₦airaland Forum

DesChyko:
INEC provided the hardcopies not IMAGE files. The documents were provided by INEC as certified true copies of the elections results in hard copies, not transferred via Xender or Instagram or some other photo sharing app.

Since they are certified, INEC takes the fall for any problems with it.

Obi failed to build a case in the hardcopies.he only tabulated the images which are secondary

DesChyko:
INEC provided the hardcopies not IMAGE files. The documents were provided by INEC as certified true copies of the elections results in hard copies, not transferred via Xender or Instagram or some other photo sharing app.

Since they are certified, INEC takes the fall for any problems with it.

Obi team actually downloaded them from irev,it wasn't delivered from inec.you are being deceived by the certified.all inec documents are certified but there is an original

wise0ne:

Obi doesn't need any other proof to show that he won, The first respondent has made the job easy for him.
How can Inec be so infantile to provide blurred Irev downloads as CTC copies of EC8A forms?

I know that you are intelligent, but you are only trying to be mischievous and infantile just like INEC, kindly take 4 hours of your time to read this brilliant, Classic, epic final address of PO's legal team and you will weep for the 1st -4th respondents.
Its game over!!!

In osun,ctc were provided for apc yet they still won.online copies are not reliable and secondary.inec didn't provide online copies,obi went to irev and downloaded it.obi provided the hardcopies yet failed to build his case on it.obu has lost

Kukutente23:
Narcotics is more than fraud or dishonesty. It's worse than the two. Very close to murder.

Yes but it is neither fraud or dishonesty.there was no judgement sentencing him for narcotics charge,just an interim order

DesChyko:
Assuming I still have my car, I may not even be using it so much as petrol is expensive this period. I guess that justifies the thief's decision to steal my car 👍

In this case,no one stole your car.they just scooped a little petrol and you have no evidence

Geometrix:
Oga the blurred copies they presented to the court was certified true copies from inec .
Inec refused to give them the CTC of the hard copies in their
possession.unless you didn't read the address or follow the court proceedings.
Both pdp and lp have their original copies submitted by their agents but they can't build a case from it because it is uncertified. quote author=Lotanna2 post=124571512]

You still don't get it.obi and atiku failed to prove that the blurring was from inec.tjey failed to compare it with the hardcopies which is fatal...inec certified server or online copies of bvas data in osun but yet the court rejected them for the original copies

Oga,forget about the certification.the most original copies recognized by law is the hardcopy.

chiefolododo:
Maybe that was the arrangement and the reason why they rigged the governorship election for the APC candidate. But court will sack him. Mark it down

Court will not.he won fair and square.ashiru is a small boy.cant you see how apc lost zamfara

Penguin2:
Stop defending criminals.

People can’t rig election and you are everywhere supporting them determining which is primary or secondary evidence.

If things are checked properly, it might be discovered that Labour Party won all Senatorial and House of Rep seat in Rivers State.

But we wait on the court.

Obi is a smooth,hypocritical criminal

paramakina202:
So traficking narcotics is not criminal and dishonet in nature?
That is the reason why the drug lord should have appealed the forfeiture since he was trading in a legal substance that is not criminal in nature.

Obi failed to prove that it was a sentence from fraud and he agreed that it was a civil case

bdon123:
The pdp governorship was a muslim.he captured both muslim n christian votes.d APC was only d muslim votes.Dont talk abt wat u dnt understand, i was in kaduna during that election.He was rigged at last minute jst like wike did in rivers in favour of Apc wen we all know it is LP everywhere in rivers

The apc candidate captured christian votes too in sanga and kaura lga.lp divided xtian votes

chiefolododo:
the arrangement was that Makinde would win governorship and APC to win presidential. Oyo is practically an APC state

Same arrangement elrufai made in kaduna.pdp won presidential.only his son and protege current speaker Abbas won.

IfnobeGod20:
You know the difference, both candidates are Muslims. Why APC chose to go for Muslim-muslim ticket, PDP went for muslim-christian ticket. El-Rufai caused all this and he should be blamed for any religious disharmony on the altar of governance.

Not true, SK have long always voted pro christian candidates even before the advent of El rufai

chiefolododo:
Oga don't see the truth and be telling lies

Apc won all the senate polls in Oyo but lost guber

wise0ne:
Dude, stop being deceptive, take your time to read the address in totality and begin to mourn the inevitable nullification of the 1st to 4th respondents

Obi failed to tender any scintilla of fact,only wild allegations

DesChyko:
😂😂😂

The real hilarious thing is some people are saying those evidence can't stand before the PEPT. INEC were subpoenaed to produce both documents. They couldn't produce the top copies and instead provided the IREV copies. Isn't that admitting the iREV is reliable when there are issues with the others?

Now, their reliable results has about 18,088 blurred and unreadable copies. In fact, over 39,000 results (which includes the 18,088 copies) are unaccessible. So the big question remains; where did INEC get their result from since they do not have the top copies of Form EC8A?? 🤷🏾‍♂️

Imagine cornering millions of voters results for nefarious reasons. Just look at the fraud in only 2 random states. If you wade in more, damn.

