ijebosb: That's his MO. He copies and pastes (usually plagiarizes) from right wing posts/disinformation sites he subscribes to without fully reading or understanding them. In this case, his post came from none other than Simon Ateba, who was banned/lost his press pass from White House press briefings for shouting at the Press Secretary. I guess he succeeded in elevating his stature for his new grift. Simon doesn't seem to understand the contempt powers the Judge can wield to manage the courtroom or how Judges are crazy about decorum in their courtroom.
But this whole thing is odd. If you or I acted like Trump we would already be under the courthouse. The Judge is bending over backwards to accommodate Trump, yet the Right somehow thinks the Judge is persecuting him.
Sure. It's because Trump is a former president that's easy enough to see. It would be a truly unprecedented thing to throw a former president in jail for contempt, which is a relatively 'simple' matter. This whole saga of Trump is really testing all the aspects of the US' systems.
bemeruca: you guys are simpletons, you don't even know when someone is mocking you. I know you will not get this.
You are the simpleton. You spew nonsense for people the believe then when you are called out you claim it was a joke. Just imagine it was some poor sapphire who would believe your nonsense would you tell him you were just joking? Of course you won't.
ijebosb: Melania is embarrassed. She also has not attended the trial. Political wives always attend these things and sit right behind their husbands. As it lends credence to the story that they believe it is a lie. I'm sure it's not lost on the Jury that Melania has not been there.
bemeruca: As trump learned she was going to testify. Would you believe that?
LoLz. I asked just to give you enough rope to hang yourself. This is not a recent picture but trust you lying MAGAts to try to spin it as if it was. Bwahahahahaha!
Metrix147: Renowned Nollywood actor, Kanayo O. Kanayo, has announced the resumption of filming, with a special addition to the production team - his son, Clinton, also known as Onyeze Mbaise!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X56me2Dg3sk Clinton has joined the team as Assistant Production Manager and Personal Assistant to his father, as part of an internship to gain practical experience in filmmaking and management. This hands-on training will precede his further studies.
Kanayo emphasized the value of involving children in their parents' professional endeavors, allowing them to appreciate the industry and gain valuable skills.
He extended a warm welcome to his son, Onyeze, as they worked together on the Simpliciter Associates Productions project.
CMdunk35: I'll tell you why I was convinced of the existence of God, first. It's a rather simple expression. You should look at a painting and know it's evidence of a painter. You've never seen Leonardo Da Vinci, but you know someone painted the Mona Lisa. And you'll look at a building, and even if you've never met the builder, you know there was one, because of the existence of a building. Same thing as the universe. I see all around me, a tiny fraction of the universe and I know that the birds, the trees, the skies the sun, the moon, how perfect creation is, I'd know it came from a creator. We can't be a set of random throw arounds, because the universe had to come from something. Order and design in the universe point to an intelligent mind. Let me know what you think🧡
Why can't we be the result of natural processes? Have you seen a god making anything the way you see humans making paintings, buildings and so on?
Emusan: One thing you still don't want to admit openly is that those verses never CLAIMED GOD CAN'T BECOME HUMAN against what the OP said.
Well, the logical reason is very simple God only highlighted Human shortcomings in those verses not that HE CAN'T BECOME HUMAN.
The logical reason the supposed god became human was because the god only highlighted Human shortcomings in those verses not that HE CAN'T BECOME HUMAN. How is this a logical reason?
Emusan: All the verse verses provided by the OP shows God is placing Himself above HUMAN based on Human characters and not that God is denying that He can't BECOME A HUMAN.
That was the reason I asked you that question.
BASED ON THEIR CHARACTER.
There's very strong logical reason for that.
For instance, in one of the verses it says: "God is not a MAN, that HE SHOULD LIE..." Which mean if God becomes a MAN HE WILL STILL NEVER LIE.
This is it!
So which means those verses never say God can NEVER BECOME A HUMAN
It's just OP self interpretation.
What is the logical reason this so called god, after stating repeatedly how beneath him humans are, he would become a human.
CMdunk35: Just want to have a meaningful conversation about why you are atheist. Tell me, and we'll talk.
