₦airaland Forum

Gabrielshow24:
Yes it doesn't expressly condemn slavery.
But it buttresses on freedom and equality👀
Which a kindergarten should be able to reconcile that "all men are equal" which negates the "act of slavery" in the first place!!!

Guy you claimed the Bible explicitly condemns slavery, now you are changing mouth to it is implied. LoLz.

All men are equal IN CHRIST so what of those who aren't IN CHRIST, they aren't equal? How does that imply ALL MEN are equal? Mr Thinker. LoLz.

Gabrielshow24:
It's nice how you cleverly brought up sources without listing their theological backgrounds.

It's like bringing out Messi without mentioning Argentina🤧.

Well it buttresses your point doesn't it? 🤣🤣
To burst your bible what's the religious belief of the king you talked about?

Except if you want to assume the king was just like you😂😂😂.

Any way have at it🙃

LoLz. All this aggression just to ask for the source. That's a one line question, not this long unnecessary talk.

Theological backgrounds? This is a historical question not a theological one.

Here is the source: https://www.britannica.com/topic/common-law

You have at it.

It is so sad we have visionless and gutless people ruling us. So very sad.

Gabrielshow24:
You can do so well to educate yourself.
You can do research as to who was the source of common law.

No one disputes that other elements of the common law also imbibed some aspects of Moses' law.

You want an exact word, I allude to the concept!!!

The same way golden ratio is not written in nature but its concept is very well evidenced in nature🤨!!!

We speak different things!
I speak of the concept, you commit exact word fallacy!

You can do better than this🙃

Common law is not sourced from your Christ.

Gabrielshow24:
Human nature was at play 🤨.
Some wanted to Lord over others, Christ taught us to serve one another!!!

Hence the difference in ideology resulted in a war👀 and to God be the glory those that fought for freedom won!

Like I said, if they didn't undertake the pursuit to free the slaves, you and I will surely have been slaves just like you said!!!

Also it doesn't matter whether someone claims to be a Christian or not!
According to Christ, it's by their fruits they shall be known👀

Some just followed the standard of their time, others were convince the standard was wrong!!!

I cited a statement of Jesus as regards becoming like "angels" neither marrying nor given to marriage.

My intent was to further exemplify our oneness with God.

We are sufficient with God!!!
Nothing more, nothing less.

If theBible explicitly condemned slavery why would a Christian fight a war to keep slaves?

Just the fact thatChristians could go to war and kill fellow Christians on this subject is clear indication it was not an explicit condemnation. Matter of fact its clear that there is NO CONDEMNATION of slavery in the Bible.

Who cares if you showed you and god eat from the same plate. The task is show where in the Bible slavery was condemned. You cannot because it doesn't condemn slavery.

Gabrielshow24:
Thanks, but I already answered you.
When you asked what do I mean by objective basis, I already gave you a clarification.
One which you answered was subjective!!!

You can go verify above!
I asked for how your subjective reasons are objectively good?
And they can be empirically determined as such🤨.

This you have failed to answer!
Evading and avoiding like an Airbender 🙃!!!
Even asking me again for further clarifications 🤨

Quote where you gave me this clarification.

And I told you until you clarify what you mean I will not answer any further.

Gabrielshow24:
You seem to have short memory!
The first question how do you determine good or bad? —you gave your subjective reasons, no doubt about it.

The second follow up, what's the object basis of such? —this you haven't answered!!!

Now from the second question am asking for your yardstick?

Since then you have been bugging me to clarify what I mean by "objective basis" 🤣🤣

It's rather bothersome that you don't know what "objective basis" should mean and it's more embarrassing that contextually you still couldn't figure it out.

To add insult to injury, I gave you clues!
One being my discussion with the lovely damsel.

The others being on your "several means"!!!
How can anyone not understand this? 🤨

Even the blind can see you haven't answered my question!

You gave a subject basis, I asked for the objective basis yet you can't provide one slithering and evading like a snake asking me, what I mean by objective basis🤕.

Educate yourself and at least provide an answer after all you have "several means" and a lot of philosophical stances!!!👀

Look at who is talking about forgetting. I asked you a question first which you have refused to answer.

Why would I answer any further questions from you when the single one I asked you, you have used sophistry to dodge answering it.

Gabrielshow24:
Of course, you never stated you were being objective.
My question is how you were going to apply your "subjective means" to all? 🤣🤣🤣

Something we both already know the answer to!!!

Everyone can see you are the one eluding the question looking for clarification when the question is self explanatory!!!🙃

What other clarification do you need?
Perhaps the meaning of objective?
Or the meaning of basis?
Come of it, you have a dictionary kindly educate yourself 🙃

Again I answered the question I was asked. Have you answered the one you were asked? LoLz.

