lefulefu:
most is majority. Guy become a deadbroke dude and have a shining personality more shining than the sun and see whether a lady that's into the sidechicing business would look at u. I know the fortune that men who womanize spend on their sidechics. But i know the ego of some of u guys here who keep multiple ladies and especially some of the married guys here who engage in such wont admit to it. Its all about our mannish pride and ego.

Most = Majority /= All /=100%.

Oh, you have no idea. You think you have all women figured out? Do you know how many deadbeat husbands out there who have side chicks. There are men who don't "womanize" in a strict sense of the word and still have a side chick.

You have this very strict view of who a sidechic is. You should broaden it.

-Lord

lefulefu:
oh u saying 100 percent. We are talking about Nigeria. Lets forget about Europe and America. Yes in those climes there are reasons women would accept to be side chics or mistresses. But in Nigeria lets be honest withing ourselves. The poverty rate is very high.the gap b/w the rich and the poor is wide. This is a country when a man rides a flashy automobile u see some ladies running after such a guy. So what makes most ladies accept to be sidechics in nigeria? The is is money. No matter how small the other reasons might be..money and power is the determine factor.a man agrees to pay the rent of a young lady..agrees to sponsor her kids in school if she's a single mom. The only thing she needs do is to be a sidechic to such a married man. Tell me why wont such be a big temptation to a young lady in Nigeria struggling financially.

Oga, in Nigeria, there are ladies who become side chicks for other reasons except money. Same way some ladies screw guys for reasons other than money. In fact, for a good percentage of them, money is the icing on the cake not the X factor.

A lady can be good friends with you, know you have a girlfriend, but enjoy your company (or insert any other reason here) that she doesn't mind letting you have your way with her (it's only a couple of hours tops). It might just be a one-time slip up that gets the ball rolling.

And contrary to popular belief, side chicks aren't always play things. Some would call it off unilaterally, no longer feel it, or even scheme to topple the main chick.

Moreover, financial security is the #1 reason on the list, which means the OP knows just how often it is the primary reason. Doesn't mean there aren't other reasons (whether primary or secondary) like you're opining.

-Lord

lefulefu:

a sidechic is also known as a mistress to a married man.she is not legally married to him but she performs wifely duties for him apart frm sex.they go on fun outings together..they share a connection together.why do u think most wives are more worried if their husbands spend special moments with a particular lady than when he meets a random woman.u said u have a sidechic so i am assuming u do spend special romantic moments with her wen ur main girlfriend is not around .

That's a very limited definition.

-Lord

lefulefu:
Financial security is the only thing that motivate ladies to be sidechics so other reasons u listed are not really relivant. A nigerian lady even if she's very wugly still get chyked by ten guys on average in a day so u certainly can't give loneliness as a reason...and personality? .. Oga op ask any babe wey dey do street things and she will ask u weda na personality she wan chop. Even broke men who are involved in keeping sidechics spend a lot to maintain these sidechics. Some go steal money from the d company dem dey work and others go borrow money from money lenders or bank to maintain their sidechics. So the motive of sidechicking in Nigeria among ladies is money.nothing more nothing less. And also take note that many smart sidechics nowadays have their own serious boyfriends. So op all the other options maybe it applies in other countries but in naija it doesn't apply o.

If you say for most ladies, I'll agree 100%. If you say for all ladies, then I'd have to respectfully disagree.

Ladies will agree to be side chicks for several reasons under the sun. Sometimes, it could be a mix of multiple factors (say a bit of cash, an alluring personality, and being lonely).

Saying money is the only reason all ladies become side chicks is factually incorrect.

-Lord

philfearon:

You are not making sense. The above years is to show that you don't need a UCL to win the WPOTY award, you just need to have an exceptional season.
You are using one match, the match against AS Roma to judge Messi's season, are you okay?
Where was Ronaldo when we walloped you people 0-3 in your home? Wait, he was chasing Shadows as usual. Ronaldo's season is bad to the extent that Real Madrid went to Club World Cup and Ramos was Madrid's highest goal scorer.
Don't even get started with Ronaldo this season, he has flopped totally and winning the UCL will not change anything.
Finally, the 2018 UCL has not been won yet, so don't get ahead of yourself!

Answer the damn question.

Who were the star players in the teams that won the UCL in 2005, 2012, and 2013?

Answer it and just maybe I'd find the time to reply your nonsense.

Well, that was the most important match for your club this season.

Ronaldo had a better first half than Messi in the 0-3 game. And the same reason why we conceded 2 goals today in the 2nd half is why we conceded 3 goals against you guys in the 2nd half. So don't talk about Ronaldo's bad season.