There are several reasons but the central thing is when I asked myself if I never believed in a god and was presented with the evidence of all of human history and what we know of the universe then told there was a good god that made all of this, would I believe? And my sincere answer was no. I then moved on to so what explains all the evidence best, an evil god? A nonchalant god? Or no god. The first 2 explain some things but not some others but the last fits every piece of evidence we have. That means what we are experiencing is just men doing what we can, with what we have, where we are. I immediately discarded faith and I felt a relief of being unburden of belief in what in seems like a dream and started embracing what is real.
My question is rhetorical. In other words after repeatedly expressing how much beneath him humans are, there is no logical reason this so called god would choose to be human, the ability to do so notwithstanding.
Kobojunkie: It is instead a very terrible question. Numbers 16 for instance where He pulled one of his claims from clearly highlights the fact that Balaam, the one who made the statement, was speaking about God's decrees, not God's appearance or physical form. The moment you abandon context, you abandon the ability to ask reasonable, even good, questions.
You are nitpicking a single quote and ignoring all the other places the god says he is not a man. Besides all of them make it make clear the god is supposedly not human whether in form or nature.
basilico: I picture you laughing hysterically high on something the Good Lord would never condone when asking darn stoopid questions. Recap. Start here to see how Hunter plea deal compares to another similar offence in a trial led by the same prosecutors.
Angelfrost: The woman's lover should arrest and charge the idiot and weak simp to court.
He should be made to pay for damages.
If you catch your wife or husband with another, your grouse should never ever be with the other man or woman...
Take out your annoyance on the one that swore to stay faithful to you. Leave out the other person.
Learn to master your emotions... Una nor want hear word.
Judge won't show you mercy based on the fact that you were cheated upon... Last time I checked, adultery is not an offense worthy of imprisonment or death. It's not even a criminal offense.
Guy adultery is a crime in the Nigerian Penal Code o! No joke.
basilico: Stupid . IRS knew he was cheating on taxes. Normally in such cases, the law is such that A republican led committee has to make recommendations before the criminal can be charged. IRS /DOJ waits for Congress to investigate before they take action.
LoLz! You never answer simple questions why? Because it will reveal how stupid you are. Bwahahahahaha!
Okay. Question for you, and also for Mr. Shapley, is it a clear line of potential investigation if somebody is charging a massive living expenses through a corporate account and not doing that through their own personal accounts and not accounting for that properly on their income tax returns? Is that the basis of a criminal investigation?
Mr. Shapley (03:56:50
Generally speaking, that would definitely be factors that would spur a criminal investigation, yes. [/color]
My question is very simple: Why didn't the committee recommend that the DOJ charge Hunter Biden? Answer this simple question.
bemeruca: People tend to go to where will favour them, it is common sense. Me saying he may likely go to where he can get favourable judgement is me wanting him to go to new York. That is my analysis of the situation. You talked about dumb here but you cannot grasp simple things. Later you will claim I said the sky is red because along the line you cannot comprehend.
So tell me, where did I say I want him to take the case to New York? It's funny that you are now saying I made the case.
Where should Hunter take the case to? I don't know, I only said he has options and New York is one. He will go where it will favor him, where they can bend the law. That is my analysis. Should I get a dictionary and explain to you how analysis works?
The bold is so dumb
LoLz. Just accept that facts will show how dumb you are. The fact is they let criminals go all the time for all sorts of plea deals but stupidos wanna act like Hunter Biden is some sort of special case.
The Dominion case was tried in Delaware because that is where Fox is incorporated but sure Hunter should take it to NY because bemeruca gave an analysis. Bwahahahahaha!
basilico: Lordreed is arguing out of ignorance Its not his fault that he knows not how Hunter was handled by Weiss before Weiss was appointed Special Counsel. How a judge rejected a plea deal where he was to plead guilty to gun charges in return for a blanket immunity on his tax crimes.
Lordreed are you aware that Hunter was paying Eastern European hookers and charging it to his LLC account as a business expense , tax deductible. Are you aware that he has not been charged with violating FARA by virtue of being an unregistered foreign lobbyist? Unlike the case of Flynn and Manafort.
Why didn't the Hunter Biden probe bring it up? Why didn't they recommend charges to the Justice Department?
bemeruca: You asked stupid question, no facts from you. Anyone that argues with you is the dumbest. Make up your mind. Am I the dumbest or basilico is the dumbest? This goes to show why you are like an headless chicken. Jump around with no direction.
