What does CFC squad in 1999 have to do with the squad in 2004 Jesus Christ?!
So the Leicester coaches that inherited the sqaud in 2017/18 after the league was won in 2015/16 should be expected to win the league since they inherited a team that had won the league 2 seasons removed?
Liverpool finished 2nd one season removed before Klopp just like ManCity when Pep signed. So how will a working brain conclude that one squad was underachieving and the other was not?
There’s a reason why I said if you have a working brain. Obviously you just prove you don’t.
For a team that was finishing 8,6,7,2,6, your brain should tell you that they overachieve finishing second when they did. The true level of the squad is between 6/7.
Just like Leicester finished 1st in 15/16 and immediately went back to their level, they overachieve that season and that was that. I really shouldn’t be explaining this thing to you.
Prior to Pep, City won the league twice and finished second twice, even when Pep was announced Manager in Feb 2016, City were second on the table.
If you want to compare a squad that was finishing 1st or 2nd with a team that was averaging 6th as being on the same level, I’m very sorry for your education. It seems all you Barkabots suspend your brains when it comes to Pap. I wish you best of luck.
Eruditor: Liverpool 2013/14 2nd in the league. (Klopp came 2014/15) CFC 2003/04 2nd in the league (Mou came 2004/5) MCFC 2014/15 4th in the league. (Pep came 2015/16)
Chelsea past 5yrs before Mou league standing 1999/2000 - 5th 2000/2001 - 6th 2001/2002 - 6th 2002/2003 - 4th 2003/2004 - 2nd
Man City past 5yrs before Pep league standing 2011/2012 - 1st 2012/2013 - 2nd 2013/2014 - 1st 2014/2015 - 2nd 2015/2016 - 4th
Anyone with a working brain will know that 2015/16 season that City finished 4th was abnormal n didn’t go with the trajectory of the club when compared with previous years.
Eruditor: Don't be triggered. I only expose flawed logic and people who are incapable of stringing good sentences to save their lives.
If a team that choked a league with Rodgers or one that got to a UCL SF AND finished 2nd in the league with Ranieri were not good enough but Pep's own that finished equal points with 5th place United is better than them. What else is there to say?
As soon as the herd's logic is challenged they will conclude that it is the person exposing their lies that did not comprehend them.
Happy New Year.
Sigh
Let’s check the team they met when they join shall we?
Eruditor: [s]Of course, FA Cup, EFL Cup and being trophyless are factored into notching up wins in the EPL. So as Klopp won 30 games out of 38 last season but did not win the EPL, it will not count in the 100 wins he has got.
Of course, the incompetence of the previous managers before the managers you mentioned above will not factor. Imagine if City had used Moyes and LVG to replace Mancini. I wonder how many years since then that City would have been without the EPL.
Of course, Pep met a better team. The one that finished 2nd and played in the UCL SFs. Unlike Mourinho whose team finished 4th (equal with 5th) and after that did not spend any money at all. That is why Pep still beat his record. Because Pep's team was better.
Clap for yourself.[/s]
Read to understand bros. Not read to reply.
I meant the team each manager met when they got to the EPL. Obviously Pep met a better team than everyone of them so it’s expected he should hit 100 wins in lesser games.
If you can’t comprehend that simple explanation, I cannot help you further.
Eruditor: Including Wolves, Newcastle, Tottenham, United and Norwich this season in absolutely winnable games that would have made the record unassailable.
But any season he does not win the EPL AND UCL he is a fraud.
It doesn’t even make sense.
When SAF got to Man Utd, we have gone 20years without a league title, even went to relegation in between those years.
When Arsene got to Arsenal, they have gone 6 years without a league title.
When Mou got to Chelsea, they have gone 50 years without a league title, just some trophies here n there. Infact 10 years before Mou, the only trophies they won was 2 FA cup and EFL cup.
When Klopp got to Liverpool, they have gone 25yrs without a league title, 10 years before Klopp, the only thing they won was 1 UCL, 1 FA cup and 1 EFL cup.
But When Pep got to City, they have gone just “2” years without a league title. 10 years before Pep, City won 2 EPL, 1 FA cup and 2 EFL cup.
It’s not hard even for the blind to acknowledge that Pep met a better team than all those other managers they compared him too and so him getting to 100 wins in less games than them is testimony to the team strength he inherited and blow over €600m on.
raumdeuter: Why can't we talk about your own team? Did your own team die? You bought the most expensive defender, midfielder and striker and you are not closer to challenging. Isnt that a shame
If you want to talk about Man Utd and the Ole, you can have that discussion with your one arm Elruditor.
The discussion is about Pap Fraudiola with his £1bn squad allowing Liverpool to win the league. Something Raineri and even your much maligned Conte didn’t allow.
raumdeuter: Why can't your own team stop Liverpool this season
PEP has done his bit, winning back to back titles
When will a team that bought the most expensive defender in the league, most expensive midfielder in the league and most expensive striker stand up and be useful
Yen yen yen
City is the closer challenge to Liverpool than Man Utd. Our team is currently poor. We haven’t won the league in 6 years.
Let’s talk about the genius pap with a £1bn squad that wants to gift the league to Liverpool.