He is the UCL highest goal scorer, scored in every group game (first player in history to do so), and has a better goal/game ratio than Messi in La Liga. He had a bad spell in the first half of the season, but the entire team was off. No one had a good spell in the first half of the season. We weren't scoring and we weren't defending. And with the near unbeaten run you guys had, this could have been another close season where you guys tip us to the league trophy with a point.

CR7 didn't play any cup game.

So can you kindly explain how CR7 "flopped totally" this season. Do you guys even read the rubbish you write?

The UCL hasn't been won yet, but we've been to three consecutive UCL finals, with CR7 leading the charge on each occasion; while Barca has crashed out at the QFs 3 times in a row, with Messi providing a disasterclass on each occasion.

-Lord

HumbleBoy21:
take it or leave, in the game of soccer - Ronaldo is a small boy where MESSI is.

I don't take the words of anyone who calls the beautiful game "soccer" serious. And this is coming from someone who majorly communicates in AmE.

Small boy that is about to get his 6th Ballon.

Still waiting for your explanation why the player who only shoots ball into the net has the most assists in RM.

You guys should start screening the type of people that joins your fanbase. I fit count this one IQ with my fingers.

-Lord

LosVikingos:


Ehya..

LordAdam I think you should just forget it

Them dey forbid @tesppidd to make sense. So when I quote am, I know from the beginning say na nonsense he go talk all through.

Now he don run enter shell.

Let him come and tell us how Ronaldo doesn't dribble, but Fellaini dribbles.

He can't help but make repeated Gbagaun. Just look at his explanation why CR7 has more assists than Iniesta. Does that read like something a normal human being would type?

-Lord

HumbleBoy21:
Ogbeni shut up

Ronaldo doesn't dribble, all he does id shoot ball inside net finish.

Individual, ronaldo and messi can never and will never be equal. Messi is far ahead. And nothing you say, turn or twist will change the fact.

Another brainless cule.

Ronaldo doesn't dribble.

In fact, Ronaldo has never dribbled in his life.

All he does is shoot ball into the net, yet he has the most assists in RM.

Disgrace!

-Lord

tesppidd:
My parting shot

*Assists are assists,

*Chances created are chances created,


To give you a proper perspective;

1.An ambitious shot at goal which is deflected into the net registers as an assist.
2.A lay off inside the 18 yard box registers as an assist.


That's not what we have on mind when we call the likes of Messi, and Iniesta play makers or chance creators.

So long brother.

You just ended up typing trash!

How is it that the same person without vision who is nothing without goals has almost twice as many career assists as Iniesta?

@LosVikingos, very soon we'll start hearing true/false, complete/incomplete, beautiful/ordinary assists.

Very disgusting fanbase.

-Lord

haymekus:


Noisemaker, so your team couldn't win a Villarreal team that had virtually all their first team players rested

Yes, but we won the Champions of France, Italy, and Germany. You guys threw away an unbeaten run to a #15 side.

Shameless thing!

-Lord

tesppidd:
truth hurts.

even fellaini dribbles.

it is generally accepted that ronaldo is not a big deal without his goals.

if ronaldo fails to score he's useless.

even if it pains you sorry you car take it out on me.


and this submission about 3 champions league exits in a row is just silly.

from 2009 to 2014 ronaldo didn't win the champions league, but in your opinion am sure he was doing football a favour and messi wasn't qualified to lace his boots.

LWF indeed!



the joke is on you.

maybe you mean L18B.

because what he plays is

Left of the 18 yard box.

See as I dey shame for you!

Fellaini dribbles, but CR7 doesn't dribble.

Why would the rant of a person who said CR7 doesn't dribble or create chances hurt me? Do you think anyone but your fellow dunce cules buys your show of shame?

Now crashing out of the UCL 3 times in a row doesn't matter. Yet we all recall how you guys were shamelessly lamenting crashing out to Roma on this thread.

Common LWF you don't know. You can continue disgracing yourself.

-Lord

Miremoses1:
this shouldn't be a suprise to you. How defense is something else. Well it's young zidane in between the sticks, so let's not worry to much. His still a newbie.

Truth be told Luca wasn't that bad. Both goals could have gone either way. Casilla would certainly have conceded both goals anyway.

We were the better side for the first 60 minutes. The last half an hour was unfortunate. Thankfully there were no injuries.

I'd be okay with any lineup at Kiev. I'm pretty sure Zidane had already made up his mind going into this game. Only two spots are up for grabs and four players are in contention--Isco, Bale, Lucas, and Benzema. Any of the four could play and there would be good reasons to back the choice.