Question to you, why was the plea deal rejected? Why should a system that indict a criminal give the criminal a deal that protects the criminal from the present and future crime? New York has long-arm statutes that allow courts to assert jurisdiction over out-of-state defendants. If Fox News has sufficient contacts with New York (such as broadcasting there), New York courts may have jurisdiction. Fox news is a national network, their headquarter is in new York, they broadcast from new York, the have significant contacts and presence in new York, so new York is an option. It's funny how you said I WANT HIM TO TAKE THE CASE TO NEW YORK. This is how you put words into people's mouth because you are a headless chicken manufacturing lies, attribute it to someone then attack the lie.
LoLz. If there is an headless person here it is you. You practically make a case for the case to be in NY but turn round to say I am putting words in your mouth. Tell me where should Hunter take his case to?
I said you are too stupid but then you go and prove it. How many times have we seen criminals who become informants and are let go to continue committing crimes because of the information they would gather? Here comes stupido acting like it's a new thing then claiming I put words in his mouth.
You think talking out your arse is what this about? No sir, bring the facts or show us how stupid you are.
bemeruca: your question is stupid because, in my previous response to you, I said the system wanted to give him a sweetheart deal. try and keep up. before you argue with someone, you should be able to comprehend and recollect.
you are here making claims no one made then attack it earlier. i called you out for it... now you are deflecting by asking stupid questions.
try and keep up. You cannot be arguing with no comprehension. Your question is dumb and when you put the "NOW" there, you are actually implying i said something rather than asking me a question.
You are the dumbass here. You make claims and when shown the facts you act like a stupid madman. Hunter was indicted and got a plea deal that was REJECTED but here comes stupid arses like you claiming he is favoured by the system. What a load of shit. Meanwhile dumbasses you are not aware that Fox is registered in Delaware so the case will be in Delaware. But stupido like you wants him to take the case to NY yet you claim to be aware of how things work. You are too stupid so it's a wonder you even know how NL works.
bemeruca: You argue like an headless chicken. No direction, just making claims and insinuating what no one is saying. A black woman who was stealing was giving a plea deal by the system, plead guilty and go to jail for 3 years. She said no, she was found guilty and sentenced 30 years.
Like I said, comprehension is important. The system, tried to give him a sweetheart deal. How did you land or come to the notion that plead deal is not the system?
Fox news headquarters is New York city, we all know what goes on in New York city.
And you respond like a seneless person. I asked a straight forward question "Is that the stance you are taking?" What claim or insinuation am I then making.
The system tried to give him a sweetheart deal which the same system rejected so what are you complaining about?
Fox is registered in Delaware. Why would he take the case to New York? The Dominion case was in Delaware not New York.
bemeruca: So prosecutors tried to shield Hunter Biden from future indictment. That's the system, which should not be doing that. Now, no one has claimed the whole system is compromised, but the DNC is trying its best. Hence, the attack on the Supreme Court etc.
Basilico is saying hunter knows where to go to get a favorable judgment against Fox.
When someone is sarcastically saying something, you don't grasp it, you also think everything is absolute.
LoLz. So plea deals are now not part of the justice system? Is that the stance you are taking?
So Hunter will take a case out of Delaware where Fox is incorporated in because?
bemeruca: Who is deflecting? Wasn't not the justice system that was hiding is IRS issues and try to give him that sweetheart deal? Are they not the system?
Did the system not surprise his laptop? Wasn't there a letter from a security agency claiming the laptop was Russian propaganda? Is that not the system?
You want to deflect to Trump, stick to the topic.
Yet the system has indicted him for 2 separate matters plus a JUDGE of the same system rejected the deal so your narrative falls flat.
bemeruca: The ones your side are actively trying to break down? The attack on judges who does not cowtow to the bidden of the DNC? Iean schumar was out there threatening them. Now see how they are using the justice system to keep Trump ftom campaigning. Bragg manufacturing crime and court case against trump because of a porn star.
Be sincere with yourself
Stop deflecting and tell me why Hunter Biden is not favoured by the system you said will favour him.
Foreign Affairs › Re: American Politics Thread: 2026 Midterm Elections Live! by LordReed(m): 5:53pm On May 08, 2024
