basilico: Let him spend his wealth on lawyers. He has already bankrupted enough people.. The process is the punishment. Has to pay his lawyers hundreds per hour over something he should have thought twice before doing Good pressured. The indictment coming from Florida will be glorious. I have a feeling they want him to start squealing.
raumdeuter: Nothing will come out of the indictment. They have to prove he knew the meaning of the code word 86-47 They need to prove that he meant to kill the president and not just depose him Then there is a part where asking to kill the president is covered under free speech as far as he hasnt taken actions on it
basilico: I don't get you. Come again. What he meant here.
2023. Comey on who to prosecute for Jan 6th:
"Get all of them...Find everybody who went into that building. Find them all...We will punish everyone who went in there...We will hunt you to the end of the earth, even for a misdemeanor, and make you pay.”pic.twitter.com/G43OVE3n5e
2023. Comey on who to prosecute for Jan 6th: "Get all of them...Find everybody who went into that building. Find them all...We will punish everyone who went in there...We will hunt you to the end of the earth, even for a misdemeanor, and make you pay
He is not facing a democrat jury before a democrat judge.
Nna2025: So guys, I need help, A friend brought a client for the sale of a property. Finally payment was made on Tuesday and unfortunately, He lost a long battle to an illness on April 16th.
He is separated, has two kids. The question now is, who do I give his share of the money. His mother, siblings, his estranged wife or Charity.
Have been pondering over this the entire week, decided to bring it here to see if you guys can help with quality inputs.
Bless Ya'all.
Ideally it should be his next of kin or his inheritors.
If anyone wants to see what a political prosecution and DOJ incompetence looks like, just read this new Comey indictment.
Funny enough I learnt the meaning from Sesame Street. There was an episode with skit of the puppets doing a stage show. One of the cast refused to do a bit so the stage manager shout "Eighty Six the birds!" and the props were tossed out. Never associated it with violence. Deep six on the other now that one is very clearly violence.
Kobojunkie: What god? I have never engaged you in such meaningless back and forth.
Anyways, the same way an atheist has no evidence to prove his belief is the very same way the others have no proof for their own side. That is where things remain to date. 🥱🥱
DeepSight: Let me confess something. There was a post which TV01 made on a thread long ago that I read, which was so balanced and sensible that i really thought here was a sound mind.
I have since been relieved of that delusion. It reaffirmed my longstanding thought that one should not hastily conclude on anyone no matter how much one may agree or disagree with them in the early stages of an interaction. The seeming devil could be an angel and vice versa.
I thought TV01 would be a knowledgeable chap but it turns out he isnt and makes the most elementary gaffes which tell one he knows very little to start with.
But you see, no one knows it all and we learn everyday so I have no issues with that. What I have issues with is stark irrationality.
Seriously. The way they assert their ignorance which such certitude can even make one doubt the facts. I guess that is what they rely on anyway.
Kobojunkie: On the God issue, Science still does not pretend to have the facts. That means the very claim that God does not exist is also of religion. So...yeah! 🥱
So if I say Harry Potter doesn't exist, I am practicing a religion?
TV01: Oga make sense. Darwin was not a Christian. Which is besides the point anyway, as calling oneself Christian does not mean you cannot have thoughts or positions that are unChristian.
When going to Cambridge to become an Anglican clergyman, he did not "in the least doubt the strict and literal truth of every word in the Bible" The Autobiography of Charles Darwin 1809–1882.
TV01: Yes now, and trains are bad because some people unfortunately throw themselves under them?
TV
If train makers could stop people from being hurt by trains and did nothing then yeah train makers would be bad. Is your god a frail human or the all powerful? Why are you using human frailties to excuse your god? It's because your god is a human invention and cannot but have those limitations as well. LoLz.
I said the wellspring - those same notions also helped form Darwinian thinking. Was also the fount of Nazi thinking. Not even sure why you have a problem with slavery as that is a logical inference if one subscribes to such ideas.
TV
LoLz! Secularist thinking had no hand in the formation of ToE. Darwin was a Christian when he put ToE together.
TV01: Atheistic\humanist\materialist thinking reintroduced old notions of natural hierarchy (read racial categorisation), which drove the thinking and justification for the slave trade. The wellspring of Darwinism and the whole TOE nonsense.
This happened as Christian principles of universal human dignity were weakened. This helped drive the re-introduction of slavery, particularly the TAST between the 15th\19th centuries. Christianity had repeatedly made inroads into abolishing slavery from the 11th century, until it finally succeeded.
[quote author=Obrigardo post=139234480]So, we agree it's all a fake staged false flag. They needed it to happen so the tyrant sexual predator can have his ballroom And now shameless republicans want to steal from Americans to build t he ballroom and basilico who won't have any of his cents in this theft, if it ever happens, will copy and paste without any intelligent thought-provoking session in his head After the tyrant sexual predator has stated repeatedly that he will use his money for the ballroom or that donors have already contributed money for the ballroom
These people have no shame at all
Fox reporters caught on a hot mic joking about the security at the White House Correspondents' Dinner: “They have like two random chicks holding the front door open. Like, guys, they’re not even trying anymore... they’re not even Secret Service people.” pic.twitter.com/Yv2HUMguwQ
the whole thing is kinda unbelieveable. The SS fired 5 whole shots at the guy and not a SINGLE bullet hit him! He just fell to the ground like he tripped or something. What??!!
Dtruthspeaker: Thanks for proving me right by yar lying as this is not the first time we are engaging each other and the threads prove it, hahahahahahaha
LoLz. Bro you have never shown anywhere I lied. The facts are clear for all to see.
Kobojunkie: Atheism is founded on the dogmatic belief, without a foundation in facts, that there exists no power higher or greater than that which is currently known. It is a religion. It is all built on falsehood.🥱
Is it god belief that is built on facts? Why then can you lot never produce these facts when asked?
DeepSight: Of course but can you see what I am trying to drive at. That the metric of wellbeing of humanity can deliver unpleasant conclusions as well. It's just one example out if many possible.
Indeed which is why we have concepts like justice and law so that we can take a look at unpleasant conclusions and attempt to mend what was broken. I am not sure we'll ever arrive at a perfect system but it is part of the drive for survival to reach for it.
Ahhh the absolutely marvellous Fry. I wish I could meet some of these people. On the subject though senescence is another baffling aspect of this whole god business.
StillDtruth: There you go lying as usual for those threads show me state your argument violations as atheism cannot stand on grounds of fair and valid arguments, so you always complain when I block you for giving an invalid argument.
And I win because you have no valid argument to give nor could any of your atheist siblings enter it to save you from losing. Hence why you are lying
LoLz. Thanks for proving me right by merely asserting with no evidence. Bwahahahahaha!
TV01: You caught me at a good time - I simply cannot keep up with the pace here. Watched the clip 2ce.
Qureshi' argument was not actually responded too. He is correct in stating that atheistic morality cannot be absolute. Dawkins proceeded to create a few strawmen, conflate religions and then assert secular thinking is what drives current day morality.
I have repeatedly stated the biblical writ giving love as the basis for all human interactions. Secular humanist morality gave us the slave trade and a brethren evil - abortion (amongst others). And humanist\secular\material morality will always prove inferior to the biblical basis of love for your fellow man as created in the image of God.
Most of what is claimed to be secular morality (Western style, as it is not universally accepted) has its basis in the bible.
And he couldn't help but liken it to "Intelligent Design" - God that is !
Any more for any more?
TV
Bro how did secular humanist morality give us slave trade when your Bible tells you to buy slaves? Is the Bible secularist morality?