What question did I elude and did you answer the question you were asked?

You are an empty barrel regurgitating nonsense apologetics with no understanding. Explain what you said na so e hook your throat. Bwahahahahahaha!

Gabrielshow24:
I gave an instance of the law of Moses, and how it isn't found word for word in the constitution but the concept of such is found.

It doesn't matter your allusions, I have stated already that loving your neighbor as yourself has implications that can be established as law.

Except if you just want to be intellectually dishonest, well good for you!

The intellectual dishonesty is on full display from you. You clearly claimed it was Christ's teachings that was the basis of common law but now you switch it up to Moses law. Is that not clearly your dishonesty on display.

State the law is what I asked, your pointless ramblings are not an answer.

Gabrielshow24:
Thanks for the slightly vague criticism.
The idea is expressly stated as oneness!!!
Under Christ there's no discrimination, we are all God's joint heirs.

The bible even alludes that those of us that do make heaven we shall be like angels neither marry nor given to marriage!!!

For Christ is sufficient for us!!!
Your ignorance keeps buttressing my point!!!

This was one of the verses that convinced christians to free slaves and fight against slavery!!!

Apart from this, who knows you might still be a slave🤧!

Vague says the person trying to relocate the venue to some imaginary mythical place. We are talking of here and now and you decide to talk about heaven. Bwahahahahaha!

If this passage is a condemnation of slavery then it is also a condemnation of ethnicity and sexuality but of course you have no recourse but to attempt to allude to a mythical place.

It was one of the versse that convinced Christians after 1700+years. And still some of them are not convinced. They even had to fight a bloody war. Christians killing Christians just so they could retain slaves.

If I might still have been a slave so would you. And it would have been a Christian whipping your arse and preaching to you from the Bible that slaves should be whipped. LoLz.

Lucifyre:
Nice job skipping questions btw, can't imagine answering them helps out.

Ahh, I thought it was just me he does it to. Glad to see I'm in good company.

Gabrielshow24:
It's obvious you are one that can't answer a simple question!!!

How can someone be feigning ignorance on a simple term such as "objective basis"? 🤨

Even after so many hints, you still can't provide one.

You said above you had "several means" but as it turns out not one of them served as an objective basis🤕!

Unlike you answered the question that was posed to me. The question I posed to you is what you are struggling to avoid answering. LoLz.

What is clear is you are regurgitating what ever nonsense apologetics you listened to or read but cannot explain anything. 2 pages and you still cannot explain what objective basis means. Bwahahahahahaha!

Mr Thinker has forgetten he acknowledged that I never stated I was being objective. LoLz.

Gabrielshow24:
It's not hard, if you want the bible verse here it is
Galatians 3:28: There is neither Jew nor Gentile, neither slave nor free, nor is there male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus

Oga how is this a CONDEMNATION of slavery? Mr Thinker. LoLz.

By Mr Thinker's logic this means people should no longer consider themselves male or female because it says it there's no male or female. Bwahahahahahaha!

Gabrielshow24:
State one law, where "an eye for an eye is stated in our constitution" 🤣🤣🤣

Yet you will find such concepts within it🙃
you are looking for the "exact word" when the concept is littered in the constitution!!!

Maybe you should educate yourself thereby saving both of us the time!!!🙃

Concept of "loving one's neighbor as yourself" screams equality before the law🤔

Don't you think at all?

LoLz. Equality under the law has nothing to do with loving your neighbor. Equality under the law means the same laws applies to everyone. But a thinker like you can't even figure that out. Bwahahahahahaha!

An eye for an eye is that what Christ preached? Mr Thinker. LoLz.

Kingsnairaland:
Move to the next door

LMAO!

Gabrielshow24:
.
How "am I" using it? 🤨
Are you not the one that has "several means"?
How are you using them?

"Objective basis " is self explanatory!!!
If you have a problem take each word one after the other, then you will get what I am asking for🤨.

I wonder how someone can be asking how I "am using" objective basis? 🤨

LoLz. See who is telling me I am playing safe. Can't even answer a simple question. Mtchewww.

Gabrielshow24:
Have quoted it already 🙃

Where did you quote Paul saying there is no slavery? I said quote the Bible not give a paraphrase of something you barely remember. Why is it so hard for you to answer questions directly?

Gabrielshow24:
Or are you looking for the "exact word fallacy" 🤣🤣🤣?

I said state 1 law in our current law books that requires you to love your neighbor or pray for your enemies.

Either you can or can't state it, trying to lie to yourself is just pitiful.

Gabrielshow24:
Should I then provide you a definition for objective basis?

What aspects of it don't you understand?

How many times do I have to say I want to know how you are using it? What do you mean by it. Spell it out.

