₦airaland Forum

How can you be certain that Bindex had no idea of the effects the earths inclination and revolution round the sun had on different locations of the earth when your idiotic church once  thought the earth was flat and the sun revolved round the earth?

Chrisbenogor:
Hehehe my mouth is shut oh

Kuns:
@ladydrugdealer wrote

Is this the best you can come up with.

This is typical christian behaviour, what you feel so bitter, to resort to childish name calling.

You are so small and narrow minded ,  you are not worth the time of day.
Run out of things to say, so you start acting foolishly ,  I told you religion has made you CRAZY.
I was right ,  as you all can see.

I think you must be the drug courier and peddler because you know all the name of the drugs you have trafficked.

Science is completely opposite to bibles view of human existance and life in general

I think all protestants like to attack catholics, they see them as the idolators, the ones who cannot pray well, and many other things. In all fairness I think the catholic church is a big and quite positive force in the world of christianity, even though they prefer to stick with tradition I think they do so quite wisely.
Jw's on the other hand, puhleez!
Hopefully like the catholics say,
Agnus dei, qui tollis peccata mundi; dona nobis pacem.

slimfine:
@ Lady,

Talk of someone who has no idea what she is talking about. JW prays our lords prayer and they never beleived that the kingdom has already come. the new kingdom is what we are praying for thouuuuu

by the way, do you catholics not pray to mary, saints, cross to name but a few so what are you questioning my knowledge in catholicism? did you ever went to block Roesery? I was the secretary of my center at Aba under CKC, went through Catechism for holy communion, and confirmation, was a member of Region of Mary, and jr Charismatic society. so please, I got my share of catholicism.

is unbeleivable that the same bible you catholic claim to have written says that you should not make false image when you pray to God (exodus 20:4-6), yet you people go contrary to that. the same bible tell us that you can only pray to God through Jesus, yet you people pray to mary to deliver the message.

I wonder which God you people are worshiping.

slimfine:
@dios,

Constantine (roman emperor) and some other people put (not wrote) the bible together and deleted severally parts of it. By the way constantine was a pagan. He put the bible together so that everyone will have one form of worship and if you were not in agreement to this new book, he kills you off. He was a big time politician and just like any politician, he did not care so much about God (yaweh).

So spare me with all these "Roman catholic wrote the bible" crap

@@Lady

Belief is what you're doing when you don't know what you are talking about.

Belief is Ignorance, belief is to ignore the facts, intentionally or ignorantly.
also
wu- nuwaubu is right knowledge, right wisdom and a right overstanding.
if one has to believe, it means he or she does not know. and if one does not know, that is ignorance.
hence, belief is ignorance and religious beliefs, without the facts is ignorance

Which is what you are portraying.

See, how you are acting krazy, this is what believe does to you, when you are deeply into it, you became krazy

davidylan:
don't these secularists like AC Grayling make you want to laugh them to derision?

when it comes to christianity . . . they are at war with religion.
When its islam they kow tow to the violent mullahs and tell us to "respect" their religion.

bunch of hypocrites.

I'm saying if the God Concept of the EUROPEAN is true, then why do we have to believe it.

Chrisbenogor:
Somebody made a remark here today, he said to be uncertain is a honest state of the mind.
Do I believe you are saying the truth, I really don't have a choice here, I don't even know who you really are, and even if I do, I cannot go around the whole of nairaland announcing with certainty that I do. I believe most of our discourse can actually be settled simply by accepting what is certain and what is not.
I will be happy to take on the scientists can I start now?

The christian churches portray E'Zeus (in latin) aka Jesus as cauasian looking, and this Jesus mother was another Cauasian. So if Jesus is so-called White and his mother is white what does that make his Father.

And according to the christian church all the people (Gods family) in the bible are so-called white

I'm here to speak truth, based on sound right reasoning, evidence, experience.

Anything else is believe which leads to ignoramus.

There is no blond hair, pale-skinned God, like your slave masters wanted you to believe.

@lady
Ha who injured you na sweetness, me I will vex oh I will vex, for what na, even as far as Er, are you sure you are ok?
Eh I will be honest and I don't know much about pre cambrian my girlfriend studied geology and all those sand stuff always bore me. I will read though, how are you doing with achan?

Most likely for no other reason than to round out the beasts of the apocalypse, John was chosen to be one of the four Gospels. For the sake of cohesive inerrancy, it would have been more beneficial in its absence. Although the author doesn't venture too far on a tangent from the life of Jesus depicted in the other canon Gospels, there are some distinguished omissions in this account. The most notable absences are the exorcism of devils, the recitation of the Lord's Prayer, Satan tempting Jesus in the wilderness, the transfiguration, the virgin birth from Mary, the Sermon on the Mount, Jesus' proclamations of his return, and every last one of the parables. Scholars agree that the original Gospel of John started at 1:19 and ended at 20:31. Furthermore, they've determined that the remainder of the book seems heavily edited and reworked.
For these reasons, John fails to be an unquestionably reliable and synoptic source of divine inspiration for the story of Jesus.