Assuming there is a rerun in that 18000 unit,obi will still fail woefully owfully

Penguin2:
No. Narcotics is not fraud, narcotics is powder🤓

In fact, it’s dusting powder😎

Una go defend defend defend tire. Tribunal go still sack Tinubu.

Give it up boy obi failed to prove anything.tame the bitterness

PrincessofDSS:
A hit below te belt; Obi is really on this guys neck. If you were the one, would you challenge an order that was like an answer to your prayers?

He was happy that it was just a forfeiture and nothing more so asking him to challenge the order is like bringing out his legs for a second time

This Obi sef, sense will not kill you mbok

For obi

seunmsg:
Is there any sense in challenging an order from a civil case?

So, if VIO or FRSC fines me N5m today fir traffic offense, is there any sense in wasting time challenging the order?

Don't mind that misguided,attention seeking bloke.the fine contemplated by the constitution must be borne out of a judgment or a guilty charge or a sentence and in Nigeria.the constitution went further to say a fine or sentence involving dishonesty or fraud which is criminal in nature.is narcotics fraud or dishonesty?

Please who is watching itura on DStv? Update me on today's episode

fergie001:
Iseyin like the CJN.

Where can I download Nigerian series

OfficialAPCNig:
Read the address and follow the argument. Again, LP and PDP don't have the same argument.

Double nomination is dead

Newton2024:
That will amount to no nomination for Tinubu because the time frame constitution requires had elapsed. Go and read APM petition for more clearity.

We are talking of obi and atiku.the supreme court has settled it, no double nomination

OfficialAPCNig:
LP he finally responded to APC addresses.

It was a long read, but I focused more on the Shettima double nomination.

Tinubu nominated Shettima on 14th July, but the 3rd respondent signed the INEC withdrawal notice on the 15th.

LP also argued that APC can not seek refuge under the SC judgement against PDP. They cited SC precedent to backup their case.

LP argument where very logical and well marshalled.

Kudos to the LP legal team.

I can't wait to read PDP and APM addresses.

Oga,the SC clearly said that shettima was never guilty of double nomination.

fergie001:
CJN Ariwoola & Raji are both from Iseyin.

lotanna2

I thought Raji is from kwara

Penguin2:
Stop supporting evil

Obi is evil

DesChyko:
Sorry, but this response is not related to what you quoted 🤔

It takes care of the blurred copies

DesChyko:
You'd do well to quote the Supreme Court judgement so I can peruse it just like you did in what you quoted, just like I did. We're not really going to consider a lower court in this instance.

See wike vs dakuku 2015...one of the judges ejembi eko I think said guidelines are not fatal but disobedience of EA are

XY23:
The substance of both cases are different, INEC certified 2 different things for the same purpose. I wont dwell on the issue of certification since the respondents didn't dispute them. In fact, Wole (SAN) even attributed the blur to printing, photocopying error etc. Meaning they acknowledge it's from INEC, and what was used to declare BAT (the response is online).

In any case, no matter how we interprete it, there is one incontrovertible fact, INEC didn't follow their prescribed guidelines (which are like laws on their own) and admitted to it by calling it 'glitch'. Unless, the court discountenance that fact, I don't see how the election will not be cancelled.

Election cannot be cancelled based on electronic evidence but on physical or manual evidence.while irev copies are from inec,the hard copies are more authentic and reliable.inec guidelines are subsidiary laws inferior to electoral act

Igwe9:
You failed to answer my question and kept repeating the same thing, only a dummy can do that

Only a dummy can fail woefully like pandora and his master.obi failed to prove rigging or his victory and that ended his case

XY23:
Lol. I understand you're basing your arguments on original EC38As and not copies. The answer is, INEC couldn't certify them, instead they blurred the uploaded copies to hide the irregularities, and they didn't dispute them as same as originals (see attached). There are laws even backing it.

I don't think you appreciate what it means for a petioner to prove a case against a complicit umpire. INEC was trying to protect themselves and BAT, but they failed in both. By certifying 18k blurred results, how then did they declare BAT? 18K PUs is substantial. That's why I said what the petitioners could rely on is the NON COMPLIANCE issue (PO did well in that area). Someday in the future, our laws should not make INEC a judge in it's own case.

You still don't get it.obi and atiku failed to prove that the blurring was from inec.tjey failed to compare it with the hardcopies which is fatal...inec certified server or online copies of bvas data in osun but yet the court rejected them for the original copies

Akwamkpuruamu:
There's no much time for that

That is why he was never going to succeed

Igwe9:
In as much he did, there's nothing there to prove, INEC did not conduct an election, all they did was selection.
For example, If three of you were to write an exam and the papers would be marked under a CCTV camera and on that day, the examiner smuggled an already written and also ended the exam before the stipulated time and when asked to provide the recording of everything that transpired during the examination, it happens that nothing was recorded on the camera, tell me, how you can prove that you passed the exam when the only condition you went into the exam is because you were assured that everything will be recorded on camera and there be no cheating.?
For you, is It not either they cancel the exam or they declared you first?

Obi failed to prove that there was massive rigging and that the rigging affected his victory