₦airaland Forum

chopnaira:
Fela makes history as first Nigerian in Rock & Roll Hall of Fame



https://dailytrust.com/fela-makes-history-as-first-nigerian-in-rock-roll-hall-of-fame/

Abami eda! You deserve it and more for being a beacon of culture. May your legacy live on.

And kudos to my childhood crush Sade.

GracieX3:
Most sharp republican politicians hate Trump. Just watch how they will turn on him if/when two things happen.

1. If Democrats gain majority in the house and senate.
2. When it is close to the end of his tenure in 2028

To those Republicans he is just a tool. Unfortunately the guy is a freaking loose canon that'll cost them dearly. I hope anyway, US politics is in a crazy place.

DeepSight:
+
The chap you are in a futile discussion with reminds me of Abuzola in terms of brevity.

Of intellect.

LoLz. Bro I love the way you string words in such wonderful ways.

GracieX3:
Trump will go down as the most unhinged and uncouth president of the USA...

Who is that doctor hugging Trump? LoLz.

bemeruca:
There is a legal distinction dummmmmmmmmy.

And this post just revealed you believe there are no differences.

Courts know which ones to use. They don't use it interchangeably in law.

It is why you posted a definition then delete it because it proves my point.

LoLz. By this it is clear you have no sense. I clearly state the NY state has a narrow definition which is what the jury used as a sign there are legal distinctions then you come on to say trash. Bwahahahahahaha!

Which definition did I post and delete?

DeepSight:
+
Do you remember one poster called Abuzola years ago.

I remember the username vaguely.

bemeruca:
No play semantics with me. You can imply something without saying it.

Go sleep with your L.

LoLz. You are the one playing semantics. You are saying the judgement didn't say sexual assault therefore he is not a sexual assaulter. Meanwhile the judge clarified that it was due to the narrow definition of New York State law when essentially Trump did sexually assault E Jean Carroll. But we know facts don't matter to empty barrels like you sexual assaulter defender. Bwahahahaha!

Meanwhile you simply cannot find where I claimed they are the same because I didn't.

Bro try to be less ignorant next time ok. LoLz.

bemeruca:
Take the L and shame go sleep.

Bro you are way too ignorant for most of the discussions you involve yourself in.

I said show where I said they are the same and you show where I said you should tell me the difference.

I even gave you an analogy to show you what you are trying to argue and here you still ignorantly arguing.

bemeruca:
So you gave a link that shows there are differences after arguing it's the same thing. 😂🤣😂

This guy no get sense at all

Kindly quote where I said they are the same.

DeepSight:
+
And all in an attempt to defend Trump?

Bro was even defending Jeffrey Epstein. LoLz.

There seems to be no low they won't go.

bemeruca:
Sexual assault is usually criminal, sexual abuse can be clinical or psychological framing.

There are lots of differences between the two but for you it's the same so ride on.

many people use the terms interchangeably in casual conversation, but the distinction matters in legal proceedings and clinical settings.

Bwahahahaha! What a piss poor attempt.

Read more and educate yourself:

https://damorelaw.com/what-is-the-difference-between-sexual-assault-and-sexual-abuse/

raumdeuter:
More Mexicans will rather flee to America than the reverse. which shows the thing that matters not the woman president of healthcare

Still a shame that the less developed nation got universal healthcare before almighty US.

bemeruca:
They are different. But to you they are the same.

Articulate the difference. This is now 5 posts and all you do is yarn dust like the empty barrel you are.

bemeruca:
Lol, if you cannot find the difference on your own I cannot help you. If. You think they mean the same thing, good for you.

Empty barrel you are the one saying they are different so why should I do your homework for you. Go do some reading empty barrel.

.

bemeruca:
You cant articulate sarcasm 😂😂

He is doubling down.

LoLz! 3 posts in and you still can't articulate a single difference between sexual assault and sexual abuse. Thanks for showing how much of an empty barrel you are. Bwahahahaha!

raumdeuter:
Go to the border and see which country the citizen are dying to enter the other

Yes and isn't that a shame.

bemeruca:
This guy can't even spot sarcasm. Goodlawd 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

And you cannot still articulate a single difference. LoLz. Sexual assaulter apologist.

bemeruca:
Lmao.

No difference, carry on with your emotions

LoLz. So you can't articulate a single difference but you want to argue. You see your life.

bemeruca:
Pay attention because you never understand anything. Comprehension is not your strong suit.

But post any evidence of Trump being convicted of sexual assault. We will wait 😂🤣

Trump was dound liable for sexual abuse and defamation, and awarded damages.

It was a civil case which was also part of their law fair to damage and bankrupt him before the incoming election.

Your honour my client was not driving a car under the influence! He was driving a vehicle under the influence!

Tell me the difference between sexual assault and sexual abuse.

bemeruca:
Convicted of what?

Sleeping with an under aged child?

Again, you don't know the facts of anything.

You keep using apologist as a substitute for proof

not accepting your conclusion or bayelsaowei's from an accusation or a file dump is not defending abuse, it is refusing mob logic. Allegation is not conviction, and suspicion is not proof.

Of sexual assault. Pay attention.

Please take the test and MAGAts ask your lord and saviour to take it too.

The US rejected female presidential candidates, Mexico embraced one. Guess which country just got universal healthcare? SMH.

bemeruca:
You mean budaatum? I am the most outspoken person here when it comes to anti pdf and groomers.

I am not just dishonest to falsely accuse people based on and unconfirmed claims.

So you and bayelsaowei should provide proof Trump and Jay z did the thing.

