plan to eventually bring salvation to all people, as promised to Abraham (Genesis 12:3)?

I see a lot of attempts in your questions to assert the claims of the man named Paul as though Paul somehow explains away Jesus Christ of Israel when in fact Jesus Christ of Israel proclaimed in His Gospel that the student can never be greater than His master - Matthew 10 vs 24.
⚈So, who should be the one telling us what impact the teachings of Jesus Christ of Israel should have on whom — Jesus Christ of Israel Himself or some other guy named Paul who came in much after Jesus Christ of Israel already declared that His Word was everlasting and hence unchangeable?
⚈Do you consider Paul to be greater than Jesus Christ that you would suggest that the opinions of Paul should in some way impact the meaning of the Words declared by Jesus Christ Himself to all of His followers?

Nachmonides:
➜You are simply unwise. You have your mind made up, unwilling to review former ideas. That is not intelligence. Intelligence is malleable. This is an accumulation of foolishness.
➜I have created a thread based on your questions. Let's see if you will ruin the opportunity for a conversation there.

You don't know what intelligence means, do you? 😏

2. Have you posted the conclusion which should result from the very words of Jesus Christ of Israel contained in the provided premises? That is what I am most interested in. So, long religious droning/meaningless mansplaining.

Nachmonides:
➜Shalom Kobojunkieee. This is not a conversation, sir.

What is it? An attempt to usurp/insult my intelligence?

Nachmonides:
➜I wrote extensively to cover any possibility of misunderstanding. Go and read my text.

Well, the gobbledegook you wrote does not extensively cover anything, not even your ignorance of what was asked.

Nachmonides:
➜Leave this thread and create yours. If you delve into the realms of religion with logic, it is acceptable, but you must also come ready to have faith (more religious than logical; as per man logic).
➜The two can mix. I will not respond to your replies on this matter on this thread any longer.

I don't delve into the realms of religion with logic because religion is wrought with contradictions essentially invalidating all logic you attempt to throw its way.

Wrong! Religion and logic should not be mixed!

Nachmonides:
➜Leave this thread, create your thread. I believe all he said. I don't doubt any at all.

✦Then why do you reject His claim that He was sent only to the Lost Sheep of Israel as He Himself declared?
✦Why do reject His claim that non-Israelites — dogs— are not to be handed that which is Holy/the Gospel and promise of God made to David for Israel?
✦ Why do you reject His assertion that His disciples only go to those who are of Israel and not to those who are not of Israel?
✦ Why do you reject His clear teaching that only those who are of the blood line of Israel — all nations — be made disciples of His?

Nachmonides:
➜Forget about religion, take it as a literature and critique it honestly according to the ways of critiquing available to us in this century.

There is no forgetting about religion since your every retort is laced with religious motives — falsehoods intended to slice away at what is written to assert ideas that are only obtained in the religious space.

Nachmonides:
➜You have not been paying attention to all we have been saying since yesterday. I didn't disagree he said what he said.

He said what He said AND you don't believe what He said. So?😐