Let's just hope Zidane's choice is the right choice.

-Lord

tesppidd:
which one be argument point?

some refused back then to use 4-1 as an argument point,

but they are now warming up to use a possible 5-6 as an argument point, right?


i do understand why you keep restricting yourself to the UCL.

of course it's very convenient for you.

all you could talk about is 8 consecutive what nonsense!

i don't even know in what aspect of the game Ronaldo betters messi;

not goals
not assists
not dribbles
not passing
not creating chances
not MVP awards
not league trophies
not golden shoes
not champions league trophies
not national team trophies

not even ballon dors

then what

abeg stop telling us about some inconsequential 8th consecutive bill.. .

Same inconsequential 8th consecutive UCL SF that you guys can't go to. Same inconsequential CL SF that'd cost Messi another Ballon D'Or.

Your preference to make stupid statements is mind-boggling. Going to the SF of the biggest competition in club football is inconsequential! And you say you are alright.

-Lord

tesppidd:
you spew nothing but gibberish all day and all night long.

i'd just respond to a few of your lines that make only minimal sense.

nobody ever belittles xavi and iniesta.

but the fact is the fact.

in the time of xavi, iniesta;

yes maestros they were, but messi's influence and contributions to the team were second to none.

you surely belong to that subset of fans who always brought up that motor park and beer parlour argument that messi was nothing without xavi and iniesta.

messi always had more goals, more assists, more dribbles, more chances created than the entire team.

nobody belittles xavi and iniesta but messi........

Same way that CR7 always had more goals, assists, and dribbles than the entire team.

Yet Messi didn't create goals, assists, and enough dribbles to make you guys advance through the QFs for 3 years in row!

But Xavi and Iniesta made it seem so easy!

as for ronaldo,

[s]he's a winger on paper yes, but on the pitch he's a striker.
he doesn't dribble nobody,
he doesn't create chances for nobody.
no vision in passing, only sideways and direct passes.[/s]

How can a normal person say:

CR7 doesn't dribble nobody?
CR7 doesn't create chances for nobody?
CR7 doesn't have vision in passing?

Only a braindead cule would insult a legend and G.O.A.T contender with these statements. Because it is very clear you neither watch the game nor highlights. You don't even check his stats.

CR7 is a LWF. Go check what that means. Ignoramus. Later you'll call yourself a football fan. Common positioning terminologies you don't know.

Stop typing nonsense!

-Lord

Olamyyde:

How many trebles did they win?

How many UCL back to backs did they win?

-Lord

femiti:
Quoting some people is needless...I know better.
Ignore button activated

At least you respected yourself and didn't push your luck too far.

-Lord

haymekus:


Stupid punk


Wat did fagnaldo do against bayern?

Foul-mouthed trashcan.

Talk civil and just maybe I'd engage you.

Oh and you may want to restrict your senseless jibes to non-UCL competitions. CR7 is called Mr Champions League for a reason.

-Lord

tesppidd:
Flip side,

Even when it was 4 -1 a lot of you could swear Ronaldo was a million times better than Messi regardless.

So why should it matter even if it gets to 5 - 6?

Tell us Sir!!!

Oga read and comprehend.

I said argument point. You mustn't necessarily agree to it.

Ronaldo fans during the Messi spell of 2009-2012 were mainly trying to say while Messi achievements couldn't be discounted, it didn't mean Ronaldo was not at the same level or higher; but that it was the Barca team, style of play (total football), and particularly the Xavi-Iniesta partnership that made it seem like they were miles apart in the Ballon D'Or tally.

You guys refused. Remember when you guys used to say CR7 couldn't enter Barca's first 11.

6 years later we've all been proven right, and you guys are grasping at straws. No more Xavi-Iniesta partnership, tiki taka, and all of a sudden Messi goes AWOL in 3 consecutive UCL QFs. Meanwhile CR7 has gone to his 8th straight UCL SF despite age and changing personnel in the team. And just like that he is about to win the Ballon D'Or for a record 6th time ahead of Messi who had a 4-1 lead.

It's not a surprise, we've been right all along.

-Lord

Olamyyde:

U for put dani alves there too na since he gave more assists to messi than iniesta and xavi combined.


Continue watching the led of your decoder and not the TV...werey!

Alves assist Messi more than Iniesta and Xavi combined? Haba!

Take am easy with the inaccurate stats.

I must not list all the players who assisted Messi. Same way Modric and Kroos are not the only players who assist CR7.

How do you cules reason sef? Seriously?! Always arguing off point.