Both of them were convicted but of course as a sexual assaulter apologist you will hand wave all that away.

You might be outspoken about PDF files but you are a apologist for them that is the classic MAGA hypocrisy cum mental dissonance.

bemeruca:
Bayelsaowei, Puff Daddy should teach you that most of the Epstein accusations are over-exaggerated.

The fact that the accusation against P-Diddy looks so similar to Epstein's shows that a lot of it is a conspiracy theory.

So Jay-Z was accused of raping a 13yo which is an ugly lie.

But to you, the accusation is enough. Jay-Z is a pdfile r8pist is enough, he is a r8pist even if it did not happen.

That's how easy it is for you because you have not been put in that situation ever. They play


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTXSE5Z8UpQ

I should not be surprised that you a pdf file apologist. After all your lord and saviour Trump is a sexual assaulter.

bemeruca:
Very soon the Pope will ask catholics to convert to Islam 😂😂

The Pope visited Algeria mosque today.

Taking his shoes off to wander around.

Algeria was a Christian nation until Islam conquered through force, just like Europe now.

Christians have no rights now there.

Pope Leo hasn't even bothered visiting suffering Nigerian Christians. pic.twitter.com/MHT46dDTAy

— Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 (@TRobinsonNewEra) April 13, 2026

Not the first time a Pope visited a mosque. I bet you were one of the ones calling Pope John Paul II the Antichrist when he did it.

raumdeuter:
Read this article from USA after McCain died

The Atlantic ran a pre-election cover story on McCain, but the cover photo was taken by celebrity photographer Jill Greenberg. It made McCain look like Emperor Palpatine’s older, less-attractive brother. This was not by accident, but by design. On her blog, Greenberg actually bragged about her dirty trick of getting him to stand above a strobe placed on the floor to make him look old and scary.

Obama surrogate Congressman John Lewis (D-Georgia) invoked Alabama racist George Wallace in talking about McCain and his running mate Sarah Palin. Jonathan Martin noted in Politico that McCain was being called racist without basis, simply because it was helpful to the Democrats. The Nation weighed in on McCain’s wartime use of the term "gook" as evidence of his racism.

Then-famous music star Madonna opened her concert tour by calling McCain Hitler and encouraging people to vote for Obama. And the popular Democratic blog DailyKos, not to be outdone, published a comparison of McCain to both Hitler and Stalin.

And, of course, the treatment was repeated with a different target in 2012, when Mitt Romney was given the same Hitler treatment. It’s as if every Republican who is in power, or who might be, is Hitler — but only as a temporary condition. (I’m old enough to remember when George W. Bush was Hitler). As soon as a new Republican target appears, the old Hitler gets rehabilitated, and even employed, by way of comparison, as a way to criticize the new one.

What’s all this about? It’s certainly not about civility, or decency, or bipartisanship. As David French wrote: “The contrast between the outpouring of love for McCain in his last days and the astonishing vitriol directed at him in 2000 and 2008 demonstrates once again how disingenuous, low, and cheap American politics were well before Trump came on the scene.”

And at this point, I suspect the voters are onto the game.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/09/04/john-mccains-funeral-george-bush-barack-obama-bipartisan-hypocrisy-column/1185092002/

Ok. Here is Obama's response:

Here’s the statement Obama campaign spokesman Bill Burton issued on Oct. 11:

"Senator Obama does not believe that John McCain or his policy criticism is in any way comparable to George Wallace or his segregationist policies. But John Lewis was right to condemn some of the hateful rhetoric that John McCain himself personally rebuked just last night, as well as the baseless and profoundly irresponsible charges from his own running mate that the Democratic nominee for President of the United States ‘pals around with terrorists.’

And Lewis later reacted like this:

Lewis later said he could have phrased his words differently, because he didn’t want to relate McCain and Palin directly to Wallace’s tactics. But he said he accomplished his goal of highlighting the dangerous tone of the rallies.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2008/oct/15/john-mccain/obama-disagreed-but-didnt-criticize/

DeepSight, budaatum, cococandy, eveyone

Listen to this:


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=124xCHfVUk4?si=Kbw4CH0YPtj2UCKq

basilico:
I don't think conservatives are saints if I must add to make you happy. Some are devils, but my theory is that liberals are inherently more evil, asinine and irrational.

I doubt you'd get a liberal who reaches the level of irrationality, idiocy and evil Trump displays. Yet you are in full support still so you are not a reliable judge of what is irrational, asinine or evil.

Seahawk:
He said he thought it depicted him as a doctor.

Either he doesn’t see because his eyes don’t work.

Or he’s never even seen a picture of Jesus Christ before (wouldn’t surprise me) but somehow he managed to conveniently use it to hoodwink them into believing he’s a Christian.

Or (most likely) he knows they’re stupid and will lap up any excuse he comes up with.

Case in point. See it’s already happening on this thread

The depths they sink to to defend the nonsense is mind boggling. Within a year they went from no new wars to war is good. Trump replacing Jesus Christ is just about right because I bet that's what has happened in their minds.

DeepSight:
+
Well, I dunno about your choice to spend time "bashing liberals" but I sure know that no one can ever comprehend God. And attempting too aggressively to do so can lead one towards madness.

As an aside, since you mention "bashing liberals" I think its good to keep in mind the fact that the world is not black and white - not liberal and conservative - rather it is infinite shades and blends of all things.

That is a big ask for someone like basilico. Nuance flies over their head like supersonic jets.

bayelsaowei:
the exaggeration can’t even work..😛😛😛

Use another exaggeration that fits the m—-a—-d man

As in even a blind man can see the point of what I said. LoLz.