Gabrielshow24:
It won't be word for word!!!
The overall concept is there 🙃

LoLz. Why do you people lie to yourselves like this. Bwahahahahahaha!

Gabrielshow24:
That's more than condemnation.
Paul made an absolute statement!
IN CHRIST there is no slavery🤤

Oga quote the place na.

Gabrielshow24:
Unfortunately for you, history is not on your side.

His teachings of resisting evil, love your neighbor as yourself, pray for your enemy were what👀?

They didn't reform the society?
They formed the foundational basis for christian values!

So people didn’t know they needed to resist evil before Christ spoke of it? And you are saying history is not on my side. LoLz.

State 1 law in our current law books that requires you to love your neighbor or pray for your enemies.

Gabrielshow24:
I have pointed that out already!
No slave, no master... etc

That is not condemantion. Or do you need me to show you the meaning of the word?

Gabrielshow24:
Like I said before, objective basis is self explanatory.
You don't know what to anticipate as a conclusion from me, so you are playing it "safe"

This question is rather shallow because how can someone not know what "objective basis" mean.

Is it the word "objective" that is the problem?
Or the word "basis"? 🤨

I even gave you hints
1) from my conversation with that lovely damsel
2) from my exemplification above which you directly quoted;

LoLz. You and which army will nudge me to play safe? Unlike you, I answer questions directly instead of dubious rigmaroles. Simple definition you cannot provide and you are saying I'm the one playing safe. Bwahahahahahaha!

I don't know how you are using the words so I ask for clarification but instead I get a song and dance. Mchewww.

Gabrielshow24:
No one disputes that.
Any tom, dick and Harry can make laws?

How profitable are they to the good of all? 🤨
I do remember some civilizations that had different laws — equality not being one of them,
Justice sometimes overlooked etc

Some had laws to make men face perilous circumstances, some had laws to kill twins,
Some had laws (recommendations) to drink houseflies🙃, some had laws to drink camel urine, some had laws to sleep with underage girls!!!

And the list goes on and on!!!
In all those societies you appeal to, you won't have the values you presently take for granted!!!

The values that stemmed from Christ!!!

Nope. They stemmed from PEOPLE who reasoned. Your Christ had little to nothing to do with it. At no point did Christ, according to the tales, even attempt to reform society. In fact the foremost apostles told Christians to obey the government and not rock the boat, exactly as Christ is purportedly recorded to have told them. Tell me which of the apostles was a societal reformer? NONE. People had to reason past the confines of your religious dogma to get things going.

Gabrielshow24:
It's clearly written there,
Those that fought against slavery were convinced of the verse!
Coupled with God's second commandment, love your neighbor as yourself!!!

I wouldn't want to be beaten, whipped or sun dried for menial reasons!!!
Also, all those that fought for the freedom of slaves were all christians!!!

I'm not saying that some elements didn't use some certain verses out of context but what am saying is that the present "freedom" you have comes from a Christian foundation!!!

You won't have all these values if you lived in the time of Hammurabi, or perhaps in an Islamic society or any society you can think of for that matter!!!

Oga show me in the Bible where slavery is condemned, no dey shalaye.

Kingsnairaland:
Then you need to take your medication

I have never scammed any one in my life I grew up with money in my account all the time

A delusional person like you is the one who needs meds.

Who gives a shìt if you are Elon Musk? How does that substantiate your delusional claims?

Kingsnairaland:
Spirit are light forms once in a while God permit human to see them with the inner eye and normal eye

Nothing wrong or not impossible for God to allow you to see them with an object

You just have to expand your horizon

You sound exactly the way a scammer sounds.

BadBradley:
are you saying liberals are flies?

No. Whatever policies he finds objectionable are. Getting rid of the organization when can he just alter the policies is absurd.

StillDtruth:
Off Point devil.

You can lick all the vaginas and nyansh in Abuja till you have mouth and penis cancer, it's one of your Curses

Is it you that will come use my tongue to lick the vaginas and nyansh? Or you will carry the cancer in a bag to come and give me? LoLz.

My sympathies remain with everyone that has to bear you in their life.

BadBradley:
American liberals have always been demonic, radical and irrational. VOA was set up to politically and culturally target ideological china and Russia, but they turned it into a left wing machine to promote hate and LGBT agenda


Way to go Trump

So you burn your house down every time you want to kill a fly?

StillDtruth:
And that is what all these how to make her adore idol you, how to make her shake with orgasms, squirts, mouth action, doggy and all those acrobatic and bodily actions taking place during sex engagements, are all steps and roads towards creating an idol or becoming an idol.

Thus, we see that again the bible Spoke Truly when it Said that fornication is idolatry.

So you don’t make your wife shake with orgasm? My sympathies to her.