-Lord

tesppidd:
@bolded,

ignorance or mischief
ignorance or mischief
ignorance or mischief

messi always had a free role during xavi and iniesta

So has CR7 for the better part of his career, although as a traditional winger he mainly hugs the touchline.

he was not called a false number 9 for nothing

CR7 is a winger.

he was a false number 9 because he always got back deep to help out inesta and xavi

Stop this dumb statement. Iniesta and Xavi did not need help in the midfield. Barca plays a possession style of football and prefers to break teams down through the middle. Everyone in the midfield and attack gets involved in this play.

Saying LM10 fell back to help out Iniesta, Xavi, and Busquests is disrespectful to those legends. Messi also played in the wings regularly when he was younger: Was that him helping the midfield as well?

Only cules will disrespect their own players just to make Messi look good.

consequently, it was he who still had the highest amount of dribbles, highest amount of assists, highest amount of chances created, as well as highest amount of goals. (with xavi and iniesta in their prime)

Just like CR7 still had the highest amount of dribbles, assists, and goals save for last year when he started playing substantially less games.

SO MY FRIEND DONT BE IN AWE,
YES IT IS POSSIBLE TO DROP BACK TO MIDFIELD AND HELP A KROOS, A MODRIC, A XAVI, AN INIESTA AND STILL BE UPFRONT TO SCORE THE GOALS.

messi did it then and is still doing it now.

I'm certainly not in awe. Messi plays as a 10 primarily in the middle of the pack. Connecting the midfield to the attack, which in Barca is barely distinguishable. While CR7 primarily plays as a LWF.

Barca plays possession football with emphasis on breaking the opposition through the middle. RM plays direct football and will not hesitate to use the wings if the middle is choked. Both players are perfect for their respective club styles and routinely take the crown for most goals and assists.

So I see no reason why you guys would belittle CR7 contribution because he doesn't play a Barca style. CR7 has no business in the RM midfield, get that into your thick skulls. That is not how RM is set up, that's not how we play, and he is of much use upfront where we lack reliable scorers than in the midfield.

The last time CR7 played as a midfielder in Manchester United (2007), he entered the FIFA XI for the year as a midfielder, ahead of Xavi.

You cules are a disgrace to football!

-Lord

femiti:
lol...from 2009-2015
Yet he has the highest assists for barca .
Smh

And CR7 has the highest assists for RM.

Dumb fellow!

-Lord

philfearon:

Okpoko... Ronaldinho won it in 2005 without the UCL, Messi won it in 2012 without the UCL, C. Ronaldo won it in 2013 without the UCL.
Like i said, it's because the award has been bastardized, that's why the likes of you go up and down the place exposing your ignorance!!!
The WPOTY is not an award for the best player of the Tournament winner... it's an award for the best player of the Year in review, putting all things in consideration!!!

Who were the star players of the respective clubs who won the UCL in 2005, 2012, and 2013?

If this UCL final was between Juve and Bayern, Messi would have most likely won this year's 2018 Balon D'or. Reason being that none of their star players have had an exceptional year.

If this UCL final was between Real and PSG, we'd be talking about a possible Neymar Balon D'Or win, not Salah.

Once upon a time, the 4-1 Ballon D'Or lead was used as an argument point, now that CR7 is about to be in a 6-5 Ballon D'Or lead, it doesn't matter.

How can a player who is about to win the Golden Shoe find it difficult to score or assist one goal in the most high profile matches of his season over 180 minutes? Not against a traditional European Heavyweight. But against Roma! Roma! If na Levante, e go dey show e sef. And you want us to give the Ballon D'Or to a man who has gone missing 3 times in a row when it mattered most in the biggest competition in club football. Where's the logic?

-Lord

tesppidd:
it is much easier to be upfront waiting for kroos and modric to get the ball to you than for you to go get it yourself and set up somebody else.

stepping up in the champions league knock out stages!!!

But when Messi was waiting up front for Iniesta and Xavi to set him up from 2009-2015, it was all game.

So if Ronaldo steps back to join Casemiro, Kroos, Modric, and Isco in the midfield, who'd score the goals?

What's the use having a 6'2'' super athlete in an already stacked midfield when he has the best physique, best positioning, and best aerial elegance of any football player on the planet?

Daft fan boys!

-Lord

victrick105:
All I see are big names... The Brazilians and Germans can easily outclass this guy's, the World Cup has never been a game for the big names, if you doubt me, ask Ronaldo and Messi

Put Ronaldo in either of the present Brazil, Spain, France, or Belgium squad and see him make the World Cup a carnival.