Scholars unanimously agree that Mark is the most primitive of the four canon Gospels. Its details are relatively less developed, consequently making this biography of Jesus very brief. Interestingly, Jesus' primary biographer was obviously a distant Roman who never knew him. In fact, the original version of Mark doesn't even contain Jesus' appearance following his crucifixion (16:9-19)! This concession is made in the NIV but left out of the KJV. Even though the author was from Rome, he provided enough minor details to have a fair understanding of his subject. Why, then, would he leave out the indispensable element of the world's most important story unless he lived during a period without a resurrection rumor?

Since about 80% of the verses in Mark appear verbatim in Matthew,we can seemingly tell that the author of Matthew used Mark as a template when writing his own account. However, he alters many of Mark's details and adds several stories presumably unknown to its author. The Gospel of Matthew most certainly had a Jewish writer since he strives to correct many of the mistakes arising from Mark's ignorance of local knowledge. Since we have no clear evidence that the author of Matthew was one of Jesus' disciples, we can't rule out the likely possibility of its author simply plagiarizing the Mark account in order to make it more acceptable to residents of the Middle East. It's far too coincidental for the writings to match so well in some passages and contradict in others for there not to have been some minor transcribing taking place. Thus, we'll analyze the contrasting details of the two accounts in order to exemplify the unreliability of the latest God-inspired product.
Mark (1:2) makes an incorrect reference to Hebrew scripture by quoting Malachi 3:1 as being the work of Isaiah

Mark also claims that only God can forgive the sin of another (2:7), but that's a direct contrast to actual Jewish beliefs, which hold that other men can forgive sins as well. Again, Matthew drops this statement from the record (9:3). Mark mentions the region of Gadarenes being near a large body of water, but it's about thirty miles from even a sizable lake (5:1). The Matthew author, realizing that Mark knows next to nothing about local geography, changes Gadarenes to Gergesenes, which is only a few miles from a lake (8:28).

Mark mentions the region of Gadarenes being near a large body of water, but it's about thirty miles from even a sizable lake (5:1). The Matthew author, realizing that Mark knows next to nothing about local geography, changes Gadarenes to Gergesenes, which is only a few miles from a lake (8:28)

Mark mentions multiple "rulers of the synagogue" even though almost all synagogues only had a single leader (5:22). The Matthew author corrected this phrase so that the reader could ambiguously interpret it as having only one ruler (9:18).

I NO KNOW OH             ask duduspace and dios and my oga Adam brody, LOL

read the thread and know na you will see the culprits me I swear I was not there, eh let me do small aproco, they opened a thread that God cannot bring down nairaland but I think Seun deleted it,      I no talk oh, LOL
How body? wetin carry you comot?

Very wise words naijacutee very wise, I wish all christians were like you, its all about belief my dear.
Take care

@chrisbenogor

I don't beleive he does as I see the facts available to me now, but I'm never hasty to draw firm lines because I can't really prove that he doesn't. So I'm okay with people who believe he does exist as long as they own up to fact that it is just a belief which cannot be proven in anyway.

Yes it is moral I mean we Nigerians have maids and servants are they not our slaves?
What we must remember is they are not sub-human or animals.

They too must be respected and cared for.

Slaves are held against their will from the time of their capture, purchase, or birth, and are deprived of the right to leave, to refuse to work, or to receive compensation(such as wages) in return for their labour. As such, slavery is one form of unfree labor.

@~lady
So you are saying your opinion of the murders is the absolute correct version?
And I should not take it up with another person?

How about the orders to kill people? Does that not count or did Moses do stuff on his own?
He ordered people who failed tin keep some commandments to be killed,

No I'm not demanding god( particularly your jewish god). I would say I'm angry though. I am because y'all( black africans) have lost our history to the point that y'all link our history to jews' regardless of the absence of proof.

The jewish god doesn't exist and if he actually does, he doesn't look at y'all as his children. Look at Africa, ain't no way a god that supposedly loves everyone equally would allow the descendants of the greatest people in antiquity to live in poverty and squalor.

because my ancestors were great and didn't follow no man's religion and constantly pursued the advancement of their society.

Higher criticism lady, its the method that was used to determine when the books were written, its an approximation  and I have said it times without number nobody knew who the authors were, mark was in fact a roman, there is a thread somewhere running on that issue.

My dear, I thought the bible was the inspired word of God oh

But if you are saying these men wrote things just as they saw the world then I will agree with you, if we know that Noah's flood did not happen the way it did then why would we believe the creation story?

All these things were fabricated from imagination there certainly was no inspiration and if there was God does suck about the knowledge of the earth he created in 7 days.

this your argument is soooooooo weak, 
your have just torn the veracity of your bible to shreds

We live longer than our forefathers because we have better medical care. That's a fact!!!

J k rowling does a better job than piss poor stories about whales and flood.

Dios:
LOL, you mad? YOU is all christians, JWs,Catholics, Baptists,Evangelicals,Pentecostal, Anglican and the rest of YOU. YOU included.
Yea, YOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU lmfao