-Lord

Arondizuogu:


Remember that at that time her father was Alexander Kirk, she didn't know that the naval Raymond was her father so it doesn't make much sense. Her mom Katrina refered the Naval Raymond as "a job" probably to get Intel as she was a Russian spy. I personally think that this imposter Raymond is Katrina, she had a sex change and the question she asked the DNA manipulator might confirm that. What do you think?
I love that they make it 22 episode per season, that's a good show. Long Live Raymond Reddington.

The bottom line is that Liz killed the Naval Raymond (her father). The man in the duffel bag that Red burned.

Red didn't kill her father, didn't kill Tom, nor did he kill Kaplan (well, he did try to kill her, so there's that; although there's an understandable reason for that). He didn't lie to her but instead has been her benefactor for eons.

So why exactly does she want to destroy him? The only plausible explanation is that in becoming Raymond, Red put her and everyone she loves in danger. Which doesn't sound like a good enough reason to me.

About the Katarina theory. There are logical reasons to think Red is Katarina. However, I'm not quite sure I care much about who Red really is, although it wouldn't hurt to know. To me, it's not that big a deal. He is Red now, whatever he was in the past is probably dead inside what he has become now. He's been playing Red for 30 years. It's not a switch he can just turn off.

I'm more concerned about the dynamic with Liz. They are both the epicenter of the show. Who wins, who loses, and who gets caught in the crossfire? First it was Kaplan, now it's Liz. Except in Liz' case, Red is probably handicapped as he (at least AFAIK) wouldn't hurt her, whereas she doesn't appear to have that fuse holding her back (if she'd be able to pull the plug at the end is up for debate tho'; she may not have it in her). Not to forget that this would be the umpteenth time she betrays him.

-Lord

Arondizuogu:
What do you guys make of blacklist season 5 finale. It confirmed my suspicion all along. But then again lemme hear from you guys.

Twasn't surprising.

Not sure why Keen is so mad? Apparently Red didn't lie. She killed her father. And if Tom et al had respected Red's privacy, they wouldn't be dead.

In a way it feels weird that Red is in the dark after 5 whole seasons of him being the masterful criminal mind. But I guess it adds to the show's appeal in trying to reinvent itself so far along. The only downside is that there are now so many questions that one or two seasons wouldn't cut it to get all the answers judging by how drawn out the show typically is (remember the baby arc). And that's with a season being almost twice as long as a traditional TV season.

IMHO, It'd suck for it to become Supernatural 2.0. But I've stayed so long for Spader's performances, hopefully that'd keep me going ad infinitum.

-Lord

Miremoses1:
lol. Barka won't do sh*t.

Sure. Although, I'd rather we met in the knockout stages, so we can re-enact the Supercopa humiliation.

Neimar:
Ronaldo vs Barcelona in UCL (real madrid + man utd)

all blank

Only another record to break.

You know the GOAT likes breaking records.

BTW, how was your win in South Africa? Felt nice didn't it?

-Lord

Miremoses1:
I don't think psg are interested. The main suitor is barka. And from want I know, he didn't snub man united last season because ATM were on transfer ban but his agent had a contact with barka to sign him in 2018/19 season. He will leave bro.

Btw I heard we are moving for mbappe next season.

Eiya. I wish him the best.

If we win the UCL this year, we'd most likely meet Barca next yr in the knockout stages. That's the last trick in the hat of UEFA!

-Lord

Miremoses1:


BTW I doubt he will be an atletico player next season

I hope he stays. However, it's a long shot, he's paid his dues for the club, and it's not like they'd be attracting top talents to give them a realistic shot of getting either the Liga or UCL. I'd completely understand if he leaves.

I'd rather he goes to PSG so we can get Neymar next season, but it doesn't seem like they're interested. Anywhere but Barca tho', else our treble next year d b harder to get.

-Lord

Miremoses1:
he turned this final into his own grand finale. Was unplayable tonight. It was as if he was doing a free audition to other big clubs.

After the last couple of years of being unlucky, he owned this finale with a vengeance.

Happy for him. CR7 b 1 block him shine finish.

Next is Liverpool. We need a clear victory like we had at Cardiff.

-Lord

Cadec007:
Lordadam we sight you....comments pls!

CAMPEONE!

Congrats Rojiblancos. Well deserved victory.

Abeg make una no sell Griezmann. We need him to stay in Madrid.

Marseille down, Liverpool next.

-Lord

Miremoses1:
ATM will feel empty if that guy leaves at the end of this season. His a baller. Imagine him as a barka player.

I hear he is planning to stay. Anything we can do to convince them to keep him should be done.

He singlehandedly won ATM this cup.

-Lord